Easiest way to find first top left pixel that is not transparent in an image?












-1















What is the easiest way to find the first nontransparent pixel in a png image and output the location of the pixel? I tried using opencv to find the contours, but because the image is transparent it was difficult.










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    first non-transparent pixel on the x-axis, on the y-axis or first given the euclidian distance / the manhattan distance?

    – quant
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:29








  • 1





    Shorter @quant: define top left.

    – Steven Rumbalski
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:34






  • 1





    @StevenRumbalski - oh, you are right, I totally forgot to mention the Chebyshev distance and other less often used distance measurements ;)

    – quant
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:40
















-1















What is the easiest way to find the first nontransparent pixel in a png image and output the location of the pixel? I tried using opencv to find the contours, but because the image is transparent it was difficult.










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    first non-transparent pixel on the x-axis, on the y-axis or first given the euclidian distance / the manhattan distance?

    – quant
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:29








  • 1





    Shorter @quant: define top left.

    – Steven Rumbalski
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:34






  • 1





    @StevenRumbalski - oh, you are right, I totally forgot to mention the Chebyshev distance and other less often used distance measurements ;)

    – quant
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:40














-1












-1








-1








What is the easiest way to find the first nontransparent pixel in a png image and output the location of the pixel? I tried using opencv to find the contours, but because the image is transparent it was difficult.










share|improve this question














What is the easiest way to find the first nontransparent pixel in a png image and output the location of the pixel? I tried using opencv to find the contours, but because the image is transparent it was difficult.







python opencv image-processing






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 15 '18 at 16:25









Lauren LederLauren Leder

465




465








  • 2





    first non-transparent pixel on the x-axis, on the y-axis or first given the euclidian distance / the manhattan distance?

    – quant
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:29








  • 1





    Shorter @quant: define top left.

    – Steven Rumbalski
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:34






  • 1





    @StevenRumbalski - oh, you are right, I totally forgot to mention the Chebyshev distance and other less often used distance measurements ;)

    – quant
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:40














  • 2





    first non-transparent pixel on the x-axis, on the y-axis or first given the euclidian distance / the manhattan distance?

    – quant
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:29








  • 1





    Shorter @quant: define top left.

    – Steven Rumbalski
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:34






  • 1





    @StevenRumbalski - oh, you are right, I totally forgot to mention the Chebyshev distance and other less often used distance measurements ;)

    – quant
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:40








2




2





first non-transparent pixel on the x-axis, on the y-axis or first given the euclidian distance / the manhattan distance?

– quant
Nov 15 '18 at 16:29







first non-transparent pixel on the x-axis, on the y-axis or first given the euclidian distance / the manhattan distance?

– quant
Nov 15 '18 at 16:29






1




1





Shorter @quant: define top left.

– Steven Rumbalski
Nov 15 '18 at 16:34





Shorter @quant: define top left.

– Steven Rumbalski
Nov 15 '18 at 16:34




1




1





@StevenRumbalski - oh, you are right, I totally forgot to mention the Chebyshev distance and other less often used distance measurements ;)

– quant
Nov 15 '18 at 16:40





@StevenRumbalski - oh, you are right, I totally forgot to mention the Chebyshev distance and other less often used distance measurements ;)

– quant
Nov 15 '18 at 16:40












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














you can read image using the alpha channel and find zero values in alpha channel



img = cv2.imread('flower.png', cv2.IMREAD_UNCHANGED)
alpha = (img[:,:,3] == 0)
indices = np.nonzero(alpha)
print(indices)


you can use np.array(indices).sort() to sort the indices






share|improve this answer


























  • how would i sort to find the top left pixel? indices is a 2xn array correct? so would you just find the min y val and then it's corresponding x coord (would that be the top left corner)?

    – Lauren Leder
    Nov 16 '18 at 19:14











  • indices is tuple of arrays, you can convert it to 2xn array using indices = np.array(indices) and use indices.sort(axis=0) to sort along row

    – user8190410
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:14











  • Note that it will be sorted row wise not distance wise, if you want distance wise then compute the distance of each index point with (0,0) and then sort it

    – user8190410
    Nov 18 '18 at 16:19











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53323813%2feasiest-way-to-find-first-top-left-pixel-that-is-not-transparent-in-an-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














you can read image using the alpha channel and find zero values in alpha channel



img = cv2.imread('flower.png', cv2.IMREAD_UNCHANGED)
alpha = (img[:,:,3] == 0)
indices = np.nonzero(alpha)
print(indices)


you can use np.array(indices).sort() to sort the indices






share|improve this answer


























  • how would i sort to find the top left pixel? indices is a 2xn array correct? so would you just find the min y val and then it's corresponding x coord (would that be the top left corner)?

    – Lauren Leder
    Nov 16 '18 at 19:14











  • indices is tuple of arrays, you can convert it to 2xn array using indices = np.array(indices) and use indices.sort(axis=0) to sort along row

    – user8190410
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:14











  • Note that it will be sorted row wise not distance wise, if you want distance wise then compute the distance of each index point with (0,0) and then sort it

    – user8190410
    Nov 18 '18 at 16:19
















0














you can read image using the alpha channel and find zero values in alpha channel



img = cv2.imread('flower.png', cv2.IMREAD_UNCHANGED)
alpha = (img[:,:,3] == 0)
indices = np.nonzero(alpha)
print(indices)


you can use np.array(indices).sort() to sort the indices






share|improve this answer


























  • how would i sort to find the top left pixel? indices is a 2xn array correct? so would you just find the min y val and then it's corresponding x coord (would that be the top left corner)?

    – Lauren Leder
    Nov 16 '18 at 19:14











  • indices is tuple of arrays, you can convert it to 2xn array using indices = np.array(indices) and use indices.sort(axis=0) to sort along row

    – user8190410
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:14











  • Note that it will be sorted row wise not distance wise, if you want distance wise then compute the distance of each index point with (0,0) and then sort it

    – user8190410
    Nov 18 '18 at 16:19














0












0








0







you can read image using the alpha channel and find zero values in alpha channel



img = cv2.imread('flower.png', cv2.IMREAD_UNCHANGED)
alpha = (img[:,:,3] == 0)
indices = np.nonzero(alpha)
print(indices)


you can use np.array(indices).sort() to sort the indices






share|improve this answer















you can read image using the alpha channel and find zero values in alpha channel



img = cv2.imread('flower.png', cv2.IMREAD_UNCHANGED)
alpha = (img[:,:,3] == 0)
indices = np.nonzero(alpha)
print(indices)


you can use np.array(indices).sort() to sort the indices







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 17 '18 at 13:03

























answered Nov 15 '18 at 17:05









user8190410user8190410

533139




533139













  • how would i sort to find the top left pixel? indices is a 2xn array correct? so would you just find the min y val and then it's corresponding x coord (would that be the top left corner)?

    – Lauren Leder
    Nov 16 '18 at 19:14











  • indices is tuple of arrays, you can convert it to 2xn array using indices = np.array(indices) and use indices.sort(axis=0) to sort along row

    – user8190410
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:14











  • Note that it will be sorted row wise not distance wise, if you want distance wise then compute the distance of each index point with (0,0) and then sort it

    – user8190410
    Nov 18 '18 at 16:19



















  • how would i sort to find the top left pixel? indices is a 2xn array correct? so would you just find the min y val and then it's corresponding x coord (would that be the top left corner)?

    – Lauren Leder
    Nov 16 '18 at 19:14











  • indices is tuple of arrays, you can convert it to 2xn array using indices = np.array(indices) and use indices.sort(axis=0) to sort along row

    – user8190410
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:14











  • Note that it will be sorted row wise not distance wise, if you want distance wise then compute the distance of each index point with (0,0) and then sort it

    – user8190410
    Nov 18 '18 at 16:19

















how would i sort to find the top left pixel? indices is a 2xn array correct? so would you just find the min y val and then it's corresponding x coord (would that be the top left corner)?

– Lauren Leder
Nov 16 '18 at 19:14





how would i sort to find the top left pixel? indices is a 2xn array correct? so would you just find the min y val and then it's corresponding x coord (would that be the top left corner)?

– Lauren Leder
Nov 16 '18 at 19:14













indices is tuple of arrays, you can convert it to 2xn array using indices = np.array(indices) and use indices.sort(axis=0) to sort along row

– user8190410
Nov 17 '18 at 13:14





indices is tuple of arrays, you can convert it to 2xn array using indices = np.array(indices) and use indices.sort(axis=0) to sort along row

– user8190410
Nov 17 '18 at 13:14













Note that it will be sorted row wise not distance wise, if you want distance wise then compute the distance of each index point with (0,0) and then sort it

– user8190410
Nov 18 '18 at 16:19





Note that it will be sorted row wise not distance wise, if you want distance wise then compute the distance of each index point with (0,0) and then sort it

– user8190410
Nov 18 '18 at 16:19




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53323813%2feasiest-way-to-find-first-top-left-pixel-that-is-not-transparent-in-an-image%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

Glorious Revolution

Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python