How to use a dynamic connection string with blob binding in Azure function
I know the azure function support dynamic binding with IBinder, with it I can create a BlobAttribut with dynamic path, but the connection property of this attribut always be processed as the name of configure item.
How can I specify a connnection string directly (an SAS token) to the BlobAttribute in the run time?
Thanks
azure-functions asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:40
frankfrank
5661615
add a comment |
I know the azure function support dynamic binding with IBinder, with it I can create a BlobAttribut with dynamic path, but the connection property of this attribut always be processed as the name of configure item.
How can I specify a connnection string directly (an SAS token) to the BlobAttribute in the run time?
Thanks
azure-functions asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:40
frankfrank
5661615
add a comment |
I know the azure function support dynamic binding with IBinder, with it I can create a BlobAttribut with dynamic path, but the connection property of this attribut always be processed as the name of configure item.
How can I specify a connnection string directly (an SAS token) to the BlobAttribute in the run time?
Thanks
azure-functions asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:40
frankfrank
5661615
I know the azure function support dynamic binding with IBinder, with it I can create a BlobAttribut with dynamic path, but the connection property of this attribut always be processed as the name of configure item.
How can I specify a connnection string directly (an SAS token) to the BlobAttribute in the run time?
Thanks
azure-functions azure-functions asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:40
frankfrank
5661615
asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:40
frankfrank
5661615
asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:40
frankfrank
5661615
asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:40
frankfrank
5661615
asked Nov 15 '18 at 9:40
frankfrank
5661615
5661615
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Unfortunately, this is not supported. To begin with, you cannot use a SAS token with a blob binding (you need to provide a connection string with full permissions, see GitHub issues #199 and #468).
You won't get the goodness of bindings, but you can directly using the Azure Storage SDK instead.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 1:02
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59117
Thanks, what's the advantage that using binding over the Azure storage SDK? Or I jsut want to learn that Azure function why provide the storage bidning when we can access storage with Azure Storage SDK?
– frank
Nov 16 '18 at 4:04
1
Trigger bindings offer unique functionality that referencing an SDK doesn't have (although you could argue that an Event Grid trigger binding is sufficient for most trigger integration points). Input/output bindings are mainly used for easy integration with other (Azure) services, which are very common scenarios. Bindings opt you in to having the azure functions runtime manage the SDK for you.
– Marie Hoeger
Nov 17 '18 at 1:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53316449%2fhow-to-use-a-dynamic-connection-string-with-blob-binding-in-azure-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Unfortunately, this is not supported. To begin with, you cannot use a SAS token with a blob binding (you need to provide a connection string with full permissions, see GitHub issues #199 and #468).
You won't get the goodness of bindings, but you can directly using the Azure Storage SDK instead.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 1:02
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59117
Thanks, what's the advantage that using binding over the Azure storage SDK? Or I jsut want to learn that Azure function why provide the storage bidning when we can access storage with Azure Storage SDK?
– frank
Nov 16 '18 at 4:04
1
Trigger bindings offer unique functionality that referencing an SDK doesn't have (although you could argue that an Event Grid trigger binding is sufficient for most trigger integration points). Input/output bindings are mainly used for easy integration with other (Azure) services, which are very common scenarios. Bindings opt you in to having the azure functions runtime manage the SDK for you.
– Marie Hoeger
Nov 17 '18 at 1:07
add a comment |
Unfortunately, this is not supported. To begin with, you cannot use a SAS token with a blob binding (you need to provide a connection string with full permissions, see GitHub issues #199 and #468).
You won't get the goodness of bindings, but you can directly using the Azure Storage SDK instead.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 1:02
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59117
Thanks, what's the advantage that using binding over the Azure storage SDK? Or I jsut want to learn that Azure function why provide the storage bidning when we can access storage with Azure Storage SDK?
– frank
Nov 16 '18 at 4:04
1
Trigger bindings offer unique functionality that referencing an SDK doesn't have (although you could argue that an Event Grid trigger binding is sufficient for most trigger integration points). Input/output bindings are mainly used for easy integration with other (Azure) services, which are very common scenarios. Bindings opt you in to having the azure functions runtime manage the SDK for you.
– Marie Hoeger
Nov 17 '18 at 1:07
add a comment |
Unfortunately, this is not supported. To begin with, you cannot use a SAS token with a blob binding (you need to provide a connection string with full permissions, see GitHub issues #199 and #468).
You won't get the goodness of bindings, but you can directly using the Azure Storage SDK instead.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 1:02
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59117
Unfortunately, this is not supported. To begin with, you cannot use a SAS token with a blob binding (you need to provide a connection string with full permissions, see GitHub issues #199 and #468).
You won't get the goodness of bindings, but you can directly using the Azure Storage SDK instead.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 1:02
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59117
answered Nov 16 '18 at 1:02
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59117
answered Nov 16 '18 at 1:02
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59117
answered Nov 16 '18 at 1:02
Marie HoegerMarie Hoeger
59117
59117
Thanks, what's the advantage that using binding over the Azure storage SDK? Or I jsut want to learn that Azure function why provide the storage bidning when we can access storage with Azure Storage SDK?
– frank
Nov 16 '18 at 4:04
1
Trigger bindings offer unique functionality that referencing an SDK doesn't have (although you could argue that an Event Grid trigger binding is sufficient for most trigger integration points). Input/output bindings are mainly used for easy integration with other (Azure) services, which are very common scenarios. Bindings opt you in to having the azure functions runtime manage the SDK for you.
– Marie Hoeger
Nov 17 '18 at 1:07
add a comment |
Thanks, what's the advantage that using binding over the Azure storage SDK? Or I jsut want to learn that Azure function why provide the storage bidning when we can access storage with Azure Storage SDK?
– frank
Nov 16 '18 at 4:04
1
Trigger bindings offer unique functionality that referencing an SDK doesn't have (although you could argue that an Event Grid trigger binding is sufficient for most trigger integration points). Input/output bindings are mainly used for easy integration with other (Azure) services, which are very common scenarios. Bindings opt you in to having the azure functions runtime manage the SDK for you.
– Marie Hoeger
Nov 17 '18 at 1:07
Thanks, what's the advantage that using binding over the Azure storage SDK? Or I jsut want to learn that Azure function why provide the storage bidning when we can access storage with Azure Storage SDK?
– frank
Nov 16 '18 at 4:04
Thanks, what's the advantage that using binding over the Azure storage SDK? Or I jsut want to learn that Azure function why provide the storage bidning when we can access storage with Azure Storage SDK?
– frank
Nov 16 '18 at 4:04
1
1
Trigger bindings offer unique functionality that referencing an SDK doesn't have (although you could argue that an Event Grid trigger binding is sufficient for most trigger integration points). Input/output bindings are mainly used for easy integration with other (Azure) services, which are very common scenarios. Bindings opt you in to having the azure functions runtime manage the SDK for you.
– Marie Hoeger
Nov 17 '18 at 1:07
Trigger bindings offer unique functionality that referencing an SDK doesn't have (although you could argue that an Event Grid trigger binding is sufficient for most trigger integration points). Input/output bindings are mainly used for easy integration with other (Azure) services, which are very common scenarios. Bindings opt you in to having the azure functions runtime manage the SDK for you.
– Marie Hoeger
Nov 17 '18 at 1:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53316449%2fhow-to-use-a-dynamic-connection-string-with-blob-binding-in-azure-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
