How to write unit test for global functions where it is calling another global function using gtest/gmock in...
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have around 10 global functions in file. Need to write unit test cases for each of them. A global function could be called from another global function.
You can consider following three global functions.
int bar(int n){
..........
//Could call another global function.
..........
}
int foo(int n){
..........
int b = bar(x);
..........
}
int hut(int n){
..........
..........
int a = foo(x);
..........
..........
int b = hut(y);
..........
..........
}
In the time of testing hut(), function foo() and bar() should be mocked. Same thing could happens with foo() and bar() too. I am using gtest and gmock. Is it possible to do using gtest and gmock?
Thanks for reading.
c++ unit-testing googletest gmock
add a comment |
I have around 10 global functions in file. Need to write unit test cases for each of them. A global function could be called from another global function.
You can consider following three global functions.
int bar(int n){
..........
//Could call another global function.
..........
}
int foo(int n){
..........
int b = bar(x);
..........
}
int hut(int n){
..........
..........
int a = foo(x);
..........
..........
int b = hut(y);
..........
..........
}
In the time of testing hut(), function foo() and bar() should be mocked. Same thing could happens with foo() and bar() too. I am using gtest and gmock. Is it possible to do using gtest and gmock?
Thanks for reading.
c++ unit-testing googletest gmock
Depending on your OS and toolchain, you may be able to do this with googletest and the linker's help. What are they? Linux/GCC? Windows/VC++...?
– Mike Kinghan
Nov 19 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
I have around 10 global functions in file. Need to write unit test cases for each of them. A global function could be called from another global function.
You can consider following three global functions.
int bar(int n){
..........
//Could call another global function.
..........
}
int foo(int n){
..........
int b = bar(x);
..........
}
int hut(int n){
..........
..........
int a = foo(x);
..........
..........
int b = hut(y);
..........
..........
}
In the time of testing hut(), function foo() and bar() should be mocked. Same thing could happens with foo() and bar() too. I am using gtest and gmock. Is it possible to do using gtest and gmock?
Thanks for reading.
c++ unit-testing googletest gmock
I have around 10 global functions in file. Need to write unit test cases for each of them. A global function could be called from another global function.
You can consider following three global functions.
int bar(int n){
..........
//Could call another global function.
..........
}
int foo(int n){
..........
int b = bar(x);
..........
}
int hut(int n){
..........
..........
int a = foo(x);
..........
..........
int b = hut(y);
..........
..........
}
In the time of testing hut(), function foo() and bar() should be mocked. Same thing could happens with foo() and bar() too. I am using gtest and gmock. Is it possible to do using gtest and gmock?
Thanks for reading.
c++ unit-testing googletest gmock
c++ unit-testing googletest gmock
asked Nov 17 '18 at 4:54
MMHossainMMHossain
16129
16129
Depending on your OS and toolchain, you may be able to do this with googletest and the linker's help. What are they? Linux/GCC? Windows/VC++...?
– Mike Kinghan
Nov 19 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
Depending on your OS and toolchain, you may be able to do this with googletest and the linker's help. What are they? Linux/GCC? Windows/VC++...?
– Mike Kinghan
Nov 19 '18 at 16:28
Depending on your OS and toolchain, you may be able to do this with googletest and the linker's help. What are they? Linux/GCC? Windows/VC++...?
– Mike Kinghan
Nov 19 '18 at 16:28
Depending on your OS and toolchain, you may be able to do this with googletest and the linker's help. What are they? Linux/GCC? Windows/VC++...?
– Mike Kinghan
Nov 19 '18 at 16:28
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If they are in the same file there sadly is no (sane) way to mock those Global Functions. Even if they are not, you would have a hard time doing this (e.g. modifying the original code to #include
the mock headers instead of the real ones when building the code for unit testing), and it will not be pretty, so I'd strongly advise you against it.
While there is a third party extension to add global mocking support, it only helps in the creation of the mock, but unfortunately not the "how do I get my functions to call the mock instead" issue.
They cover this in this FAQ and even provide possible workarounds in their Blog - you can rewrite your code in a way to "get rid" of the static global function and making your code testable.
In short: No, there is no good & easy way to mock global functions (especially if they call other globals), you may be better off refactoring the code into something more testable instead.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53348354%2fhow-to-write-unit-test-for-global-functions-where-it-is-calling-another-global-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If they are in the same file there sadly is no (sane) way to mock those Global Functions. Even if they are not, you would have a hard time doing this (e.g. modifying the original code to #include
the mock headers instead of the real ones when building the code for unit testing), and it will not be pretty, so I'd strongly advise you against it.
While there is a third party extension to add global mocking support, it only helps in the creation of the mock, but unfortunately not the "how do I get my functions to call the mock instead" issue.
They cover this in this FAQ and even provide possible workarounds in their Blog - you can rewrite your code in a way to "get rid" of the static global function and making your code testable.
In short: No, there is no good & easy way to mock global functions (especially if they call other globals), you may be better off refactoring the code into something more testable instead.
add a comment |
If they are in the same file there sadly is no (sane) way to mock those Global Functions. Even if they are not, you would have a hard time doing this (e.g. modifying the original code to #include
the mock headers instead of the real ones when building the code for unit testing), and it will not be pretty, so I'd strongly advise you against it.
While there is a third party extension to add global mocking support, it only helps in the creation of the mock, but unfortunately not the "how do I get my functions to call the mock instead" issue.
They cover this in this FAQ and even provide possible workarounds in their Blog - you can rewrite your code in a way to "get rid" of the static global function and making your code testable.
In short: No, there is no good & easy way to mock global functions (especially if they call other globals), you may be better off refactoring the code into something more testable instead.
add a comment |
If they are in the same file there sadly is no (sane) way to mock those Global Functions. Even if they are not, you would have a hard time doing this (e.g. modifying the original code to #include
the mock headers instead of the real ones when building the code for unit testing), and it will not be pretty, so I'd strongly advise you against it.
While there is a third party extension to add global mocking support, it only helps in the creation of the mock, but unfortunately not the "how do I get my functions to call the mock instead" issue.
They cover this in this FAQ and even provide possible workarounds in their Blog - you can rewrite your code in a way to "get rid" of the static global function and making your code testable.
In short: No, there is no good & easy way to mock global functions (especially if they call other globals), you may be better off refactoring the code into something more testable instead.
If they are in the same file there sadly is no (sane) way to mock those Global Functions. Even if they are not, you would have a hard time doing this (e.g. modifying the original code to #include
the mock headers instead of the real ones when building the code for unit testing), and it will not be pretty, so I'd strongly advise you against it.
While there is a third party extension to add global mocking support, it only helps in the creation of the mock, but unfortunately not the "how do I get my functions to call the mock instead" issue.
They cover this in this FAQ and even provide possible workarounds in their Blog - you can rewrite your code in a way to "get rid" of the static global function and making your code testable.
In short: No, there is no good & easy way to mock global functions (especially if they call other globals), you may be better off refactoring the code into something more testable instead.
answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:23
CharonXCharonX
1,070119
1,070119
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53348354%2fhow-to-write-unit-test-for-global-functions-where-it-is-calling-another-global-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Depending on your OS and toolchain, you may be able to do this with googletest and the linker's help. What are they? Linux/GCC? Windows/VC++...?
– Mike Kinghan
Nov 19 '18 at 16:28