Is the use of 後で fading from usage in Japanese?
When first studying Japanese, I learned that "after" in Japanese is 後で. But asking around and looking at regular usage, a lot of Japanese will tell me a sentence like the following is slightly unnatural:
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
I actually tried making a few sentences with 後で and I kept getting corrected to either drop the で or use 後に. So, is 後で being used less these days? I see plenty of examples being used in the Tanaka Corpus, but that's a bit old.
nuances conjunctions
add a comment |
When first studying Japanese, I learned that "after" in Japanese is 後で. But asking around and looking at regular usage, a lot of Japanese will tell me a sentence like the following is slightly unnatural:
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
I actually tried making a few sentences with 後で and I kept getting corrected to either drop the で or use 後に. So, is 後で being used less these days? I see plenty of examples being used in the Tanaka Corpus, but that's a bit old.
nuances conjunctions
3
I think it is used quite a lot? Although in your example sentence I would go with てから...
– bjorn
Nov 14 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
When first studying Japanese, I learned that "after" in Japanese is 後で. But asking around and looking at regular usage, a lot of Japanese will tell me a sentence like the following is slightly unnatural:
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
I actually tried making a few sentences with 後で and I kept getting corrected to either drop the で or use 後に. So, is 後で being used less these days? I see plenty of examples being used in the Tanaka Corpus, but that's a bit old.
nuances conjunctions
When first studying Japanese, I learned that "after" in Japanese is 後で. But asking around and looking at regular usage, a lot of Japanese will tell me a sentence like the following is slightly unnatural:
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
I actually tried making a few sentences with 後で and I kept getting corrected to either drop the で or use 後に. So, is 後で being used less these days? I see plenty of examples being used in the Tanaka Corpus, but that's a bit old.
nuances conjunctions
nuances conjunctions
edited Nov 15 '18 at 2:19
broccoli forest
30.5k14099
30.5k14099
asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:15
MacMac
522314
522314
3
I think it is used quite a lot? Although in your example sentence I would go with てから...
– bjorn
Nov 14 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
3
I think it is used quite a lot? Although in your example sentence I would go with てから...
– bjorn
Nov 14 '18 at 18:08
3
3
I think it is used quite a lot? Although in your example sentence I would go with てから...
– bjorn
Nov 14 '18 at 18:08
I think it is used quite a lot? Although in your example sentence I would go with てから...
– bjorn
Nov 14 '18 at 18:08
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
There are several things to consider in answering your question.
An objective answer to your question would require a direct comparison between the total usage of 後で
at two different points in time. This is not a trivial task and it requires more specific information, i.e. exactly which two time points to compare, what corpora you will base your conclusions on, whether you want to include Nounの後で
or other variants as well, etc. You could then see if there is a pattern of attrition and perhaps even investigate the reasons.
If you are just looking for a subjective answer, then it is reasonable to ask native speakers but I think you would also have to use example sentences generated by native speakers. For example you could take 20 sentences containing 後で
from a corpus and show them to Japanese people to ask whether they feel something is unnatural in the sentence. The reason I believe it is important to avoid non-native speaker examples is that they often have errors which can make the sentence sound unnatural for a variety of reasons that might not be immediately apparent, even to native speaker.
Take your sample sentence, for example.
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
According to the Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar, 後で
indicates "any space of time after" whereas ~てから
indicates "the space of time following after". It may well be the case that
映画を見てから家に帰ってきました。
would sound more natural to a native speaker precisely because of the implication that the action of going home immediately followed the action of watching the movie, and was not separated by "any space of time". So you could argue that 後で
is not the appropriate term to use in this specific circumstance because of the meaning of the sentence. You have to be careful attributing a cause to an effect and so I think it is best to avoid sentences made by non native speakers.
Finally, when something does end up becoming obsolete there is usually a reason for it, and it's often the case that it is superseded by something else. You might investigate which terms are more likely to be used instead of 後で
as another way to explore your question.
So without directly answering your question, I hope that helped. :)
You pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I was just wondering if anyone else noticed this, since it's difficult to prove really.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:15
By the way, てから doesn't seem to mean "the space of time following after" as the Dictionary would lead you to believe. In my research, it seems to mean more something like "once" as in "Once I go to the bathroom, I'll eat breakfast." It emphasizes the completion of one event before another takes place.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:22
1
@Mac Perhaps, but then again the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar series is considered an authoritative source. Also, the sentence I used with てから is natural in Japanese but would sound somewhat unnatural (in my opinion) when translated as “Once I watched the movie I went home”. In other words, I’m not sure that “once” is the best translation of てから, at least in this case.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 0:38
4
@Mac where exactly does kandyman confirm your suspicions in this answer? I saw him saying (1) change in use is hard to analyze and (2) to check change in use it needs to be natural sentences (i.e., the sort native speakers make) rather use-mistakes...
– virmaior
Nov 15 '18 at 2:53
@Mac As noted above it was not my intention to confirm your suspicions. I think you made a premature conclusion.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 10:50
|
show 2 more comments
This sentence sounds unnatural indeed. As you were instructed, either drop the で or use 後に, that will make it more natural.
I am quite sure the sentence has never sounded natural, actually. The reason it sounds unnatural is not because the language is changing.
In particular, 後で is used all the time, you can't spend a day at school or work without hearing it at least once.
It is just that you can't put this 後で inside this sentence. Consider this English sentence:
Afterwards watching the movie I came back home.
It sounds weird, not because "afterwards" is fading in usage, but just because it is the wrong word here, you should use "after" instead.
The sentence listed above is from the Tanaka Corpus so somebody somewhere considered this natural at one time.
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:00
1
@Mac: "This corpus has many sentences that don't sound natural in Japanese." manythings.org/corpus/warning.html
– Nicolas Raoul
Nov 16 '18 at 2:22
Good to know! Maybe that is the issue I'm seeing. A lot of these sentences that use 後で are from the Tanaka Corpus or from textbooks (another questionable source).
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62841%2fis-the-use-of-%25e5%25be%258c%25e3%2581%25a7-fading-from-usage-in-japanese%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There are several things to consider in answering your question.
An objective answer to your question would require a direct comparison between the total usage of 後で
at two different points in time. This is not a trivial task and it requires more specific information, i.e. exactly which two time points to compare, what corpora you will base your conclusions on, whether you want to include Nounの後で
or other variants as well, etc. You could then see if there is a pattern of attrition and perhaps even investigate the reasons.
If you are just looking for a subjective answer, then it is reasonable to ask native speakers but I think you would also have to use example sentences generated by native speakers. For example you could take 20 sentences containing 後で
from a corpus and show them to Japanese people to ask whether they feel something is unnatural in the sentence. The reason I believe it is important to avoid non-native speaker examples is that they often have errors which can make the sentence sound unnatural for a variety of reasons that might not be immediately apparent, even to native speaker.
Take your sample sentence, for example.
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
According to the Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar, 後で
indicates "any space of time after" whereas ~てから
indicates "the space of time following after". It may well be the case that
映画を見てから家に帰ってきました。
would sound more natural to a native speaker precisely because of the implication that the action of going home immediately followed the action of watching the movie, and was not separated by "any space of time". So you could argue that 後で
is not the appropriate term to use in this specific circumstance because of the meaning of the sentence. You have to be careful attributing a cause to an effect and so I think it is best to avoid sentences made by non native speakers.
Finally, when something does end up becoming obsolete there is usually a reason for it, and it's often the case that it is superseded by something else. You might investigate which terms are more likely to be used instead of 後で
as another way to explore your question.
So without directly answering your question, I hope that helped. :)
You pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I was just wondering if anyone else noticed this, since it's difficult to prove really.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:15
By the way, てから doesn't seem to mean "the space of time following after" as the Dictionary would lead you to believe. In my research, it seems to mean more something like "once" as in "Once I go to the bathroom, I'll eat breakfast." It emphasizes the completion of one event before another takes place.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:22
1
@Mac Perhaps, but then again the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar series is considered an authoritative source. Also, the sentence I used with てから is natural in Japanese but would sound somewhat unnatural (in my opinion) when translated as “Once I watched the movie I went home”. In other words, I’m not sure that “once” is the best translation of てから, at least in this case.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 0:38
4
@Mac where exactly does kandyman confirm your suspicions in this answer? I saw him saying (1) change in use is hard to analyze and (2) to check change in use it needs to be natural sentences (i.e., the sort native speakers make) rather use-mistakes...
– virmaior
Nov 15 '18 at 2:53
@Mac As noted above it was not my intention to confirm your suspicions. I think you made a premature conclusion.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 10:50
|
show 2 more comments
There are several things to consider in answering your question.
An objective answer to your question would require a direct comparison between the total usage of 後で
at two different points in time. This is not a trivial task and it requires more specific information, i.e. exactly which two time points to compare, what corpora you will base your conclusions on, whether you want to include Nounの後で
or other variants as well, etc. You could then see if there is a pattern of attrition and perhaps even investigate the reasons.
If you are just looking for a subjective answer, then it is reasonable to ask native speakers but I think you would also have to use example sentences generated by native speakers. For example you could take 20 sentences containing 後で
from a corpus and show them to Japanese people to ask whether they feel something is unnatural in the sentence. The reason I believe it is important to avoid non-native speaker examples is that they often have errors which can make the sentence sound unnatural for a variety of reasons that might not be immediately apparent, even to native speaker.
Take your sample sentence, for example.
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
According to the Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar, 後で
indicates "any space of time after" whereas ~てから
indicates "the space of time following after". It may well be the case that
映画を見てから家に帰ってきました。
would sound more natural to a native speaker precisely because of the implication that the action of going home immediately followed the action of watching the movie, and was not separated by "any space of time". So you could argue that 後で
is not the appropriate term to use in this specific circumstance because of the meaning of the sentence. You have to be careful attributing a cause to an effect and so I think it is best to avoid sentences made by non native speakers.
Finally, when something does end up becoming obsolete there is usually a reason for it, and it's often the case that it is superseded by something else. You might investigate which terms are more likely to be used instead of 後で
as another way to explore your question.
So without directly answering your question, I hope that helped. :)
You pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I was just wondering if anyone else noticed this, since it's difficult to prove really.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:15
By the way, てから doesn't seem to mean "the space of time following after" as the Dictionary would lead you to believe. In my research, it seems to mean more something like "once" as in "Once I go to the bathroom, I'll eat breakfast." It emphasizes the completion of one event before another takes place.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:22
1
@Mac Perhaps, but then again the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar series is considered an authoritative source. Also, the sentence I used with てから is natural in Japanese but would sound somewhat unnatural (in my opinion) when translated as “Once I watched the movie I went home”. In other words, I’m not sure that “once” is the best translation of てから, at least in this case.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 0:38
4
@Mac where exactly does kandyman confirm your suspicions in this answer? I saw him saying (1) change in use is hard to analyze and (2) to check change in use it needs to be natural sentences (i.e., the sort native speakers make) rather use-mistakes...
– virmaior
Nov 15 '18 at 2:53
@Mac As noted above it was not my intention to confirm your suspicions. I think you made a premature conclusion.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 10:50
|
show 2 more comments
There are several things to consider in answering your question.
An objective answer to your question would require a direct comparison between the total usage of 後で
at two different points in time. This is not a trivial task and it requires more specific information, i.e. exactly which two time points to compare, what corpora you will base your conclusions on, whether you want to include Nounの後で
or other variants as well, etc. You could then see if there is a pattern of attrition and perhaps even investigate the reasons.
If you are just looking for a subjective answer, then it is reasonable to ask native speakers but I think you would also have to use example sentences generated by native speakers. For example you could take 20 sentences containing 後で
from a corpus and show them to Japanese people to ask whether they feel something is unnatural in the sentence. The reason I believe it is important to avoid non-native speaker examples is that they often have errors which can make the sentence sound unnatural for a variety of reasons that might not be immediately apparent, even to native speaker.
Take your sample sentence, for example.
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
According to the Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar, 後で
indicates "any space of time after" whereas ~てから
indicates "the space of time following after". It may well be the case that
映画を見てから家に帰ってきました。
would sound more natural to a native speaker precisely because of the implication that the action of going home immediately followed the action of watching the movie, and was not separated by "any space of time". So you could argue that 後で
is not the appropriate term to use in this specific circumstance because of the meaning of the sentence. You have to be careful attributing a cause to an effect and so I think it is best to avoid sentences made by non native speakers.
Finally, when something does end up becoming obsolete there is usually a reason for it, and it's often the case that it is superseded by something else. You might investigate which terms are more likely to be used instead of 後で
as another way to explore your question.
So without directly answering your question, I hope that helped. :)
There are several things to consider in answering your question.
An objective answer to your question would require a direct comparison between the total usage of 後で
at two different points in time. This is not a trivial task and it requires more specific information, i.e. exactly which two time points to compare, what corpora you will base your conclusions on, whether you want to include Nounの後で
or other variants as well, etc. You could then see if there is a pattern of attrition and perhaps even investigate the reasons.
If you are just looking for a subjective answer, then it is reasonable to ask native speakers but I think you would also have to use example sentences generated by native speakers. For example you could take 20 sentences containing 後で
from a corpus and show them to Japanese people to ask whether they feel something is unnatural in the sentence. The reason I believe it is important to avoid non-native speaker examples is that they often have errors which can make the sentence sound unnatural for a variety of reasons that might not be immediately apparent, even to native speaker.
Take your sample sentence, for example.
映画を見た後で家に帰ってきました。
According to the Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar, 後で
indicates "any space of time after" whereas ~てから
indicates "the space of time following after". It may well be the case that
映画を見てから家に帰ってきました。
would sound more natural to a native speaker precisely because of the implication that the action of going home immediately followed the action of watching the movie, and was not separated by "any space of time". So you could argue that 後で
is not the appropriate term to use in this specific circumstance because of the meaning of the sentence. You have to be careful attributing a cause to an effect and so I think it is best to avoid sentences made by non native speakers.
Finally, when something does end up becoming obsolete there is usually a reason for it, and it's often the case that it is superseded by something else. You might investigate which terms are more likely to be used instead of 後で
as another way to explore your question.
So without directly answering your question, I hope that helped. :)
answered Nov 14 '18 at 18:05
kandymankandyman
3,200621
3,200621
You pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I was just wondering if anyone else noticed this, since it's difficult to prove really.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:15
By the way, てから doesn't seem to mean "the space of time following after" as the Dictionary would lead you to believe. In my research, it seems to mean more something like "once" as in "Once I go to the bathroom, I'll eat breakfast." It emphasizes the completion of one event before another takes place.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:22
1
@Mac Perhaps, but then again the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar series is considered an authoritative source. Also, the sentence I used with てから is natural in Japanese but would sound somewhat unnatural (in my opinion) when translated as “Once I watched the movie I went home”. In other words, I’m not sure that “once” is the best translation of てから, at least in this case.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 0:38
4
@Mac where exactly does kandyman confirm your suspicions in this answer? I saw him saying (1) change in use is hard to analyze and (2) to check change in use it needs to be natural sentences (i.e., the sort native speakers make) rather use-mistakes...
– virmaior
Nov 15 '18 at 2:53
@Mac As noted above it was not my intention to confirm your suspicions. I think you made a premature conclusion.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 10:50
|
show 2 more comments
You pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I was just wondering if anyone else noticed this, since it's difficult to prove really.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:15
By the way, てから doesn't seem to mean "the space of time following after" as the Dictionary would lead you to believe. In my research, it seems to mean more something like "once" as in "Once I go to the bathroom, I'll eat breakfast." It emphasizes the completion of one event before another takes place.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:22
1
@Mac Perhaps, but then again the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar series is considered an authoritative source. Also, the sentence I used with てから is natural in Japanese but would sound somewhat unnatural (in my opinion) when translated as “Once I watched the movie I went home”. In other words, I’m not sure that “once” is the best translation of てから, at least in this case.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 0:38
4
@Mac where exactly does kandyman confirm your suspicions in this answer? I saw him saying (1) change in use is hard to analyze and (2) to check change in use it needs to be natural sentences (i.e., the sort native speakers make) rather use-mistakes...
– virmaior
Nov 15 '18 at 2:53
@Mac As noted above it was not my intention to confirm your suspicions. I think you made a premature conclusion.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 10:50
You pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I was just wondering if anyone else noticed this, since it's difficult to prove really.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:15
You pretty much confirmed my suspicions. I was just wondering if anyone else noticed this, since it's difficult to prove really.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:15
By the way, てから doesn't seem to mean "the space of time following after" as the Dictionary would lead you to believe. In my research, it seems to mean more something like "once" as in "Once I go to the bathroom, I'll eat breakfast." It emphasizes the completion of one event before another takes place.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:22
By the way, てから doesn't seem to mean "the space of time following after" as the Dictionary would lead you to believe. In my research, it seems to mean more something like "once" as in "Once I go to the bathroom, I'll eat breakfast." It emphasizes the completion of one event before another takes place.
– Mac
Nov 15 '18 at 0:22
1
1
@Mac Perhaps, but then again the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar series is considered an authoritative source. Also, the sentence I used with てから is natural in Japanese but would sound somewhat unnatural (in my opinion) when translated as “Once I watched the movie I went home”. In other words, I’m not sure that “once” is the best translation of てから, at least in this case.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 0:38
@Mac Perhaps, but then again the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar series is considered an authoritative source. Also, the sentence I used with てから is natural in Japanese but would sound somewhat unnatural (in my opinion) when translated as “Once I watched the movie I went home”. In other words, I’m not sure that “once” is the best translation of てから, at least in this case.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 0:38
4
4
@Mac where exactly does kandyman confirm your suspicions in this answer? I saw him saying (1) change in use is hard to analyze and (2) to check change in use it needs to be natural sentences (i.e., the sort native speakers make) rather use-mistakes...
– virmaior
Nov 15 '18 at 2:53
@Mac where exactly does kandyman confirm your suspicions in this answer? I saw him saying (1) change in use is hard to analyze and (2) to check change in use it needs to be natural sentences (i.e., the sort native speakers make) rather use-mistakes...
– virmaior
Nov 15 '18 at 2:53
@Mac As noted above it was not my intention to confirm your suspicions. I think you made a premature conclusion.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 10:50
@Mac As noted above it was not my intention to confirm your suspicions. I think you made a premature conclusion.
– kandyman
Nov 15 '18 at 10:50
|
show 2 more comments
This sentence sounds unnatural indeed. As you were instructed, either drop the で or use 後に, that will make it more natural.
I am quite sure the sentence has never sounded natural, actually. The reason it sounds unnatural is not because the language is changing.
In particular, 後で is used all the time, you can't spend a day at school or work without hearing it at least once.
It is just that you can't put this 後で inside this sentence. Consider this English sentence:
Afterwards watching the movie I came back home.
It sounds weird, not because "afterwards" is fading in usage, but just because it is the wrong word here, you should use "after" instead.
The sentence listed above is from the Tanaka Corpus so somebody somewhere considered this natural at one time.
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:00
1
@Mac: "This corpus has many sentences that don't sound natural in Japanese." manythings.org/corpus/warning.html
– Nicolas Raoul
Nov 16 '18 at 2:22
Good to know! Maybe that is the issue I'm seeing. A lot of these sentences that use 後で are from the Tanaka Corpus or from textbooks (another questionable source).
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:30
add a comment |
This sentence sounds unnatural indeed. As you were instructed, either drop the で or use 後に, that will make it more natural.
I am quite sure the sentence has never sounded natural, actually. The reason it sounds unnatural is not because the language is changing.
In particular, 後で is used all the time, you can't spend a day at school or work without hearing it at least once.
It is just that you can't put this 後で inside this sentence. Consider this English sentence:
Afterwards watching the movie I came back home.
It sounds weird, not because "afterwards" is fading in usage, but just because it is the wrong word here, you should use "after" instead.
The sentence listed above is from the Tanaka Corpus so somebody somewhere considered this natural at one time.
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:00
1
@Mac: "This corpus has many sentences that don't sound natural in Japanese." manythings.org/corpus/warning.html
– Nicolas Raoul
Nov 16 '18 at 2:22
Good to know! Maybe that is the issue I'm seeing. A lot of these sentences that use 後で are from the Tanaka Corpus or from textbooks (another questionable source).
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:30
add a comment |
This sentence sounds unnatural indeed. As you were instructed, either drop the で or use 後に, that will make it more natural.
I am quite sure the sentence has never sounded natural, actually. The reason it sounds unnatural is not because the language is changing.
In particular, 後で is used all the time, you can't spend a day at school or work without hearing it at least once.
It is just that you can't put this 後で inside this sentence. Consider this English sentence:
Afterwards watching the movie I came back home.
It sounds weird, not because "afterwards" is fading in usage, but just because it is the wrong word here, you should use "after" instead.
This sentence sounds unnatural indeed. As you were instructed, either drop the で or use 後に, that will make it more natural.
I am quite sure the sentence has never sounded natural, actually. The reason it sounds unnatural is not because the language is changing.
In particular, 後で is used all the time, you can't spend a day at school or work without hearing it at least once.
It is just that you can't put this 後で inside this sentence. Consider this English sentence:
Afterwards watching the movie I came back home.
It sounds weird, not because "afterwards" is fading in usage, but just because it is the wrong word here, you should use "after" instead.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 3:40
Nicolas RaoulNicolas Raoul
5,19512160
5,19512160
The sentence listed above is from the Tanaka Corpus so somebody somewhere considered this natural at one time.
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:00
1
@Mac: "This corpus has many sentences that don't sound natural in Japanese." manythings.org/corpus/warning.html
– Nicolas Raoul
Nov 16 '18 at 2:22
Good to know! Maybe that is the issue I'm seeing. A lot of these sentences that use 後で are from the Tanaka Corpus or from textbooks (another questionable source).
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:30
add a comment |
The sentence listed above is from the Tanaka Corpus so somebody somewhere considered this natural at one time.
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:00
1
@Mac: "This corpus has many sentences that don't sound natural in Japanese." manythings.org/corpus/warning.html
– Nicolas Raoul
Nov 16 '18 at 2:22
Good to know! Maybe that is the issue I'm seeing. A lot of these sentences that use 後で are from the Tanaka Corpus or from textbooks (another questionable source).
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:30
The sentence listed above is from the Tanaka Corpus so somebody somewhere considered this natural at one time.
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:00
The sentence listed above is from the Tanaka Corpus so somebody somewhere considered this natural at one time.
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:00
1
1
@Mac: "This corpus has many sentences that don't sound natural in Japanese." manythings.org/corpus/warning.html
– Nicolas Raoul
Nov 16 '18 at 2:22
@Mac: "This corpus has many sentences that don't sound natural in Japanese." manythings.org/corpus/warning.html
– Nicolas Raoul
Nov 16 '18 at 2:22
Good to know! Maybe that is the issue I'm seeing. A lot of these sentences that use 後で are from the Tanaka Corpus or from textbooks (another questionable source).
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:30
Good to know! Maybe that is the issue I'm seeing. A lot of these sentences that use 後で are from the Tanaka Corpus or from textbooks (another questionable source).
– Mac
Nov 16 '18 at 2:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62841%2fis-the-use-of-%25e5%25be%258c%25e3%2581%25a7-fading-from-usage-in-japanese%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
I think it is used quite a lot? Although in your example sentence I would go with てから...
– bjorn
Nov 14 '18 at 18:08