Pandas merge handling duplicates in join output











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is there a nice way to bring only one row, preferably random in one-to-many matching during left join in Pandas?



e.g



left = [[1,1,1], [2,2,2],[3,3,3], [9,9,9], [1,3,2]]
right = [[1,2,2],[1,2,3],[3,2,2], [3,2,9], [3,2,2]]
left = np.asarray(left)
right = np.asarray(right)
left = pd.DataFrame(left)
right = pd.DataFrame(right)
joined_left = left.merge(right, how="left", left_on=[0], right_on=[0])


So this is what we get



   0  1  2
0 1 1 1
1 2 2 2
2 3 3 3
3 9 9 9
4 1 3 2

0 1 2
0 1 2 2
1 1 2 3
2 3 2 2
3 3 2 9
4 3 2 2

0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
1 1 1 1 2.0 3.0
2 2 2 2 NaN NaN
3 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
4 3 3 3 2.0 9.0
5 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
6 9 9 9 NaN NaN
7 1 3 2 2.0 2.0
8 1 3 2 2.0 3.0


So now I want to have output to be of the same size as my left dataframe and when there are more than one match in right dataframe I want to bring only single random column.



Is there a nice way of doing it using pandas short cut tricks?



thank you!










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Is there a nice way to bring only one row, preferably random in one-to-many matching during left join in Pandas?



    e.g



    left = [[1,1,1], [2,2,2],[3,3,3], [9,9,9], [1,3,2]]
    right = [[1,2,2],[1,2,3],[3,2,2], [3,2,9], [3,2,2]]
    left = np.asarray(left)
    right = np.asarray(right)
    left = pd.DataFrame(left)
    right = pd.DataFrame(right)
    joined_left = left.merge(right, how="left", left_on=[0], right_on=[0])


    So this is what we get



       0  1  2
    0 1 1 1
    1 2 2 2
    2 3 3 3
    3 9 9 9
    4 1 3 2

    0 1 2
    0 1 2 2
    1 1 2 3
    2 3 2 2
    3 3 2 9
    4 3 2 2

    0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
    0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
    1 1 1 1 2.0 3.0
    2 2 2 2 NaN NaN
    3 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
    4 3 3 3 2.0 9.0
    5 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
    6 9 9 9 NaN NaN
    7 1 3 2 2.0 2.0
    8 1 3 2 2.0 3.0


    So now I want to have output to be of the same size as my left dataframe and when there are more than one match in right dataframe I want to bring only single random column.



    Is there a nice way of doing it using pandas short cut tricks?



    thank you!










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Is there a nice way to bring only one row, preferably random in one-to-many matching during left join in Pandas?



      e.g



      left = [[1,1,1], [2,2,2],[3,3,3], [9,9,9], [1,3,2]]
      right = [[1,2,2],[1,2,3],[3,2,2], [3,2,9], [3,2,2]]
      left = np.asarray(left)
      right = np.asarray(right)
      left = pd.DataFrame(left)
      right = pd.DataFrame(right)
      joined_left = left.merge(right, how="left", left_on=[0], right_on=[0])


      So this is what we get



         0  1  2
      0 1 1 1
      1 2 2 2
      2 3 3 3
      3 9 9 9
      4 1 3 2

      0 1 2
      0 1 2 2
      1 1 2 3
      2 3 2 2
      3 3 2 9
      4 3 2 2

      0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
      0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
      1 1 1 1 2.0 3.0
      2 2 2 2 NaN NaN
      3 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
      4 3 3 3 2.0 9.0
      5 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
      6 9 9 9 NaN NaN
      7 1 3 2 2.0 2.0
      8 1 3 2 2.0 3.0


      So now I want to have output to be of the same size as my left dataframe and when there are more than one match in right dataframe I want to bring only single random column.



      Is there a nice way of doing it using pandas short cut tricks?



      thank you!










      share|improve this question















      Is there a nice way to bring only one row, preferably random in one-to-many matching during left join in Pandas?



      e.g



      left = [[1,1,1], [2,2,2],[3,3,3], [9,9,9], [1,3,2]]
      right = [[1,2,2],[1,2,3],[3,2,2], [3,2,9], [3,2,2]]
      left = np.asarray(left)
      right = np.asarray(right)
      left = pd.DataFrame(left)
      right = pd.DataFrame(right)
      joined_left = left.merge(right, how="left", left_on=[0], right_on=[0])


      So this is what we get



         0  1  2
      0 1 1 1
      1 2 2 2
      2 3 3 3
      3 9 9 9
      4 1 3 2

      0 1 2
      0 1 2 2
      1 1 2 3
      2 3 2 2
      3 3 2 9
      4 3 2 2

      0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
      0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
      1 1 1 1 2.0 3.0
      2 2 2 2 NaN NaN
      3 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
      4 3 3 3 2.0 9.0
      5 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
      6 9 9 9 NaN NaN
      7 1 3 2 2.0 2.0
      8 1 3 2 2.0 3.0


      So now I want to have output to be of the same size as my left dataframe and when there are more than one match in right dataframe I want to bring only single random column.



      Is there a nice way of doing it using pandas short cut tricks?



      thank you!







      python pandas dataframe random merge






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 11 at 1:26









      coldspeed

      111k1799169




      111k1799169










      asked Nov 11 at 0:36









      YohanRoth

      8861819




      8861819
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You can shuffle right and drop_duplicates(...[, keep='first']) before merging.



          right2 = right.sample(frac=1).drop_duplicates(subset=[0])
          left.merge(right2, how='left', left_on=[0], right_on=[0])

          0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
          0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
          1 2 2 2 NaN NaN
          2 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
          3 9 9 9 NaN NaN
          4 1 3 2 2.0 2.0


          We shuffle right first, and then drop every duplicate except the first row (considering only column #0), which is the same as randomly selecting a row.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I see, so you drop duplicates for a merge key column right. Ingenious! Thank you
            – YohanRoth
            Nov 11 at 0:43










          • @YohanRoth - in this case - if your first row of the output is 1 1 1 2.0 2.0, I think that guarantees the last row is also 1 3 2 2.0 2.0 since you've dropped 1 2 3. From your question asking for a random choice, I'm a bit concerned that this may not be the behavior you want. Perhaps it's fine, but worth making sure it's consistent with what you want.
            – Joel
            Nov 11 at 4:47











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53244793%2fpandas-merge-handling-duplicates-in-join-output%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You can shuffle right and drop_duplicates(...[, keep='first']) before merging.



          right2 = right.sample(frac=1).drop_duplicates(subset=[0])
          left.merge(right2, how='left', left_on=[0], right_on=[0])

          0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
          0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
          1 2 2 2 NaN NaN
          2 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
          3 9 9 9 NaN NaN
          4 1 3 2 2.0 2.0


          We shuffle right first, and then drop every duplicate except the first row (considering only column #0), which is the same as randomly selecting a row.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I see, so you drop duplicates for a merge key column right. Ingenious! Thank you
            – YohanRoth
            Nov 11 at 0:43










          • @YohanRoth - in this case - if your first row of the output is 1 1 1 2.0 2.0, I think that guarantees the last row is also 1 3 2 2.0 2.0 since you've dropped 1 2 3. From your question asking for a random choice, I'm a bit concerned that this may not be the behavior you want. Perhaps it's fine, but worth making sure it's consistent with what you want.
            – Joel
            Nov 11 at 4:47















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          You can shuffle right and drop_duplicates(...[, keep='first']) before merging.



          right2 = right.sample(frac=1).drop_duplicates(subset=[0])
          left.merge(right2, how='left', left_on=[0], right_on=[0])

          0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
          0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
          1 2 2 2 NaN NaN
          2 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
          3 9 9 9 NaN NaN
          4 1 3 2 2.0 2.0


          We shuffle right first, and then drop every duplicate except the first row (considering only column #0), which is the same as randomly selecting a row.






          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            I see, so you drop duplicates for a merge key column right. Ingenious! Thank you
            – YohanRoth
            Nov 11 at 0:43










          • @YohanRoth - in this case - if your first row of the output is 1 1 1 2.0 2.0, I think that guarantees the last row is also 1 3 2 2.0 2.0 since you've dropped 1 2 3. From your question asking for a random choice, I'm a bit concerned that this may not be the behavior you want. Perhaps it's fine, but worth making sure it's consistent with what you want.
            – Joel
            Nov 11 at 4:47













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          You can shuffle right and drop_duplicates(...[, keep='first']) before merging.



          right2 = right.sample(frac=1).drop_duplicates(subset=[0])
          left.merge(right2, how='left', left_on=[0], right_on=[0])

          0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
          0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
          1 2 2 2 NaN NaN
          2 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
          3 9 9 9 NaN NaN
          4 1 3 2 2.0 2.0


          We shuffle right first, and then drop every duplicate except the first row (considering only column #0), which is the same as randomly selecting a row.






          share|improve this answer












          You can shuffle right and drop_duplicates(...[, keep='first']) before merging.



          right2 = right.sample(frac=1).drop_duplicates(subset=[0])
          left.merge(right2, how='left', left_on=[0], right_on=[0])

          0 1_x 2_x 1_y 2_y
          0 1 1 1 2.0 2.0
          1 2 2 2 NaN NaN
          2 3 3 3 2.0 2.0
          3 9 9 9 NaN NaN
          4 1 3 2 2.0 2.0


          We shuffle right first, and then drop every duplicate except the first row (considering only column #0), which is the same as randomly selecting a row.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 11 at 0:39









          coldspeed

          111k1799169




          111k1799169








          • 1




            I see, so you drop duplicates for a merge key column right. Ingenious! Thank you
            – YohanRoth
            Nov 11 at 0:43










          • @YohanRoth - in this case - if your first row of the output is 1 1 1 2.0 2.0, I think that guarantees the last row is also 1 3 2 2.0 2.0 since you've dropped 1 2 3. From your question asking for a random choice, I'm a bit concerned that this may not be the behavior you want. Perhaps it's fine, but worth making sure it's consistent with what you want.
            – Joel
            Nov 11 at 4:47














          • 1




            I see, so you drop duplicates for a merge key column right. Ingenious! Thank you
            – YohanRoth
            Nov 11 at 0:43










          • @YohanRoth - in this case - if your first row of the output is 1 1 1 2.0 2.0, I think that guarantees the last row is also 1 3 2 2.0 2.0 since you've dropped 1 2 3. From your question asking for a random choice, I'm a bit concerned that this may not be the behavior you want. Perhaps it's fine, but worth making sure it's consistent with what you want.
            – Joel
            Nov 11 at 4:47








          1




          1




          I see, so you drop duplicates for a merge key column right. Ingenious! Thank you
          – YohanRoth
          Nov 11 at 0:43




          I see, so you drop duplicates for a merge key column right. Ingenious! Thank you
          – YohanRoth
          Nov 11 at 0:43












          @YohanRoth - in this case - if your first row of the output is 1 1 1 2.0 2.0, I think that guarantees the last row is also 1 3 2 2.0 2.0 since you've dropped 1 2 3. From your question asking for a random choice, I'm a bit concerned that this may not be the behavior you want. Perhaps it's fine, but worth making sure it's consistent with what you want.
          – Joel
          Nov 11 at 4:47




          @YohanRoth - in this case - if your first row of the output is 1 1 1 2.0 2.0, I think that guarantees the last row is also 1 3 2 2.0 2.0 since you've dropped 1 2 3. From your question asking for a random choice, I'm a bit concerned that this may not be the behavior you want. Perhaps it's fine, but worth making sure it's consistent with what you want.
          – Joel
          Nov 11 at 4:47


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53244793%2fpandas-merge-handling-duplicates-in-join-output%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bressuire

          Vorschmack

          Quarantine