Why I am getting java.lang.AbstractMethodError errors?
What are the possible causes for ABstractMethodError?
Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-1" java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.isOneway()Z
at org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.process(ProcessFunction.java:51)
at org.apache.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:39)
at com.gemfire.gemstone.thrift.hbase.ThreadPoolServer$ClientConnnection.run(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
java thrift
edited Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
dda
5,47822032
asked Jul 31 '13 at 11:41
AvinashAvinash
5,5272381157
add a comment |
What are the possible causes for ABstractMethodError?
Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-1" java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.isOneway()Z
at org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.process(ProcessFunction.java:51)
at org.apache.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:39)
at com.gemfire.gemstone.thrift.hbase.ThreadPoolServer$ClientConnnection.run(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
java thrift
edited Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
dda
5,47822032
asked Jul 31 '13 at 11:41
AvinashAvinash
5,5272381157
Give us some context , what are you trying to do ? May be some version issue ! The method that you invoke or some other code invokes is converted into an abstract method now .
– NINCOMPOOP
Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
I was trying out hbase thrift version. I build thrift compiler and generated thrift files. and using mvn building my project which is also downloading 0.9.0 version of apache thrift jars. this is the same I am using.
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
add a comment |
What are the possible causes for ABstractMethodError?
Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-1" java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.isOneway()Z
at org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.process(ProcessFunction.java:51)
at org.apache.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:39)
at com.gemfire.gemstone.thrift.hbase.ThreadPoolServer$ClientConnnection.run(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
java thrift
edited Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
dda
5,47822032
asked Jul 31 '13 at 11:41
AvinashAvinash
5,5272381157
What are the possible causes for ABstractMethodError?
Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-1" java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.isOneway()Z
at org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.process(ProcessFunction.java:51)
at org.apache.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:39)
at com.gemfire.gemstone.thrift.hbase.ThreadPoolServer$ClientConnnection.run(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
java thrift
java thrift
edited Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
dda
5,47822032
asked Jul 31 '13 at 11:41
AvinashAvinash
5,5272381157
edited Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
dda
5,47822032
asked Jul 31 '13 at 11:41
AvinashAvinash
5,5272381157
edited Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
dda
5,47822032
edited Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
dda
5,47822032
edited Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
dda
5,47822032
5,47822032
asked Jul 31 '13 at 11:41
AvinashAvinash
5,5272381157
asked Jul 31 '13 at 11:41
AvinashAvinash
5,5272381157
asked Jul 31 '13 at 11:41
AvinashAvinash
5,5272381157
5,5272381157
Give us some context , what are you trying to do ? May be some version issue ! The method that you invoke or some other code invokes is converted into an abstract method now .
– NINCOMPOOP
Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
I was trying out hbase thrift version. I build thrift compiler and generated thrift files. and using mvn building my project which is also downloading 0.9.0 version of apache thrift jars. this is the same I am using.
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
add a comment |
Give us some context , what are you trying to do ? May be some version issue ! The method that you invoke or some other code invokes is converted into an abstract method now .
– NINCOMPOOP
Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
I was trying out hbase thrift version. I build thrift compiler and generated thrift files. and using mvn building my project which is also downloading 0.9.0 version of apache thrift jars. this is the same I am using.
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
Give us some context , what are you trying to do ? May be some version issue ! The method that you invoke or some other code invokes is converted into an abstract method now .
– NINCOMPOOP
Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
Give us some context , what are you trying to do ? May be some version issue ! The method that you invoke or some other code invokes is converted into an abstract method now .
– NINCOMPOOP
Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
I was trying out hbase thrift version. I build thrift compiler and generated thrift files. and using mvn building my project which is also downloading 0.9.0 version of apache thrift jars. this is the same I am using.
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
I was trying out hbase thrift version. I build thrift compiler and generated thrift files. and using mvn building my project which is also downloading 0.9.0 version of apache thrift jars. this is the same I am using.
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
The simple answer is this: some code is trying to call a method which is declared abstract. Abstract methods have no body and cannot be executed. Since you have provided so little information I can't really elaborate more on how this can happen since the compiler usually catches this problem - as described here, this means the class must have changed at runtime.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
devrobfdevrobf
4,90712037
Yes, method is defined as abstract, but I traced through the eclipse and I see methods are implemented in child classes
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
Sure, but that means you have to call a specific child class implementation. You still can't call the method itself.
– devrobf
Jul 31 '13 at 11:57
I checked again , Apache thrift generated code is calling child object specific implementation
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 12:51
Please double-check that. If you are still sure about it, open a JIRA ticket with a complete, reproducible test case.
– JensG
Jul 31 '13 at 22:43
add a comment |
It usually means that you are using an old version of an interface implementation which is missing a new interface method. For example java.sql.Connection interface got a new getSchema method in 1.7. If you have 1.6 JDBC driver and call Connection.getSchema you will get AbstractMethodError.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 12:15
Evgeniy DorofeevEvgeniy Dorofeev
105k23141222
3
Nice, you had me at "old version of an interface"
– mtyson
Sep 7 '16 at 20:53
Encountered this Exception recently. It's exactly the cause - interface incompatibly between components at runtime. One can refers to the javadoc of the exception for more details.
– tuan.dinh
May 11 '18 at 7:15
add a comment |
From documnentation of AbstractMethodError
Thrown when an application tries to call an abstract method. Normally,
this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only occur at run
time if the definition of some class has incompatibly changed since
the currently executing method was last compiled.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:46
Damian Leszczyński - VashDamian Leszczyński - Vash
25.1k74587
add a comment |
If you you are getting this error on the implemented methods, make sure you have added your dependencies correctly as mentioned in this thread.
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
answered Dec 14 '16 at 13:04
amanzooramanzoor
22026
add a comment |
As Damian quoted :
Normally, this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only
occur at run time if [...]
I had the same error that was not caught by the compiler but at runtime. To solve it I only compiled again without giving the code any modification.
answered Jun 28 '18 at 12:30
yutanpoyutanpo
236
add a comment |
A kind of special case of the above answer.
I had this error, because I was using a spring-boot-starter-parent (e.g. 2.1.0.RELEASE uses spring version: 5.1.2.RELEASE) but I also included a BOM, that also defined some spring dependencies, but in an older version (e.g. 5.0.9.RELEASE).
So one thing to do, is check your dependency tree (in Eclipse e.g. you can use the Dependency Hierarchy) if you are using the same versions.
So one solution could be that you upgrade the spring dependencies in your BOM, another one could be that you exclude them (but depending on the amount, this could be ugly).
answered Nov 13 '18 at 18:11
morecoremorecore
1851318
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f17969365%2fwhy-i-am-getting-java-lang-abstractmethoderror-errors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The simple answer is this: some code is trying to call a method which is declared abstract. Abstract methods have no body and cannot be executed. Since you have provided so little information I can't really elaborate more on how this can happen since the compiler usually catches this problem - as described here, this means the class must have changed at runtime.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
devrobfdevrobf
4,90712037
Yes, method is defined as abstract, but I traced through the eclipse and I see methods are implemented in child classes
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
Sure, but that means you have to call a specific child class implementation. You still can't call the method itself.
– devrobf
Jul 31 '13 at 11:57
I checked again , Apache thrift generated code is calling child object specific implementation
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 12:51
Please double-check that. If you are still sure about it, open a JIRA ticket with a complete, reproducible test case.
– JensG
Jul 31 '13 at 22:43
add a comment |
The simple answer is this: some code is trying to call a method which is declared abstract. Abstract methods have no body and cannot be executed. Since you have provided so little information I can't really elaborate more on how this can happen since the compiler usually catches this problem - as described here, this means the class must have changed at runtime.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
devrobfdevrobf
4,90712037
Yes, method is defined as abstract, but I traced through the eclipse and I see methods are implemented in child classes
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
Sure, but that means you have to call a specific child class implementation. You still can't call the method itself.
– devrobf
Jul 31 '13 at 11:57
I checked again , Apache thrift generated code is calling child object specific implementation
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 12:51
Please double-check that. If you are still sure about it, open a JIRA ticket with a complete, reproducible test case.
– JensG
Jul 31 '13 at 22:43
add a comment |
The simple answer is this: some code is trying to call a method which is declared abstract. Abstract methods have no body and cannot be executed. Since you have provided so little information I can't really elaborate more on how this can happen since the compiler usually catches this problem - as described here, this means the class must have changed at runtime.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
devrobfdevrobf
4,90712037
The simple answer is this: some code is trying to call a method which is declared abstract. Abstract methods have no body and cannot be executed. Since you have provided so little information I can't really elaborate more on how this can happen since the compiler usually catches this problem - as described here, this means the class must have changed at runtime.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
devrobfdevrobf
4,90712037
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
devrobfdevrobf
4,90712037
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
devrobfdevrobf
4,90712037
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
devrobfdevrobf
4,90712037
4,90712037
Yes, method is defined as abstract, but I traced through the eclipse and I see methods are implemented in child classes
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
Sure, but that means you have to call a specific child class implementation. You still can't call the method itself.
– devrobf
Jul 31 '13 at 11:57
I checked again , Apache thrift generated code is calling child object specific implementation
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 12:51
Please double-check that. If you are still sure about it, open a JIRA ticket with a complete, reproducible test case.
– JensG
Jul 31 '13 at 22:43
add a comment |
Yes, method is defined as abstract, but I traced through the eclipse and I see methods are implemented in child classes
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
Sure, but that means you have to call a specific child class implementation. You still can't call the method itself.
– devrobf
Jul 31 '13 at 11:57
I checked again , Apache thrift generated code is calling child object specific implementation
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 12:51
Please double-check that. If you are still sure about it, open a JIRA ticket with a complete, reproducible test case.
– JensG
Jul 31 '13 at 22:43
Yes, method is defined as abstract, but I traced through the eclipse and I see methods are implemented in child classes
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
Yes, method is defined as abstract, but I traced through the eclipse and I see methods are implemented in child classes
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56
Sure, but that means you have to call a specific child class implementation. You still can't call the method itself.
– devrobf
Jul 31 '13 at 11:57
Sure, but that means you have to call a specific child class implementation. You still can't call the method itself.
– devrobf
Jul 31 '13 at 11:57
I checked again , Apache thrift generated code is calling child object specific implementation
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 12:51
I checked again , Apache thrift generated code is calling child object specific implementation
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 12:51
Please double-check that. If you are still sure about it, open a JIRA ticket with a complete, reproducible test case.
– JensG
Jul 31 '13 at 22:43
Please double-check that. If you are still sure about it, open a JIRA ticket with a complete, reproducible test case.
– JensG
Jul 31 '13 at 22:43
add a comment |
It usually means that you are using an old version of an interface implementation which is missing a new interface method. For example java.sql.Connection interface got a new getSchema method in 1.7. If you have 1.6 JDBC driver and call Connection.getSchema you will get AbstractMethodError.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 12:15
Evgeniy DorofeevEvgeniy Dorofeev
105k23141222
3
Nice, you had me at "old version of an interface"
– mtyson
Sep 7 '16 at 20:53
Encountered this Exception recently. It's exactly the cause - interface incompatibly between components at runtime. One can refers to the javadoc of the exception for more details.
– tuan.dinh
May 11 '18 at 7:15
add a comment |
It usually means that you are using an old version of an interface implementation which is missing a new interface method. For example java.sql.Connection interface got a new getSchema method in 1.7. If you have 1.6 JDBC driver and call Connection.getSchema you will get AbstractMethodError.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 12:15
Evgeniy DorofeevEvgeniy Dorofeev
105k23141222
3
Nice, you had me at "old version of an interface"
– mtyson
Sep 7 '16 at 20:53
Encountered this Exception recently. It's exactly the cause - interface incompatibly between components at runtime. One can refers to the javadoc of the exception for more details.
– tuan.dinh
May 11 '18 at 7:15
add a comment |
It usually means that you are using an old version of an interface implementation which is missing a new interface method. For example java.sql.Connection interface got a new getSchema method in 1.7. If you have 1.6 JDBC driver and call Connection.getSchema you will get AbstractMethodError.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 12:15
Evgeniy DorofeevEvgeniy Dorofeev
105k23141222
It usually means that you are using an old version of an interface implementation which is missing a new interface method. For example java.sql.Connection interface got a new getSchema method in 1.7. If you have 1.6 JDBC driver and call Connection.getSchema you will get AbstractMethodError.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 12:15
Evgeniy DorofeevEvgeniy Dorofeev
105k23141222
answered Jul 31 '13 at 12:15
Evgeniy DorofeevEvgeniy Dorofeev
105k23141222
answered Jul 31 '13 at 12:15
Evgeniy DorofeevEvgeniy Dorofeev
105k23141222
answered Jul 31 '13 at 12:15
Evgeniy DorofeevEvgeniy Dorofeev
105k23141222
105k23141222
3
Nice, you had me at "old version of an interface"
– mtyson
Sep 7 '16 at 20:53
Encountered this Exception recently. It's exactly the cause - interface incompatibly between components at runtime. One can refers to the javadoc of the exception for more details.
– tuan.dinh
May 11 '18 at 7:15
add a comment |
3
Nice, you had me at "old version of an interface"
– mtyson
Sep 7 '16 at 20:53
Encountered this Exception recently. It's exactly the cause - interface incompatibly between components at runtime. One can refers to the javadoc of the exception for more details.
– tuan.dinh
May 11 '18 at 7:15
3
3
Nice, you had me at "old version of an interface"
– mtyson
Sep 7 '16 at 20:53
Nice, you had me at "old version of an interface"
– mtyson
Sep 7 '16 at 20:53
Encountered this Exception recently. It's exactly the cause - interface incompatibly between components at runtime. One can refers to the javadoc of the exception for more details.
– tuan.dinh
May 11 '18 at 7:15
Encountered this Exception recently. It's exactly the cause - interface incompatibly between components at runtime. One can refers to the javadoc of the exception for more details.
– tuan.dinh
May 11 '18 at 7:15
add a comment |
From documnentation of AbstractMethodError
Thrown when an application tries to call an abstract method. Normally,
this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only occur at run
time if the definition of some class has incompatibly changed since
the currently executing method was last compiled.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:46
Damian Leszczyński - VashDamian Leszczyński - Vash
25.1k74587
add a comment |
From documnentation of AbstractMethodError
Thrown when an application tries to call an abstract method. Normally,
this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only occur at run
time if the definition of some class has incompatibly changed since
the currently executing method was last compiled.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:46
Damian Leszczyński - VashDamian Leszczyński - Vash
25.1k74587
add a comment |
From documnentation of AbstractMethodError
Thrown when an application tries to call an abstract method. Normally,
this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only occur at run
time if the definition of some class has incompatibly changed since
the currently executing method was last compiled.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:46
Damian Leszczyński - VashDamian Leszczyński - Vash
25.1k74587
From documnentation of AbstractMethodError
Thrown when an application tries to call an abstract method. Normally,
this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only occur at run
time if the definition of some class has incompatibly changed since
the currently executing method was last compiled.
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:46
Damian Leszczyński - VashDamian Leszczyński - Vash
25.1k74587
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:46
Damian Leszczyński - VashDamian Leszczyński - Vash
25.1k74587
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:46
Damian Leszczyński - VashDamian Leszczyński - Vash
25.1k74587
answered Jul 31 '13 at 11:46
Damian Leszczyński - VashDamian Leszczyński - Vash
25.1k74587
25.1k74587
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you you are getting this error on the implemented methods, make sure you have added your dependencies correctly as mentioned in this thread.
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
answered Dec 14 '16 at 13:04
amanzooramanzoor
22026
add a comment |
If you you are getting this error on the implemented methods, make sure you have added your dependencies correctly as mentioned in this thread.
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
answered Dec 14 '16 at 13:04
amanzooramanzoor
22026
add a comment |
If you you are getting this error on the implemented methods, make sure you have added your dependencies correctly as mentioned in this thread.
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
answered Dec 14 '16 at 13:04
amanzooramanzoor
22026
If you you are getting this error on the implemented methods, make sure you have added your dependencies correctly as mentioned in this thread.
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
answered Dec 14 '16 at 13:04
amanzooramanzoor
22026
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
edited May 23 '17 at 11:47
Community♦
11
11
answered Dec 14 '16 at 13:04
amanzooramanzoor
22026
answered Dec 14 '16 at 13:04
amanzooramanzoor
22026
answered Dec 14 '16 at 13:04
amanzooramanzoor
22026
22026
add a comment |
add a comment |
As Damian quoted :
Normally, this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only
occur at run time if [...]
I had the same error that was not caught by the compiler but at runtime. To solve it I only compiled again without giving the code any modification.
answered Jun 28 '18 at 12:30
yutanpoyutanpo
236
add a comment |
As Damian quoted :
Normally, this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only
occur at run time if [...]
I had the same error that was not caught by the compiler but at runtime. To solve it I only compiled again without giving the code any modification.
answered Jun 28 '18 at 12:30
yutanpoyutanpo
236
add a comment |
As Damian quoted :
Normally, this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only
occur at run time if [...]
I had the same error that was not caught by the compiler but at runtime. To solve it I only compiled again without giving the code any modification.
answered Jun 28 '18 at 12:30
yutanpoyutanpo
236
As Damian quoted :
Normally, this error is caught by the compiler; this error can only
occur at run time if [...]
I had the same error that was not caught by the compiler but at runtime. To solve it I only compiled again without giving the code any modification.
answered Jun 28 '18 at 12:30
yutanpoyutanpo
236
answered Jun 28 '18 at 12:30
yutanpoyutanpo
236
answered Jun 28 '18 at 12:30
yutanpoyutanpo
236
answered Jun 28 '18 at 12:30
yutanpoyutanpo
236
236
add a comment |
add a comment |
A kind of special case of the above answer.
I had this error, because I was using a spring-boot-starter-parent (e.g. 2.1.0.RELEASE uses spring version: 5.1.2.RELEASE) but I also included a BOM, that also defined some spring dependencies, but in an older version (e.g. 5.0.9.RELEASE).
So one thing to do, is check your dependency tree (in Eclipse e.g. you can use the Dependency Hierarchy) if you are using the same versions.
So one solution could be that you upgrade the spring dependencies in your BOM, another one could be that you exclude them (but depending on the amount, this could be ugly).
answered Nov 13 '18 at 18:11
morecoremorecore
1851318
add a comment |
A kind of special case of the above answer.
I had this error, because I was using a spring-boot-starter-parent (e.g. 2.1.0.RELEASE uses spring version: 5.1.2.RELEASE) but I also included a BOM, that also defined some spring dependencies, but in an older version (e.g. 5.0.9.RELEASE).
So one thing to do, is check your dependency tree (in Eclipse e.g. you can use the Dependency Hierarchy) if you are using the same versions.
So one solution could be that you upgrade the spring dependencies in your BOM, another one could be that you exclude them (but depending on the amount, this could be ugly).
answered Nov 13 '18 at 18:11
morecoremorecore
1851318
add a comment |
A kind of special case of the above answer.
I had this error, because I was using a spring-boot-starter-parent (e.g. 2.1.0.RELEASE uses spring version: 5.1.2.RELEASE) but I also included a BOM, that also defined some spring dependencies, but in an older version (e.g. 5.0.9.RELEASE).
So one thing to do, is check your dependency tree (in Eclipse e.g. you can use the Dependency Hierarchy) if you are using the same versions.
So one solution could be that you upgrade the spring dependencies in your BOM, another one could be that you exclude them (but depending on the amount, this could be ugly).
answered Nov 13 '18 at 18:11
morecoremorecore
1851318
A kind of special case of the above answer.
I had this error, because I was using a spring-boot-starter-parent (e.g. 2.1.0.RELEASE uses spring version: 5.1.2.RELEASE) but I also included a BOM, that also defined some spring dependencies, but in an older version (e.g. 5.0.9.RELEASE).
So one thing to do, is check your dependency tree (in Eclipse e.g. you can use the Dependency Hierarchy) if you are using the same versions.
So one solution could be that you upgrade the spring dependencies in your BOM, another one could be that you exclude them (but depending on the amount, this could be ugly).
answered Nov 13 '18 at 18:11
morecoremorecore
1851318
answered Nov 13 '18 at 18:11
morecoremorecore
1851318
answered Nov 13 '18 at 18:11
morecoremorecore
1851318
answered Nov 13 '18 at 18:11
morecoremorecore
1851318
1851318
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f17969365%2fwhy-i-am-getting-java-lang-abstractmethoderror-errors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Give us some context , what are you trying to do ? May be some version issue ! The method that you invoke or some other code invokes is converted into an abstract method now .
– NINCOMPOOP
Jul 31 '13 at 11:44
I was trying out hbase thrift version. I build thrift compiler and generated thrift files. and using mvn building my project which is also downloading 0.9.0 version of apache thrift jars. this is the same I am using.
– Avinash
Jul 31 '13 at 11:56