Postgresql - Optimizing creation of several indexes on one big table
What's the best way to create multiple indexes on one very large table (hundreds of Gb).
Currently I have to execute queries like that
create index A on myBigTable (a) using btree ;
create index B on myBigTable (b) using btree ;
create index C on myBigTable (c) using btree ;
....
It takes a very long time. PG has to read all the data from the table several times.
When index on column A is in creation, it prevents from creating an index on column B at the same time.
So, is there a way to optimize the time (and resources consumption) to create all indexes on the same table?
If not possible to really optimize currently, is it something planned for a near future?
postgresql optimization indexing
add a comment |
What's the best way to create multiple indexes on one very large table (hundreds of Gb).
Currently I have to execute queries like that
create index A on myBigTable (a) using btree ;
create index B on myBigTable (b) using btree ;
create index C on myBigTable (c) using btree ;
....
It takes a very long time. PG has to read all the data from the table several times.
When index on column A is in creation, it prevents from creating an index on column B at the same time.
So, is there a way to optimize the time (and resources consumption) to create all indexes on the same table?
If not possible to really optimize currently, is it something planned for a near future?
postgresql optimization indexing
2
create index concurrently ...
will allow you to create all indexes at the same time (if issued from different connections)
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:07
1
Postgres 11 improved the time it takes to create the index as it can use a parallel scan on the table
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:09
thank you @a_horse_with_no_name , but are you sure ? with different connexion, when creating index with 'concurrently', I see that one index is being creating, and others are 'waiting' (wait_evt_typ = lock // wait_evt = relation)
– Enialis
Jan 16 at 11:51
add a comment |
What's the best way to create multiple indexes on one very large table (hundreds of Gb).
Currently I have to execute queries like that
create index A on myBigTable (a) using btree ;
create index B on myBigTable (b) using btree ;
create index C on myBigTable (c) using btree ;
....
It takes a very long time. PG has to read all the data from the table several times.
When index on column A is in creation, it prevents from creating an index on column B at the same time.
So, is there a way to optimize the time (and resources consumption) to create all indexes on the same table?
If not possible to really optimize currently, is it something planned for a near future?
postgresql optimization indexing
What's the best way to create multiple indexes on one very large table (hundreds of Gb).
Currently I have to execute queries like that
create index A on myBigTable (a) using btree ;
create index B on myBigTable (b) using btree ;
create index C on myBigTable (c) using btree ;
....
It takes a very long time. PG has to read all the data from the table several times.
When index on column A is in creation, it prevents from creating an index on column B at the same time.
So, is there a way to optimize the time (and resources consumption) to create all indexes on the same table?
If not possible to really optimize currently, is it something planned for a near future?
postgresql optimization indexing
postgresql optimization indexing
edited Nov 15 '18 at 15:08
a_horse_with_no_name
302k46463559
302k46463559
asked Nov 15 '18 at 14:59
EnialisEnialis
787
787
2
create index concurrently ...
will allow you to create all indexes at the same time (if issued from different connections)
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:07
1
Postgres 11 improved the time it takes to create the index as it can use a parallel scan on the table
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:09
thank you @a_horse_with_no_name , but are you sure ? with different connexion, when creating index with 'concurrently', I see that one index is being creating, and others are 'waiting' (wait_evt_typ = lock // wait_evt = relation)
– Enialis
Jan 16 at 11:51
add a comment |
2
create index concurrently ...
will allow you to create all indexes at the same time (if issued from different connections)
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:07
1
Postgres 11 improved the time it takes to create the index as it can use a parallel scan on the table
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:09
thank you @a_horse_with_no_name , but are you sure ? with different connexion, when creating index with 'concurrently', I see that one index is being creating, and others are 'waiting' (wait_evt_typ = lock // wait_evt = relation)
– Enialis
Jan 16 at 11:51
2
2
create index concurrently ...
will allow you to create all indexes at the same time (if issued from different connections)– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:07
create index concurrently ...
will allow you to create all indexes at the same time (if issued from different connections)– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:07
1
1
Postgres 11 improved the time it takes to create the index as it can use a parallel scan on the table
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:09
Postgres 11 improved the time it takes to create the index as it can use a parallel scan on the table
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:09
thank you @a_horse_with_no_name , but are you sure ? with different connexion, when creating index with 'concurrently', I see that one index is being creating, and others are 'waiting' (wait_evt_typ = lock // wait_evt = relation)
– Enialis
Jan 16 at 11:51
thank you @a_horse_with_no_name , but are you sure ? with different connexion, when creating index with 'concurrently', I see that one index is being creating, and others are 'waiting' (wait_evt_typ = lock // wait_evt = relation)
– Enialis
Jan 16 at 11:51
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53322231%2fpostgresql-optimizing-creation-of-several-indexes-on-one-big-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53322231%2fpostgresql-optimizing-creation-of-several-indexes-on-one-big-table%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
create index concurrently ...
will allow you to create all indexes at the same time (if issued from different connections)– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:07
1
Postgres 11 improved the time it takes to create the index as it can use a parallel scan on the table
– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 15 '18 at 15:09
thank you @a_horse_with_no_name , but are you sure ? with different connexion, when creating index with 'concurrently', I see that one index is being creating, and others are 'waiting' (wait_evt_typ = lock // wait_evt = relation)
– Enialis
Jan 16 at 11:51