Bigquery partition not being used while deleting data












0














Our project is being charged a high cost. Looks like such commands are not using the partition. Is there a way in bigquery to force the query to become partition aware based on the results for a subquery ?



The following query currently is processing TBs of data.



    delete from tableName
where QuoteDate >= cast((SELECT batch_date as start from batch_table where Batch_Status='Running') as timestamp)


Processes 1TB of data.



Ideally this should only process hundred MB of data.



delete from TableName
where
QuoteDate >= '2018-11-01'


Processes ~100MB










share|improve this question



























    0














    Our project is being charged a high cost. Looks like such commands are not using the partition. Is there a way in bigquery to force the query to become partition aware based on the results for a subquery ?



    The following query currently is processing TBs of data.



        delete from tableName
    where QuoteDate >= cast((SELECT batch_date as start from batch_table where Batch_Status='Running') as timestamp)


    Processes 1TB of data.



    Ideally this should only process hundred MB of data.



    delete from TableName
    where
    QuoteDate >= '2018-11-01'


    Processes ~100MB










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Our project is being charged a high cost. Looks like such commands are not using the partition. Is there a way in bigquery to force the query to become partition aware based on the results for a subquery ?



      The following query currently is processing TBs of data.



          delete from tableName
      where QuoteDate >= cast((SELECT batch_date as start from batch_table where Batch_Status='Running') as timestamp)


      Processes 1TB of data.



      Ideally this should only process hundred MB of data.



      delete from TableName
      where
      QuoteDate >= '2018-11-01'


      Processes ~100MB










      share|improve this question













      Our project is being charged a high cost. Looks like such commands are not using the partition. Is there a way in bigquery to force the query to become partition aware based on the results for a subquery ?



      The following query currently is processing TBs of data.



          delete from tableName
      where QuoteDate >= cast((SELECT batch_date as start from batch_table where Batch_Status='Running') as timestamp)


      Processes 1TB of data.



      Ideally this should only process hundred MB of data.



      delete from TableName
      where
      QuoteDate >= '2018-11-01'


      Processes ~100MB







      google-bigquery






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 13 '18 at 6:18









      Ratnesh Sharma

      65




      65
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          From the documentation:




          Complex queries that require the evaluation of multiple stages of a query in order to resolve the predicate (such as inner queries or subqueries) will not prune partitions from the query.




          ...




          The following query does not prune partitions (note the use of a subquery):




          #standardSQL
          SELECT
          t1.name,
          t2.category
          FROM
          table1 t1
          INNER JOIN
          table2 t2
          ON
          t1.id_field = t2.field2
          WHERE
          t1.ts = (SELECT timestamp from table3 where key = 2)


          For the time being, you need to evaluate the queries that you have provided separately.






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53274927%2fbigquery-partition-not-being-used-while-deleting-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            From the documentation:




            Complex queries that require the evaluation of multiple stages of a query in order to resolve the predicate (such as inner queries or subqueries) will not prune partitions from the query.




            ...




            The following query does not prune partitions (note the use of a subquery):




            #standardSQL
            SELECT
            t1.name,
            t2.category
            FROM
            table1 t1
            INNER JOIN
            table2 t2
            ON
            t1.id_field = t2.field2
            WHERE
            t1.ts = (SELECT timestamp from table3 where key = 2)


            For the time being, you need to evaluate the queries that you have provided separately.






            share|improve this answer


























              0














              From the documentation:




              Complex queries that require the evaluation of multiple stages of a query in order to resolve the predicate (such as inner queries or subqueries) will not prune partitions from the query.




              ...




              The following query does not prune partitions (note the use of a subquery):




              #standardSQL
              SELECT
              t1.name,
              t2.category
              FROM
              table1 t1
              INNER JOIN
              table2 t2
              ON
              t1.id_field = t2.field2
              WHERE
              t1.ts = (SELECT timestamp from table3 where key = 2)


              For the time being, you need to evaluate the queries that you have provided separately.






              share|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                From the documentation:




                Complex queries that require the evaluation of multiple stages of a query in order to resolve the predicate (such as inner queries or subqueries) will not prune partitions from the query.




                ...




                The following query does not prune partitions (note the use of a subquery):




                #standardSQL
                SELECT
                t1.name,
                t2.category
                FROM
                table1 t1
                INNER JOIN
                table2 t2
                ON
                t1.id_field = t2.field2
                WHERE
                t1.ts = (SELECT timestamp from table3 where key = 2)


                For the time being, you need to evaluate the queries that you have provided separately.






                share|improve this answer












                From the documentation:




                Complex queries that require the evaluation of multiple stages of a query in order to resolve the predicate (such as inner queries or subqueries) will not prune partitions from the query.




                ...




                The following query does not prune partitions (note the use of a subquery):




                #standardSQL
                SELECT
                t1.name,
                t2.category
                FROM
                table1 t1
                INNER JOIN
                table2 t2
                ON
                t1.id_field = t2.field2
                WHERE
                t1.ts = (SELECT timestamp from table3 where key = 2)


                For the time being, you need to evaluate the queries that you have provided separately.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 13 '18 at 6:49









                Elliott Brossard

                16.2k21035




                16.2k21035






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53274927%2fbigquery-partition-not-being-used-while-deleting-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    List item for chat from Array inside array React Native

                    Thiostrepton

                    Caerphilly