How to implement EVERY and NO operations for a joined 'list' table





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















I have two tables Person and _Person_Name which contains a column Name and a column Owner with Person.Id as foreign key. I'm looking for two search operations I'd call EVERY and NO.



1.) Every



The following returns only the Person IDs for which all corresponding names match for query LIKE '%n%':



SELECT Person.Id as Result FROM Person
INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
WHERE __T1.Name LIKE '%n%'
GROUP BY Result
HAVING Count(Result)=(Select Count(*) FROM _Person_Name
WHERE Person.Id=_Person_Name.Owner)


But the problem is that I also have to deal with other queries for which just a single match suffices, and the HAVING clause applies to all terms in the WHERE clause.



Is there a way to get the same effect as in the HAVING clause in the above query, but somehow express this within the WHERE clause such that other, ordinary conditions can be added to it?



Example:



SELECT Person.Id as Result FROM Person 
INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
WHERE (EVERY __T1.Name LIKE '%n%')
OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


The second disjunct should just behave in the ordinary way without any restrictions. Now I'm looking for a way to express EVERY like in the above HAVING clause. The query should return __T1.Owner (=Person.Id) whenever it is the case that one field with matching owner has a name field __T1.Name LIKE 'John' or it is the case that all __T1.Name fields with matching owner contain an 'n'.



If it is not possible to express this in the WHERE clause, how can it be expressed?



2.) No



The NO search operation is just like EVERY but the base condition is negated, i.e., I'm looking for the Persons for which none of their associated Name parts matches the query. I suppose I can get that easily if I have a solution for EVERY.



EDIT: The answer by Dávid Laczkó is correct. If he hasn't edited his reply already, a small change is required. Here is the solution for NO based on his answer:



SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person 
INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
WHERE
NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2
WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner
)









share|improve this question































    1















    I have two tables Person and _Person_Name which contains a column Name and a column Owner with Person.Id as foreign key. I'm looking for two search operations I'd call EVERY and NO.



    1.) Every



    The following returns only the Person IDs for which all corresponding names match for query LIKE '%n%':



    SELECT Person.Id as Result FROM Person
    INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
    WHERE __T1.Name LIKE '%n%'
    GROUP BY Result
    HAVING Count(Result)=(Select Count(*) FROM _Person_Name
    WHERE Person.Id=_Person_Name.Owner)


    But the problem is that I also have to deal with other queries for which just a single match suffices, and the HAVING clause applies to all terms in the WHERE clause.



    Is there a way to get the same effect as in the HAVING clause in the above query, but somehow express this within the WHERE clause such that other, ordinary conditions can be added to it?



    Example:



    SELECT Person.Id as Result FROM Person 
    INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
    WHERE (EVERY __T1.Name LIKE '%n%')
    OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


    The second disjunct should just behave in the ordinary way without any restrictions. Now I'm looking for a way to express EVERY like in the above HAVING clause. The query should return __T1.Owner (=Person.Id) whenever it is the case that one field with matching owner has a name field __T1.Name LIKE 'John' or it is the case that all __T1.Name fields with matching owner contain an 'n'.



    If it is not possible to express this in the WHERE clause, how can it be expressed?



    2.) No



    The NO search operation is just like EVERY but the base condition is negated, i.e., I'm looking for the Persons for which none of their associated Name parts matches the query. I suppose I can get that easily if I have a solution for EVERY.



    EDIT: The answer by Dávid Laczkó is correct. If he hasn't edited his reply already, a small change is required. Here is the solution for NO based on his answer:



    SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person 
    INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
    WHERE
    NOT EXISTS (
    SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2
    WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner
    )









    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      I have two tables Person and _Person_Name which contains a column Name and a column Owner with Person.Id as foreign key. I'm looking for two search operations I'd call EVERY and NO.



      1.) Every



      The following returns only the Person IDs for which all corresponding names match for query LIKE '%n%':



      SELECT Person.Id as Result FROM Person
      INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
      WHERE __T1.Name LIKE '%n%'
      GROUP BY Result
      HAVING Count(Result)=(Select Count(*) FROM _Person_Name
      WHERE Person.Id=_Person_Name.Owner)


      But the problem is that I also have to deal with other queries for which just a single match suffices, and the HAVING clause applies to all terms in the WHERE clause.



      Is there a way to get the same effect as in the HAVING clause in the above query, but somehow express this within the WHERE clause such that other, ordinary conditions can be added to it?



      Example:



      SELECT Person.Id as Result FROM Person 
      INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
      WHERE (EVERY __T1.Name LIKE '%n%')
      OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


      The second disjunct should just behave in the ordinary way without any restrictions. Now I'm looking for a way to express EVERY like in the above HAVING clause. The query should return __T1.Owner (=Person.Id) whenever it is the case that one field with matching owner has a name field __T1.Name LIKE 'John' or it is the case that all __T1.Name fields with matching owner contain an 'n'.



      If it is not possible to express this in the WHERE clause, how can it be expressed?



      2.) No



      The NO search operation is just like EVERY but the base condition is negated, i.e., I'm looking for the Persons for which none of their associated Name parts matches the query. I suppose I can get that easily if I have a solution for EVERY.



      EDIT: The answer by Dávid Laczkó is correct. If he hasn't edited his reply already, a small change is required. Here is the solution for NO based on his answer:



      SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person 
      INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
      WHERE
      NOT EXISTS (
      SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2
      WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner
      )









      share|improve this question
















      I have two tables Person and _Person_Name which contains a column Name and a column Owner with Person.Id as foreign key. I'm looking for two search operations I'd call EVERY and NO.



      1.) Every



      The following returns only the Person IDs for which all corresponding names match for query LIKE '%n%':



      SELECT Person.Id as Result FROM Person
      INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
      WHERE __T1.Name LIKE '%n%'
      GROUP BY Result
      HAVING Count(Result)=(Select Count(*) FROM _Person_Name
      WHERE Person.Id=_Person_Name.Owner)


      But the problem is that I also have to deal with other queries for which just a single match suffices, and the HAVING clause applies to all terms in the WHERE clause.



      Is there a way to get the same effect as in the HAVING clause in the above query, but somehow express this within the WHERE clause such that other, ordinary conditions can be added to it?



      Example:



      SELECT Person.Id as Result FROM Person 
      INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
      WHERE (EVERY __T1.Name LIKE '%n%')
      OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


      The second disjunct should just behave in the ordinary way without any restrictions. Now I'm looking for a way to express EVERY like in the above HAVING clause. The query should return __T1.Owner (=Person.Id) whenever it is the case that one field with matching owner has a name field __T1.Name LIKE 'John' or it is the case that all __T1.Name fields with matching owner contain an 'n'.



      If it is not possible to express this in the WHERE clause, how can it be expressed?



      2.) No



      The NO search operation is just like EVERY but the base condition is negated, i.e., I'm looking for the Persons for which none of their associated Name parts matches the query. I suppose I can get that easily if I have a solution for EVERY.



      EDIT: The answer by Dávid Laczkó is correct. If he hasn't edited his reply already, a small change is required. Here is the solution for NO based on his answer:



      SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person 
      INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner
      WHERE
      NOT EXISTS (
      SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2
      WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner
      )






      sql database sqlite sqlite3






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 17 '18 at 15:05







      Eric '3ToedSloth'

















      asked Nov 16 '18 at 17:43









      Eric '3ToedSloth'Eric '3ToedSloth'

      1947




      1947
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Let me start with an idea for NO: you can check if no row exists if you look up by condition LIKE '%n%'. You can do it in the WHERE clause with EXISTS subquery:



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          NOT EXISTS checks if there is NO match.



          Based on this the implementation for EVERY is to see if the negation of your condition for no row is true, so you are looking for NOT LIKE '%n%':



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name NOT LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          This time NOT EXISTS will make sure no rows found that does NOT match your criteria - therefore EVERY row matched it.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Perfect! This works, with a small change. The inner SELECT would need a JOIN for the ON condition to work, instead I used: SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner )

            – Eric '3ToedSloth'
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:01













          • Oh, I did it incorrectly, but you don't need a join there. Try my update.

            – Dávid Laczkó
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:15












          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53342896%2fhow-to-implement-every-and-no-operations-for-a-joined-list-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Let me start with an idea for NO: you can check if no row exists if you look up by condition LIKE '%n%'. You can do it in the WHERE clause with EXISTS subquery:



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          NOT EXISTS checks if there is NO match.



          Based on this the implementation for EVERY is to see if the negation of your condition for no row is true, so you are looking for NOT LIKE '%n%':



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name NOT LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          This time NOT EXISTS will make sure no rows found that does NOT match your criteria - therefore EVERY row matched it.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Perfect! This works, with a small change. The inner SELECT would need a JOIN for the ON condition to work, instead I used: SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner )

            – Eric '3ToedSloth'
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:01













          • Oh, I did it incorrectly, but you don't need a join there. Try my update.

            – Dávid Laczkó
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:15
















          1














          Let me start with an idea for NO: you can check if no row exists if you look up by condition LIKE '%n%'. You can do it in the WHERE clause with EXISTS subquery:



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          NOT EXISTS checks if there is NO match.



          Based on this the implementation for EVERY is to see if the negation of your condition for no row is true, so you are looking for NOT LIKE '%n%':



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name NOT LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          This time NOT EXISTS will make sure no rows found that does NOT match your criteria - therefore EVERY row matched it.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Perfect! This works, with a small change. The inner SELECT would need a JOIN for the ON condition to work, instead I used: SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner )

            – Eric '3ToedSloth'
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:01













          • Oh, I did it incorrectly, but you don't need a join there. Try my update.

            – Dávid Laczkó
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:15














          1












          1








          1







          Let me start with an idea for NO: you can check if no row exists if you look up by condition LIKE '%n%'. You can do it in the WHERE clause with EXISTS subquery:



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          NOT EXISTS checks if there is NO match.



          Based on this the implementation for EVERY is to see if the negation of your condition for no row is true, so you are looking for NOT LIKE '%n%':



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name NOT LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          This time NOT EXISTS will make sure no rows found that does NOT match your criteria - therefore EVERY row matched it.






          share|improve this answer















          Let me start with an idea for NO: you can check if no row exists if you look up by condition LIKE '%n%'. You can do it in the WHERE clause with EXISTS subquery:



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          NOT EXISTS checks if there is NO match.



          Based on this the implementation for EVERY is to see if the negation of your condition for no row is true, so you are looking for NOT LIKE '%n%':



          WHERE
          NOT EXISTS (
          SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE Person.Id = __T2.Owner
          and __T2.Name NOT LIKE '%n%'
          )
          OR (__T1.Name LIKE 'John')


          This time NOT EXISTS will make sure no rows found that does NOT match your criteria - therefore EVERY row matched it.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 17 '18 at 15:14

























          answered Nov 16 '18 at 18:19









          Dávid LaczkóDávid Laczkó

          419129




          419129













          • Perfect! This works, with a small change. The inner SELECT would need a JOIN for the ON condition to work, instead I used: SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner )

            – Eric '3ToedSloth'
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:01













          • Oh, I did it incorrectly, but you don't need a join there. Try my update.

            – Dávid Laczkó
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:15



















          • Perfect! This works, with a small change. The inner SELECT would need a JOIN for the ON condition to work, instead I used: SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner )

            – Eric '3ToedSloth'
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:01













          • Oh, I did it incorrectly, but you don't need a join there. Try my update.

            – Dávid Laczkó
            Nov 17 '18 at 15:15

















          Perfect! This works, with a small change. The inner SELECT would need a JOIN for the ON condition to work, instead I used: SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner )

          – Eric '3ToedSloth'
          Nov 17 '18 at 15:01







          Perfect! This works, with a small change. The inner SELECT would need a JOIN for the ON condition to work, instead I used: SELECT DISTINCT Person.Id as Result FROM Person INNER JOIN _Person_Name AS __T1 ON Person.Id = __T1.Owner WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM _Person_Name AS __T2 WHERE __T2.Name LIKE '%n%' AND Person.Id=__T2.Owner )

          – Eric '3ToedSloth'
          Nov 17 '18 at 15:01















          Oh, I did it incorrectly, but you don't need a join there. Try my update.

          – Dávid Laczkó
          Nov 17 '18 at 15:15





          Oh, I did it incorrectly, but you don't need a join there. Try my update.

          – Dávid Laczkó
          Nov 17 '18 at 15:15




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53342896%2fhow-to-implement-every-and-no-operations-for-a-joined-list-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

          Glorious Revolution

          Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python