Activity coefficient




An activity coefficient is a factor used in thermodynamics to account for deviations from ideal behaviour in a mixture of chemical substances.[1] In an ideal mixture, the microscopic interactions between each pair of chemical species are the same (or macroscopically equivalent, the enthalpy change of solution and volume variation in mixing is zero) and, as a result, properties of the mixtures can be expressed directly in terms of simple concentrations or partial pressures of the substances present e.g. Raoult's law. Deviations from ideality are accommodated by modifying the concentration by an activity coefficient. Analogously, expressions involving gases can be adjusted for non-ideality by scaling partial pressures by a fugacity coefficient.


The concept of activity coefficient is closely linked to that of activity in chemistry.




Contents






  • 1 Thermodynamic definition


    • 1.1 Ionic solutions




  • 2 Experimental determination of activity coefficients


    • 2.1 Radiochemical methods




  • 3 Theoretical calculation of activity coefficients


  • 4 Link to ionic diameter


  • 5 Dependence on state parameters


  • 6 Concentrated solutions of electrolytes


  • 7 Application to chemical equilibrium


  • 8 References


  • 9 External links





Thermodynamic definition


The chemical potential, μB, of a substance B in an ideal mixture of liquids or an ideal solution is given by


μB=μB⊖+RTln⁡xB{displaystyle mu _{mathrm {B} }=mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }+RTln x_{mathrm {B} },}{displaystyle mu _{mathrm {B} }=mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }+RTln x_{mathrm {B} },}

where μo
B is the chemical potential of a pure substance B{displaystyle mathrm {B} }mathrm{B} and xB is the mole fraction of the substance in the mixture.


This is generalised to include non-ideal behavior by writing


μB=μB⊖+RTln⁡aB{displaystyle mu _{mathrm {B} }=mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }+RTln a_{mathrm {B} },}{displaystyle mu _{mathrm {B} }=mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }+RTln a_{mathrm {B} },}

when aB is the activity of the substance in the mixture with


aB=xBγB{displaystyle a_{mathrm {B} }=x_{mathrm {B} }gamma _{mathrm {B} }}{displaystyle a_{mathrm {B} }=x_{mathrm {B} }gamma _{mathrm {B} }}

where γB is the activity coefficient, which may itself depend on xB. As γB approaches 1, the substance behaves as if it were ideal. For instance, if γB ≈ 1, then Raoult's law is accurate. For γB > 1 and γB < 1, substance B shows positive and negative deviation from Raoult's law, respectively. A positive deviation implies that substance B is more volatile.


In many cases, as xB goes to zero, the activity coefficient of substance B approaches a constant; this relationship is Henry's law for the solvent. These relationships are related to each other through the Gibbs–Duhem equation.[2]
Note that in general activity coefficients are dimensionless.


In detail: Raoult's law states that the partial pressure of component B is related to its vapor pressure (saturation pressure) and its mole fraction xB in the liquid phase,


pB=xBγBpBσ,{displaystyle p_{mathrm {B} }=x_{mathrm {B} }gamma _{mathrm {B} }p_{mathrm {B} }^{sigma };,}{displaystyle p_{mathrm {B} }=x_{mathrm {B} }gamma _{mathrm {B} }p_{mathrm {B} }^{sigma };,}

with the convention
limxB→1γB=1.{displaystyle lim _{x_{mathrm {B} }to 1}gamma _{mathrm {B} }=1;.}{displaystyle lim _{x_{mathrm {B} }to 1}gamma _{mathrm {B} }=1;.}
In other words: Pure liquids represent the ideal case.


At infinite dilution, the activity coefficient approaches its limiting value, γB∞. Comparison with Henry's law,


pB=KH,BxBforxB→0,{displaystyle p_{mathrm {B} }=K_{mathrm {H,B} }x_{mathrm {B} }quad {text{for}}quad x_{mathrm {B} }to 0;,}{displaystyle p_{mathrm {B} }=K_{mathrm {H,B} }x_{mathrm {B} }quad {text{for}}quad x_{mathrm {B} }to 0;,}

immediately gives


KH,B=pBσγB∞.{displaystyle K_{mathrm {H,B} }=p_{mathrm {B} }^{sigma }gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{infty };.}{displaystyle K_{mathrm {H,B} }=p_{mathrm {B} }^{sigma }gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{infty };.}

In other words: The compound shows nonideal behavior in the dilute case.


The above definition of the activity coefficient is impractical if the compound does not exist as a pure liquid. This is often the case for electrolytes or biochemical compounds. In such cases, a different definition is used that considers infinite dilution as the ideal state:


γB†≡γB/γB∞{displaystyle gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{dagger }equiv gamma _{mathrm {B} }/gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{infty }}{displaystyle gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{dagger }equiv gamma _{mathrm {B} }/gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{infty }}

with
limxB→0γB†=1,{displaystyle lim _{x_{mathrm {B} }to 0}gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{dagger }=1;,}{displaystyle lim _{x_{mathrm {B} }to 0}gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{dagger }=1;,}
and


μB=μB⊖+RTln⁡γB∞⏟μB⊖†+RTln⁡(xBγB†){displaystyle mu _{mathrm {B} }=underbrace {mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }+RTln gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{infty }} _{mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus dagger }}+RTln(x_{mathrm {B} }gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{dagger })}{displaystyle mu _{mathrm {B} }=underbrace {mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }+RTln gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{infty }} _{mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus dagger }}+RTln(x_{mathrm {B} }gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{dagger })}

The †{displaystyle ^{dagger }}{displaystyle ^{dagger }} symbol has been used here to dinstinguish between the two kinds of activity coefficients. Usually it is omitted, as it is clear from the context which kind is meant. But there are cases where both kinds of activity coefficients are needed and may even appear in the same equation, e.g., for solutions of salts in (water + alcohol) mixtures. This is sometimes a source of errors.


Modifying mole fractions or concentrations by activity coefficients gives the effective activities of the components, and hence allows expressions such as Raoult's law and equilibrium constants to be applied to both ideal and non-ideal mixtures.


Knowledge of activity coefficients is particularly important in the context of electrochemistry since the behaviour of electrolyte solutions is often far from ideal, due to the effects of the ionic atmosphere. Additionally, they are particularly important in the context of soil chemistry due to the low volumes of solvent and, consequently, the high concentration of electrolytes.[3]



Ionic solutions


For solution of substances which ionize in solution the activity coefficients of the cation and anion cannot be experimentally determined independently of each other because solution properties depend on both ions. Single ion activity coefficients must be linked to the activity coefficient of the dissolved electrolyte as if undissociated. In this case a mean stoichiometric activity coefficient of the dissolved electrolyte, γ±, is used. It is called stoichiometric because it expresses both the deviation from the ideality of the solution and the incomplete ionic dissociation of the ionic compound which occurs especially with the increase of its concentration.


For a 1:1 electrolyte, such as NaCl it is given by the following:


γ±=γ+γ−{displaystyle gamma _{pm }={sqrt {gamma _{+}gamma _{-}}}}gamma _{pm }={sqrt {gamma _{+}gamma _{-}}}

where γ+ and γ− are the activity coefficients of the cation and anion respectively.


More generally, the mean activity coefficient of a compound of formula ApBq is given by[4]


γ±=γApγBqp+q{displaystyle gamma _{pm }={sqrt[{p+q}]{gamma _{mathrm {A} }^{p}gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{q}}}}{displaystyle gamma _{pm }={sqrt[{p+q}]{gamma _{mathrm {A} }^{p}gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{q}}}}

Single-ion activity coefficients can be calculated theoretically, for example by using the Debye–Hückel equation. The theoretical equation can be tested by combining the calculated single-ion activity coefficients to give mean values which can be compared to experimental values.


The prevailing view that single ion activity coefficients are unmeasurable independently, or perhaps even physically meaningless, has its roots in the work of Guggenheim in the late 1920s.[5] However, chemists have never been able to give up the idea of single ion activities, and by implication single ion activity coefficients. For example, pH is defined as the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion activity. If the prevailing view on the physical meaning and measurability of single ion activities is correct then defining pH as the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion activity places the quantity squarely in the unmeasurable category. Recognizing this logical difficulty, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) states that the activity-based definition of pH is a notional definition only.[6] Despite the prevailing negative view on the measurability of single ion coefficients, the concept of single ion activities continues to be discussed in the literature, and at least one author presents a definition of single ion activity in terms of purely thermodynamic quantities and proposes a method of measuring single ion activity coefficients based on purely thermodynamic processes.[7]



Experimental determination of activity coefficients


Activity coefficients may be determined experimentally by making measurements on non-ideal mixtures. Use may be made of Raoult's law or Henry's law to provide a value for an ideal mixture against which the experimental value may be compared to obtain the activity coefficient. Other colligative properties, such as osmotic pressure may also be used.



Radiochemical methods


Activity coefficients can be determined by radiochemical methods.[8]



Theoretical calculation of activity coefficients




UNIQUAC Regression of activity coefficients (chloroform/methanol mixture)


Activity coefficients of electrolyte solutions may be calculated theoretically, using the Debye–Hückel equation or extensions such as the Davies equation,[9]Pitzer equations[10] or TCPC model.[11][12][13][14]Specific ion interaction theory (SIT)[15] may also be used.


For non-electrolyte solutions correlative methods such as UNIQUAC, NRTL, MOSCED or UNIFAC may be employed, provided fitted component-specific or model parameters are available. COSMO-RS is a theoretical method which is less dependent on model parameters as required information is obtained from quantum mechanics calculations specific to each molecule (sigma profiles) combined with a statistical thermodynamics treatment of surface segments.[16]


For uncharged species, the activity coefficient γ0 mostly follows a salting-out model:[17]


log10⁡(γ0)=bI{displaystyle log _{10}(gamma _{0})=bI}log _{{10}}(gamma _{{0}})=bI

This simple model predicts activities of many species (dissolved undissociated gases such as CO2, H2S, NH3, undissociated acids and bases) to high ionic strengths (up to 5 mol/kg). The value of the constant b for CO2 is 0.11 at 10 °C and 0.20 at 330 °C.[18]


For water as solvent, the activity aw can be calculated using:[17]


ln⁡(aw)=−νb55.51φ{displaystyle ln(a_{mathrm {w} })={frac {-nu b}{55.51}}varphi }{displaystyle ln(a_{mathrm {w} })={frac {-nu b}{55.51}}varphi }

where ν is the number of ions produced from the dissociation of one molecule of the dissolved salt, b is the molality of the salt dissolved in water, φ is the osmotic coefficient of water, and the constant 55.51 represents the molality of water. In the above equation, the activity of a solvent (here water) is represented as inversely proportional to the number of particles of salt versus that of the solvent.



Link to ionic diameter


The ionic activity coefficient is connected to the ionic diameter by the formula obtained from Debye-Huckel theory of electrolytes:


log⁡(γi)=−Azi2I1+BaI{displaystyle log(gamma _{i})=-{frac {Az_{i}^{2}{sqrt {I}}}{1+Ba{sqrt {I}}}}}{displaystyle log(gamma _{i})=-{frac {Az_{i}^{2}{sqrt {I}}}{1+Ba{sqrt {I}}}}}

where A and B are constant, zi is the valence number of the ion, and I is ionic strength.



Dependence on state parameters


The derivative of an activity coefficient with respect to temperature is related to excess molar enthalpy by


H¯iE=−RT2∂∂Tln⁡(γi){displaystyle {bar {H}}_{i}^{mathsf {E}}=-RT^{2}{frac {partial }{partial T}}ln(gamma _{i})}{displaystyle {bar {H}}_{i}^{mathsf {E}}=-RT^{2}{frac {partial }{partial T}}ln(gamma _{i})}

Similarly, the derivative of an activity coefficient with respect to pressure can be related to excess molar volume.


V¯iE=RT∂∂Pln⁡(γi){displaystyle {bar {V}}_{i}^{mathsf {E}}=RT{frac {partial }{partial P}}ln(gamma _{i})}{displaystyle {bar {V}}_{i}^{mathsf {E}}=RT{frac {partial }{partial P}}ln(gamma _{i})}


Concentrated solutions of electrolytes


For concentrated ionic solutions the hydration of ions must be taken into consideration, as done by Stokes and Robinson in their hydration model from 1948[19]. The activity coefficient of the electrolyte is split into electric and statistical components by E. Glueckauf who modifies the Robinson Stokes model.


The statistical part includes hydration index number h , the number of ions from the dissociation and the ratio r between the apparent molar volume of the electrolyte and the molar volume of water and molality b.


Concentrated solution statistical part of the activity coefficient is:



ln⁡γs=h−ννln⁡(1+br55.5)−hνln⁡(1−br55.5)+br(r+h−ν)55.5(1+br55.5){displaystyle ln gamma _{s}={frac {h-nu }{nu }}ln left(1+{frac {br}{55.5}}right)-{frac {h}{nu }}ln left(1-{frac {br}{55.5}}right)+{frac {br(r+h-nu )}{55.5left(1+{frac {br}{55.5}}right)}}}{displaystyle ln gamma _{s}={frac {h-nu }{nu }}ln left(1+{frac {br}{55.5}}right)-{frac {h}{nu }}ln left(1-{frac {br}{55.5}}right)+{frac {br(r+h-nu )}{55.5left(1+{frac {br}{55.5}}right)}}}[20],[21][22]

The Stokes Robinson model has been analyzed and improved by other investigators as well[23][24].



Application to chemical equilibrium


At equilibrium, the sum of the chemical potentials of the reactants is equal to the sum of the chemical potentials of the products. The Gibbs free energy change for the reactions, ΔrG, is equal to the difference between these sums and therefore, at equilibrium, is equal to zero. Thus, for an equilibrium such as




α A + β B ⇌ σ S + τ T

ΔrG=σμS+τμT−(αμA+βμB)=0{displaystyle Delta _{mathrm {r} }G=sigma mu _{mathrm {S} }+tau mu _{mathrm {T} }-(alpha mu _{mathrm {A} }+beta mu _{mathrm {B} })=0,}{displaystyle Delta _{mathrm {r} }G=sigma mu _{mathrm {S} }+tau mu _{mathrm {T} }-(alpha mu _{mathrm {A} }+beta mu _{mathrm {B} })=0,}


Substitute in the expressions for the chemical potential of each reactant:


ΔrG=σμS⊖+σRTln⁡aS+τμT⊖+τRTln⁡aT−(αμA⊖+αRTln⁡aA+βμB⊖+βRTln⁡aB)=0{displaystyle Delta _{mathrm {r} }G=sigma mu _{S}^{ominus }+sigma RTln a_{mathrm {S} }+tau mu _{mathrm {T} }^{ominus }+tau RTln a_{mathrm {T} }-(alpha mu _{mathrm {A} }^{ominus }+alpha RTln a_{mathrm {A} }+beta mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }+beta RTln a_{mathrm {B} })=0}{displaystyle Delta _{mathrm {r} }G=sigma mu _{S}^{ominus }+sigma RTln a_{mathrm {S} }+tau mu _{mathrm {T} }^{ominus }+tau RTln a_{mathrm {T} }-(alpha mu _{mathrm {A} }^{ominus }+alpha RTln a_{mathrm {A} }+beta mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }+beta RTln a_{mathrm {B} })=0}

Upon rearrangement this expression becomes


ΔrG=(σμS⊖+τμT⊖−αμA⊖−βμB⊖)+RTln⁡aSσaTτaAαaBβ=0{displaystyle Delta _{mathrm {r} }G=left(sigma mu _{mathrm {S} }^{ominus }+tau mu _{mathrm {T} }^{ominus }-alpha mu _{mathrm {A} }^{ominus }-beta mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }right)+RTln {frac {a_{mathrm {S} }^{sigma }a_{mathrm {T} }^{tau }}{a_{mathrm {A} }^{alpha }a_{mathrm {B} }^{beta }}}=0}{displaystyle Delta _{mathrm {r} }G=left(sigma mu _{mathrm {S} }^{ominus }+tau mu _{mathrm {T} }^{ominus }-alpha mu _{mathrm {A} }^{ominus }-beta mu _{mathrm {B} }^{ominus }right)+RTln {frac {a_{mathrm {S} }^{sigma }a_{mathrm {T} }^{tau }}{a_{mathrm {A} }^{alpha }a_{mathrm {B} }^{beta }}}=0}

The sum σμo
S + τμo
T − αμo
A − βμo
B is the standard free energy change for the reaction, ΔrGo. Therefore,


ΔrG⊖=−RTln⁡K{displaystyle Delta _{r}G^{ominus }=-RTln K}Delta _{r}G^{ominus }=-RTln K

K is the equilibrium constant. Note that activities and equilibrium constants are dimensionless numbers.


This derivation serves two purposes. It shows the relationship between standard free energy change and equilibrium constant. It also shows that an equilibrium constant is defined as a quotient of activities. In practical terms this is inconvenient. When each activity is replaced by the product of a concentration and an activity coefficient, the equilibrium constant is defined as


K=[S]σ[T]τ[A]α[B]β×γSσγTτγAαγBβ{displaystyle K={frac {[mathrm {S} ]^{sigma }[mathrm {T} ]^{tau }}{[mathrm {A} ]^{alpha }[mathrm {B} ]^{beta }}}times {frac {gamma _{mathrm {S} }^{sigma }gamma _{mathrm {T} }^{tau }}{gamma _{mathrm {A} }^{alpha }gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{beta }}}}{displaystyle K={frac {[mathrm {S} ]^{sigma }[mathrm {T} ]^{tau }}{[mathrm {A} ]^{alpha }[mathrm {B} ]^{beta }}}times {frac {gamma _{mathrm {S} }^{sigma }gamma _{mathrm {T} }^{tau }}{gamma _{mathrm {A} }^{alpha }gamma _{mathrm {B} }^{beta }}}}

where [S] denotes the concentration of S, etc. In practice equilibrium constants are determined in a medium such that the quotient of activity coefficient is constant and can be ignored, leading to the usual expression


K=[S]σ[T]τ[A]α[B]β{displaystyle K={frac {[mathrm {S} ]^{sigma }[mathrm {T} ]^{tau }}{[mathrm {A} ]^{alpha }[mathrm {B} ]^{beta }}}}{displaystyle K={frac {[mathrm {S} ]^{sigma }[mathrm {T} ]^{tau }}{[mathrm {A} ]^{alpha }[mathrm {B} ]^{beta }}}}

which applies under the conditions that the activity quotient has a particular (constant) value.



References





  1. ^ IUPAC, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the "Gold Book") (1997). Online corrected version:  (2006–) "Activity coefficient".


  2. ^ DeHoff, Robert (2006). "Thermodynamics in materials science". Entropy (2nd ed.). 20 (7): 230–231. Bibcode:2018Entrp..20..532G. doi:10.3390/e20070532. ISBN 9780849340659..mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}


  3. ^ Ibáñez, Jorge G.; Hernández Esparza, Margarita; Doría Serrano, Carmen; Singh, Mono Mohan (2007). Environmental Chemistry: Fundamentals. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-26061-7.


  4. ^ Atkins, Peter; dePaula, Julio (2006). "Section 5.9, The activities of ions in solution". Physical Chemisrry (8th ed.). OUP. ISBN 9780198700722.


  5. ^ Guggenheim, E. A. (1928). "The Conceptions of Electrical Potential Difference between Two Phases and the Individual Activities of Ions". The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 33 (6): 842–849. doi:10.1021/j150300a003. ISSN 0092-7325.


  6. ^ IUPAC, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the "Gold Book") (1997). Online corrected version:  (2006–) "pH".


  7. ^ Rockwood, Alan L. (2015). "Meaning and Measurability of Single-Ion Activities, the Thermodynamic Foundations of pH, and the Gibbs Free Energy for the Transfer of Ions between Dissimilar Materials". ChemPhysChem. 16 (9): 1978–1991. doi:10.1002/cphc.201500044. ISSN 1439-4235. PMC 4501315. PMID 25919971.


  8. ^ Betts, R. H.; MacKenzie, Agnes N. (1952). "Radiochemical Measurements of Activity Coefficients in Mixed Electrolytes". Canadian Journal of Chemistry. 30 (2): 146–162. doi:10.1139/v52-020.


  9. ^ King, E. L. (1964). "Book Review: Ion Association, C. W. Davies, Butterworth, Washington, D.C., 1962". Science. 143 (3601): 37. Bibcode:1964Sci...143...37D. doi:10.1126/science.143.3601.37. ISSN 0036-8075.


  10. ^ Grenthe, I.; Wanner, H. "Guidelines for the extrapolation to zero ionic strength" (PDF).


  11. ^ Ge, Xinlei; Wang, Xidong; Zhang, Mei; Seetharaman, Seshadri (2007). "Correlation and Prediction of Activity and Osmotic Coefficients of Aqueous Electrolytes at 298.15 K by the Modified TCPC Model". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 52 (2): 538–547. doi:10.1021/je060451k. ISSN 0021-9568.


  12. ^ Ge, Xinlei; Zhang, Mei; Guo, Min; Wang, Xidong (2008). "Correlation and Prediction of Thermodynamic Properties of Nonaqueous Electrolytes by the Modified TCPC Model". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 53 (1): 149–159. doi:10.1021/je700446q. ISSN 0021-9568.


  13. ^ Ge, Xinlei; Zhang, Mei; Guo, Min; Wang, Xidong (2008). "Correlation and Prediction of Thermodynamic Properties of Some Complex Aqueous Electrolytes by the Modified Three-Characteristic-Parameter Correlation Model". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 53 (4): 950–958. doi:10.1021/je7006499. ISSN 0021-9568.


  14. ^ Ge, Xinlei; Wang, Xidong (2009). "A Simple Two-Parameter Correlation Model for Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions across a Wide Range of Temperatures". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. 54 (2): 179–186. doi:10.1021/je800483q. ISSN 0021-9568.


  15. ^ "Project: Ionic Strength Corrections for Stability Constants". IUPAC. Archived from the original on 29 October 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-15.


  16. ^ Klamt, Andreas (2005). COSMO-RS from quantum chemistry to fluid phase thermodynamics and drug design (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-444-51994-8.


  17. ^ ab N. Butler, James (1998). Ionic equilibrium: solubility and pH calculations. New York, NY [u.a.]: Wiley. ISBN 9780471585268.


  18. ^ Ellis, A. J.; Golding, R. M. (1963). "The solubility of carbon dioxide above 100 degrees C in water and in sodium chloride solutions". American Journal of Science. 261 (1): 47–60. Bibcode:1963AmJS..261...47E. doi:10.2475/ajs.261.1.47. ISSN 0002-9599.


  19. ^ Stokes, R. H; Robinson, R. A (1948). "Ionic Hydration and Activity in Electrolyte Solutions". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 70 (5): 1870–1878. doi:10.1021/ja01185a065.


  20. ^ http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1955/tf/tf9555101235#!divAbstract


  21. ^ http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1957/tf/tf9575300305#!divAbstract


  22. ^ Kortüm, G. (1960). "The Structure of Electrolytic Solutions, herausgeg. von W. J. Hamer. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York; Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London 1959. 1. Aufl., XII, 441 S., geb. $ 18.50". Angewandte Chemie. 72 (24): 97. doi:10.1002/ange.19600722427. ISSN 0044-8249.


  23. ^ Miller, Donald G (1956). "On the Stokes-Robinson Hydration Model for Solutions". The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 60 (9): 1296–1299. doi:10.1021/j150543a034.


  24. ^ Nesbitt, H. Wayne (1982). "The stokes and robinson hydration theory: A modification with application to concentrated electrolyte solutions". Journal of Solution Chemistry. 11 (6): 415–422. doi:10.1007/BF00649040.




External links




  • AIOMFAC online-model An interactive group-contribution model for the calculation of activity coefficients in organic-inorganic mixtures.


  • Electrochimica Acta Single-ion activity coefficients




-

Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Image
Subprefecture and commune in Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France Bressuire Subprefecture and commune Chateau de Bressuire and the Eglise Notre-Dame Coat of arms Location of Bressuire Bressuire Show map of France Bressuire Show map of Nouvelle-Aquitaine Coordinates: 46°50′27″N 0°29′14″W  /  46.8408°N 0.4872°W  / 46.8408; -0.4872 Coordinates: 46°50′27″N 0°29′14″W  /  46.8408°N 0.4872°W  / 46.8408; -0.4872 Country France Region Nouvelle-Aquitaine Department Deux-Sèvres Arrondissement Bressuire Canton Bressuire Government  • Mayor .mw-parser-output .nobold{font-weight:normal} (2014–20) Jean Michel Bernier Area 1 180.59 km 2 (69.73 sq mi) Population (2014) 2 19,300  • Density 110/km 2 (280/sq mi) Time zone UTC+01:00 (CET)  • Summer (DST) UTC+02:00 (CEST) INSEE/Postal code 79049 /79300 Elevation 98–236 m (322–774 ft) (avg. 173 m or 568 ft) 1 French Land Register data, which exclude
Read more

Vorschmack

Image
Vorschmack Ukrainian Jewish-style vorschmack served on rye bread Course Hors d'oeuvre Region or state Eastern Europe Associated national cuisine Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish, German, Ukrainian, Polish, Russian Main ingredients Ground meat and/or fish Cookbook: Vorschmack   Media: Vorschmack Vorschmack or forshmak (Yiddish: פֿאָרשמאַק ‎, from archaic German Vorschmack , "foretaste" [1] or "appetizer" [2] ) is an originally East European dish made of salty minced fish or meat. Different variants of this dish are especially common in Ashkenazi Jewish and Finnish cuisine. Some varieties are also known in Russian and Polish cuisine. Contents 1 In Jewish cuisine 2 In Russian cuisine 3 In Polish cuisine 4 In Finnish cuisine 5 See also 6 References In Jewish cuisine According to Gil Marks, the German name points to the possible Germanic origin of this dish. [1] William Pokhlyobkin descr
Read more

Quarantine

Image
For other uses, see Quarantine (disambiguation). Signal flag "Lima" called the "Yellow Jack" which when flown in harbor means ship is under quarantine. A simple yellow flag (also called the "Yellow Jack") had historically been used to signal quarantine (it stands for Q among signal flags), but now indicates the opposite, as a signal of a ship free of disease that requests boarding and inspection. A quarantine is used to separate and restrict the movement of people; it is 'a restraint upon the activities or communication of persons or the transport of goods designed to prevent the spread of disease or pests', for a certain period of time. [1] This is often used in connection to disease and illness, such as those who may possibly have been exposed to a communicable disease. [2] The term is often erroneously used to mean medical isolation, which is "to separate ill persons who have a communicable disease from those who are healthy
Read more