Sort list of urls by datetime path component












2















I have a list of urls that have a multiple datetime components.



urls = [ www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z, www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z]


I want to sort on it and then return the list back like this:



urls = [ www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z, www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z]


Because the first element has 2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z it is greater than 2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z. Is there a way to do this in a list comprehension? I am assuming this is the right path:



for url in urls:
date = url.split('/')[2]


But not sure what to do from there.










share|improve this question

























  • sorted() would work?

    – kon_u
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:04
















2















I have a list of urls that have a multiple datetime components.



urls = [ www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z, www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z]


I want to sort on it and then return the list back like this:



urls = [ www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z, www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z]


Because the first element has 2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z it is greater than 2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z. Is there a way to do this in a list comprehension? I am assuming this is the right path:



for url in urls:
date = url.split('/')[2]


But not sure what to do from there.










share|improve this question

























  • sorted() would work?

    – kon_u
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:04














2












2








2








I have a list of urls that have a multiple datetime components.



urls = [ www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z, www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z]


I want to sort on it and then return the list back like this:



urls = [ www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z, www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z]


Because the first element has 2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z it is greater than 2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z. Is there a way to do this in a list comprehension? I am assuming this is the right path:



for url in urls:
date = url.split('/')[2]


But not sure what to do from there.










share|improve this question
















I have a list of urls that have a multiple datetime components.



urls = [ www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z, www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z]


I want to sort on it and then return the list back like this:



urls = [ www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z, www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z]


Because the first element has 2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z it is greater than 2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z. Is there a way to do this in a list comprehension? I am assuming this is the right path:



for url in urls:
date = url.split('/')[2]


But not sure what to do from there.







python list sorting datetime






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:19









benvc

5,3341625




5,3341625










asked Nov 14 '18 at 16:01









skim8201skim8201

373




373













  • sorted() would work?

    – kon_u
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:04



















  • sorted() would work?

    – kon_u
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:04

















sorted() would work?

– kon_u
Nov 14 '18 at 16:04





sorted() would work?

– kon_u
Nov 14 '18 at 16:04












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














You can sort your urls inplace based on the timestamp (i.e. the last element after the slash) in reverse order (most recent first) via:



urls.sort(key=lambda url: url.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)





share|improve this answer
























  • great this worked perfectly. im surprised it didnt need to be converted because of the T in the string. Thanks again!

    – skim8201
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:58



















1














You can sort the list using a function to define the sort key. For example:



urls = ['www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z', 'www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z']

sorted_urls = sorted(urls, key=lambda x: x.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)
print(sorted_urls)
# OUTPUT
# ['www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z', 'www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z']





share|improve this answer
























  • @Alexander beat me to the punch by a few seconds (which is why our answers are near dups) and that answer uses list.sort() rather than sorted() which avoids creating a probably unnecessary extra variable, so I recommend that you accept Alexander's answer.

    – benvc
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:11













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53304258%2fsort-list-of-urls-by-datetime-path-component%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














You can sort your urls inplace based on the timestamp (i.e. the last element after the slash) in reverse order (most recent first) via:



urls.sort(key=lambda url: url.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)





share|improve this answer
























  • great this worked perfectly. im surprised it didnt need to be converted because of the T in the string. Thanks again!

    – skim8201
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:58
















3














You can sort your urls inplace based on the timestamp (i.e. the last element after the slash) in reverse order (most recent first) via:



urls.sort(key=lambda url: url.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)





share|improve this answer
























  • great this worked perfectly. im surprised it didnt need to be converted because of the T in the string. Thanks again!

    – skim8201
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:58














3












3








3







You can sort your urls inplace based on the timestamp (i.e. the last element after the slash) in reverse order (most recent first) via:



urls.sort(key=lambda url: url.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)





share|improve this answer













You can sort your urls inplace based on the timestamp (i.e. the last element after the slash) in reverse order (most recent first) via:



urls.sort(key=lambda url: url.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 16:08









AlexanderAlexander

54.4k1487123




54.4k1487123













  • great this worked perfectly. im surprised it didnt need to be converted because of the T in the string. Thanks again!

    – skim8201
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:58



















  • great this worked perfectly. im surprised it didnt need to be converted because of the T in the string. Thanks again!

    – skim8201
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:58

















great this worked perfectly. im surprised it didnt need to be converted because of the T in the string. Thanks again!

– skim8201
Nov 14 '18 at 17:58





great this worked perfectly. im surprised it didnt need to be converted because of the T in the string. Thanks again!

– skim8201
Nov 14 '18 at 17:58













1














You can sort the list using a function to define the sort key. For example:



urls = ['www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z', 'www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z']

sorted_urls = sorted(urls, key=lambda x: x.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)
print(sorted_urls)
# OUTPUT
# ['www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z', 'www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z']





share|improve this answer
























  • @Alexander beat me to the punch by a few seconds (which is why our answers are near dups) and that answer uses list.sort() rather than sorted() which avoids creating a probably unnecessary extra variable, so I recommend that you accept Alexander's answer.

    – benvc
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:11


















1














You can sort the list using a function to define the sort key. For example:



urls = ['www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z', 'www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z']

sorted_urls = sorted(urls, key=lambda x: x.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)
print(sorted_urls)
# OUTPUT
# ['www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z', 'www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z']





share|improve this answer
























  • @Alexander beat me to the punch by a few seconds (which is why our answers are near dups) and that answer uses list.sort() rather than sorted() which avoids creating a probably unnecessary extra variable, so I recommend that you accept Alexander's answer.

    – benvc
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:11
















1












1








1







You can sort the list using a function to define the sort key. For example:



urls = ['www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z', 'www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z']

sorted_urls = sorted(urls, key=lambda x: x.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)
print(sorted_urls)
# OUTPUT
# ['www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z', 'www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z']





share|improve this answer













You can sort the list using a function to define the sort key. For example:



urls = ['www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z', 'www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z']

sorted_urls = sorted(urls, key=lambda x: x.split('/')[-1], reverse=True)
print(sorted_urls)
# OUTPUT
# ['www.google.com//2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:09:18.000Z', 'www.google.com/2018-10-26/2018-10-26T11:07:10.000Z']






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 16:08









benvcbenvc

5,3341625




5,3341625













  • @Alexander beat me to the punch by a few seconds (which is why our answers are near dups) and that answer uses list.sort() rather than sorted() which avoids creating a probably unnecessary extra variable, so I recommend that you accept Alexander's answer.

    – benvc
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:11





















  • @Alexander beat me to the punch by a few seconds (which is why our answers are near dups) and that answer uses list.sort() rather than sorted() which avoids creating a probably unnecessary extra variable, so I recommend that you accept Alexander's answer.

    – benvc
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:11



















@Alexander beat me to the punch by a few seconds (which is why our answers are near dups) and that answer uses list.sort() rather than sorted() which avoids creating a probably unnecessary extra variable, so I recommend that you accept Alexander's answer.

– benvc
Nov 14 '18 at 16:11







@Alexander beat me to the punch by a few seconds (which is why our answers are near dups) and that answer uses list.sort() rather than sorted() which avoids creating a probably unnecessary extra variable, so I recommend that you accept Alexander's answer.

– benvc
Nov 14 '18 at 16:11




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53304258%2fsort-list-of-urls-by-datetime-path-component%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

List item for chat from Array inside array React Native

Thiostrepton

Caerphilly