Python pulp constraint - Doubling the weight of any one variable which contributes the most












0















I am trying to use http://www.philipkalinda.com/ds9.html to set up a constrained optimisation.



prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

decision_variables =

res = self.team_df
# Set up the LP

for rownum, row in res.iterrows():
variable = str('x' + str(rownum))
variable = pulp.LpVariable(str(variable), lowBound = 0, upBound = 1, cat= 'Integer') #make variables binary
decision_variables.append(variable)

print ("Total number of decision_variables: " + str(len(decision_variables)))


total_points = ""


for rownum, row in res.iterrows():
for i, player in enumerate(decision_variables):
if rownum == i:
formula = row['TotalPoint']* player
total_points += formula

prob += total_points
print ("Optimization function: " + str(total_points))


The above, however, creates an optimisation where if points earned by x1 = X1, x2=X2.... and xn=Xn, it maximises
x1*X1 + x2*X2 +..... + xn*XN. Here xi is the points earned by the XI variable. However, in my case, I need to double the points for the variable that earns the most points. How do I set this up?



Maximize
OBJ: 38.1 x0 + 52.5 x1 + 31.3 x10 + 7.8 x11 + 42.7 x12 + 42.3 x13 + 4.7 x14
+ 49.5 x15 + 21.2 x16 + 11.8 x17 + 1.4 x18 + 3.2 x2 + 20.8 x3 + 1.2 x4
+ 24 x5 + 25.9 x6 + 27.8 x7 + 6.2 x8 + 41 x9



When I maximise the sum x1 gets dropped but when I maximise with the top guy taking double points, it should be there



Here are the constraints I am using:-



Subject To
_C1: 10.5 x0 + 21.5 x1 + 17 x10 + 7.5 x11 + 11.5 x12 + 12 x13 + 7 x14 + 19 x15
+ 10.5 x16 + 5.5 x17 + 6.5 x18 + 6.5 x2 + 9.5 x3 + 9 x4 + 12 x5 + 12 x6
+ 9.5 x7 + 7 x8 + 14 x9 <= 100
_C10: x12 + x2 + x6 >= 1
_C11: x10 + x11 + x17 + x3 <= 4
_C12: x10 + x11 + x17 + x3 >= 1
_C13: x0 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x18 + x2 <= 5
_C14: x0 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x18 + x2 >= 3
_C15: x1 + x16 + x17 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 <= 5
_C16: x1 + x16 + x17 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 >= 3
_C2: x0 + x1 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x16 + x17 + x18 + x2 + x3
+ x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 = 8
_C3: x0 + x14 + x16 + x5 <= 4
_C4: x0 + x14 + x16 + x5 >= 1
_C5: x15 + x18 + x4 + x7 + x8 <= 4
_C6: x15 + x18 + x4 + x7 + x8 >= 1
_C7: x1 + x13 + x9 <= 4
_C8: x1 + x13 + x9 >= 1
_C9: x12 + x2 + x6 <= 4


Naturally, maximising A + B + C + D doesn't maximise max(2A+B+C+D, A+2B+C+D, A+B+2C+D, A+B+C+2D)










share|improve this question

























  • where are the constraints you are using? Maybe you can force x1 to be the one that earns most points

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:26













  • Have put in the constraints

    – Arc
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:40











  • I don´t see where <= 100 comes from your code

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:42











  • That part is further down in the code. All those constraints have been created later in the code.

    – Arc
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:44













  • Is x1 is not the one that earns most points as it gets multiplied by 21.5? or the points is the result of 21.5 * x1 ?

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:50


















0















I am trying to use http://www.philipkalinda.com/ds9.html to set up a constrained optimisation.



prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

decision_variables =

res = self.team_df
# Set up the LP

for rownum, row in res.iterrows():
variable = str('x' + str(rownum))
variable = pulp.LpVariable(str(variable), lowBound = 0, upBound = 1, cat= 'Integer') #make variables binary
decision_variables.append(variable)

print ("Total number of decision_variables: " + str(len(decision_variables)))


total_points = ""


for rownum, row in res.iterrows():
for i, player in enumerate(decision_variables):
if rownum == i:
formula = row['TotalPoint']* player
total_points += formula

prob += total_points
print ("Optimization function: " + str(total_points))


The above, however, creates an optimisation where if points earned by x1 = X1, x2=X2.... and xn=Xn, it maximises
x1*X1 + x2*X2 +..... + xn*XN. Here xi is the points earned by the XI variable. However, in my case, I need to double the points for the variable that earns the most points. How do I set this up?



Maximize
OBJ: 38.1 x0 + 52.5 x1 + 31.3 x10 + 7.8 x11 + 42.7 x12 + 42.3 x13 + 4.7 x14
+ 49.5 x15 + 21.2 x16 + 11.8 x17 + 1.4 x18 + 3.2 x2 + 20.8 x3 + 1.2 x4
+ 24 x5 + 25.9 x6 + 27.8 x7 + 6.2 x8 + 41 x9



When I maximise the sum x1 gets dropped but when I maximise with the top guy taking double points, it should be there



Here are the constraints I am using:-



Subject To
_C1: 10.5 x0 + 21.5 x1 + 17 x10 + 7.5 x11 + 11.5 x12 + 12 x13 + 7 x14 + 19 x15
+ 10.5 x16 + 5.5 x17 + 6.5 x18 + 6.5 x2 + 9.5 x3 + 9 x4 + 12 x5 + 12 x6
+ 9.5 x7 + 7 x8 + 14 x9 <= 100
_C10: x12 + x2 + x6 >= 1
_C11: x10 + x11 + x17 + x3 <= 4
_C12: x10 + x11 + x17 + x3 >= 1
_C13: x0 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x18 + x2 <= 5
_C14: x0 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x18 + x2 >= 3
_C15: x1 + x16 + x17 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 <= 5
_C16: x1 + x16 + x17 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 >= 3
_C2: x0 + x1 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x16 + x17 + x18 + x2 + x3
+ x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 = 8
_C3: x0 + x14 + x16 + x5 <= 4
_C4: x0 + x14 + x16 + x5 >= 1
_C5: x15 + x18 + x4 + x7 + x8 <= 4
_C6: x15 + x18 + x4 + x7 + x8 >= 1
_C7: x1 + x13 + x9 <= 4
_C8: x1 + x13 + x9 >= 1
_C9: x12 + x2 + x6 <= 4


Naturally, maximising A + B + C + D doesn't maximise max(2A+B+C+D, A+2B+C+D, A+B+2C+D, A+B+C+2D)










share|improve this question

























  • where are the constraints you are using? Maybe you can force x1 to be the one that earns most points

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:26













  • Have put in the constraints

    – Arc
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:40











  • I don´t see where <= 100 comes from your code

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:42











  • That part is further down in the code. All those constraints have been created later in the code.

    – Arc
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:44













  • Is x1 is not the one that earns most points as it gets multiplied by 21.5? or the points is the result of 21.5 * x1 ?

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:50
















0












0








0








I am trying to use http://www.philipkalinda.com/ds9.html to set up a constrained optimisation.



prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

decision_variables =

res = self.team_df
# Set up the LP

for rownum, row in res.iterrows():
variable = str('x' + str(rownum))
variable = pulp.LpVariable(str(variable), lowBound = 0, upBound = 1, cat= 'Integer') #make variables binary
decision_variables.append(variable)

print ("Total number of decision_variables: " + str(len(decision_variables)))


total_points = ""


for rownum, row in res.iterrows():
for i, player in enumerate(decision_variables):
if rownum == i:
formula = row['TotalPoint']* player
total_points += formula

prob += total_points
print ("Optimization function: " + str(total_points))


The above, however, creates an optimisation where if points earned by x1 = X1, x2=X2.... and xn=Xn, it maximises
x1*X1 + x2*X2 +..... + xn*XN. Here xi is the points earned by the XI variable. However, in my case, I need to double the points for the variable that earns the most points. How do I set this up?



Maximize
OBJ: 38.1 x0 + 52.5 x1 + 31.3 x10 + 7.8 x11 + 42.7 x12 + 42.3 x13 + 4.7 x14
+ 49.5 x15 + 21.2 x16 + 11.8 x17 + 1.4 x18 + 3.2 x2 + 20.8 x3 + 1.2 x4
+ 24 x5 + 25.9 x6 + 27.8 x7 + 6.2 x8 + 41 x9



When I maximise the sum x1 gets dropped but when I maximise with the top guy taking double points, it should be there



Here are the constraints I am using:-



Subject To
_C1: 10.5 x0 + 21.5 x1 + 17 x10 + 7.5 x11 + 11.5 x12 + 12 x13 + 7 x14 + 19 x15
+ 10.5 x16 + 5.5 x17 + 6.5 x18 + 6.5 x2 + 9.5 x3 + 9 x4 + 12 x5 + 12 x6
+ 9.5 x7 + 7 x8 + 14 x9 <= 100
_C10: x12 + x2 + x6 >= 1
_C11: x10 + x11 + x17 + x3 <= 4
_C12: x10 + x11 + x17 + x3 >= 1
_C13: x0 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x18 + x2 <= 5
_C14: x0 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x18 + x2 >= 3
_C15: x1 + x16 + x17 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 <= 5
_C16: x1 + x16 + x17 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 >= 3
_C2: x0 + x1 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x16 + x17 + x18 + x2 + x3
+ x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 = 8
_C3: x0 + x14 + x16 + x5 <= 4
_C4: x0 + x14 + x16 + x5 >= 1
_C5: x15 + x18 + x4 + x7 + x8 <= 4
_C6: x15 + x18 + x4 + x7 + x8 >= 1
_C7: x1 + x13 + x9 <= 4
_C8: x1 + x13 + x9 >= 1
_C9: x12 + x2 + x6 <= 4


Naturally, maximising A + B + C + D doesn't maximise max(2A+B+C+D, A+2B+C+D, A+B+2C+D, A+B+C+2D)










share|improve this question
















I am trying to use http://www.philipkalinda.com/ds9.html to set up a constrained optimisation.



prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

decision_variables =

res = self.team_df
# Set up the LP

for rownum, row in res.iterrows():
variable = str('x' + str(rownum))
variable = pulp.LpVariable(str(variable), lowBound = 0, upBound = 1, cat= 'Integer') #make variables binary
decision_variables.append(variable)

print ("Total number of decision_variables: " + str(len(decision_variables)))


total_points = ""


for rownum, row in res.iterrows():
for i, player in enumerate(decision_variables):
if rownum == i:
formula = row['TotalPoint']* player
total_points += formula

prob += total_points
print ("Optimization function: " + str(total_points))


The above, however, creates an optimisation where if points earned by x1 = X1, x2=X2.... and xn=Xn, it maximises
x1*X1 + x2*X2 +..... + xn*XN. Here xi is the points earned by the XI variable. However, in my case, I need to double the points for the variable that earns the most points. How do I set this up?



Maximize
OBJ: 38.1 x0 + 52.5 x1 + 31.3 x10 + 7.8 x11 + 42.7 x12 + 42.3 x13 + 4.7 x14
+ 49.5 x15 + 21.2 x16 + 11.8 x17 + 1.4 x18 + 3.2 x2 + 20.8 x3 + 1.2 x4
+ 24 x5 + 25.9 x6 + 27.8 x7 + 6.2 x8 + 41 x9



When I maximise the sum x1 gets dropped but when I maximise with the top guy taking double points, it should be there



Here are the constraints I am using:-



Subject To
_C1: 10.5 x0 + 21.5 x1 + 17 x10 + 7.5 x11 + 11.5 x12 + 12 x13 + 7 x14 + 19 x15
+ 10.5 x16 + 5.5 x17 + 6.5 x18 + 6.5 x2 + 9.5 x3 + 9 x4 + 12 x5 + 12 x6
+ 9.5 x7 + 7 x8 + 14 x9 <= 100
_C10: x12 + x2 + x6 >= 1
_C11: x10 + x11 + x17 + x3 <= 4
_C12: x10 + x11 + x17 + x3 >= 1
_C13: x0 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x18 + x2 <= 5
_C14: x0 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x18 + x2 >= 3
_C15: x1 + x16 + x17 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 <= 5
_C16: x1 + x16 + x17 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 >= 3
_C2: x0 + x1 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 + x14 + x15 + x16 + x17 + x18 + x2 + x3
+ x4 + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 = 8
_C3: x0 + x14 + x16 + x5 <= 4
_C4: x0 + x14 + x16 + x5 >= 1
_C5: x15 + x18 + x4 + x7 + x8 <= 4
_C6: x15 + x18 + x4 + x7 + x8 >= 1
_C7: x1 + x13 + x9 <= 4
_C8: x1 + x13 + x9 >= 1
_C9: x12 + x2 + x6 <= 4


Naturally, maximising A + B + C + D doesn't maximise max(2A+B+C+D, A+2B+C+D, A+B+2C+D, A+B+C+2D)







python optimization linear-programming constraint-programming pulp






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '18 at 15:57







Arc

















asked Nov 14 '18 at 13:45









ArcArc

77442247




77442247













  • where are the constraints you are using? Maybe you can force x1 to be the one that earns most points

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:26













  • Have put in the constraints

    – Arc
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:40











  • I don´t see where <= 100 comes from your code

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:42











  • That part is further down in the code. All those constraints have been created later in the code.

    – Arc
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:44













  • Is x1 is not the one that earns most points as it gets multiplied by 21.5? or the points is the result of 21.5 * x1 ?

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:50





















  • where are the constraints you are using? Maybe you can force x1 to be the one that earns most points

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:26













  • Have put in the constraints

    – Arc
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:40











  • I don´t see where <= 100 comes from your code

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:42











  • That part is further down in the code. All those constraints have been created later in the code.

    – Arc
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:44













  • Is x1 is not the one that earns most points as it gets multiplied by 21.5? or the points is the result of 21.5 * x1 ?

    – juvian
    Nov 14 '18 at 15:50



















where are the constraints you are using? Maybe you can force x1 to be the one that earns most points

– juvian
Nov 14 '18 at 14:26







where are the constraints you are using? Maybe you can force x1 to be the one that earns most points

– juvian
Nov 14 '18 at 14:26















Have put in the constraints

– Arc
Nov 14 '18 at 14:40





Have put in the constraints

– Arc
Nov 14 '18 at 14:40













I don´t see where <= 100 comes from your code

– juvian
Nov 14 '18 at 15:42





I don´t see where <= 100 comes from your code

– juvian
Nov 14 '18 at 15:42













That part is further down in the code. All those constraints have been created later in the code.

– Arc
Nov 14 '18 at 15:44







That part is further down in the code. All those constraints have been created later in the code.

– Arc
Nov 14 '18 at 15:44















Is x1 is not the one that earns most points as it gets multiplied by 21.5? or the points is the result of 21.5 * x1 ?

– juvian
Nov 14 '18 at 15:50







Is x1 is not the one that earns most points as it gets multiplied by 21.5? or the points is the result of 21.5 * x1 ?

– juvian
Nov 14 '18 at 15:50














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I'm going to answer the question I think you're asking and you can correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your question is:




  • I have a series of binary variables x0...xN, and if a variable is included is receives some points. If it is not included it receives no points.

  • There are some constraints which apply to the selection

  • If (and only if) a variable is selected and if (and only if) it is the chosen variable which receives the highest number of points, then that particular variable gets double points

  • The objective is to maximize the total points including the doubling of the highest scoring one.


Assuming that's your question here is a dummy example that does that. Basically we add an auxiliary binary variable for each variable which is true iff (if and only if) that variable scores the most number of points:



from pulp import *

n_vars = 4
idxs = range(n_vars)
points = [2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0]

prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

# Variables
x = LpVariable.dicts('x', idxs, cat='Binary')
x_highest_score = LpVariable.dicts('x_highest_score', idxs, cat='Binary')

# Objective
prob += lpSum([points[i]*(x[i] + x_highest_score[i]) for i in idxs])

# Constraints
# Exactly one item has highest score:
prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1

# If a score is to be highest, it has to be chosen
for i in idxs:
prob += x_highest_score[i] <= x[i]

# And some selection constraints:
prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 1.5*x[3] <= 3
prob += x[0] + x[2] + 3*x[3] <= 3
prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 2*x[3] <= 3
# etc...

# Solve problem
prob.solve()

# Get soln
x_soln = [x[i].varValue for i in idxs]
x_highest_soln = [x_highest_score[i].varValue for i in idxs]

# And print the outputs
print (("Status: "), LpStatus[prob.status])
print ("Total points: ", value(prob.objective))
print ("x = ", x_soln)
print ("x_highest_soln = ", x_highest_soln)


This should return the following:



Status:  Optimal
Total points: 13.0
x = [0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0]
x_highest_soln = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]


If you turn off the double-points option, by changing the constraint to the following:



prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1



I.E. none scores highest, you'll find a different set of choices is made.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53301689%2fpython-pulp-constraint-doubling-the-weight-of-any-one-variable-which-contribut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I'm going to answer the question I think you're asking and you can correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your question is:




    • I have a series of binary variables x0...xN, and if a variable is included is receives some points. If it is not included it receives no points.

    • There are some constraints which apply to the selection

    • If (and only if) a variable is selected and if (and only if) it is the chosen variable which receives the highest number of points, then that particular variable gets double points

    • The objective is to maximize the total points including the doubling of the highest scoring one.


    Assuming that's your question here is a dummy example that does that. Basically we add an auxiliary binary variable for each variable which is true iff (if and only if) that variable scores the most number of points:



    from pulp import *

    n_vars = 4
    idxs = range(n_vars)
    points = [2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0]

    prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

    # Variables
    x = LpVariable.dicts('x', idxs, cat='Binary')
    x_highest_score = LpVariable.dicts('x_highest_score', idxs, cat='Binary')

    # Objective
    prob += lpSum([points[i]*(x[i] + x_highest_score[i]) for i in idxs])

    # Constraints
    # Exactly one item has highest score:
    prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1

    # If a score is to be highest, it has to be chosen
    for i in idxs:
    prob += x_highest_score[i] <= x[i]

    # And some selection constraints:
    prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 1.5*x[3] <= 3
    prob += x[0] + x[2] + 3*x[3] <= 3
    prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 2*x[3] <= 3
    # etc...

    # Solve problem
    prob.solve()

    # Get soln
    x_soln = [x[i].varValue for i in idxs]
    x_highest_soln = [x_highest_score[i].varValue for i in idxs]

    # And print the outputs
    print (("Status: "), LpStatus[prob.status])
    print ("Total points: ", value(prob.objective))
    print ("x = ", x_soln)
    print ("x_highest_soln = ", x_highest_soln)


    This should return the following:



    Status:  Optimal
    Total points: 13.0
    x = [0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0]
    x_highest_soln = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]


    If you turn off the double-points option, by changing the constraint to the following:



    prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1



    I.E. none scores highest, you'll find a different set of choices is made.






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      I'm going to answer the question I think you're asking and you can correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your question is:




      • I have a series of binary variables x0...xN, and if a variable is included is receives some points. If it is not included it receives no points.

      • There are some constraints which apply to the selection

      • If (and only if) a variable is selected and if (and only if) it is the chosen variable which receives the highest number of points, then that particular variable gets double points

      • The objective is to maximize the total points including the doubling of the highest scoring one.


      Assuming that's your question here is a dummy example that does that. Basically we add an auxiliary binary variable for each variable which is true iff (if and only if) that variable scores the most number of points:



      from pulp import *

      n_vars = 4
      idxs = range(n_vars)
      points = [2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0]

      prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

      # Variables
      x = LpVariable.dicts('x', idxs, cat='Binary')
      x_highest_score = LpVariable.dicts('x_highest_score', idxs, cat='Binary')

      # Objective
      prob += lpSum([points[i]*(x[i] + x_highest_score[i]) for i in idxs])

      # Constraints
      # Exactly one item has highest score:
      prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1

      # If a score is to be highest, it has to be chosen
      for i in idxs:
      prob += x_highest_score[i] <= x[i]

      # And some selection constraints:
      prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 1.5*x[3] <= 3
      prob += x[0] + x[2] + 3*x[3] <= 3
      prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 2*x[3] <= 3
      # etc...

      # Solve problem
      prob.solve()

      # Get soln
      x_soln = [x[i].varValue for i in idxs]
      x_highest_soln = [x_highest_score[i].varValue for i in idxs]

      # And print the outputs
      print (("Status: "), LpStatus[prob.status])
      print ("Total points: ", value(prob.objective))
      print ("x = ", x_soln)
      print ("x_highest_soln = ", x_highest_soln)


      This should return the following:



      Status:  Optimal
      Total points: 13.0
      x = [0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0]
      x_highest_soln = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]


      If you turn off the double-points option, by changing the constraint to the following:



      prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1



      I.E. none scores highest, you'll find a different set of choices is made.






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        I'm going to answer the question I think you're asking and you can correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your question is:




        • I have a series of binary variables x0...xN, and if a variable is included is receives some points. If it is not included it receives no points.

        • There are some constraints which apply to the selection

        • If (and only if) a variable is selected and if (and only if) it is the chosen variable which receives the highest number of points, then that particular variable gets double points

        • The objective is to maximize the total points including the doubling of the highest scoring one.


        Assuming that's your question here is a dummy example that does that. Basically we add an auxiliary binary variable for each variable which is true iff (if and only if) that variable scores the most number of points:



        from pulp import *

        n_vars = 4
        idxs = range(n_vars)
        points = [2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0]

        prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

        # Variables
        x = LpVariable.dicts('x', idxs, cat='Binary')
        x_highest_score = LpVariable.dicts('x_highest_score', idxs, cat='Binary')

        # Objective
        prob += lpSum([points[i]*(x[i] + x_highest_score[i]) for i in idxs])

        # Constraints
        # Exactly one item has highest score:
        prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1

        # If a score is to be highest, it has to be chosen
        for i in idxs:
        prob += x_highest_score[i] <= x[i]

        # And some selection constraints:
        prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 1.5*x[3] <= 3
        prob += x[0] + x[2] + 3*x[3] <= 3
        prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 2*x[3] <= 3
        # etc...

        # Solve problem
        prob.solve()

        # Get soln
        x_soln = [x[i].varValue for i in idxs]
        x_highest_soln = [x_highest_score[i].varValue for i in idxs]

        # And print the outputs
        print (("Status: "), LpStatus[prob.status])
        print ("Total points: ", value(prob.objective))
        print ("x = ", x_soln)
        print ("x_highest_soln = ", x_highest_soln)


        This should return the following:



        Status:  Optimal
        Total points: 13.0
        x = [0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0]
        x_highest_soln = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]


        If you turn off the double-points option, by changing the constraint to the following:



        prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1



        I.E. none scores highest, you'll find a different set of choices is made.






        share|improve this answer













        I'm going to answer the question I think you're asking and you can correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your question is:




        • I have a series of binary variables x0...xN, and if a variable is included is receives some points. If it is not included it receives no points.

        • There are some constraints which apply to the selection

        • If (and only if) a variable is selected and if (and only if) it is the chosen variable which receives the highest number of points, then that particular variable gets double points

        • The objective is to maximize the total points including the doubling of the highest scoring one.


        Assuming that's your question here is a dummy example that does that. Basically we add an auxiliary binary variable for each variable which is true iff (if and only if) that variable scores the most number of points:



        from pulp import *

        n_vars = 4
        idxs = range(n_vars)
        points = [2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0]

        prob = pulp.LpProblem('FantasyTeam', pulp.LpMaximize)

        # Variables
        x = LpVariable.dicts('x', idxs, cat='Binary')
        x_highest_score = LpVariable.dicts('x_highest_score', idxs, cat='Binary')

        # Objective
        prob += lpSum([points[i]*(x[i] + x_highest_score[i]) for i in idxs])

        # Constraints
        # Exactly one item has highest score:
        prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1

        # If a score is to be highest, it has to be chosen
        for i in idxs:
        prob += x_highest_score[i] <= x[i]

        # And some selection constraints:
        prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 1.5*x[3] <= 3
        prob += x[0] + x[2] + 3*x[3] <= 3
        prob += x[0] + x[1] + x[2] + 2*x[3] <= 3
        # etc...

        # Solve problem
        prob.solve()

        # Get soln
        x_soln = [x[i].varValue for i in idxs]
        x_highest_soln = [x_highest_score[i].varValue for i in idxs]

        # And print the outputs
        print (("Status: "), LpStatus[prob.status])
        print ("Total points: ", value(prob.objective))
        print ("x = ", x_soln)
        print ("x_highest_soln = ", x_highest_soln)


        This should return the following:



        Status:  Optimal
        Total points: 13.0
        x = [0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0]
        x_highest_soln = [0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0]


        If you turn off the double-points option, by changing the constraint to the following:



        prob += lpSum([x_highest_score[i] for i in idxs]) == 1



        I.E. none scores highest, you'll find a different set of choices is made.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 19 '18 at 20:58









        kabdullakabdulla

        2,1071724




        2,1071724
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53301689%2fpython-pulp-constraint-doubling-the-weight-of-any-one-variable-which-contribut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Vorschmack

            Quarantine