Trigraphs in a comment, converted in c++11, ignored in c++17
Consider the following piece of code (notice the comment):
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
std::cout << x << std::endl;
}
To compile this program, I am using the GNU C++ Compiler g++
:
$ g++ --version // g++ (Ubuntu 6.5.0-1ubuntu1~16.04) 6.5.0 20181026
Now, when compiling this for C++11 and C++17, I get different results (and warnings).
For C++11, g++ -std=c++11 trigraph.cpp -Wall
:
trigraph.cpp:5:26: warning: trigraph ??/ converted to [-Wtrigraphs]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
trigraph.cpp:5:16: warning: multi-line comment [-Wcomment]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
^
$ ./a.out
1
For C++17, g++ -std=c++17 trigraph.cpp -Wall
:
trigraph.cpp:5:26: warning: trigraph ??/ ignored, use -trigraphs to enable [-Wtrigraphs]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
$ ./a.out
2
After reading a bit about trigraphs, I understand that they were removed in C++17, thus ignored by the compiler as shown in the example above. However, in the case of C++11, even when it's in a comment it was converted!
Now, I can see how that would affect the code if the trigraph was in a character string for instance. But, in this example, shouldn't it be ignored since it's in a comment?
After removing the trailing forward slash ("/") from the comment, all warnings disappeared. My question is what did exactly happen here? Why the output is different?
c++ c++11 c++17
add a comment |
Consider the following piece of code (notice the comment):
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
std::cout << x << std::endl;
}
To compile this program, I am using the GNU C++ Compiler g++
:
$ g++ --version // g++ (Ubuntu 6.5.0-1ubuntu1~16.04) 6.5.0 20181026
Now, when compiling this for C++11 and C++17, I get different results (and warnings).
For C++11, g++ -std=c++11 trigraph.cpp -Wall
:
trigraph.cpp:5:26: warning: trigraph ??/ converted to [-Wtrigraphs]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
trigraph.cpp:5:16: warning: multi-line comment [-Wcomment]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
^
$ ./a.out
1
For C++17, g++ -std=c++17 trigraph.cpp -Wall
:
trigraph.cpp:5:26: warning: trigraph ??/ ignored, use -trigraphs to enable [-Wtrigraphs]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
$ ./a.out
2
After reading a bit about trigraphs, I understand that they were removed in C++17, thus ignored by the compiler as shown in the example above. However, in the case of C++11, even when it's in a comment it was converted!
Now, I can see how that would affect the code if the trigraph was in a character string for instance. But, in this example, shouldn't it be ignored since it's in a comment?
After removing the trailing forward slash ("/") from the comment, all warnings disappeared. My question is what did exactly happen here? Why the output is different?
c++ c++11 c++17
1
Beside of knowing that something like trigraphs exists, I had wondered that they are considered even in comments. Hence, I quickly re-called Phases of translation: Phase 1: 3) Trigraph sequences are replaced by corresponding single-character representations. (until C++17), Phase 2: 1) Whenever backslash appears at the end of a line (immediately followed by the newline character), both backslash and newline are deleted, Phase 3: 3) Each comment is replaced by one space character. - This// <-- Why??/
is really underhanded. ;-)
– Scheff
Nov 15 '18 at 9:56
@Scheff thank you for the link, and also for summarizing its content to fit the question. Indeed// <-- Why??/
was tricky!
– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 10:09
add a comment |
Consider the following piece of code (notice the comment):
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
std::cout << x << std::endl;
}
To compile this program, I am using the GNU C++ Compiler g++
:
$ g++ --version // g++ (Ubuntu 6.5.0-1ubuntu1~16.04) 6.5.0 20181026
Now, when compiling this for C++11 and C++17, I get different results (and warnings).
For C++11, g++ -std=c++11 trigraph.cpp -Wall
:
trigraph.cpp:5:26: warning: trigraph ??/ converted to [-Wtrigraphs]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
trigraph.cpp:5:16: warning: multi-line comment [-Wcomment]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
^
$ ./a.out
1
For C++17, g++ -std=c++17 trigraph.cpp -Wall
:
trigraph.cpp:5:26: warning: trigraph ??/ ignored, use -trigraphs to enable [-Wtrigraphs]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
$ ./a.out
2
After reading a bit about trigraphs, I understand that they were removed in C++17, thus ignored by the compiler as shown in the example above. However, in the case of C++11, even when it's in a comment it was converted!
Now, I can see how that would affect the code if the trigraph was in a character string for instance. But, in this example, shouldn't it be ignored since it's in a comment?
After removing the trailing forward slash ("/") from the comment, all warnings disappeared. My question is what did exactly happen here? Why the output is different?
c++ c++11 c++17
Consider the following piece of code (notice the comment):
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
std::cout << x << std::endl;
}
To compile this program, I am using the GNU C++ Compiler g++
:
$ g++ --version // g++ (Ubuntu 6.5.0-1ubuntu1~16.04) 6.5.0 20181026
Now, when compiling this for C++11 and C++17, I get different results (and warnings).
For C++11, g++ -std=c++11 trigraph.cpp -Wall
:
trigraph.cpp:5:26: warning: trigraph ??/ converted to [-Wtrigraphs]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
trigraph.cpp:5:16: warning: multi-line comment [-Wcomment]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
^
$ ./a.out
1
For C++17, g++ -std=c++17 trigraph.cpp -Wall
:
trigraph.cpp:5:26: warning: trigraph ??/ ignored, use -trigraphs to enable [-Wtrigraphs]
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
$ ./a.out
2
After reading a bit about trigraphs, I understand that they were removed in C++17, thus ignored by the compiler as shown in the example above. However, in the case of C++11, even when it's in a comment it was converted!
Now, I can see how that would affect the code if the trigraph was in a character string for instance. But, in this example, shouldn't it be ignored since it's in a comment?
After removing the trailing forward slash ("/") from the comment, all warnings disappeared. My question is what did exactly happen here? Why the output is different?
c++ c++11 c++17
c++ c++11 c++17
asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:00
omaromar
30419
30419
1
Beside of knowing that something like trigraphs exists, I had wondered that they are considered even in comments. Hence, I quickly re-called Phases of translation: Phase 1: 3) Trigraph sequences are replaced by corresponding single-character representations. (until C++17), Phase 2: 1) Whenever backslash appears at the end of a line (immediately followed by the newline character), both backslash and newline are deleted, Phase 3: 3) Each comment is replaced by one space character. - This// <-- Why??/
is really underhanded. ;-)
– Scheff
Nov 15 '18 at 9:56
@Scheff thank you for the link, and also for summarizing its content to fit the question. Indeed// <-- Why??/
was tricky!
– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 10:09
add a comment |
1
Beside of knowing that something like trigraphs exists, I had wondered that they are considered even in comments. Hence, I quickly re-called Phases of translation: Phase 1: 3) Trigraph sequences are replaced by corresponding single-character representations. (until C++17), Phase 2: 1) Whenever backslash appears at the end of a line (immediately followed by the newline character), both backslash and newline are deleted, Phase 3: 3) Each comment is replaced by one space character. - This// <-- Why??/
is really underhanded. ;-)
– Scheff
Nov 15 '18 at 9:56
@Scheff thank you for the link, and also for summarizing its content to fit the question. Indeed// <-- Why??/
was tricky!
– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 10:09
1
1
Beside of knowing that something like trigraphs exists, I had wondered that they are considered even in comments. Hence, I quickly re-called Phases of translation: Phase 1: 3) Trigraph sequences are replaced by corresponding single-character representations. (until C++17), Phase 2: 1) Whenever backslash appears at the end of a line (immediately followed by the newline character), both backslash and newline are deleted, Phase 3: 3) Each comment is replaced by one space character. - This
// <-- Why??/
is really underhanded. ;-)– Scheff
Nov 15 '18 at 9:56
Beside of knowing that something like trigraphs exists, I had wondered that they are considered even in comments. Hence, I quickly re-called Phases of translation: Phase 1: 3) Trigraph sequences are replaced by corresponding single-character representations. (until C++17), Phase 2: 1) Whenever backslash appears at the end of a line (immediately followed by the newline character), both backslash and newline are deleted, Phase 3: 3) Each comment is replaced by one space character. - This
// <-- Why??/
is really underhanded. ;-)– Scheff
Nov 15 '18 at 9:56
@Scheff thank you for the link, and also for summarizing its content to fit the question. Indeed
// <-- Why??/
was tricky!– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 10:09
@Scheff thank you for the link, and also for summarizing its content to fit the question. Indeed
// <-- Why??/
was tricky!– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 10:09
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Trigraphs are are very old way to insert certain characters into code, which were possibly not available on all keybords. For full list, see cppreference.
In your example, you accidentally created one of the trigraphs ??/
, which is translated into . Trailing
has a special meaning - it tells the compiler to ignore line break and treat next line as part of the current line.
Your code would be translated like this:
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
This is what the warnings actually mean.
Trigraph was interpreted and changed into , and it created a multi line comment, even though you used
//
.
Now, trigraphs became depracated in C++11 and were removed from standard in C++17.
This means, when compiling in C++11 your trigraph was translated, but in C++17 it was ignored (and compiler sent you a note that you can still enable them).
So thex += 1;
statement got stripped out during preprocessing, makes sense. Thanks!
– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
add a comment |
The trigraph ??/
gets converted by the compiler to before actual compilation happens (i.e. before comments are removed).
So these lines
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
get converted to
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
A backslash at the end of a line appends the next line to it. So it becomes
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
Which moves the statement x+=1;
into the comment and thus it is not compiled.
When you remove the trailing /
, it is not a trigraph anymore (sincce it's now only ??
) and nothing special happens.
add a comment |
If ??/
is converted to then
??//
would be converted to /
.
Or //
also starts a comment, so the application rule for trigraphs comes first, and only after that does the compiler check whether it's a comment or not.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315710%2ftrigraphs-in-a-comment-converted-in-c11-ignored-in-c17%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Trigraphs are are very old way to insert certain characters into code, which were possibly not available on all keybords. For full list, see cppreference.
In your example, you accidentally created one of the trigraphs ??/
, which is translated into . Trailing
has a special meaning - it tells the compiler to ignore line break and treat next line as part of the current line.
Your code would be translated like this:
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
This is what the warnings actually mean.
Trigraph was interpreted and changed into , and it created a multi line comment, even though you used
//
.
Now, trigraphs became depracated in C++11 and were removed from standard in C++17.
This means, when compiling in C++11 your trigraph was translated, but in C++17 it was ignored (and compiler sent you a note that you can still enable them).
So thex += 1;
statement got stripped out during preprocessing, makes sense. Thanks!
– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
add a comment |
Trigraphs are are very old way to insert certain characters into code, which were possibly not available on all keybords. For full list, see cppreference.
In your example, you accidentally created one of the trigraphs ??/
, which is translated into . Trailing
has a special meaning - it tells the compiler to ignore line break and treat next line as part of the current line.
Your code would be translated like this:
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
This is what the warnings actually mean.
Trigraph was interpreted and changed into , and it created a multi line comment, even though you used
//
.
Now, trigraphs became depracated in C++11 and were removed from standard in C++17.
This means, when compiling in C++11 your trigraph was translated, but in C++17 it was ignored (and compiler sent you a note that you can still enable them).
So thex += 1;
statement got stripped out during preprocessing, makes sense. Thanks!
– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
add a comment |
Trigraphs are are very old way to insert certain characters into code, which were possibly not available on all keybords. For full list, see cppreference.
In your example, you accidentally created one of the trigraphs ??/
, which is translated into . Trailing
has a special meaning - it tells the compiler to ignore line break and treat next line as part of the current line.
Your code would be translated like this:
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
This is what the warnings actually mean.
Trigraph was interpreted and changed into , and it created a multi line comment, even though you used
//
.
Now, trigraphs became depracated in C++11 and were removed from standard in C++17.
This means, when compiling in C++11 your trigraph was translated, but in C++17 it was ignored (and compiler sent you a note that you can still enable them).
Trigraphs are are very old way to insert certain characters into code, which were possibly not available on all keybords. For full list, see cppreference.
In your example, you accidentally created one of the trigraphs ??/
, which is translated into . Trailing
has a special meaning - it tells the compiler to ignore line break and treat next line as part of the current line.
Your code would be translated like this:
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
This is what the warnings actually mean.
Trigraph was interpreted and changed into , and it created a multi line comment, even though you used
//
.
Now, trigraphs became depracated in C++11 and were removed from standard in C++17.
This means, when compiling in C++11 your trigraph was translated, but in C++17 it was ignored (and compiler sent you a note that you can still enable them).
answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:11
YksisarvinenYksisarvinen
1,628519
1,628519
So thex += 1;
statement got stripped out during preprocessing, makes sense. Thanks!
– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
add a comment |
So thex += 1;
statement got stripped out during preprocessing, makes sense. Thanks!
– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
So the
x += 1;
statement got stripped out during preprocessing, makes sense. Thanks!– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
So the
x += 1;
statement got stripped out during preprocessing, makes sense. Thanks!– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 9:23
add a comment |
The trigraph ??/
gets converted by the compiler to before actual compilation happens (i.e. before comments are removed).
So these lines
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
get converted to
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
A backslash at the end of a line appends the next line to it. So it becomes
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
Which moves the statement x+=1;
into the comment and thus it is not compiled.
When you remove the trailing /
, it is not a trigraph anymore (sincce it's now only ??
) and nothing special happens.
add a comment |
The trigraph ??/
gets converted by the compiler to before actual compilation happens (i.e. before comments are removed).
So these lines
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
get converted to
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
A backslash at the end of a line appends the next line to it. So it becomes
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
Which moves the statement x+=1;
into the comment and thus it is not compiled.
When you remove the trailing /
, it is not a trigraph anymore (sincce it's now only ??
) and nothing special happens.
add a comment |
The trigraph ??/
gets converted by the compiler to before actual compilation happens (i.e. before comments are removed).
So these lines
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
get converted to
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
A backslash at the end of a line appends the next line to it. So it becomes
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
Which moves the statement x+=1;
into the comment and thus it is not compiled.
When you remove the trailing /
, it is not a trigraph anymore (sincce it's now only ??
) and nothing special happens.
The trigraph ??/
gets converted by the compiler to before actual compilation happens (i.e. before comments are removed).
So these lines
int x = 1; // <-- Why??/
x += 1;
get converted to
int x = 1; // <-- Why
x += 1;
A backslash at the end of a line appends the next line to it. So it becomes
int x = 1; // <-- Why x += 1;
Which moves the statement x+=1;
into the comment and thus it is not compiled.
When you remove the trailing /
, it is not a trigraph anymore (sincce it's now only ??
) and nothing special happens.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:07
davedave
613110
613110
add a comment |
add a comment |
If ??/
is converted to then
??//
would be converted to /
.
Or //
also starts a comment, so the application rule for trigraphs comes first, and only after that does the compiler check whether it's a comment or not.
add a comment |
If ??/
is converted to then
??//
would be converted to /
.
Or //
also starts a comment, so the application rule for trigraphs comes first, and only after that does the compiler check whether it's a comment or not.
add a comment |
If ??/
is converted to then
??//
would be converted to /
.
Or //
also starts a comment, so the application rule for trigraphs comes first, and only after that does the compiler check whether it's a comment or not.
If ??/
is converted to then
??//
would be converted to /
.
Or //
also starts a comment, so the application rule for trigraphs comes first, and only after that does the compiler check whether it's a comment or not.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 9:06
GeoffroyGeoffroy
9,15033383
9,15033383
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315710%2ftrigraphs-in-a-comment-converted-in-c11-ignored-in-c17%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Beside of knowing that something like trigraphs exists, I had wondered that they are considered even in comments. Hence, I quickly re-called Phases of translation: Phase 1: 3) Trigraph sequences are replaced by corresponding single-character representations. (until C++17), Phase 2: 1) Whenever backslash appears at the end of a line (immediately followed by the newline character), both backslash and newline are deleted, Phase 3: 3) Each comment is replaced by one space character. - This
// <-- Why??/
is really underhanded. ;-)– Scheff
Nov 15 '18 at 9:56
@Scheff thank you for the link, and also for summarizing its content to fit the question. Indeed
// <-- Why??/
was tricky!– omar
Nov 15 '18 at 10:09