Run SQL without transaction












1















Is there a way how to execute SQL or stored procedure without creating additional transaction in entity framework ? There is solution for entity framework Stored Procedure without transaction in Entity Framework but it is not available for .net core.










share|improve this question



























    1















    Is there a way how to execute SQL or stored procedure without creating additional transaction in entity framework ? There is solution for entity framework Stored Procedure without transaction in Entity Framework but it is not available for .net core.










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      Is there a way how to execute SQL or stored procedure without creating additional transaction in entity framework ? There is solution for entity framework Stored Procedure without transaction in Entity Framework but it is not available for .net core.










      share|improve this question














      Is there a way how to execute SQL or stored procedure without creating additional transaction in entity framework ? There is solution for entity framework Stored Procedure without transaction in Entity Framework but it is not available for .net core.







      asp.net-core entity-framework-core






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 13 '18 at 11:35









      MuflixMuflix

      1,50452969




      1,50452969
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          The default behavior of ExecuteSqlCommand in EF Core is different than the EF6:




          Note that this method does not start a transaction. To use this method with a transaction, first call BeginTransaction(DatabaseFacade, IsolationLevel) or UseTransaction(DatabaseFacade, DbTransaction).



          Note that the current ExecutionStrategy is not used by this method since the SQL may not be idempotent and does not run in a transaction. An ExecutionStrategy can be used explicitly, making sure to also use a transaction if the SQL is not idempotent.




          In other words, what are you asking is the default behavior in EF Core, so no action is needed.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Wow that is great, i always manage transaction myself in SQL Server. Thank you :-)

            – Muflix
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:39











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53280168%2frun-sql-without-transaction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          The default behavior of ExecuteSqlCommand in EF Core is different than the EF6:




          Note that this method does not start a transaction. To use this method with a transaction, first call BeginTransaction(DatabaseFacade, IsolationLevel) or UseTransaction(DatabaseFacade, DbTransaction).



          Note that the current ExecutionStrategy is not used by this method since the SQL may not be idempotent and does not run in a transaction. An ExecutionStrategy can be used explicitly, making sure to also use a transaction if the SQL is not idempotent.




          In other words, what are you asking is the default behavior in EF Core, so no action is needed.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Wow that is great, i always manage transaction myself in SQL Server. Thank you :-)

            – Muflix
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:39
















          1














          The default behavior of ExecuteSqlCommand in EF Core is different than the EF6:




          Note that this method does not start a transaction. To use this method with a transaction, first call BeginTransaction(DatabaseFacade, IsolationLevel) or UseTransaction(DatabaseFacade, DbTransaction).



          Note that the current ExecutionStrategy is not used by this method since the SQL may not be idempotent and does not run in a transaction. An ExecutionStrategy can be used explicitly, making sure to also use a transaction if the SQL is not idempotent.




          In other words, what are you asking is the default behavior in EF Core, so no action is needed.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Wow that is great, i always manage transaction myself in SQL Server. Thank you :-)

            – Muflix
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:39














          1












          1








          1







          The default behavior of ExecuteSqlCommand in EF Core is different than the EF6:




          Note that this method does not start a transaction. To use this method with a transaction, first call BeginTransaction(DatabaseFacade, IsolationLevel) or UseTransaction(DatabaseFacade, DbTransaction).



          Note that the current ExecutionStrategy is not used by this method since the SQL may not be idempotent and does not run in a transaction. An ExecutionStrategy can be used explicitly, making sure to also use a transaction if the SQL is not idempotent.




          In other words, what are you asking is the default behavior in EF Core, so no action is needed.






          share|improve this answer













          The default behavior of ExecuteSqlCommand in EF Core is different than the EF6:




          Note that this method does not start a transaction. To use this method with a transaction, first call BeginTransaction(DatabaseFacade, IsolationLevel) or UseTransaction(DatabaseFacade, DbTransaction).



          Note that the current ExecutionStrategy is not used by this method since the SQL may not be idempotent and does not run in a transaction. An ExecutionStrategy can be used explicitly, making sure to also use a transaction if the SQL is not idempotent.




          In other words, what are you asking is the default behavior in EF Core, so no action is needed.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 13 '18 at 12:37









          Ivan StoevIvan Stoev

          101k771125




          101k771125













          • Wow that is great, i always manage transaction myself in SQL Server. Thank you :-)

            – Muflix
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:39



















          • Wow that is great, i always manage transaction myself in SQL Server. Thank you :-)

            – Muflix
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:39

















          Wow that is great, i always manage transaction myself in SQL Server. Thank you :-)

          – Muflix
          Nov 14 '18 at 11:39





          Wow that is great, i always manage transaction myself in SQL Server. Thank you :-)

          – Muflix
          Nov 14 '18 at 11:39


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53280168%2frun-sql-without-transaction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Vorschmack

          Quarantine