My Spring Boot server returns 406 Http error code
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have a Spring Boot server application that receives a POST request from an external service with the following characteristics:
Headers
accept-encoding: gzip,deflate
user-agent: Apache-HttpClient/4.3.6 (java 1.5)
connection: Keep-Alive
host: webhook.site
content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
content-length: 558
Query strings:(empty)
Form values
BillNumber: 41492032464
BillValue: 600000.0
Description: Description
To be able to handle this POST request from the external service I implemented the following controller, which what it does is create and store an invoice, but my application returns an HTTP Error 406:
@RequestMapping(value = "/bills", method = RequestMethod.POST, headers = "Accept=application/x-www-form-urlencoded")
@ResponseBody
@Transactional
public void createBill(UriComponentsBuilder uriComponentsBuilder, final HttpServletRequest request,
final HttpServletResponse response) throws IOException {
}
I understand that the error refers to the client (in this case the external service) does not understand the "language" of the server response, but as you can see in the headers of my controller I am accepting "application / x-www-form -urlencoded "I do not know if it's due to another problem also my controller it's void
How should this controller be implemented in my spring boot app?
Many Thanks!
java spring spring-boot
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
AlejoDevAlejoDev
389525
add a comment |
I have a Spring Boot server application that receives a POST request from an external service with the following characteristics:
Headers
accept-encoding: gzip,deflate
user-agent: Apache-HttpClient/4.3.6 (java 1.5)
connection: Keep-Alive
host: webhook.site
content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
content-length: 558
Query strings:(empty)
Form values
BillNumber: 41492032464
BillValue: 600000.0
Description: Description
To be able to handle this POST request from the external service I implemented the following controller, which what it does is create and store an invoice, but my application returns an HTTP Error 406:
@RequestMapping(value = "/bills", method = RequestMethod.POST, headers = "Accept=application/x-www-form-urlencoded")
@ResponseBody
@Transactional
public void createBill(UriComponentsBuilder uriComponentsBuilder, final HttpServletRequest request,
final HttpServletResponse response) throws IOException {
}
I understand that the error refers to the client (in this case the external service) does not understand the "language" of the server response, but as you can see in the headers of my controller I am accepting "application / x-www-form -urlencoded "I do not know if it's due to another problem also my controller it's void
How should this controller be implemented in my spring boot app?
Many Thanks!
java spring spring-boot
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
AlejoDevAlejoDev
389525
1
No, it means that the server can't generate what the client is asking for. You're mixing up Accept (here's what I want back) and Content-Type (here's what I'm sending) headers.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 16 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
I have a Spring Boot server application that receives a POST request from an external service with the following characteristics:
Headers
accept-encoding: gzip,deflate
user-agent: Apache-HttpClient/4.3.6 (java 1.5)
connection: Keep-Alive
host: webhook.site
content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
content-length: 558
Query strings:(empty)
Form values
BillNumber: 41492032464
BillValue: 600000.0
Description: Description
To be able to handle this POST request from the external service I implemented the following controller, which what it does is create and store an invoice, but my application returns an HTTP Error 406:
@RequestMapping(value = "/bills", method = RequestMethod.POST, headers = "Accept=application/x-www-form-urlencoded")
@ResponseBody
@Transactional
public void createBill(UriComponentsBuilder uriComponentsBuilder, final HttpServletRequest request,
final HttpServletResponse response) throws IOException {
}
I understand that the error refers to the client (in this case the external service) does not understand the "language" of the server response, but as you can see in the headers of my controller I am accepting "application / x-www-form -urlencoded "I do not know if it's due to another problem also my controller it's void
How should this controller be implemented in my spring boot app?
Many Thanks!
java spring spring-boot
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
AlejoDevAlejoDev
389525
I have a Spring Boot server application that receives a POST request from an external service with the following characteristics:
Headers
accept-encoding: gzip,deflate
user-agent: Apache-HttpClient/4.3.6 (java 1.5)
connection: Keep-Alive
host: webhook.site
content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
content-length: 558
Query strings:(empty)
Form values
BillNumber: 41492032464
BillValue: 600000.0
Description: Description
To be able to handle this POST request from the external service I implemented the following controller, which what it does is create and store an invoice, but my application returns an HTTP Error 406:
@RequestMapping(value = "/bills", method = RequestMethod.POST, headers = "Accept=application/x-www-form-urlencoded")
@ResponseBody
@Transactional
public void createBill(UriComponentsBuilder uriComponentsBuilder, final HttpServletRequest request,
final HttpServletResponse response) throws IOException {
}
I understand that the error refers to the client (in this case the external service) does not understand the "language" of the server response, but as you can see in the headers of my controller I am accepting "application / x-www-form -urlencoded "I do not know if it's due to another problem also my controller it's void
How should this controller be implemented in my spring boot app?
Many Thanks!
java spring spring-boot
java spring spring-boot
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
AlejoDevAlejoDev
389525
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
AlejoDevAlejoDev
389525
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
AlejoDevAlejoDev
389525
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
AlejoDevAlejoDev
389525
asked Nov 16 '18 at 12:44
AlejoDevAlejoDev
389525
389525
1
No, it means that the server can't generate what the client is asking for. You're mixing up Accept (here's what I want back) and Content-Type (here's what I'm sending) headers.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 16 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
1
No, it means that the server can't generate what the client is asking for. You're mixing up Accept (here's what I want back) and Content-Type (here's what I'm sending) headers.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 16 '18 at 12:46
1
1
No, it means that the server can't generate what the client is asking for. You're mixing up Accept (here's what I want back) and Content-Type (here's what I'm sending) headers.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 16 '18 at 12:46
No, it means that the server can't generate what the client is asking for. You're mixing up Accept (here's what I want back) and Content-Type (here's what I'm sending) headers.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 16 '18 at 12:46
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You should use consumes with MediaType to define the supported Content-Type. You can further simplify by using @PostMapping:
@PostMapping(value = "/bills", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED_VALUE)
It's pointless to set Accept header on response like you do now, this is a request header. As per Mozilla docs:
The
Acceptrequest HTTP header advertises which content types, expressed as MIME types, the client is able to understand. Using content negotiation, the server then selects one of the proposals, uses it and informs the client of its choice with theContent-Typeresponse header. Browsers set adequate values for this header depending on the context where the request is done: when fetching a CSS stylesheet a different value is set for the request than when fetching an image, video or a script.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:51
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.4k93759
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53338185%2fmy-spring-boot-server-returns-406-http-error-code%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You should use consumes with MediaType to define the supported Content-Type. You can further simplify by using @PostMapping:
@PostMapping(value = "/bills", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED_VALUE)
It's pointless to set Accept header on response like you do now, this is a request header. As per Mozilla docs:
The
Acceptrequest HTTP header advertises which content types, expressed as MIME types, the client is able to understand. Using content negotiation, the server then selects one of the proposals, uses it and informs the client of its choice with theContent-Typeresponse header. Browsers set adequate values for this header depending on the context where the request is done: when fetching a CSS stylesheet a different value is set for the request than when fetching an image, video or a script.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:51
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.4k93759
add a comment |
You should use consumes with MediaType to define the supported Content-Type. You can further simplify by using @PostMapping:
@PostMapping(value = "/bills", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED_VALUE)
It's pointless to set Accept header on response like you do now, this is a request header. As per Mozilla docs:
The
Acceptrequest HTTP header advertises which content types, expressed as MIME types, the client is able to understand. Using content negotiation, the server then selects one of the proposals, uses it and informs the client of its choice with theContent-Typeresponse header. Browsers set adequate values for this header depending on the context where the request is done: when fetching a CSS stylesheet a different value is set for the request than when fetching an image, video or a script.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:51
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.4k93759
add a comment |
You should use consumes with MediaType to define the supported Content-Type. You can further simplify by using @PostMapping:
@PostMapping(value = "/bills", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED_VALUE)
It's pointless to set Accept header on response like you do now, this is a request header. As per Mozilla docs:
The
Acceptrequest HTTP header advertises which content types, expressed as MIME types, the client is able to understand. Using content negotiation, the server then selects one of the proposals, uses it and informs the client of its choice with theContent-Typeresponse header. Browsers set adequate values for this header depending on the context where the request is done: when fetching a CSS stylesheet a different value is set for the request than when fetching an image, video or a script.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:51
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.4k93759
You should use consumes with MediaType to define the supported Content-Type. You can further simplify by using @PostMapping:
@PostMapping(value = "/bills", consumes = MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED_VALUE)
It's pointless to set Accept header on response like you do now, this is a request header. As per Mozilla docs:
The
Acceptrequest HTTP header advertises which content types, expressed as MIME types, the client is able to understand. Using content negotiation, the server then selects one of the proposals, uses it and informs the client of its choice with theContent-Typeresponse header. Browsers set adequate values for this header depending on the context where the request is done: when fetching a CSS stylesheet a different value is set for the request than when fetching an image, video or a script.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:51
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.4k93759
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:51
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.4k93759
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:51
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.4k93759
answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:51
Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki
26.4k93759
26.4k93759
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53338185%2fmy-spring-boot-server-returns-406-http-error-code%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
No, it means that the server can't generate what the client is asking for. You're mixing up Accept (here's what I want back) and Content-Type (here's what I'm sending) headers.
– jonrsharpe
Nov 16 '18 at 12:46