Segfault while accessing dynamicly allocated C struct array












-1















I have the following struct that is defined in the following way



typedef struct _abcd {
int a;
unsigned long b;
void (*c)(int);
int d;
} abcd_t, *abcd;


Now i have the following code



static abcd foo

int set_size(int size){
foo = malloc(sizeof(abcd) * size);
}


This code for some reason gives me segfault when accessing some of the properties of array members.
But i have noticed that if i change the malloc line to the following - it fixes the issue



foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);


I find it strange as obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)
So what is exactly the difference here?



Thanks










share|improve this question





























    -1















    I have the following struct that is defined in the following way



    typedef struct _abcd {
    int a;
    unsigned long b;
    void (*c)(int);
    int d;
    } abcd_t, *abcd;


    Now i have the following code



    static abcd foo

    int set_size(int size){
    foo = malloc(sizeof(abcd) * size);
    }


    This code for some reason gives me segfault when accessing some of the properties of array members.
    But i have noticed that if i change the malloc line to the following - it fixes the issue



    foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);


    I find it strange as obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)
    So what is exactly the difference here?



    Thanks










    share|improve this question



























      -1












      -1








      -1








      I have the following struct that is defined in the following way



      typedef struct _abcd {
      int a;
      unsigned long b;
      void (*c)(int);
      int d;
      } abcd_t, *abcd;


      Now i have the following code



      static abcd foo

      int set_size(int size){
      foo = malloc(sizeof(abcd) * size);
      }


      This code for some reason gives me segfault when accessing some of the properties of array members.
      But i have noticed that if i change the malloc line to the following - it fixes the issue



      foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);


      I find it strange as obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)
      So what is exactly the difference here?



      Thanks










      share|improve this question
















      I have the following struct that is defined in the following way



      typedef struct _abcd {
      int a;
      unsigned long b;
      void (*c)(int);
      int d;
      } abcd_t, *abcd;


      Now i have the following code



      static abcd foo

      int set_size(int size){
      foo = malloc(sizeof(abcd) * size);
      }


      This code for some reason gives me segfault when accessing some of the properties of array members.
      But i have noticed that if i change the malloc line to the following - it fixes the issue



      foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);


      I find it strange as obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)
      So what is exactly the difference here?



      Thanks







      c malloc dynamic-arrays






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:56







      Dor Dali

















      asked Nov 15 '18 at 0:50









      Dor DaliDor Dali

      235




      235
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2















          obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)




          It is not the same since you typedefed abcd to be a *pointer* to struct _abcd.



          Use



          foo = malloc(sizeof(*foo) * size);


          to have robust code even if the type of foo should change at some point.



          Your




          foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);



          is essentially the same since foo[0] is just syntactic sugar for *(foo + 0) which becomes *foo.






          share|improve this answer































            0














            The bug is you're allocating sizeof(abcd) and that's a pointer, not a struct. You want sizeof(abcd_t) or sizeof(*abcd).






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              });
              });
              }, "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53310928%2fsegfault-while-accessing-dynamicly-allocated-c-struct-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2















              obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)




              It is not the same since you typedefed abcd to be a *pointer* to struct _abcd.



              Use



              foo = malloc(sizeof(*foo) * size);


              to have robust code even if the type of foo should change at some point.



              Your




              foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);



              is essentially the same since foo[0] is just syntactic sugar for *(foo + 0) which becomes *foo.






              share|improve this answer




























                2















                obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)




                It is not the same since you typedefed abcd to be a *pointer* to struct _abcd.



                Use



                foo = malloc(sizeof(*foo) * size);


                to have robust code even if the type of foo should change at some point.



                Your




                foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);



                is essentially the same since foo[0] is just syntactic sugar for *(foo + 0) which becomes *foo.






                share|improve this answer


























                  2












                  2








                  2








                  obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)




                  It is not the same since you typedefed abcd to be a *pointer* to struct _abcd.



                  Use



                  foo = malloc(sizeof(*foo) * size);


                  to have robust code even if the type of foo should change at some point.



                  Your




                  foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);



                  is essentially the same since foo[0] is just syntactic sugar for *(foo + 0) which becomes *foo.






                  share|improve this answer














                  obviously sizeof(foo[0]) = sizeof(abcd)




                  It is not the same since you typedefed abcd to be a *pointer* to struct _abcd.



                  Use



                  foo = malloc(sizeof(*foo) * size);


                  to have robust code even if the type of foo should change at some point.



                  Your




                  foo = malloc(sizeof(foo[0]) * size);



                  is essentially the same since foo[0] is just syntactic sugar for *(foo + 0) which becomes *foo.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 15 '18 at 0:55









                  SwordfishSwordfish

                  9,71011436




                  9,71011436

























                      0














                      The bug is you're allocating sizeof(abcd) and that's a pointer, not a struct. You want sizeof(abcd_t) or sizeof(*abcd).






                      share|improve this answer




























                        0














                        The bug is you're allocating sizeof(abcd) and that's a pointer, not a struct. You want sizeof(abcd_t) or sizeof(*abcd).






                        share|improve this answer


























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          The bug is you're allocating sizeof(abcd) and that's a pointer, not a struct. You want sizeof(abcd_t) or sizeof(*abcd).






                          share|improve this answer













                          The bug is you're allocating sizeof(abcd) and that's a pointer, not a struct. You want sizeof(abcd_t) or sizeof(*abcd).







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 15 '18 at 0:56









                          John ZwinckJohn Zwinck

                          153k17177294




                          153k17177294






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53310928%2fsegfault-while-accessing-dynamicly-allocated-c-struct-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

                              Glorious Revolution

                              Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python