Prove a problem that is NP-hard and not NP-complete in not in P











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If A is not NP-hard, but not NP-complete, then prove that A in not in P.



A is NP-hard if there is an NP-complete problem B such that B is reducible to A in polynomial time. A is NP-complete if A is in NP and all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time. But A is not NP-complete, so one one or both of those conditions must be false. If A is not in NP, then A is not in P. The other case is that there exists at least one NP problem that is not reducible to A in polynomial time. This is where I am stuck. How do I get from knowing that there is an NP-complete problem that is reducible and an NP problem that is not reducible to A is not in P?










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    If A is not NP-hard, but not NP-complete, then prove that A in not in P.



    A is NP-hard if there is an NP-complete problem B such that B is reducible to A in polynomial time. A is NP-complete if A is in NP and all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time. But A is not NP-complete, so one one or both of those conditions must be false. If A is not in NP, then A is not in P. The other case is that there exists at least one NP problem that is not reducible to A in polynomial time. This is where I am stuck. How do I get from knowing that there is an NP-complete problem that is reducible and an NP problem that is not reducible to A is not in P?










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      If A is not NP-hard, but not NP-complete, then prove that A in not in P.



      A is NP-hard if there is an NP-complete problem B such that B is reducible to A in polynomial time. A is NP-complete if A is in NP and all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time. But A is not NP-complete, so one one or both of those conditions must be false. If A is not in NP, then A is not in P. The other case is that there exists at least one NP problem that is not reducible to A in polynomial time. This is where I am stuck. How do I get from knowing that there is an NP-complete problem that is reducible and an NP problem that is not reducible to A is not in P?










      share|improve this question













      If A is not NP-hard, but not NP-complete, then prove that A in not in P.



      A is NP-hard if there is an NP-complete problem B such that B is reducible to A in polynomial time. A is NP-complete if A is in NP and all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time. But A is not NP-complete, so one one or both of those conditions must be false. If A is not in NP, then A is not in P. The other case is that there exists at least one NP problem that is not reducible to A in polynomial time. This is where I am stuck. How do I get from knowing that there is an NP-complete problem that is reducible and an NP problem that is not reducible to A is not in P?







      np np-complete np-hard






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 11 at 16:41









      AdamK

      72118




      72118
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          If a problem A is NP-hard, then all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time.



          Proof:
          Since the problem A is not NP-Complete, then there exists problem B as defined above. All problems C in NP can be reduced to B in polynomial time, then B can be reduced to A in polynomial time. Composition of polynomial time algorithms is polynomial, so C can be reduced to A in polynomial time.



          --



          Since A is NP-Hard but not NP-Complete, A must not be in NP, therefore A is not in P either.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53250896%2fprove-a-problem-that-is-np-hard-and-not-np-complete-in-not-in-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            If a problem A is NP-hard, then all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time.



            Proof:
            Since the problem A is not NP-Complete, then there exists problem B as defined above. All problems C in NP can be reduced to B in polynomial time, then B can be reduced to A in polynomial time. Composition of polynomial time algorithms is polynomial, so C can be reduced to A in polynomial time.



            --



            Since A is NP-Hard but not NP-Complete, A must not be in NP, therefore A is not in P either.






            share|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              If a problem A is NP-hard, then all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time.



              Proof:
              Since the problem A is not NP-Complete, then there exists problem B as defined above. All problems C in NP can be reduced to B in polynomial time, then B can be reduced to A in polynomial time. Composition of polynomial time algorithms is polynomial, so C can be reduced to A in polynomial time.



              --



              Since A is NP-Hard but not NP-Complete, A must not be in NP, therefore A is not in P either.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                If a problem A is NP-hard, then all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time.



                Proof:
                Since the problem A is not NP-Complete, then there exists problem B as defined above. All problems C in NP can be reduced to B in polynomial time, then B can be reduced to A in polynomial time. Composition of polynomial time algorithms is polynomial, so C can be reduced to A in polynomial time.



                --



                Since A is NP-Hard but not NP-Complete, A must not be in NP, therefore A is not in P either.






                share|improve this answer














                If a problem A is NP-hard, then all NP problems are reducible to A in polynomial time.



                Proof:
                Since the problem A is not NP-Complete, then there exists problem B as defined above. All problems C in NP can be reduced to B in polynomial time, then B can be reduced to A in polynomial time. Composition of polynomial time algorithms is polynomial, so C can be reduced to A in polynomial time.



                --



                Since A is NP-Hard but not NP-Complete, A must not be in NP, therefore A is not in P either.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Nov 12 at 14:24









                AdamK

                72118




                72118










                answered Nov 11 at 16:51









                ralphmerridew

                261




                261






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53250896%2fprove-a-problem-that-is-np-hard-and-not-np-complete-in-not-in-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Bressuire

                    Vorschmack

                    Quarantine