Define enum as flag with an or












1














I'm trying to create an enum as flag. I come from C#, and I want to create an equivalent in C++. I found how to create an enum as a flag in C++, but not how to re-use a member for another member value.



I do not know how to ask my question clearly so here's what I'm trying to do (C# code):



[Flags]
enum myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
}


What I wrote in C++:



enum myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
};
inline myEnum operator|(myEnum a, myEnum b)
{
return static_cast<myEnum>(static_cast<int>(a) | static_cast<int>(b));
}


But I have an error :




redefinition of 'TypeA '




Edit:



I'm very new to C++ and I forgot the compiler. There is my environment:




  • I'm working on windows 10

  • with Visual studio 2017

  • I compile for android with Clang 3.8 and I target KitKat 4.4

  • I'm using C++ 11


Edit2:



I identified the problem. In my namespace I have a class name typeA:



In a .h :



namespace myNameSpace
{
namespace myOtherNameSpace
{
class typeA {...}
}
}


There is a conflict between both. Can I modify my enum to keep myEnum.TypeA or should I rename this member ?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    You don't need to implement a custorm operator| for your enum since it is not a ("strongly typed") scoped enum.
    – Swordfish
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






  • 2




    Yes, please provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. Your code builds fine for me coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/61d1123fa137fbd2
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48








  • 3




    @Swordfish - You do if you want to assign the result back to myEnum without a cast.
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






  • 1




    @Swordfish - It's not used in definition of the enumeration. The enumerators are just names of specific values from the underlying type. So when TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB is defined | is the built-in integer or operator, while myEnum e = TypeA | TypeB; would in fact use the overloaded operator (or cause an error if the operator isn't present). Same tokens mean different things in different contexts. Gotta love C++, huh?
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:53








  • 1




    Use a enum class if you don't want the enumerators populate the surrounding namespace.
    – Swordfish
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:15
















1














I'm trying to create an enum as flag. I come from C#, and I want to create an equivalent in C++. I found how to create an enum as a flag in C++, but not how to re-use a member for another member value.



I do not know how to ask my question clearly so here's what I'm trying to do (C# code):



[Flags]
enum myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
}


What I wrote in C++:



enum myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
};
inline myEnum operator|(myEnum a, myEnum b)
{
return static_cast<myEnum>(static_cast<int>(a) | static_cast<int>(b));
}


But I have an error :




redefinition of 'TypeA '




Edit:



I'm very new to C++ and I forgot the compiler. There is my environment:




  • I'm working on windows 10

  • with Visual studio 2017

  • I compile for android with Clang 3.8 and I target KitKat 4.4

  • I'm using C++ 11


Edit2:



I identified the problem. In my namespace I have a class name typeA:



In a .h :



namespace myNameSpace
{
namespace myOtherNameSpace
{
class typeA {...}
}
}


There is a conflict between both. Can I modify my enum to keep myEnum.TypeA or should I rename this member ?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    You don't need to implement a custorm operator| for your enum since it is not a ("strongly typed") scoped enum.
    – Swordfish
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






  • 2




    Yes, please provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. Your code builds fine for me coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/61d1123fa137fbd2
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48








  • 3




    @Swordfish - You do if you want to assign the result back to myEnum without a cast.
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






  • 1




    @Swordfish - It's not used in definition of the enumeration. The enumerators are just names of specific values from the underlying type. So when TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB is defined | is the built-in integer or operator, while myEnum e = TypeA | TypeB; would in fact use the overloaded operator (or cause an error if the operator isn't present). Same tokens mean different things in different contexts. Gotta love C++, huh?
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:53








  • 1




    Use a enum class if you don't want the enumerators populate the surrounding namespace.
    – Swordfish
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:15














1












1








1







I'm trying to create an enum as flag. I come from C#, and I want to create an equivalent in C++. I found how to create an enum as a flag in C++, but not how to re-use a member for another member value.



I do not know how to ask my question clearly so here's what I'm trying to do (C# code):



[Flags]
enum myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
}


What I wrote in C++:



enum myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
};
inline myEnum operator|(myEnum a, myEnum b)
{
return static_cast<myEnum>(static_cast<int>(a) | static_cast<int>(b));
}


But I have an error :




redefinition of 'TypeA '




Edit:



I'm very new to C++ and I forgot the compiler. There is my environment:




  • I'm working on windows 10

  • with Visual studio 2017

  • I compile for android with Clang 3.8 and I target KitKat 4.4

  • I'm using C++ 11


Edit2:



I identified the problem. In my namespace I have a class name typeA:



In a .h :



namespace myNameSpace
{
namespace myOtherNameSpace
{
class typeA {...}
}
}


There is a conflict between both. Can I modify my enum to keep myEnum.TypeA or should I rename this member ?










share|improve this question















I'm trying to create an enum as flag. I come from C#, and I want to create an equivalent in C++. I found how to create an enum as a flag in C++, but not how to re-use a member for another member value.



I do not know how to ask my question clearly so here's what I'm trying to do (C# code):



[Flags]
enum myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
}


What I wrote in C++:



enum myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
};
inline myEnum operator|(myEnum a, myEnum b)
{
return static_cast<myEnum>(static_cast<int>(a) | static_cast<int>(b));
}


But I have an error :




redefinition of 'TypeA '




Edit:



I'm very new to C++ and I forgot the compiler. There is my environment:




  • I'm working on windows 10

  • with Visual studio 2017

  • I compile for android with Clang 3.8 and I target KitKat 4.4

  • I'm using C++ 11


Edit2:



I identified the problem. In my namespace I have a class name typeA:



In a .h :



namespace myNameSpace
{
namespace myOtherNameSpace
{
class typeA {...}
}
}


There is a conflict between both. Can I modify my enum to keep myEnum.TypeA or should I rename this member ?







c++ enums






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 13 '18 at 10:36









ctrl-alt-delor

4,15532443




4,15532443










asked Nov 13 '18 at 9:44









A.PissicatA.Pissicat

7131834




7131834








  • 1




    You don't need to implement a custorm operator| for your enum since it is not a ("strongly typed") scoped enum.
    – Swordfish
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






  • 2




    Yes, please provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. Your code builds fine for me coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/61d1123fa137fbd2
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48








  • 3




    @Swordfish - You do if you want to assign the result back to myEnum without a cast.
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






  • 1




    @Swordfish - It's not used in definition of the enumeration. The enumerators are just names of specific values from the underlying type. So when TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB is defined | is the built-in integer or operator, while myEnum e = TypeA | TypeB; would in fact use the overloaded operator (or cause an error if the operator isn't present). Same tokens mean different things in different contexts. Gotta love C++, huh?
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:53








  • 1




    Use a enum class if you don't want the enumerators populate the surrounding namespace.
    – Swordfish
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:15














  • 1




    You don't need to implement a custorm operator| for your enum since it is not a ("strongly typed") scoped enum.
    – Swordfish
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






  • 2




    Yes, please provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. Your code builds fine for me coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/61d1123fa137fbd2
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48








  • 3




    @Swordfish - You do if you want to assign the result back to myEnum without a cast.
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






  • 1




    @Swordfish - It's not used in definition of the enumeration. The enumerators are just names of specific values from the underlying type. So when TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB is defined | is the built-in integer or operator, while myEnum e = TypeA | TypeB; would in fact use the overloaded operator (or cause an error if the operator isn't present). Same tokens mean different things in different contexts. Gotta love C++, huh?
    – StoryTeller
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:53








  • 1




    Use a enum class if you don't want the enumerators populate the surrounding namespace.
    – Swordfish
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:15








1




1




You don't need to implement a custorm operator| for your enum since it is not a ("strongly typed") scoped enum.
– Swordfish
Nov 13 '18 at 9:48




You don't need to implement a custorm operator| for your enum since it is not a ("strongly typed") scoped enum.
– Swordfish
Nov 13 '18 at 9:48




2




2




Yes, please provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. Your code builds fine for me coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/61d1123fa137fbd2
– StoryTeller
Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






Yes, please provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. Your code builds fine for me coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/61d1123fa137fbd2
– StoryTeller
Nov 13 '18 at 9:48






3




3




@Swordfish - You do if you want to assign the result back to myEnum without a cast.
– StoryTeller
Nov 13 '18 at 9:48




@Swordfish - You do if you want to assign the result back to myEnum without a cast.
– StoryTeller
Nov 13 '18 at 9:48




1




1




@Swordfish - It's not used in definition of the enumeration. The enumerators are just names of specific values from the underlying type. So when TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB is defined | is the built-in integer or operator, while myEnum e = TypeA | TypeB; would in fact use the overloaded operator (or cause an error if the operator isn't present). Same tokens mean different things in different contexts. Gotta love C++, huh?
– StoryTeller
Nov 13 '18 at 9:53






@Swordfish - It's not used in definition of the enumeration. The enumerators are just names of specific values from the underlying type. So when TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB is defined | is the built-in integer or operator, while myEnum e = TypeA | TypeB; would in fact use the overloaded operator (or cause an error if the operator isn't present). Same tokens mean different things in different contexts. Gotta love C++, huh?
– StoryTeller
Nov 13 '18 at 9:53






1




1




Use a enum class if you don't want the enumerators populate the surrounding namespace.
– Swordfish
Nov 13 '18 at 10:15




Use a enum class if you don't want the enumerators populate the surrounding namespace.
– Swordfish
Nov 13 '18 at 10:15












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














To close this topic, there is the answer found thanks to Swordfish :



Replace enum by enum class



enum class myEnum
{
TypeA = 0x01,
TypeB = 0x02,
TypeC = 0x04,
TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
};


With simple enum you can write myEnum e = TypeA, so if a class is named TypeA, there is a conflit and you have a compilation error.



With enum class you must specify the enum myEnum e = myEnum::TypeA. This can avoid some errors and allow to have a class named TypeA






share|improve this answer































    -1














    There is nothing wrong with your code - so maybe a different issue.



    However, instead of the casts, etc. you may just specify the underlying enum, so your enum becomes



    enum myEnum : int
    {
    TypeA = 0x01,
    TypeB = 0x02,
    TypeC = 0x04,
    TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
    };


    UPDATE: that code may not work on an older compiler such as clang 3.8 - since it's a 'modern' c++ feature.






    share|improve this answer























    • and is utterly useless without operator|() if it should be used as flags.
      – Swordfish
      Nov 13 '18 at 10:04











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53278076%2fdefine-enum-as-flag-with-an-or%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    To close this topic, there is the answer found thanks to Swordfish :



    Replace enum by enum class



    enum class myEnum
    {
    TypeA = 0x01,
    TypeB = 0x02,
    TypeC = 0x04,
    TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
    };


    With simple enum you can write myEnum e = TypeA, so if a class is named TypeA, there is a conflit and you have a compilation error.



    With enum class you must specify the enum myEnum e = myEnum::TypeA. This can avoid some errors and allow to have a class named TypeA






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      To close this topic, there is the answer found thanks to Swordfish :



      Replace enum by enum class



      enum class myEnum
      {
      TypeA = 0x01,
      TypeB = 0x02,
      TypeC = 0x04,
      TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
      };


      With simple enum you can write myEnum e = TypeA, so if a class is named TypeA, there is a conflit and you have a compilation error.



      With enum class you must specify the enum myEnum e = myEnum::TypeA. This can avoid some errors and allow to have a class named TypeA






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        To close this topic, there is the answer found thanks to Swordfish :



        Replace enum by enum class



        enum class myEnum
        {
        TypeA = 0x01,
        TypeB = 0x02,
        TypeC = 0x04,
        TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
        };


        With simple enum you can write myEnum e = TypeA, so if a class is named TypeA, there is a conflit and you have a compilation error.



        With enum class you must specify the enum myEnum e = myEnum::TypeA. This can avoid some errors and allow to have a class named TypeA






        share|improve this answer














        To close this topic, there is the answer found thanks to Swordfish :



        Replace enum by enum class



        enum class myEnum
        {
        TypeA = 0x01,
        TypeB = 0x02,
        TypeC = 0x04,
        TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
        };


        With simple enum you can write myEnum e = TypeA, so if a class is named TypeA, there is a conflit and you have a compilation error.



        With enum class you must specify the enum myEnum e = myEnum::TypeA. This can avoid some errors and allow to have a class named TypeA







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 14 '18 at 9:05

























        answered Nov 14 '18 at 8:55









        A.PissicatA.Pissicat

        7131834




        7131834

























            -1














            There is nothing wrong with your code - so maybe a different issue.



            However, instead of the casts, etc. you may just specify the underlying enum, so your enum becomes



            enum myEnum : int
            {
            TypeA = 0x01,
            TypeB = 0x02,
            TypeC = 0x04,
            TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
            };


            UPDATE: that code may not work on an older compiler such as clang 3.8 - since it's a 'modern' c++ feature.






            share|improve this answer























            • and is utterly useless without operator|() if it should be used as flags.
              – Swordfish
              Nov 13 '18 at 10:04
















            -1














            There is nothing wrong with your code - so maybe a different issue.



            However, instead of the casts, etc. you may just specify the underlying enum, so your enum becomes



            enum myEnum : int
            {
            TypeA = 0x01,
            TypeB = 0x02,
            TypeC = 0x04,
            TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
            };


            UPDATE: that code may not work on an older compiler such as clang 3.8 - since it's a 'modern' c++ feature.






            share|improve this answer























            • and is utterly useless without operator|() if it should be used as flags.
              – Swordfish
              Nov 13 '18 at 10:04














            -1












            -1








            -1






            There is nothing wrong with your code - so maybe a different issue.



            However, instead of the casts, etc. you may just specify the underlying enum, so your enum becomes



            enum myEnum : int
            {
            TypeA = 0x01,
            TypeB = 0x02,
            TypeC = 0x04,
            TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
            };


            UPDATE: that code may not work on an older compiler such as clang 3.8 - since it's a 'modern' c++ feature.






            share|improve this answer














            There is nothing wrong with your code - so maybe a different issue.



            However, instead of the casts, etc. you may just specify the underlying enum, so your enum becomes



            enum myEnum : int
            {
            TypeA = 0x01,
            TypeB = 0x02,
            TypeC = 0x04,
            TypeAB = TypeA | TypeB
            };


            UPDATE: that code may not work on an older compiler such as clang 3.8 - since it's a 'modern' c++ feature.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 13 '18 at 10:38









            ctrl-alt-delor

            4,15532443




            4,15532443










            answered Nov 13 '18 at 10:03









            darunedarune

            1,084516




            1,084516












            • and is utterly useless without operator|() if it should be used as flags.
              – Swordfish
              Nov 13 '18 at 10:04


















            • and is utterly useless without operator|() if it should be used as flags.
              – Swordfish
              Nov 13 '18 at 10:04
















            and is utterly useless without operator|() if it should be used as flags.
            – Swordfish
            Nov 13 '18 at 10:04




            and is utterly useless without operator|() if it should be used as flags.
            – Swordfish
            Nov 13 '18 at 10:04


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53278076%2fdefine-enum-as-flag-with-an-or%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

            Glorious Revolution

            Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python