Similar Object are different using VueJs












0















I'm using the following getter in my Vuex store to get the datasets from my state.



getDatasets: state => {
let datasets = ;
state.observations.forEach(obs => {
if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
datasets.push(obs.dataset);
}
})
return datasets;
}


However, this return as many datasets as observations in my state whereas it should return only one dataset.



I believe this is due to the __obs__ field added by VueJs that is different for each dataset object.



Did I misunderstood something and how could I fix this?










share|improve this question



























    0















    I'm using the following getter in my Vuex store to get the datasets from my state.



    getDatasets: state => {
    let datasets = ;
    state.observations.forEach(obs => {
    if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
    datasets.push(obs.dataset);
    }
    })
    return datasets;
    }


    However, this return as many datasets as observations in my state whereas it should return only one dataset.



    I believe this is due to the __obs__ field added by VueJs that is different for each dataset object.



    Did I misunderstood something and how could I fix this?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I'm using the following getter in my Vuex store to get the datasets from my state.



      getDatasets: state => {
      let datasets = ;
      state.observations.forEach(obs => {
      if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
      datasets.push(obs.dataset);
      }
      })
      return datasets;
      }


      However, this return as many datasets as observations in my state whereas it should return only one dataset.



      I believe this is due to the __obs__ field added by VueJs that is different for each dataset object.



      Did I misunderstood something and how could I fix this?










      share|improve this question














      I'm using the following getter in my Vuex store to get the datasets from my state.



      getDatasets: state => {
      let datasets = ;
      state.observations.forEach(obs => {
      if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
      datasets.push(obs.dataset);
      }
      })
      return datasets;
      }


      However, this return as many datasets as observations in my state whereas it should return only one dataset.



      I believe this is due to the __obs__ field added by VueJs that is different for each dataset object.



      Did I misunderstood something and how could I fix this?







      javascript vuejs2






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 15 '18 at 11:07









      charlycoucharlycou

      44111




      44111
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          It's not the issue with vuex/vue. By checking datasets.includes(obs.dataset)), you are actually check if datasets contains any object that have same reference with obs.dataset, which is inevitably false.



          A very simple example can be ran in browser console to replicate your logic:



          var state = { observations: [ { dataset: {}}, { dataset: {}} ]}
          var datasets =
          state.observations.forEach(function(obs) {
          if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
          datasets.push(obs.dataset);
          }
          })
          console.log(datasets.length) // 2, not 1
          console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[0].dataset) // true, same reference
          console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[1].dataset) // false


          If you want to get unique values of datasets, try comparing parsed string of object instead:



          state.observations.forEach(obs => {
          if (!datasets.some(
          elem => SON.stringify(elem) === JSON.stringify(obs.dataset))
          ) {
          datasets.push(obs.dataset);
          }
          })





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53318110%2fsimilar-object-are-different-using-vuejs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            It's not the issue with vuex/vue. By checking datasets.includes(obs.dataset)), you are actually check if datasets contains any object that have same reference with obs.dataset, which is inevitably false.



            A very simple example can be ran in browser console to replicate your logic:



            var state = { observations: [ { dataset: {}}, { dataset: {}} ]}
            var datasets =
            state.observations.forEach(function(obs) {
            if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
            datasets.push(obs.dataset);
            }
            })
            console.log(datasets.length) // 2, not 1
            console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[0].dataset) // true, same reference
            console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[1].dataset) // false


            If you want to get unique values of datasets, try comparing parsed string of object instead:



            state.observations.forEach(obs => {
            if (!datasets.some(
            elem => SON.stringify(elem) === JSON.stringify(obs.dataset))
            ) {
            datasets.push(obs.dataset);
            }
            })





            share|improve this answer




























              1














              It's not the issue with vuex/vue. By checking datasets.includes(obs.dataset)), you are actually check if datasets contains any object that have same reference with obs.dataset, which is inevitably false.



              A very simple example can be ran in browser console to replicate your logic:



              var state = { observations: [ { dataset: {}}, { dataset: {}} ]}
              var datasets =
              state.observations.forEach(function(obs) {
              if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
              datasets.push(obs.dataset);
              }
              })
              console.log(datasets.length) // 2, not 1
              console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[0].dataset) // true, same reference
              console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[1].dataset) // false


              If you want to get unique values of datasets, try comparing parsed string of object instead:



              state.observations.forEach(obs => {
              if (!datasets.some(
              elem => SON.stringify(elem) === JSON.stringify(obs.dataset))
              ) {
              datasets.push(obs.dataset);
              }
              })





              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                It's not the issue with vuex/vue. By checking datasets.includes(obs.dataset)), you are actually check if datasets contains any object that have same reference with obs.dataset, which is inevitably false.



                A very simple example can be ran in browser console to replicate your logic:



                var state = { observations: [ { dataset: {}}, { dataset: {}} ]}
                var datasets =
                state.observations.forEach(function(obs) {
                if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
                datasets.push(obs.dataset);
                }
                })
                console.log(datasets.length) // 2, not 1
                console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[0].dataset) // true, same reference
                console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[1].dataset) // false


                If you want to get unique values of datasets, try comparing parsed string of object instead:



                state.observations.forEach(obs => {
                if (!datasets.some(
                elem => SON.stringify(elem) === JSON.stringify(obs.dataset))
                ) {
                datasets.push(obs.dataset);
                }
                })





                share|improve this answer













                It's not the issue with vuex/vue. By checking datasets.includes(obs.dataset)), you are actually check if datasets contains any object that have same reference with obs.dataset, which is inevitably false.



                A very simple example can be ran in browser console to replicate your logic:



                var state = { observations: [ { dataset: {}}, { dataset: {}} ]}
                var datasets =
                state.observations.forEach(function(obs) {
                if (!datasets.includes(obs.dataset)) {
                datasets.push(obs.dataset);
                }
                })
                console.log(datasets.length) // 2, not 1
                console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[0].dataset) // true, same reference
                console.log(datasets[0] === state.observations[1].dataset) // false


                If you want to get unique values of datasets, try comparing parsed string of object instead:



                state.observations.forEach(obs => {
                if (!datasets.some(
                elem => SON.stringify(elem) === JSON.stringify(obs.dataset))
                ) {
                datasets.push(obs.dataset);
                }
                })






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 15 '18 at 11:42









                blazblaz

                1,691917




                1,691917
































                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53318110%2fsimilar-object-are-different-using-vuejs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Vorschmack

                    Quarantine