How to evaluate double asterisk (star) in path?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Any double asterisk in a path means all sub-directories.



Now if I have a path like this a/b/c/**/*.txt Which means I need all files under all sub-directories under c. How to get that in python?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Any double asterisk in a path means all sub-directories.



    Now if I have a path like this a/b/c/**/*.txt Which means I need all files under all sub-directories under c. How to get that in python?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Any double asterisk in a path means all sub-directories.



      Now if I have a path like this a/b/c/**/*.txt Which means I need all files under all sub-directories under c. How to get that in python?










      share|improve this question















      Any double asterisk in a path means all sub-directories.



      Now if I have a path like this a/b/c/**/*.txt Which means I need all files under all sub-directories under c. How to get that in python?







      python-3.x path wildcard






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 11 at 16:37









      Uwe Keim

      27.3k30128210




      27.3k30128210










      asked Nov 11 at 16:35









      Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'

      3,36631936




      3,36631936
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Using glob.



          From Docs:



          For example, consider a directory containing the following files: 1.gif, 2.txt, card.gif and a subdirectory sub which contains only the file 3.txt. glob() will produce the following results. Notice how any leading components of the path are preserved.



          >>> import glob
          >>> glob.glob('./[0-9].*')
          ['./1.gif', './2.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('*.gif')
          ['1.gif', 'card.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('?.gif')
          ['1.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('**/*.txt', recursive=True) #python 3.5+
          ['2.txt', 'sub/3.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('./**/', recursive=True)
          ['./', './sub/']


          EDIT:
          For python 3.4



          For older Python versions, use os.walk to recursively walk a directory and fnmatch.filter to match against a simple expression:



          import fnmatch
          import os

          matches =
          for root, dirnames, filenames in os.walk('src'):
          for filename in fnmatch.filter(filenames, '*.txt'):
          matches.append(os.path.join(root, filename))





          share|improve this answer























          • Two things not working. 1) recursive is not an argument. 2) If I do ./**/* it will go down only single sub-directory, whereas I need all sub-directories (multi-level) to traverse.
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:34










          • hmm. what python version are you on? the docs i linked state python 3.5+ @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:39










          • I'm using 3.4..
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:46










          • you should upgrade if you can. otherwise you might want to make a custom function that does the job for you, but that sounds annoying. @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:59










          • try the edit solution, and see if that works for you @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 19:11











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53250835%2fhow-to-evaluate-double-asterisk-star-in-path%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Using glob.



          From Docs:



          For example, consider a directory containing the following files: 1.gif, 2.txt, card.gif and a subdirectory sub which contains only the file 3.txt. glob() will produce the following results. Notice how any leading components of the path are preserved.



          >>> import glob
          >>> glob.glob('./[0-9].*')
          ['./1.gif', './2.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('*.gif')
          ['1.gif', 'card.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('?.gif')
          ['1.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('**/*.txt', recursive=True) #python 3.5+
          ['2.txt', 'sub/3.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('./**/', recursive=True)
          ['./', './sub/']


          EDIT:
          For python 3.4



          For older Python versions, use os.walk to recursively walk a directory and fnmatch.filter to match against a simple expression:



          import fnmatch
          import os

          matches =
          for root, dirnames, filenames in os.walk('src'):
          for filename in fnmatch.filter(filenames, '*.txt'):
          matches.append(os.path.join(root, filename))





          share|improve this answer























          • Two things not working. 1) recursive is not an argument. 2) If I do ./**/* it will go down only single sub-directory, whereas I need all sub-directories (multi-level) to traverse.
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:34










          • hmm. what python version are you on? the docs i linked state python 3.5+ @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:39










          • I'm using 3.4..
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:46










          • you should upgrade if you can. otherwise you might want to make a custom function that does the job for you, but that sounds annoying. @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:59










          • try the edit solution, and see if that works for you @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 19:11















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Using glob.



          From Docs:



          For example, consider a directory containing the following files: 1.gif, 2.txt, card.gif and a subdirectory sub which contains only the file 3.txt. glob() will produce the following results. Notice how any leading components of the path are preserved.



          >>> import glob
          >>> glob.glob('./[0-9].*')
          ['./1.gif', './2.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('*.gif')
          ['1.gif', 'card.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('?.gif')
          ['1.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('**/*.txt', recursive=True) #python 3.5+
          ['2.txt', 'sub/3.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('./**/', recursive=True)
          ['./', './sub/']


          EDIT:
          For python 3.4



          For older Python versions, use os.walk to recursively walk a directory and fnmatch.filter to match against a simple expression:



          import fnmatch
          import os

          matches =
          for root, dirnames, filenames in os.walk('src'):
          for filename in fnmatch.filter(filenames, '*.txt'):
          matches.append(os.path.join(root, filename))





          share|improve this answer























          • Two things not working. 1) recursive is not an argument. 2) If I do ./**/* it will go down only single sub-directory, whereas I need all sub-directories (multi-level) to traverse.
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:34










          • hmm. what python version are you on? the docs i linked state python 3.5+ @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:39










          • I'm using 3.4..
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:46










          • you should upgrade if you can. otherwise you might want to make a custom function that does the job for you, but that sounds annoying. @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:59










          • try the edit solution, and see if that works for you @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 19:11













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          Using glob.



          From Docs:



          For example, consider a directory containing the following files: 1.gif, 2.txt, card.gif and a subdirectory sub which contains only the file 3.txt. glob() will produce the following results. Notice how any leading components of the path are preserved.



          >>> import glob
          >>> glob.glob('./[0-9].*')
          ['./1.gif', './2.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('*.gif')
          ['1.gif', 'card.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('?.gif')
          ['1.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('**/*.txt', recursive=True) #python 3.5+
          ['2.txt', 'sub/3.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('./**/', recursive=True)
          ['./', './sub/']


          EDIT:
          For python 3.4



          For older Python versions, use os.walk to recursively walk a directory and fnmatch.filter to match against a simple expression:



          import fnmatch
          import os

          matches =
          for root, dirnames, filenames in os.walk('src'):
          for filename in fnmatch.filter(filenames, '*.txt'):
          matches.append(os.path.join(root, filename))





          share|improve this answer














          Using glob.



          From Docs:



          For example, consider a directory containing the following files: 1.gif, 2.txt, card.gif and a subdirectory sub which contains only the file 3.txt. glob() will produce the following results. Notice how any leading components of the path are preserved.



          >>> import glob
          >>> glob.glob('./[0-9].*')
          ['./1.gif', './2.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('*.gif')
          ['1.gif', 'card.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('?.gif')
          ['1.gif']
          >>> glob.glob('**/*.txt', recursive=True) #python 3.5+
          ['2.txt', 'sub/3.txt']
          >>> glob.glob('./**/', recursive=True)
          ['./', './sub/']


          EDIT:
          For python 3.4



          For older Python versions, use os.walk to recursively walk a directory and fnmatch.filter to match against a simple expression:



          import fnmatch
          import os

          matches =
          for root, dirnames, filenames in os.walk('src'):
          for filename in fnmatch.filter(filenames, '*.txt'):
          matches.append(os.path.join(root, filename))






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 11 at 19:10

























          answered Nov 11 at 16:54









          Paritosh Singh

          4908




          4908












          • Two things not working. 1) recursive is not an argument. 2) If I do ./**/* it will go down only single sub-directory, whereas I need all sub-directories (multi-level) to traverse.
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:34










          • hmm. what python version are you on? the docs i linked state python 3.5+ @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:39










          • I'm using 3.4..
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:46










          • you should upgrade if you can. otherwise you might want to make a custom function that does the job for you, but that sounds annoying. @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:59










          • try the edit solution, and see if that works for you @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 19:11


















          • Two things not working. 1) recursive is not an argument. 2) If I do ./**/* it will go down only single sub-directory, whereas I need all sub-directories (multi-level) to traverse.
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:34










          • hmm. what python version are you on? the docs i linked state python 3.5+ @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:39










          • I'm using 3.4..
            – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
            Nov 11 at 18:46










          • you should upgrade if you can. otherwise you might want to make a custom function that does the job for you, but that sounds annoying. @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 18:59










          • try the edit solution, and see if that works for you @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
            – Paritosh Singh
            Nov 11 at 19:11
















          Two things not working. 1) recursive is not an argument. 2) If I do ./**/* it will go down only single sub-directory, whereas I need all sub-directories (multi-level) to traverse.
          – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
          Nov 11 at 18:34




          Two things not working. 1) recursive is not an argument. 2) If I do ./**/* it will go down only single sub-directory, whereas I need all sub-directories (multi-level) to traverse.
          – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
          Nov 11 at 18:34












          hmm. what python version are you on? the docs i linked state python 3.5+ @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
          – Paritosh Singh
          Nov 11 at 18:39




          hmm. what python version are you on? the docs i linked state python 3.5+ @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
          – Paritosh Singh
          Nov 11 at 18:39












          I'm using 3.4..
          – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
          Nov 11 at 18:46




          I'm using 3.4..
          – Anirban Nag 'tintinmj'
          Nov 11 at 18:46












          you should upgrade if you can. otherwise you might want to make a custom function that does the job for you, but that sounds annoying. @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
          – Paritosh Singh
          Nov 11 at 18:59




          you should upgrade if you can. otherwise you might want to make a custom function that does the job for you, but that sounds annoying. @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
          – Paritosh Singh
          Nov 11 at 18:59












          try the edit solution, and see if that works for you @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
          – Paritosh Singh
          Nov 11 at 19:11




          try the edit solution, and see if that works for you @AnirbanNag'tintinmj'
          – Paritosh Singh
          Nov 11 at 19:11


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53250835%2fhow-to-evaluate-double-asterisk-star-in-path%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

          Glorious Revolution

          Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python