A query related to activiti
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have just started exploring Activiti, so my question may be noobish.
I have a process definition wherein I have defined a subprocess.
Subprocess has 2 user tasks defined. After completion of 1st user task(UT1), second one(UT2) starts. Subprocess in itself has following confg:
<subProcess id="..." name="...">
<multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics isSequential="false" activiti:collection="#{parameters.ids}" activiti:elementVariable="input"></multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics>
<userTask id="UT1" name="..." activiti:candidateGroups="..." activiti:category="..." activiti:priority="...">
...
</userTask>
<userTask id="UT2" name="..." activiti:candidateGroups="..." activiti:category="..." activiti:priority="...">
...
</userTask>
...
...</subProcess>
So, for every n UT1 tasks, there are equal number(n) of UT2 tasks.
Now I need to change this arrangement in a way that for n UT1 tasks, only a percentage of n tasks are created for UT2. So, for every n UT1 tasks, there are x% of n UT2 tasks.
Is this possible by changing process definition file itself? Or do I need to take some alternate approach, like running some batch?
activiti
asked Nov 12 at 6:09
Mapper
715
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have just started exploring Activiti, so my question may be noobish.
I have a process definition wherein I have defined a subprocess.
Subprocess has 2 user tasks defined. After completion of 1st user task(UT1), second one(UT2) starts. Subprocess in itself has following confg:
<subProcess id="..." name="...">
<multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics isSequential="false" activiti:collection="#{parameters.ids}" activiti:elementVariable="input"></multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics>
<userTask id="UT1" name="..." activiti:candidateGroups="..." activiti:category="..." activiti:priority="...">
...
</userTask>
<userTask id="UT2" name="..." activiti:candidateGroups="..." activiti:category="..." activiti:priority="...">
...
</userTask>
...
...</subProcess>
So, for every n UT1 tasks, there are equal number(n) of UT2 tasks.
Now I need to change this arrangement in a way that for n UT1 tasks, only a percentage of n tasks are created for UT2. So, for every n UT1 tasks, there are x% of n UT2 tasks.
Is this possible by changing process definition file itself? Or do I need to take some alternate approach, like running some batch?
activiti
asked Nov 12 at 6:09
Mapper
715
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have just started exploring Activiti, so my question may be noobish.
I have a process definition wherein I have defined a subprocess.
Subprocess has 2 user tasks defined. After completion of 1st user task(UT1), second one(UT2) starts. Subprocess in itself has following confg:
<subProcess id="..." name="...">
<multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics isSequential="false" activiti:collection="#{parameters.ids}" activiti:elementVariable="input"></multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics>
<userTask id="UT1" name="..." activiti:candidateGroups="..." activiti:category="..." activiti:priority="...">
...
</userTask>
<userTask id="UT2" name="..." activiti:candidateGroups="..." activiti:category="..." activiti:priority="...">
...
</userTask>
...
...</subProcess>
So, for every n UT1 tasks, there are equal number(n) of UT2 tasks.
Now I need to change this arrangement in a way that for n UT1 tasks, only a percentage of n tasks are created for UT2. So, for every n UT1 tasks, there are x% of n UT2 tasks.
Is this possible by changing process definition file itself? Or do I need to take some alternate approach, like running some batch?
activiti
asked Nov 12 at 6:09
Mapper
715
I have just started exploring Activiti, so my question may be noobish.
I have a process definition wherein I have defined a subprocess.
Subprocess has 2 user tasks defined. After completion of 1st user task(UT1), second one(UT2) starts. Subprocess in itself has following confg:
<subProcess id="..." name="...">
<multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics isSequential="false" activiti:collection="#{parameters.ids}" activiti:elementVariable="input"></multiInstanceLoopCharacteristics>
<userTask id="UT1" name="..." activiti:candidateGroups="..." activiti:category="..." activiti:priority="...">
...
</userTask>
<userTask id="UT2" name="..." activiti:candidateGroups="..." activiti:category="..." activiti:priority="...">
...
</userTask>
...
...</subProcess>
So, for every n UT1 tasks, there are equal number(n) of UT2 tasks.
Now I need to change this arrangement in a way that for n UT1 tasks, only a percentage of n tasks are created for UT2. So, for every n UT1 tasks, there are x% of n UT2 tasks.
Is this possible by changing process definition file itself? Or do I need to take some alternate approach, like running some batch?
activiti
activiti
asked Nov 12 at 6:09
Mapper
715
asked Nov 12 at 6:09
Mapper
715
edited Nov 12 at 6:28
asked Nov 12 at 6:09
Mapper
715
asked Nov 12 at 6:09
Mapper
715
asked Nov 12 at 6:09
Mapper
715
715
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Obviously there is a condition of some sort that will determine if a UT2 task is required.
Therefore, you should be able to use a decision step to determine whether to create a UT2 task based on some logic.
answered Nov 12 at 18:13
Greg Harley
2,3491714
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Use decision table for logical interpretation, which will decide when the second user task should be started.
answered Nov 22 at 6:07
vikram
16410
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53256689%2fa-query-related-to-activiti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Obviously there is a condition of some sort that will determine if a UT2 task is required.
Therefore, you should be able to use a decision step to determine whether to create a UT2 task based on some logic.
answered Nov 12 at 18:13
Greg Harley
2,3491714
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Obviously there is a condition of some sort that will determine if a UT2 task is required.
Therefore, you should be able to use a decision step to determine whether to create a UT2 task based on some logic.
answered Nov 12 at 18:13
Greg Harley
2,3491714
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Obviously there is a condition of some sort that will determine if a UT2 task is required.
Therefore, you should be able to use a decision step to determine whether to create a UT2 task based on some logic.
answered Nov 12 at 18:13
Greg Harley
2,3491714
Obviously there is a condition of some sort that will determine if a UT2 task is required.
Therefore, you should be able to use a decision step to determine whether to create a UT2 task based on some logic.
answered Nov 12 at 18:13
Greg Harley
2,3491714
answered Nov 12 at 18:13
Greg Harley
2,3491714
answered Nov 12 at 18:13
Greg Harley
2,3491714
answered Nov 12 at 18:13
Greg Harley
2,3491714
2,3491714
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Use decision table for logical interpretation, which will decide when the second user task should be started.
answered Nov 22 at 6:07
vikram
16410
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Use decision table for logical interpretation, which will decide when the second user task should be started.
answered Nov 22 at 6:07
vikram
16410
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Use decision table for logical interpretation, which will decide when the second user task should be started.
answered Nov 22 at 6:07
vikram
16410
Use decision table for logical interpretation, which will decide when the second user task should be started.
answered Nov 22 at 6:07
vikram
16410
answered Nov 22 at 6:07
vikram
16410
answered Nov 22 at 6:07
vikram
16410
answered Nov 22 at 6:07
vikram
16410
16410
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53256689%2fa-query-related-to-activiti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
