Creating dynamic queries with entity framework











up vote
35
down vote

favorite
21












I would like to know what is the best way of creating dynamic queries with entity framework and linq.



I want to create a service that has many parameters for sorting and filtering (over 50). I will be getting object from gui where these will be filled out... and query will be executed from a single service method.



I looked around And I saw that I could dynamically create a string that can be executed at the end of my method. I don't like this way very much. Is there a better way to do this? Preferably type safe with compile check?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    35
    down vote

    favorite
    21












    I would like to know what is the best way of creating dynamic queries with entity framework and linq.



    I want to create a service that has many parameters for sorting and filtering (over 50). I will be getting object from gui where these will be filled out... and query will be executed from a single service method.



    I looked around And I saw that I could dynamically create a string that can be executed at the end of my method. I don't like this way very much. Is there a better way to do this? Preferably type safe with compile check?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      35
      down vote

      favorite
      21









      up vote
      35
      down vote

      favorite
      21






      21





      I would like to know what is the best way of creating dynamic queries with entity framework and linq.



      I want to create a service that has many parameters for sorting and filtering (over 50). I will be getting object from gui where these will be filled out... and query will be executed from a single service method.



      I looked around And I saw that I could dynamically create a string that can be executed at the end of my method. I don't like this way very much. Is there a better way to do this? Preferably type safe with compile check?










      share|improve this question















      I would like to know what is the best way of creating dynamic queries with entity framework and linq.



      I want to create a service that has many parameters for sorting and filtering (over 50). I will be getting object from gui where these will be filled out... and query will be executed from a single service method.



      I looked around And I saw that I could dynamically create a string that can be executed at the end of my method. I don't like this way very much. Is there a better way to do this? Preferably type safe with compile check?







      c# linq entity-framework entity-framework-4






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 4 '11 at 16:24









      Gabe Moothart

      22.6k126794




      22.6k126794










      asked Apr 4 '11 at 16:10









      Eduard

      2,40711627




      2,40711627
























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          52
          down vote



          accepted










          You could compose an IQueryable<T> step by step. Assuming you have a FilterDefinition class which describes how the user wants to filter ...



          public class FilterDefinition
          {
          public bool FilterByName { get; set; }
          public string NameFrom { get; set; }
          public string NameTo { get; set; }

          public bool FilterByQuantity { get; set; }
          public double QuantityFrom { get; set; }
          public double QuantityTo { get; set; }
          }


          ... then you could build a query like so:



          public IQueryable<SomeEntity> GetQuery(FilterDefinition filter)
          {
          IQueryable<SomeEntity> query = context.Set<SomeEntity>();
          // assuming that you return all records when nothing is specified in the filter

          if (filter.FilterByName)
          query = query.Where(t =>
          t.Name >= filter.NameFrom && t.Name <= filter.NameTo);

          if (filter.FilterByQuantity)
          query = query.Where(t =>
          t.Quantity >= filter.QuantityFrom && t.Quantity <= filter.QuantityTo);

          return query;
          }





          share|improve this answer























          • Thank you, but how dows this work? Doesnt this pull all the data from database and then step by step narrow it down to desired set of data??
            – Eduard
            Apr 5 '11 at 6:36






          • 7




            @t-edd: No, it leverages deferred execution (blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/…). That means that IQueryable<T> which is composed in the example above is only a query expression which describes how the data are filtered. The real execution of the query isn't in the example at all. You execute the query then by applying a "greedy" operator to IQueryable<T>, for instance query.ToList(). At this point - and not earlier - the query expression is translated into SQL and sent to the server.
            – Slauma
            Apr 5 '11 at 10:03










          • It's not that good because it assumes that SomeEntity has Name and Quantity fields so this is only half dynamic.
            – Maciej Szpakowski
            Jan 23 '17 at 17:56










          • Is there any way to define and or or dynamically?
            – Yusril Maulidan Raji
            Apr 20 '17 at 8:14












          • it also doesn't allow for dynamic conditional operators, for example if you wanted to dynamically allow users to filter by "cost > 10" or "cost < 10"
            – ferr
            Sep 14 '17 at 18:01


















          up vote
          31
          down vote













          The only other way that I know of would be to build an IQueryable based on your filter vaues.



              public List<Contact> Get(FilterValues filter)
          {
          using (var context = new AdventureWorksEntities())
          {
          IQueryable<Contact> query = context.Contacts.Where(c => c.ModifiedDate > DateTime.Now);

          if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.FirstName))
          {
          query = query.Where(c => c.FirstName == filter.FirstName);
          }

          if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.LastName))
          {
          query = query.Where(c => c.LastName == filter.LastName);
          }

          return query.ToList();
          }
          }





          share|improve this answer





















          • Yes, but is this efective performance wise? When is the select executed? In the end when ToList() is called? Imagine I have very large set of data....
            – Eduard
            Apr 5 '11 at 6:38






          • 1




            No, it's not a performance hit, as it uses deferred execution to only query once.
            – BrandonZeider
            Apr 5 '11 at 12:54










          • +1 Thank you for good answer.
            – Eduard
            Apr 5 '11 at 14:05


















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          I have created a generic repository which should help you. It supports uniform API to query and sort on both known and dynamic fields:



                 //Filter on known fields
          var keyboard = Query<Product>.Create(p=>p.Category=="Keyboard");
          var keyboards = repository.Get(keyboard);

          //Or filter on dynamic fields
          var filter = Query<Product>.Create("Rating", OperationType.GreaterThan, 4)
          var filteredKeyboards = repository.Get(filter);

          //You can also combine two queries togather
          var filterdKeyboards2 = repository.Get(keyboard.And(filter))

          //Order it on known fields
          var orderedKeyboard = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc(p=>p.Name));
          var orderedKeyboards = repository.Get(orderedKeyboard);

          //Or order by on dynamic fields
          var userOrdering = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc("Name"));
          var orderedKeyboards2 = repository.Get(userOrdering);


          I do not know about the search object/DTO you're getting but you can easily create a generic search object/DTO and can map it to a Query object in few lines of code. I have used it in past around a WCF service and it has worked very well for me.






          share|improve this answer






























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            You could look into creating the service using WCF Data Services and dynamically create the URI to query your entity model.






            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              });
              });
              }, "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f5541234%2fcreating-dynamic-queries-with-entity-framework%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              52
              down vote



              accepted










              You could compose an IQueryable<T> step by step. Assuming you have a FilterDefinition class which describes how the user wants to filter ...



              public class FilterDefinition
              {
              public bool FilterByName { get; set; }
              public string NameFrom { get; set; }
              public string NameTo { get; set; }

              public bool FilterByQuantity { get; set; }
              public double QuantityFrom { get; set; }
              public double QuantityTo { get; set; }
              }


              ... then you could build a query like so:



              public IQueryable<SomeEntity> GetQuery(FilterDefinition filter)
              {
              IQueryable<SomeEntity> query = context.Set<SomeEntity>();
              // assuming that you return all records when nothing is specified in the filter

              if (filter.FilterByName)
              query = query.Where(t =>
              t.Name >= filter.NameFrom && t.Name <= filter.NameTo);

              if (filter.FilterByQuantity)
              query = query.Where(t =>
              t.Quantity >= filter.QuantityFrom && t.Quantity <= filter.QuantityTo);

              return query;
              }





              share|improve this answer























              • Thank you, but how dows this work? Doesnt this pull all the data from database and then step by step narrow it down to desired set of data??
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 6:36






              • 7




                @t-edd: No, it leverages deferred execution (blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/…). That means that IQueryable<T> which is composed in the example above is only a query expression which describes how the data are filtered. The real execution of the query isn't in the example at all. You execute the query then by applying a "greedy" operator to IQueryable<T>, for instance query.ToList(). At this point - and not earlier - the query expression is translated into SQL and sent to the server.
                – Slauma
                Apr 5 '11 at 10:03










              • It's not that good because it assumes that SomeEntity has Name and Quantity fields so this is only half dynamic.
                – Maciej Szpakowski
                Jan 23 '17 at 17:56










              • Is there any way to define and or or dynamically?
                – Yusril Maulidan Raji
                Apr 20 '17 at 8:14












              • it also doesn't allow for dynamic conditional operators, for example if you wanted to dynamically allow users to filter by "cost > 10" or "cost < 10"
                – ferr
                Sep 14 '17 at 18:01















              up vote
              52
              down vote



              accepted










              You could compose an IQueryable<T> step by step. Assuming you have a FilterDefinition class which describes how the user wants to filter ...



              public class FilterDefinition
              {
              public bool FilterByName { get; set; }
              public string NameFrom { get; set; }
              public string NameTo { get; set; }

              public bool FilterByQuantity { get; set; }
              public double QuantityFrom { get; set; }
              public double QuantityTo { get; set; }
              }


              ... then you could build a query like so:



              public IQueryable<SomeEntity> GetQuery(FilterDefinition filter)
              {
              IQueryable<SomeEntity> query = context.Set<SomeEntity>();
              // assuming that you return all records when nothing is specified in the filter

              if (filter.FilterByName)
              query = query.Where(t =>
              t.Name >= filter.NameFrom && t.Name <= filter.NameTo);

              if (filter.FilterByQuantity)
              query = query.Where(t =>
              t.Quantity >= filter.QuantityFrom && t.Quantity <= filter.QuantityTo);

              return query;
              }





              share|improve this answer























              • Thank you, but how dows this work? Doesnt this pull all the data from database and then step by step narrow it down to desired set of data??
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 6:36






              • 7




                @t-edd: No, it leverages deferred execution (blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/…). That means that IQueryable<T> which is composed in the example above is only a query expression which describes how the data are filtered. The real execution of the query isn't in the example at all. You execute the query then by applying a "greedy" operator to IQueryable<T>, for instance query.ToList(). At this point - and not earlier - the query expression is translated into SQL and sent to the server.
                – Slauma
                Apr 5 '11 at 10:03










              • It's not that good because it assumes that SomeEntity has Name and Quantity fields so this is only half dynamic.
                – Maciej Szpakowski
                Jan 23 '17 at 17:56










              • Is there any way to define and or or dynamically?
                – Yusril Maulidan Raji
                Apr 20 '17 at 8:14












              • it also doesn't allow for dynamic conditional operators, for example if you wanted to dynamically allow users to filter by "cost > 10" or "cost < 10"
                – ferr
                Sep 14 '17 at 18:01













              up vote
              52
              down vote



              accepted







              up vote
              52
              down vote



              accepted






              You could compose an IQueryable<T> step by step. Assuming you have a FilterDefinition class which describes how the user wants to filter ...



              public class FilterDefinition
              {
              public bool FilterByName { get; set; }
              public string NameFrom { get; set; }
              public string NameTo { get; set; }

              public bool FilterByQuantity { get; set; }
              public double QuantityFrom { get; set; }
              public double QuantityTo { get; set; }
              }


              ... then you could build a query like so:



              public IQueryable<SomeEntity> GetQuery(FilterDefinition filter)
              {
              IQueryable<SomeEntity> query = context.Set<SomeEntity>();
              // assuming that you return all records when nothing is specified in the filter

              if (filter.FilterByName)
              query = query.Where(t =>
              t.Name >= filter.NameFrom && t.Name <= filter.NameTo);

              if (filter.FilterByQuantity)
              query = query.Where(t =>
              t.Quantity >= filter.QuantityFrom && t.Quantity <= filter.QuantityTo);

              return query;
              }





              share|improve this answer














              You could compose an IQueryable<T> step by step. Assuming you have a FilterDefinition class which describes how the user wants to filter ...



              public class FilterDefinition
              {
              public bool FilterByName { get; set; }
              public string NameFrom { get; set; }
              public string NameTo { get; set; }

              public bool FilterByQuantity { get; set; }
              public double QuantityFrom { get; set; }
              public double QuantityTo { get; set; }
              }


              ... then you could build a query like so:



              public IQueryable<SomeEntity> GetQuery(FilterDefinition filter)
              {
              IQueryable<SomeEntity> query = context.Set<SomeEntity>();
              // assuming that you return all records when nothing is specified in the filter

              if (filter.FilterByName)
              query = query.Where(t =>
              t.Name >= filter.NameFrom && t.Name <= filter.NameTo);

              if (filter.FilterByQuantity)
              query = query.Where(t =>
              t.Quantity >= filter.QuantityFrom && t.Quantity <= filter.QuantityTo);

              return query;
              }






              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Apr 4 '11 at 16:41

























              answered Apr 4 '11 at 16:33









              Slauma

              146k51355383




              146k51355383












              • Thank you, but how dows this work? Doesnt this pull all the data from database and then step by step narrow it down to desired set of data??
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 6:36






              • 7




                @t-edd: No, it leverages deferred execution (blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/…). That means that IQueryable<T> which is composed in the example above is only a query expression which describes how the data are filtered. The real execution of the query isn't in the example at all. You execute the query then by applying a "greedy" operator to IQueryable<T>, for instance query.ToList(). At this point - and not earlier - the query expression is translated into SQL and sent to the server.
                – Slauma
                Apr 5 '11 at 10:03










              • It's not that good because it assumes that SomeEntity has Name and Quantity fields so this is only half dynamic.
                – Maciej Szpakowski
                Jan 23 '17 at 17:56










              • Is there any way to define and or or dynamically?
                – Yusril Maulidan Raji
                Apr 20 '17 at 8:14












              • it also doesn't allow for dynamic conditional operators, for example if you wanted to dynamically allow users to filter by "cost > 10" or "cost < 10"
                – ferr
                Sep 14 '17 at 18:01


















              • Thank you, but how dows this work? Doesnt this pull all the data from database and then step by step narrow it down to desired set of data??
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 6:36






              • 7




                @t-edd: No, it leverages deferred execution (blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/…). That means that IQueryable<T> which is composed in the example above is only a query expression which describes how the data are filtered. The real execution of the query isn't in the example at all. You execute the query then by applying a "greedy" operator to IQueryable<T>, for instance query.ToList(). At this point - and not earlier - the query expression is translated into SQL and sent to the server.
                – Slauma
                Apr 5 '11 at 10:03










              • It's not that good because it assumes that SomeEntity has Name and Quantity fields so this is only half dynamic.
                – Maciej Szpakowski
                Jan 23 '17 at 17:56










              • Is there any way to define and or or dynamically?
                – Yusril Maulidan Raji
                Apr 20 '17 at 8:14












              • it also doesn't allow for dynamic conditional operators, for example if you wanted to dynamically allow users to filter by "cost > 10" or "cost < 10"
                – ferr
                Sep 14 '17 at 18:01
















              Thank you, but how dows this work? Doesnt this pull all the data from database and then step by step narrow it down to desired set of data??
              – Eduard
              Apr 5 '11 at 6:36




              Thank you, but how dows this work? Doesnt this pull all the data from database and then step by step narrow it down to desired set of data??
              – Eduard
              Apr 5 '11 at 6:36




              7




              7




              @t-edd: No, it leverages deferred execution (blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/…). That means that IQueryable<T> which is composed in the example above is only a query expression which describes how the data are filtered. The real execution of the query isn't in the example at all. You execute the query then by applying a "greedy" operator to IQueryable<T>, for instance query.ToList(). At this point - and not earlier - the query expression is translated into SQL and sent to the server.
              – Slauma
              Apr 5 '11 at 10:03




              @t-edd: No, it leverages deferred execution (blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/…). That means that IQueryable<T> which is composed in the example above is only a query expression which describes how the data are filtered. The real execution of the query isn't in the example at all. You execute the query then by applying a "greedy" operator to IQueryable<T>, for instance query.ToList(). At this point - and not earlier - the query expression is translated into SQL and sent to the server.
              – Slauma
              Apr 5 '11 at 10:03












              It's not that good because it assumes that SomeEntity has Name and Quantity fields so this is only half dynamic.
              – Maciej Szpakowski
              Jan 23 '17 at 17:56




              It's not that good because it assumes that SomeEntity has Name and Quantity fields so this is only half dynamic.
              – Maciej Szpakowski
              Jan 23 '17 at 17:56












              Is there any way to define and or or dynamically?
              – Yusril Maulidan Raji
              Apr 20 '17 at 8:14






              Is there any way to define and or or dynamically?
              – Yusril Maulidan Raji
              Apr 20 '17 at 8:14














              it also doesn't allow for dynamic conditional operators, for example if you wanted to dynamically allow users to filter by "cost > 10" or "cost < 10"
              – ferr
              Sep 14 '17 at 18:01




              it also doesn't allow for dynamic conditional operators, for example if you wanted to dynamically allow users to filter by "cost > 10" or "cost < 10"
              – ferr
              Sep 14 '17 at 18:01












              up vote
              31
              down vote













              The only other way that I know of would be to build an IQueryable based on your filter vaues.



                  public List<Contact> Get(FilterValues filter)
              {
              using (var context = new AdventureWorksEntities())
              {
              IQueryable<Contact> query = context.Contacts.Where(c => c.ModifiedDate > DateTime.Now);

              if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.FirstName))
              {
              query = query.Where(c => c.FirstName == filter.FirstName);
              }

              if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.LastName))
              {
              query = query.Where(c => c.LastName == filter.LastName);
              }

              return query.ToList();
              }
              }





              share|improve this answer





















              • Yes, but is this efective performance wise? When is the select executed? In the end when ToList() is called? Imagine I have very large set of data....
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 6:38






              • 1




                No, it's not a performance hit, as it uses deferred execution to only query once.
                – BrandonZeider
                Apr 5 '11 at 12:54










              • +1 Thank you for good answer.
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 14:05















              up vote
              31
              down vote













              The only other way that I know of would be to build an IQueryable based on your filter vaues.



                  public List<Contact> Get(FilterValues filter)
              {
              using (var context = new AdventureWorksEntities())
              {
              IQueryable<Contact> query = context.Contacts.Where(c => c.ModifiedDate > DateTime.Now);

              if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.FirstName))
              {
              query = query.Where(c => c.FirstName == filter.FirstName);
              }

              if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.LastName))
              {
              query = query.Where(c => c.LastName == filter.LastName);
              }

              return query.ToList();
              }
              }





              share|improve this answer





















              • Yes, but is this efective performance wise? When is the select executed? In the end when ToList() is called? Imagine I have very large set of data....
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 6:38






              • 1




                No, it's not a performance hit, as it uses deferred execution to only query once.
                – BrandonZeider
                Apr 5 '11 at 12:54










              • +1 Thank you for good answer.
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 14:05













              up vote
              31
              down vote










              up vote
              31
              down vote









              The only other way that I know of would be to build an IQueryable based on your filter vaues.



                  public List<Contact> Get(FilterValues filter)
              {
              using (var context = new AdventureWorksEntities())
              {
              IQueryable<Contact> query = context.Contacts.Where(c => c.ModifiedDate > DateTime.Now);

              if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.FirstName))
              {
              query = query.Where(c => c.FirstName == filter.FirstName);
              }

              if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.LastName))
              {
              query = query.Where(c => c.LastName == filter.LastName);
              }

              return query.ToList();
              }
              }





              share|improve this answer












              The only other way that I know of would be to build an IQueryable based on your filter vaues.



                  public List<Contact> Get(FilterValues filter)
              {
              using (var context = new AdventureWorksEntities())
              {
              IQueryable<Contact> query = context.Contacts.Where(c => c.ModifiedDate > DateTime.Now);

              if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.FirstName))
              {
              query = query.Where(c => c.FirstName == filter.FirstName);
              }

              if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filter.LastName))
              {
              query = query.Where(c => c.LastName == filter.LastName);
              }

              return query.ToList();
              }
              }






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 4 '11 at 16:33









              BrandonZeider

              6,90821619




              6,90821619












              • Yes, but is this efective performance wise? When is the select executed? In the end when ToList() is called? Imagine I have very large set of data....
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 6:38






              • 1




                No, it's not a performance hit, as it uses deferred execution to only query once.
                – BrandonZeider
                Apr 5 '11 at 12:54










              • +1 Thank you for good answer.
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 14:05


















              • Yes, but is this efective performance wise? When is the select executed? In the end when ToList() is called? Imagine I have very large set of data....
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 6:38






              • 1




                No, it's not a performance hit, as it uses deferred execution to only query once.
                – BrandonZeider
                Apr 5 '11 at 12:54










              • +1 Thank you for good answer.
                – Eduard
                Apr 5 '11 at 14:05
















              Yes, but is this efective performance wise? When is the select executed? In the end when ToList() is called? Imagine I have very large set of data....
              – Eduard
              Apr 5 '11 at 6:38




              Yes, but is this efective performance wise? When is the select executed? In the end when ToList() is called? Imagine I have very large set of data....
              – Eduard
              Apr 5 '11 at 6:38




              1




              1




              No, it's not a performance hit, as it uses deferred execution to only query once.
              – BrandonZeider
              Apr 5 '11 at 12:54




              No, it's not a performance hit, as it uses deferred execution to only query once.
              – BrandonZeider
              Apr 5 '11 at 12:54












              +1 Thank you for good answer.
              – Eduard
              Apr 5 '11 at 14:05




              +1 Thank you for good answer.
              – Eduard
              Apr 5 '11 at 14:05










              up vote
              6
              down vote













              I have created a generic repository which should help you. It supports uniform API to query and sort on both known and dynamic fields:



                     //Filter on known fields
              var keyboard = Query<Product>.Create(p=>p.Category=="Keyboard");
              var keyboards = repository.Get(keyboard);

              //Or filter on dynamic fields
              var filter = Query<Product>.Create("Rating", OperationType.GreaterThan, 4)
              var filteredKeyboards = repository.Get(filter);

              //You can also combine two queries togather
              var filterdKeyboards2 = repository.Get(keyboard.And(filter))

              //Order it on known fields
              var orderedKeyboard = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc(p=>p.Name));
              var orderedKeyboards = repository.Get(orderedKeyboard);

              //Or order by on dynamic fields
              var userOrdering = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc("Name"));
              var orderedKeyboards2 = repository.Get(userOrdering);


              I do not know about the search object/DTO you're getting but you can easily create a generic search object/DTO and can map it to a Query object in few lines of code. I have used it in past around a WCF service and it has worked very well for me.






              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                6
                down vote













                I have created a generic repository which should help you. It supports uniform API to query and sort on both known and dynamic fields:



                       //Filter on known fields
                var keyboard = Query<Product>.Create(p=>p.Category=="Keyboard");
                var keyboards = repository.Get(keyboard);

                //Or filter on dynamic fields
                var filter = Query<Product>.Create("Rating", OperationType.GreaterThan, 4)
                var filteredKeyboards = repository.Get(filter);

                //You can also combine two queries togather
                var filterdKeyboards2 = repository.Get(keyboard.And(filter))

                //Order it on known fields
                var orderedKeyboard = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc(p=>p.Name));
                var orderedKeyboards = repository.Get(orderedKeyboard);

                //Or order by on dynamic fields
                var userOrdering = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc("Name"));
                var orderedKeyboards2 = repository.Get(userOrdering);


                I do not know about the search object/DTO you're getting but you can easily create a generic search object/DTO and can map it to a Query object in few lines of code. I have used it in past around a WCF service and it has worked very well for me.






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  6
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  6
                  down vote









                  I have created a generic repository which should help you. It supports uniform API to query and sort on both known and dynamic fields:



                         //Filter on known fields
                  var keyboard = Query<Product>.Create(p=>p.Category=="Keyboard");
                  var keyboards = repository.Get(keyboard);

                  //Or filter on dynamic fields
                  var filter = Query<Product>.Create("Rating", OperationType.GreaterThan, 4)
                  var filteredKeyboards = repository.Get(filter);

                  //You can also combine two queries togather
                  var filterdKeyboards2 = repository.Get(keyboard.And(filter))

                  //Order it on known fields
                  var orderedKeyboard = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc(p=>p.Name));
                  var orderedKeyboards = repository.Get(orderedKeyboard);

                  //Or order by on dynamic fields
                  var userOrdering = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc("Name"));
                  var orderedKeyboards2 = repository.Get(userOrdering);


                  I do not know about the search object/DTO you're getting but you can easily create a generic search object/DTO and can map it to a Query object in few lines of code. I have used it in past around a WCF service and it has worked very well for me.






                  share|improve this answer














                  I have created a generic repository which should help you. It supports uniform API to query and sort on both known and dynamic fields:



                         //Filter on known fields
                  var keyboard = Query<Product>.Create(p=>p.Category=="Keyboard");
                  var keyboards = repository.Get(keyboard);

                  //Or filter on dynamic fields
                  var filter = Query<Product>.Create("Rating", OperationType.GreaterThan, 4)
                  var filteredKeyboards = repository.Get(filter);

                  //You can also combine two queries togather
                  var filterdKeyboards2 = repository.Get(keyboard.And(filter))

                  //Order it on known fields
                  var orderedKeyboard = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc(p=>p.Name));
                  var orderedKeyboards = repository.Get(orderedKeyboard);

                  //Or order by on dynamic fields
                  var userOrdering = keyboard.OrderBy(o=>o.Asc("Name"));
                  var orderedKeyboards2 = repository.Get(userOrdering);


                  I do not know about the search object/DTO you're getting but you can easily create a generic search object/DTO and can map it to a Query object in few lines of code. I have used it in past around a WCF service and it has worked very well for me.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jun 20 at 12:00

























                  answered Aug 26 '15 at 16:30









                  Gurmit Teotia

                  7914




                  7914






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      You could look into creating the service using WCF Data Services and dynamically create the URI to query your entity model.






                      share|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        You could look into creating the service using WCF Data Services and dynamically create the URI to query your entity model.






                        share|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          You could look into creating the service using WCF Data Services and dynamically create the URI to query your entity model.






                          share|improve this answer












                          You could look into creating the service using WCF Data Services and dynamically create the URI to query your entity model.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Apr 4 '11 at 16:20









                          Thomas Li

                          3,0631214




                          3,0631214






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f5541234%2fcreating-dynamic-queries-with-entity-framework%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Bressuire

                              Vorschmack

                              Quarantine