Why isn't letbfrelax working for bibliography?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
As I understand, the line renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography} should remove any bold numbering in the bibliography. But if you compile it, you'll see that the bold numbering is still there.
What's going wrong?
bibliographies harvard-style
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
As I understand, the line renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography} should remove any bold numbering in the bibliography. But if you compile it, you'll see that the bold numbering is still there.
What's going wrong?
bibliographies harvard-style
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
As I understand, the line renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography} should remove any bold numbering in the bibliography. But if you compile it, you'll see that the bold numbering is still there.
What's going wrong?
bibliographies harvard-style
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
bibliography{mybib}
end{document}
As I understand, the line renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography} should remove any bold numbering in the bibliography. But if you compile it, you'll see that the bold numbering is still there.
What's going wrong?
bibliographies harvard-style
bibliographies harvard-style
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
513114
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Your patching of thebibliography is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf and em.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
begingroup
renewcommandbf{}
renewcommandem{}
bibliography{mybib}
endgroup
end{document}
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69k8153257
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommand{oldthebibliography}{}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography}
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old into OLD or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch and do
usepackage{xpatch} % in the package loading part
pretocmd{thebibliography}{letbfrelaxletemrelax}{}{}
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
705k8618763155
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459539%2fwhy-isnt-let-bf-relax-working-for-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Your patching of thebibliography is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf and em.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
begingroup
renewcommandbf{}
renewcommandem{}
bibliography{mybib}
endgroup
end{document}
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69k8153257
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Your patching of thebibliography is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf and em.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
begingroup
renewcommandbf{}
renewcommandem{}
bibliography{mybib}
endgroup
end{document}
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69k8153257
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Your patching of thebibliography is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf and em.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
begingroup
renewcommandbf{}
renewcommandem{}
bibliography{mybib}
endgroup
end{document}
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69k8153257
Your patching of thebibliography is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxoldthebibliography}
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliography{letemrelaxoldthebibliography}
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf and em.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclass{article}
usepackage{harvard}
bibliographystyle{agsm}
usepackage{filecontents}
begin{document}
begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{roth2007,
title={Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets},
author={Roth, Alvin E},
journal={Journal of Economic Perspectives},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={37--58},
year={2007}
}
end{filecontents*}
nocite{*}
%setcitestyle{numbers}
begingroup
renewcommandbf{}
renewcommandem{}
bibliography{mybib}
endgroup
end{document}
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69k8153257
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69k8153257
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69k8153257
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69k8153257
69k8153257
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommand{oldthebibliography}{}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography}
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old into OLD or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch and do
usepackage{xpatch} % in the package loading part
pretocmd{thebibliography}{letbfrelaxletemrelax}{}{}
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
705k8618763155
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommand{oldthebibliography}{}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography}
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old into OLD or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch and do
usepackage{xpatch} % in the package loading part
pretocmd{thebibliography}{letbfrelaxletemrelax}{}{}
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
705k8618763155
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommand{oldthebibliography}{}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography}
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old into OLD or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch and do
usepackage{xpatch} % in the package loading part
pretocmd{thebibliography}{letbfrelaxletemrelax}{}{}
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
705k8618763155
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommand{oldthebibliography}{}
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliography{letbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography}
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old into OLD or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch and do
usepackage{xpatch} % in the package loading part
pretocmd{thebibliography}{letbfrelaxletemrelax}{}{}
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
705k8618763155
edited Nov 12 at 8:54
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
705k8618763155
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
705k8618763155
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
705k8618763155
705k8618763155
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459539%2fwhy-isnt-let-bf-relax-working-for-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
