Is synchronization really needed in multithreading in python?
I am a little bit confused with why synchronization is needed in multithreading in python. Given the Global internal lock, there can only be one thread accessing the python object at a time right? so why do we still need synchronization library such as queue.Queue
?
python multithreading synchronization
add a comment |
I am a little bit confused with why synchronization is needed in multithreading in python. Given the Global internal lock, there can only be one thread accessing the python object at a time right? so why do we still need synchronization library such as queue.Queue
?
python multithreading synchronization
add a comment |
I am a little bit confused with why synchronization is needed in multithreading in python. Given the Global internal lock, there can only be one thread accessing the python object at a time right? so why do we still need synchronization library such as queue.Queue
?
python multithreading synchronization
I am a little bit confused with why synchronization is needed in multithreading in python. Given the Global internal lock, there can only be one thread accessing the python object at a time right? so why do we still need synchronization library such as queue.Queue
?
python multithreading synchronization
python multithreading synchronization
asked Nov 13 '18 at 21:09
Kaiyue WangKaiyue Wang
628
628
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is because pulling an item from a list and marking it as pulled, processing it and marking it as done are no atomic operation.
1
More generally, to lock a data structure during multiple operations. The interpreter may even switch threads in the middle of a line of code, if that line consists of multiple operations.
– soundstripe
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53289518%2fis-synchronization-really-needed-in-multithreading-in-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is because pulling an item from a list and marking it as pulled, processing it and marking it as done are no atomic operation.
1
More generally, to lock a data structure during multiple operations. The interpreter may even switch threads in the middle of a line of code, if that line consists of multiple operations.
– soundstripe
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31
add a comment |
This is because pulling an item from a list and marking it as pulled, processing it and marking it as done are no atomic operation.
1
More generally, to lock a data structure during multiple operations. The interpreter may even switch threads in the middle of a line of code, if that line consists of multiple operations.
– soundstripe
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31
add a comment |
This is because pulling an item from a list and marking it as pulled, processing it and marking it as done are no atomic operation.
This is because pulling an item from a list and marking it as pulled, processing it and marking it as done are no atomic operation.
edited Nov 13 '18 at 21:47
answered Nov 13 '18 at 21:24
jhinghausjhinghaus
261517
261517
1
More generally, to lock a data structure during multiple operations. The interpreter may even switch threads in the middle of a line of code, if that line consists of multiple operations.
– soundstripe
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31
add a comment |
1
More generally, to lock a data structure during multiple operations. The interpreter may even switch threads in the middle of a line of code, if that line consists of multiple operations.
– soundstripe
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31
1
1
More generally, to lock a data structure during multiple operations. The interpreter may even switch threads in the middle of a line of code, if that line consists of multiple operations.
– soundstripe
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31
More generally, to lock a data structure during multiple operations. The interpreter may even switch threads in the middle of a line of code, if that line consists of multiple operations.
– soundstripe
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53289518%2fis-synchronization-really-needed-in-multithreading-in-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown