Google colab TPU and reading from disc while traning
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have 100k pics, and it doesn't fit into ram, so I need read it from disc while training.
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(in_pics)
dataset = dataset.map(extract_fn)
def extract_fn(x):
x = tf.read_file(x)
x = tf.image.decode_jpeg(x, channels=3)
x = tf.image.resize_images(x, [64, 64])
return x
But then I try to train, I get this error
File system scheme '[local]' not implemented (file: '/content/anime-faces/black_hair/danbooru_2629248_487b383a8a6e7cc0e004383300477d66.jpg')
Can I work around it somehow?
Also tried with TFRecords API, get the same error.
python tensorflow google-colaboratory google-cloud-tpu
add a comment |
I have 100k pics, and it doesn't fit into ram, so I need read it from disc while training.
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(in_pics)
dataset = dataset.map(extract_fn)
def extract_fn(x):
x = tf.read_file(x)
x = tf.image.decode_jpeg(x, channels=3)
x = tf.image.resize_images(x, [64, 64])
return x
But then I try to train, I get this error
File system scheme '[local]' not implemented (file: '/content/anime-faces/black_hair/danbooru_2629248_487b383a8a6e7cc0e004383300477d66.jpg')
Can I work around it somehow?
Also tried with TFRecords API, get the same error.
python tensorflow google-colaboratory google-cloud-tpu
add a comment |
I have 100k pics, and it doesn't fit into ram, so I need read it from disc while training.
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(in_pics)
dataset = dataset.map(extract_fn)
def extract_fn(x):
x = tf.read_file(x)
x = tf.image.decode_jpeg(x, channels=3)
x = tf.image.resize_images(x, [64, 64])
return x
But then I try to train, I get this error
File system scheme '[local]' not implemented (file: '/content/anime-faces/black_hair/danbooru_2629248_487b383a8a6e7cc0e004383300477d66.jpg')
Can I work around it somehow?
Also tried with TFRecords API, get the same error.
python tensorflow google-colaboratory google-cloud-tpu
I have 100k pics, and it doesn't fit into ram, so I need read it from disc while training.
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices(in_pics)
dataset = dataset.map(extract_fn)
def extract_fn(x):
x = tf.read_file(x)
x = tf.image.decode_jpeg(x, channels=3)
x = tf.image.resize_images(x, [64, 64])
return x
But then I try to train, I get this error
File system scheme '[local]' not implemented (file: '/content/anime-faces/black_hair/danbooru_2629248_487b383a8a6e7cc0e004383300477d66.jpg')
Can I work around it somehow?
Also tried with TFRecords API, get the same error.
python tensorflow google-colaboratory google-cloud-tpu
python tensorflow google-colaboratory google-cloud-tpu
edited Nov 17 '18 at 14:34
had
asked Nov 17 '18 at 1:11
hadhad
547
547
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The Cloud TPU you use in this scenario is not colocated on the same VM where your python runs. Easiest is to stage your data on GCS and use a gs:// URI to point the TPU at it.
To optimize performance when using GCS add prefetch(AUTOTUNE)
to your tf.data pipeline, and for small (<50GB) datasets use cache()
.
Its how I do it, but it has a great performance hit.
– had
Dec 14 '18 at 3:03
That's odd; GCS storage should be the fastest way to get data to a TPU. Perhaps try increasing the replication of your stored data? (E.g. global or multi regional storage instead of zonal)
– Ami F
Dec 14 '18 at 15:36
I will try, for now, I only compared colab vm ram vs google cloud storage. And second option 3 times slower.
– had
Dec 15 '18 at 1:09
Tested with multi-regional, its faster now, but still worse then colab RAM.
– had
Jan 17 at 8:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53347293%2fgoogle-colab-tpu-and-reading-from-disc-while-traning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The Cloud TPU you use in this scenario is not colocated on the same VM where your python runs. Easiest is to stage your data on GCS and use a gs:// URI to point the TPU at it.
To optimize performance when using GCS add prefetch(AUTOTUNE)
to your tf.data pipeline, and for small (<50GB) datasets use cache()
.
Its how I do it, but it has a great performance hit.
– had
Dec 14 '18 at 3:03
That's odd; GCS storage should be the fastest way to get data to a TPU. Perhaps try increasing the replication of your stored data? (E.g. global or multi regional storage instead of zonal)
– Ami F
Dec 14 '18 at 15:36
I will try, for now, I only compared colab vm ram vs google cloud storage. And second option 3 times slower.
– had
Dec 15 '18 at 1:09
Tested with multi-regional, its faster now, but still worse then colab RAM.
– had
Jan 17 at 8:46
add a comment |
The Cloud TPU you use in this scenario is not colocated on the same VM where your python runs. Easiest is to stage your data on GCS and use a gs:// URI to point the TPU at it.
To optimize performance when using GCS add prefetch(AUTOTUNE)
to your tf.data pipeline, and for small (<50GB) datasets use cache()
.
Its how I do it, but it has a great performance hit.
– had
Dec 14 '18 at 3:03
That's odd; GCS storage should be the fastest way to get data to a TPU. Perhaps try increasing the replication of your stored data? (E.g. global or multi regional storage instead of zonal)
– Ami F
Dec 14 '18 at 15:36
I will try, for now, I only compared colab vm ram vs google cloud storage. And second option 3 times slower.
– had
Dec 15 '18 at 1:09
Tested with multi-regional, its faster now, but still worse then colab RAM.
– had
Jan 17 at 8:46
add a comment |
The Cloud TPU you use in this scenario is not colocated on the same VM where your python runs. Easiest is to stage your data on GCS and use a gs:// URI to point the TPU at it.
To optimize performance when using GCS add prefetch(AUTOTUNE)
to your tf.data pipeline, and for small (<50GB) datasets use cache()
.
The Cloud TPU you use in this scenario is not colocated on the same VM where your python runs. Easiest is to stage your data on GCS and use a gs:// URI to point the TPU at it.
To optimize performance when using GCS add prefetch(AUTOTUNE)
to your tf.data pipeline, and for small (<50GB) datasets use cache()
.
edited Feb 4 at 21:09
michaelb
24616
24616
answered Dec 13 '18 at 2:05
Ami FAmi F
80729
80729
Its how I do it, but it has a great performance hit.
– had
Dec 14 '18 at 3:03
That's odd; GCS storage should be the fastest way to get data to a TPU. Perhaps try increasing the replication of your stored data? (E.g. global or multi regional storage instead of zonal)
– Ami F
Dec 14 '18 at 15:36
I will try, for now, I only compared colab vm ram vs google cloud storage. And second option 3 times slower.
– had
Dec 15 '18 at 1:09
Tested with multi-regional, its faster now, but still worse then colab RAM.
– had
Jan 17 at 8:46
add a comment |
Its how I do it, but it has a great performance hit.
– had
Dec 14 '18 at 3:03
That's odd; GCS storage should be the fastest way to get data to a TPU. Perhaps try increasing the replication of your stored data? (E.g. global or multi regional storage instead of zonal)
– Ami F
Dec 14 '18 at 15:36
I will try, for now, I only compared colab vm ram vs google cloud storage. And second option 3 times slower.
– had
Dec 15 '18 at 1:09
Tested with multi-regional, its faster now, but still worse then colab RAM.
– had
Jan 17 at 8:46
Its how I do it, but it has a great performance hit.
– had
Dec 14 '18 at 3:03
Its how I do it, but it has a great performance hit.
– had
Dec 14 '18 at 3:03
That's odd; GCS storage should be the fastest way to get data to a TPU. Perhaps try increasing the replication of your stored data? (E.g. global or multi regional storage instead of zonal)
– Ami F
Dec 14 '18 at 15:36
That's odd; GCS storage should be the fastest way to get data to a TPU. Perhaps try increasing the replication of your stored data? (E.g. global or multi regional storage instead of zonal)
– Ami F
Dec 14 '18 at 15:36
I will try, for now, I only compared colab vm ram vs google cloud storage. And second option 3 times slower.
– had
Dec 15 '18 at 1:09
I will try, for now, I only compared colab vm ram vs google cloud storage. And second option 3 times slower.
– had
Dec 15 '18 at 1:09
Tested with multi-regional, its faster now, but still worse then colab RAM.
– had
Jan 17 at 8:46
Tested with multi-regional, its faster now, but still worse then colab RAM.
– had
Jan 17 at 8:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53347293%2fgoogle-colab-tpu-and-reading-from-disc-while-traning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown