Entity Framework Core 2.1 Adding related data with a composite foreign key
I have an parent InspectionData model with a composite primary key to two other tables(Component and Inspection) and a child WrittenFindings model:
public class InspectionData
{
public int InspectionId { get; set; }
public virtual Inspection Inspection { get; set; }
public int? ComponentId { get; set; }
public virtual Component Component { get; set; }
public virtual WrittenFinding WrittenFinding { get; set; }
}
public class WrittenFinding
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int? InspectionId { get; set; }
public int? ComponentId { get; set; }
public virtual InspectionData InspectionData { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Text { get; set; }
}
WrittenFinding is configured through FluentApi here:
modelBuilder.Entity<WrittenFinding>()
.HasOne(wf => wf.InspectionData)
.WithOne(id => id.WrittenFinding)
.HasForeignKey<WrittenFinding>(wf => new { wf.InspectionId, wf.ComponentId })
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
I am trying to add them to the database with this:
_context.InspectionData.Add(inspectionData);
await _context.SaveChangesAsync();
But I run into a foreign key constraint when I do:
SqlException: The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_WrittenFinding_InspectionData_InspectionId_ComponentId". The conflict occurred in database "InstantBSIContext-26452145-dc4a-4073-ae99-96b88874434d", table "dbo.InspectionData".
This is what the data I'm adding looks like:
InspectionId: 3
ComponentId: 1
WrittenFinding[InspectionId]: 3
WrittenFinding[ComponentId]: 1
WrittenFinding[Text]: <p><br></p>
I know there is a component with an id of 1 and an inspection with an id of 3 in the database and I know I'm sending and receiving the data correctly due to debugging.
If I remove WrittenFinding from the data I send, then InspectionData will be inserted just fine.
Why am I running into this error with valid values for my composite foreign key?
sql-server entity-framework asked Nov 16 '18 at 10:49
Ian GleesonIan Gleeson
799
add a comment |
I have an parent InspectionData model with a composite primary key to two other tables(Component and Inspection) and a child WrittenFindings model:
public class InspectionData
{
public int InspectionId { get; set; }
public virtual Inspection Inspection { get; set; }
public int? ComponentId { get; set; }
public virtual Component Component { get; set; }
public virtual WrittenFinding WrittenFinding { get; set; }
}
public class WrittenFinding
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int? InspectionId { get; set; }
public int? ComponentId { get; set; }
public virtual InspectionData InspectionData { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Text { get; set; }
}
WrittenFinding is configured through FluentApi here:
modelBuilder.Entity<WrittenFinding>()
.HasOne(wf => wf.InspectionData)
.WithOne(id => id.WrittenFinding)
.HasForeignKey<WrittenFinding>(wf => new { wf.InspectionId, wf.ComponentId })
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
I am trying to add them to the database with this:
_context.InspectionData.Add(inspectionData);
await _context.SaveChangesAsync();
But I run into a foreign key constraint when I do:
SqlException: The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_WrittenFinding_InspectionData_InspectionId_ComponentId". The conflict occurred in database "InstantBSIContext-26452145-dc4a-4073-ae99-96b88874434d", table "dbo.InspectionData".
This is what the data I'm adding looks like:
InspectionId: 3
ComponentId: 1
WrittenFinding[InspectionId]: 3
WrittenFinding[ComponentId]: 1
WrittenFinding[Text]: <p><br></p>
I know there is a component with an id of 1 and an inspection with an id of 3 in the database and I know I'm sending and receiving the data correctly due to debugging.
If I remove WrittenFinding from the data I send, then InspectionData will be inserted just fine.
Why am I running into this error with valid values for my composite foreign key?
sql-server entity-framework asked Nov 16 '18 at 10:49
Ian GleesonIan Gleeson
799
There's nothing obviously wrong with the bits you've posted. Can you pull it together into a minimal, complete repro?
– David Browne - Microsoft
Nov 16 '18 at 12:55
add a comment |
I have an parent InspectionData model with a composite primary key to two other tables(Component and Inspection) and a child WrittenFindings model:
public class InspectionData
{
public int InspectionId { get; set; }
public virtual Inspection Inspection { get; set; }
public int? ComponentId { get; set; }
public virtual Component Component { get; set; }
public virtual WrittenFinding WrittenFinding { get; set; }
}
public class WrittenFinding
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int? InspectionId { get; set; }
public int? ComponentId { get; set; }
public virtual InspectionData InspectionData { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Text { get; set; }
}
WrittenFinding is configured through FluentApi here:
modelBuilder.Entity<WrittenFinding>()
.HasOne(wf => wf.InspectionData)
.WithOne(id => id.WrittenFinding)
.HasForeignKey<WrittenFinding>(wf => new { wf.InspectionId, wf.ComponentId })
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
I am trying to add them to the database with this:
_context.InspectionData.Add(inspectionData);
await _context.SaveChangesAsync();
But I run into a foreign key constraint when I do:
SqlException: The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_WrittenFinding_InspectionData_InspectionId_ComponentId". The conflict occurred in database "InstantBSIContext-26452145-dc4a-4073-ae99-96b88874434d", table "dbo.InspectionData".
This is what the data I'm adding looks like:
InspectionId: 3
ComponentId: 1
WrittenFinding[InspectionId]: 3
WrittenFinding[ComponentId]: 1
WrittenFinding[Text]: <p><br></p>
I know there is a component with an id of 1 and an inspection with an id of 3 in the database and I know I'm sending and receiving the data correctly due to debugging.
If I remove WrittenFinding from the data I send, then InspectionData will be inserted just fine.
Why am I running into this error with valid values for my composite foreign key?
sql-server entity-framework asked Nov 16 '18 at 10:49
Ian GleesonIan Gleeson
799
I have an parent InspectionData model with a composite primary key to two other tables(Component and Inspection) and a child WrittenFindings model:
public class InspectionData
{
public int InspectionId { get; set; }
public virtual Inspection Inspection { get; set; }
public int? ComponentId { get; set; }
public virtual Component Component { get; set; }
public virtual WrittenFinding WrittenFinding { get; set; }
}
public class WrittenFinding
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int? InspectionId { get; set; }
public int? ComponentId { get; set; }
public virtual InspectionData InspectionData { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Text { get; set; }
}
WrittenFinding is configured through FluentApi here:
modelBuilder.Entity<WrittenFinding>()
.HasOne(wf => wf.InspectionData)
.WithOne(id => id.WrittenFinding)
.HasForeignKey<WrittenFinding>(wf => new { wf.InspectionId, wf.ComponentId })
.OnDelete(DeleteBehavior.Cascade);
I am trying to add them to the database with this:
_context.InspectionData.Add(inspectionData);
await _context.SaveChangesAsync();
But I run into a foreign key constraint when I do:
SqlException: The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_WrittenFinding_InspectionData_InspectionId_ComponentId". The conflict occurred in database "InstantBSIContext-26452145-dc4a-4073-ae99-96b88874434d", table "dbo.InspectionData".
This is what the data I'm adding looks like:
InspectionId: 3
ComponentId: 1
WrittenFinding[InspectionId]: 3
WrittenFinding[ComponentId]: 1
WrittenFinding[Text]: <p><br></p>
I know there is a component with an id of 1 and an inspection with an id of 3 in the database and I know I'm sending and receiving the data correctly due to debugging.
If I remove WrittenFinding from the data I send, then InspectionData will be inserted just fine.
Why am I running into this error with valid values for my composite foreign key?
sql-server entity-framework sql-server entity-framework asked Nov 16 '18 at 10:49
Ian GleesonIan Gleeson
799
asked Nov 16 '18 at 10:49
Ian GleesonIan Gleeson
799
asked Nov 16 '18 at 10:49
Ian GleesonIan Gleeson
799
asked Nov 16 '18 at 10:49
Ian GleesonIan Gleeson
799
asked Nov 16 '18 at 10:49
Ian GleesonIan Gleeson
799
799
There's nothing obviously wrong with the bits you've posted. Can you pull it together into a minimal, complete repro?
– David Browne - Microsoft
Nov 16 '18 at 12:55
add a comment |
There's nothing obviously wrong with the bits you've posted. Can you pull it together into a minimal, complete repro?
– David Browne - Microsoft
Nov 16 '18 at 12:55
There's nothing obviously wrong with the bits you've posted. Can you pull it together into a minimal, complete repro?
– David Browne - Microsoft
Nov 16 '18 at 12:55
There's nothing obviously wrong with the bits you've posted. Can you pull it together into a minimal, complete repro?
– David Browne - Microsoft
Nov 16 '18 at 12:55
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53336343%2fentity-framework-core-2-1-adding-related-data-with-a-composite-foreign-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53336343%2fentity-framework-core-2-1-adding-related-data-with-a-composite-foreign-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
There's nothing obviously wrong with the bits you've posted. Can you pull it together into a minimal, complete repro?
– David Browne - Microsoft
Nov 16 '18 at 12:55