Angular 2 add debounce function directly to pipe





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







3















I've written a pipe that filters out an array of objects based on a given query. It works great but what I'd like to do is add a debounce function to this pipe directly, instead of adding it to the input's keyup event, if possible.



I've been looking around for a solution but can't seem to find anything that's specific to what I'm looking for.



import {Pipe, PipeTransform} from '@angular/core';

@Pipe({
name: 'filterBy'
})

export class FilterByPipe implements PipeTransform {

transform(value: any, args: string): any {

if (!args[0]) {
return value;
}
else if (value) {

return value.filter(item => {

// TODO: Allow args[1] to be null, therefore searching in all object properties
if ((typeof item[args[1]] === 'string' || item[args[1]] instanceof String) && (item[args[1]].toLowerCase().indexOf(args[0].toLowerCase()) !== -1)) {
return true;
}
});
}
}
}


Any ideas on how I would implement this in this pipe?










share|improve this question























  • Where you want to apply the debounce

    – Bazinga
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:17











  • @PatrickJane Not sure where it needs to go.

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:27











  • Why do u need the debounce?

    – Bazinga
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:39











  • @PatrickJane So it doesn't filter a list of potentially hundreds of items on every keystroke..

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:44


















3















I've written a pipe that filters out an array of objects based on a given query. It works great but what I'd like to do is add a debounce function to this pipe directly, instead of adding it to the input's keyup event, if possible.



I've been looking around for a solution but can't seem to find anything that's specific to what I'm looking for.



import {Pipe, PipeTransform} from '@angular/core';

@Pipe({
name: 'filterBy'
})

export class FilterByPipe implements PipeTransform {

transform(value: any, args: string): any {

if (!args[0]) {
return value;
}
else if (value) {

return value.filter(item => {

// TODO: Allow args[1] to be null, therefore searching in all object properties
if ((typeof item[args[1]] === 'string' || item[args[1]] instanceof String) && (item[args[1]].toLowerCase().indexOf(args[0].toLowerCase()) !== -1)) {
return true;
}
});
}
}
}


Any ideas on how I would implement this in this pipe?










share|improve this question























  • Where you want to apply the debounce

    – Bazinga
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:17











  • @PatrickJane Not sure where it needs to go.

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:27











  • Why do u need the debounce?

    – Bazinga
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:39











  • @PatrickJane So it doesn't filter a list of potentially hundreds of items on every keystroke..

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:44














3












3








3








I've written a pipe that filters out an array of objects based on a given query. It works great but what I'd like to do is add a debounce function to this pipe directly, instead of adding it to the input's keyup event, if possible.



I've been looking around for a solution but can't seem to find anything that's specific to what I'm looking for.



import {Pipe, PipeTransform} from '@angular/core';

@Pipe({
name: 'filterBy'
})

export class FilterByPipe implements PipeTransform {

transform(value: any, args: string): any {

if (!args[0]) {
return value;
}
else if (value) {

return value.filter(item => {

// TODO: Allow args[1] to be null, therefore searching in all object properties
if ((typeof item[args[1]] === 'string' || item[args[1]] instanceof String) && (item[args[1]].toLowerCase().indexOf(args[0].toLowerCase()) !== -1)) {
return true;
}
});
}
}
}


Any ideas on how I would implement this in this pipe?










share|improve this question














I've written a pipe that filters out an array of objects based on a given query. It works great but what I'd like to do is add a debounce function to this pipe directly, instead of adding it to the input's keyup event, if possible.



I've been looking around for a solution but can't seem to find anything that's specific to what I'm looking for.



import {Pipe, PipeTransform} from '@angular/core';

@Pipe({
name: 'filterBy'
})

export class FilterByPipe implements PipeTransform {

transform(value: any, args: string): any {

if (!args[0]) {
return value;
}
else if (value) {

return value.filter(item => {

// TODO: Allow args[1] to be null, therefore searching in all object properties
if ((typeof item[args[1]] === 'string' || item[args[1]] instanceof String) && (item[args[1]].toLowerCase().indexOf(args[0].toLowerCase()) !== -1)) {
return true;
}
});
}
}
}


Any ideas on how I would implement this in this pipe?







angular typescript debouncing angular2-pipe






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Oct 31 '16 at 7:45









ChrillewoodzChrillewoodz

11.7k1349103




11.7k1349103













  • Where you want to apply the debounce

    – Bazinga
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:17











  • @PatrickJane Not sure where it needs to go.

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:27











  • Why do u need the debounce?

    – Bazinga
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:39











  • @PatrickJane So it doesn't filter a list of potentially hundreds of items on every keystroke..

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:44



















  • Where you want to apply the debounce

    – Bazinga
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:17











  • @PatrickJane Not sure where it needs to go.

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:27











  • Why do u need the debounce?

    – Bazinga
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:39











  • @PatrickJane So it doesn't filter a list of potentially hundreds of items on every keystroke..

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 8:44

















Where you want to apply the debounce

– Bazinga
Oct 31 '16 at 8:17





Where you want to apply the debounce

– Bazinga
Oct 31 '16 at 8:17













@PatrickJane Not sure where it needs to go.

– Chrillewoodz
Oct 31 '16 at 8:27





@PatrickJane Not sure where it needs to go.

– Chrillewoodz
Oct 31 '16 at 8:27













Why do u need the debounce?

– Bazinga
Oct 31 '16 at 8:39





Why do u need the debounce?

– Bazinga
Oct 31 '16 at 8:39













@PatrickJane So it doesn't filter a list of potentially hundreds of items on every keystroke..

– Chrillewoodz
Oct 31 '16 at 8:44





@PatrickJane So it doesn't filter a list of potentially hundreds of items on every keystroke..

– Chrillewoodz
Oct 31 '16 at 8:44












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














The debounce or delay functions are async, in this case you need to return a promise or an observable from your pipe and use the async pipe. I created a simple example to show you how to do that with observable.



@Pipe({
name: 'myfilter'
})

export class MyFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {
transform(items, filterBy) {
const filteredItems = items.filter(item => item.title.indexOf(filterBy.title) !== -1);
return Observable.of(filteredItems).delay(1000);
}
}


@Component({
selector: 'my-app',
template: `
<div>
<ul>
<li *ngFor="let item of items | myfilter:filterBy | async">
{{item.title}}
</li>
</ul>

<input type="text" (input)="filter($event)">

</div>
`,
})
export class App {
filterBy;
constructor() {
this.filterBy = {title: 'hello world'};
this.items = [{title: 'hello world'}, {title: 'hello kitty'}, {title: 'foo bar'}];
}

filter($event) {
this.filterBy = {title: $event.target.value}
}
}


Plunker






share|improve this answer
























  • Nice, I'll try it out and see how it works.

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 10:04






  • 1





    Doesn't this just add a delay between the input and the output rather than debouncing (wait x amount after the last input before processing)?

    – 0xcaff
    Nov 24 '16 at 2:42













  • How can we estimate the delay value ? lets say I have 10 000 items (less or more in my case)

    – HDJEMAI
    Dec 28 '17 at 4:03











  • I've just tested this solution but it does not speed up the filter in my case, I don't know how to approach this problem.

    – HDJEMAI
    Dec 28 '17 at 4:06





















0














Lets imagine a scenario where a text field performs a 'search-as-you-type' job. In order to log meaningful search text, component should wait until typing comes to an end.



The correct way to set a delay time to pipe execution should be as follows (See the comments in the code):



import { Pipe, PipeTransform } from '@angular/core';

@Pipe({
name: 'searchFilter'
})
export class SearchFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {

//-----
// 1
// ----
//hold a timeout handle on class scope
private timeoutHandle: number = -1;

constructor(private dbLogger: DbLogService) {

}

transform(items: any, value?: any): any {

if (!items) return ;

//-----
// 2
// ----

//clear time out handle on every pipe call
//so that only handles created earlier than
// 1000ms would execute
window.clearTimeout(this.timeoutHandle);


//-----
// 3
// ----

//create time out handle on every pipe call
this.timeoutHandle = window.setTimeout(() => {

//-----
// 4
// ----

//if there is no further typing,
//then this timeout handle made the way to here:
console.log("search triggered with value: " + value);
}, 1000);

return items.filter(it => it["name"].toLowerCase().indexOf(value.trim().toLowerCase()) !== -1);
}

}





share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f40338233%2fangular-2-add-debounce-function-directly-to-pipe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    The debounce or delay functions are async, in this case you need to return a promise or an observable from your pipe and use the async pipe. I created a simple example to show you how to do that with observable.



    @Pipe({
    name: 'myfilter'
    })

    export class MyFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {
    transform(items, filterBy) {
    const filteredItems = items.filter(item => item.title.indexOf(filterBy.title) !== -1);
    return Observable.of(filteredItems).delay(1000);
    }
    }


    @Component({
    selector: 'my-app',
    template: `
    <div>
    <ul>
    <li *ngFor="let item of items | myfilter:filterBy | async">
    {{item.title}}
    </li>
    </ul>

    <input type="text" (input)="filter($event)">

    </div>
    `,
    })
    export class App {
    filterBy;
    constructor() {
    this.filterBy = {title: 'hello world'};
    this.items = [{title: 'hello world'}, {title: 'hello kitty'}, {title: 'foo bar'}];
    }

    filter($event) {
    this.filterBy = {title: $event.target.value}
    }
    }


    Plunker






    share|improve this answer
























    • Nice, I'll try it out and see how it works.

      – Chrillewoodz
      Oct 31 '16 at 10:04






    • 1





      Doesn't this just add a delay between the input and the output rather than debouncing (wait x amount after the last input before processing)?

      – 0xcaff
      Nov 24 '16 at 2:42













    • How can we estimate the delay value ? lets say I have 10 000 items (less or more in my case)

      – HDJEMAI
      Dec 28 '17 at 4:03











    • I've just tested this solution but it does not speed up the filter in my case, I don't know how to approach this problem.

      – HDJEMAI
      Dec 28 '17 at 4:06


















    2














    The debounce or delay functions are async, in this case you need to return a promise or an observable from your pipe and use the async pipe. I created a simple example to show you how to do that with observable.



    @Pipe({
    name: 'myfilter'
    })

    export class MyFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {
    transform(items, filterBy) {
    const filteredItems = items.filter(item => item.title.indexOf(filterBy.title) !== -1);
    return Observable.of(filteredItems).delay(1000);
    }
    }


    @Component({
    selector: 'my-app',
    template: `
    <div>
    <ul>
    <li *ngFor="let item of items | myfilter:filterBy | async">
    {{item.title}}
    </li>
    </ul>

    <input type="text" (input)="filter($event)">

    </div>
    `,
    })
    export class App {
    filterBy;
    constructor() {
    this.filterBy = {title: 'hello world'};
    this.items = [{title: 'hello world'}, {title: 'hello kitty'}, {title: 'foo bar'}];
    }

    filter($event) {
    this.filterBy = {title: $event.target.value}
    }
    }


    Plunker






    share|improve this answer
























    • Nice, I'll try it out and see how it works.

      – Chrillewoodz
      Oct 31 '16 at 10:04






    • 1





      Doesn't this just add a delay between the input and the output rather than debouncing (wait x amount after the last input before processing)?

      – 0xcaff
      Nov 24 '16 at 2:42













    • How can we estimate the delay value ? lets say I have 10 000 items (less or more in my case)

      – HDJEMAI
      Dec 28 '17 at 4:03











    • I've just tested this solution but it does not speed up the filter in my case, I don't know how to approach this problem.

      – HDJEMAI
      Dec 28 '17 at 4:06
















    2












    2








    2







    The debounce or delay functions are async, in this case you need to return a promise or an observable from your pipe and use the async pipe. I created a simple example to show you how to do that with observable.



    @Pipe({
    name: 'myfilter'
    })

    export class MyFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {
    transform(items, filterBy) {
    const filteredItems = items.filter(item => item.title.indexOf(filterBy.title) !== -1);
    return Observable.of(filteredItems).delay(1000);
    }
    }


    @Component({
    selector: 'my-app',
    template: `
    <div>
    <ul>
    <li *ngFor="let item of items | myfilter:filterBy | async">
    {{item.title}}
    </li>
    </ul>

    <input type="text" (input)="filter($event)">

    </div>
    `,
    })
    export class App {
    filterBy;
    constructor() {
    this.filterBy = {title: 'hello world'};
    this.items = [{title: 'hello world'}, {title: 'hello kitty'}, {title: 'foo bar'}];
    }

    filter($event) {
    this.filterBy = {title: $event.target.value}
    }
    }


    Plunker






    share|improve this answer













    The debounce or delay functions are async, in this case you need to return a promise or an observable from your pipe and use the async pipe. I created a simple example to show you how to do that with observable.



    @Pipe({
    name: 'myfilter'
    })

    export class MyFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {
    transform(items, filterBy) {
    const filteredItems = items.filter(item => item.title.indexOf(filterBy.title) !== -1);
    return Observable.of(filteredItems).delay(1000);
    }
    }


    @Component({
    selector: 'my-app',
    template: `
    <div>
    <ul>
    <li *ngFor="let item of items | myfilter:filterBy | async">
    {{item.title}}
    </li>
    </ul>

    <input type="text" (input)="filter($event)">

    </div>
    `,
    })
    export class App {
    filterBy;
    constructor() {
    this.filterBy = {title: 'hello world'};
    this.items = [{title: 'hello world'}, {title: 'hello kitty'}, {title: 'foo bar'}];
    }

    filter($event) {
    this.filterBy = {title: $event.target.value}
    }
    }


    Plunker







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Oct 31 '16 at 9:29









    BazingaBazinga

    6,40332649




    6,40332649













    • Nice, I'll try it out and see how it works.

      – Chrillewoodz
      Oct 31 '16 at 10:04






    • 1





      Doesn't this just add a delay between the input and the output rather than debouncing (wait x amount after the last input before processing)?

      – 0xcaff
      Nov 24 '16 at 2:42













    • How can we estimate the delay value ? lets say I have 10 000 items (less or more in my case)

      – HDJEMAI
      Dec 28 '17 at 4:03











    • I've just tested this solution but it does not speed up the filter in my case, I don't know how to approach this problem.

      – HDJEMAI
      Dec 28 '17 at 4:06





















    • Nice, I'll try it out and see how it works.

      – Chrillewoodz
      Oct 31 '16 at 10:04






    • 1





      Doesn't this just add a delay between the input and the output rather than debouncing (wait x amount after the last input before processing)?

      – 0xcaff
      Nov 24 '16 at 2:42













    • How can we estimate the delay value ? lets say I have 10 000 items (less or more in my case)

      – HDJEMAI
      Dec 28 '17 at 4:03











    • I've just tested this solution but it does not speed up the filter in my case, I don't know how to approach this problem.

      – HDJEMAI
      Dec 28 '17 at 4:06



















    Nice, I'll try it out and see how it works.

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 10:04





    Nice, I'll try it out and see how it works.

    – Chrillewoodz
    Oct 31 '16 at 10:04




    1




    1





    Doesn't this just add a delay between the input and the output rather than debouncing (wait x amount after the last input before processing)?

    – 0xcaff
    Nov 24 '16 at 2:42







    Doesn't this just add a delay between the input and the output rather than debouncing (wait x amount after the last input before processing)?

    – 0xcaff
    Nov 24 '16 at 2:42















    How can we estimate the delay value ? lets say I have 10 000 items (less or more in my case)

    – HDJEMAI
    Dec 28 '17 at 4:03





    How can we estimate the delay value ? lets say I have 10 000 items (less or more in my case)

    – HDJEMAI
    Dec 28 '17 at 4:03













    I've just tested this solution but it does not speed up the filter in my case, I don't know how to approach this problem.

    – HDJEMAI
    Dec 28 '17 at 4:06







    I've just tested this solution but it does not speed up the filter in my case, I don't know how to approach this problem.

    – HDJEMAI
    Dec 28 '17 at 4:06















    0














    Lets imagine a scenario where a text field performs a 'search-as-you-type' job. In order to log meaningful search text, component should wait until typing comes to an end.



    The correct way to set a delay time to pipe execution should be as follows (See the comments in the code):



    import { Pipe, PipeTransform } from '@angular/core';

    @Pipe({
    name: 'searchFilter'
    })
    export class SearchFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {

    //-----
    // 1
    // ----
    //hold a timeout handle on class scope
    private timeoutHandle: number = -1;

    constructor(private dbLogger: DbLogService) {

    }

    transform(items: any, value?: any): any {

    if (!items) return ;

    //-----
    // 2
    // ----

    //clear time out handle on every pipe call
    //so that only handles created earlier than
    // 1000ms would execute
    window.clearTimeout(this.timeoutHandle);


    //-----
    // 3
    // ----

    //create time out handle on every pipe call
    this.timeoutHandle = window.setTimeout(() => {

    //-----
    // 4
    // ----

    //if there is no further typing,
    //then this timeout handle made the way to here:
    console.log("search triggered with value: " + value);
    }, 1000);

    return items.filter(it => it["name"].toLowerCase().indexOf(value.trim().toLowerCase()) !== -1);
    }

    }





    share|improve this answer






























      0














      Lets imagine a scenario where a text field performs a 'search-as-you-type' job. In order to log meaningful search text, component should wait until typing comes to an end.



      The correct way to set a delay time to pipe execution should be as follows (See the comments in the code):



      import { Pipe, PipeTransform } from '@angular/core';

      @Pipe({
      name: 'searchFilter'
      })
      export class SearchFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {

      //-----
      // 1
      // ----
      //hold a timeout handle on class scope
      private timeoutHandle: number = -1;

      constructor(private dbLogger: DbLogService) {

      }

      transform(items: any, value?: any): any {

      if (!items) return ;

      //-----
      // 2
      // ----

      //clear time out handle on every pipe call
      //so that only handles created earlier than
      // 1000ms would execute
      window.clearTimeout(this.timeoutHandle);


      //-----
      // 3
      // ----

      //create time out handle on every pipe call
      this.timeoutHandle = window.setTimeout(() => {

      //-----
      // 4
      // ----

      //if there is no further typing,
      //then this timeout handle made the way to here:
      console.log("search triggered with value: " + value);
      }, 1000);

      return items.filter(it => it["name"].toLowerCase().indexOf(value.trim().toLowerCase()) !== -1);
      }

      }





      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        Lets imagine a scenario where a text field performs a 'search-as-you-type' job. In order to log meaningful search text, component should wait until typing comes to an end.



        The correct way to set a delay time to pipe execution should be as follows (See the comments in the code):



        import { Pipe, PipeTransform } from '@angular/core';

        @Pipe({
        name: 'searchFilter'
        })
        export class SearchFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {

        //-----
        // 1
        // ----
        //hold a timeout handle on class scope
        private timeoutHandle: number = -1;

        constructor(private dbLogger: DbLogService) {

        }

        transform(items: any, value?: any): any {

        if (!items) return ;

        //-----
        // 2
        // ----

        //clear time out handle on every pipe call
        //so that only handles created earlier than
        // 1000ms would execute
        window.clearTimeout(this.timeoutHandle);


        //-----
        // 3
        // ----

        //create time out handle on every pipe call
        this.timeoutHandle = window.setTimeout(() => {

        //-----
        // 4
        // ----

        //if there is no further typing,
        //then this timeout handle made the way to here:
        console.log("search triggered with value: " + value);
        }, 1000);

        return items.filter(it => it["name"].toLowerCase().indexOf(value.trim().toLowerCase()) !== -1);
        }

        }





        share|improve this answer















        Lets imagine a scenario where a text field performs a 'search-as-you-type' job. In order to log meaningful search text, component should wait until typing comes to an end.



        The correct way to set a delay time to pipe execution should be as follows (See the comments in the code):



        import { Pipe, PipeTransform } from '@angular/core';

        @Pipe({
        name: 'searchFilter'
        })
        export class SearchFilterPipe implements PipeTransform {

        //-----
        // 1
        // ----
        //hold a timeout handle on class scope
        private timeoutHandle: number = -1;

        constructor(private dbLogger: DbLogService) {

        }

        transform(items: any, value?: any): any {

        if (!items) return ;

        //-----
        // 2
        // ----

        //clear time out handle on every pipe call
        //so that only handles created earlier than
        // 1000ms would execute
        window.clearTimeout(this.timeoutHandle);


        //-----
        // 3
        // ----

        //create time out handle on every pipe call
        this.timeoutHandle = window.setTimeout(() => {

        //-----
        // 4
        // ----

        //if there is no further typing,
        //then this timeout handle made the way to here:
        console.log("search triggered with value: " + value);
        }, 1000);

        return items.filter(it => it["name"].toLowerCase().indexOf(value.trim().toLowerCase()) !== -1);
        }

        }






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 16 '18 at 20:50

























        answered May 17 '18 at 20:50









        Omer GurarslanOmer Gurarslan

        37616




        37616






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f40338233%2fangular-2-add-debounce-function-directly-to-pipe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

            Glorious Revolution

            Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python