A way to show all my branches on github
I always have to go to a specific repository, click the switch branch button, type my branch name and finally arrive at what I want. Is there a way to submit advanced search terms into the search bar and return only my branches (the ones that I contributed to?)
github
asked Oct 12 '15 at 17:49
1mike121mike12
570322
add a comment |
I always have to go to a specific repository, click the switch branch button, type my branch name and finally arrive at what I want. Is there a way to submit advanced search terms into the search bar and return only my branches (the ones that I contributed to?)
github
asked Oct 12 '15 at 17:49
1mike121mike12
570322
add a comment |
I always have to go to a specific repository, click the switch branch button, type my branch name and finally arrive at what I want. Is there a way to submit advanced search terms into the search bar and return only my branches (the ones that I contributed to?)
github
asked Oct 12 '15 at 17:49
1mike121mike12
570322
I always have to go to a specific repository, click the switch branch button, type my branch name and finally arrive at what I want. Is there a way to submit advanced search terms into the search bar and return only my branches (the ones that I contributed to?)
github
github
asked Oct 12 '15 at 17:49
1mike121mike12
570322
asked Oct 12 '15 at 17:49
1mike121mike12
570322
asked Oct 12 '15 at 17:49
1mike121mike12
570322
asked Oct 12 '15 at 17:49
1mike121mike12
570322
asked Oct 12 '15 at 17:49
1mike121mike12
570322
570322
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I am not aware of a way to do this. While this is not definitive, my initial search of the help on github suggests that it's not currently possible. Based on this link: https://help.github.com/articles/searching-code/
Only the default branch is considered. In most cases, this will be the master branch.
Also, there's nothing about branches on the advanced search page, sad to say: https://help.github.com/articles/advanced-search/
answered Oct 12 '15 at 20:09
mrcheshiremrcheshire
45028
man, that's too bad. I did a few searches myself, but I figured it was because I was bad, not that there was no solution. :(
– 1mike12
Oct 12 '15 at 20:36
Since at least 2016, there has been a way to do this, as given in stackoverflow.com/a/51321004/323177
– Woodz
Nov 7 '18 at 4:27
add a comment |
have you tried to use
github.com/yourrepository/branches/yours
It works in my projects but I do not know if somebody have done that
answered Jul 13 '18 at 8:35
vmrvictorvmrvictor
253117
add a comment |
I would also like to point out that there is a graphical way to accomplish what is answered already here.
From https://help.github.com/articles/viewing-branches-in-your-repository/ :
On GitHub, navigate to the main page of the repository.
Above the list of files, click NUMBER branches.
Use the navigation at the top of the page to view specific lists of branches:
- Your branches: In repositories that you have push access to, the Yours view shows all branches that you’ve pushed to, with the most recent branches first.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:02
dadexix86dadexix86
13718
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f33087252%2fa-way-to-show-all-my-branches-on-github%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I am not aware of a way to do this. While this is not definitive, my initial search of the help on github suggests that it's not currently possible. Based on this link: https://help.github.com/articles/searching-code/
Only the default branch is considered. In most cases, this will be the master branch.
Also, there's nothing about branches on the advanced search page, sad to say: https://help.github.com/articles/advanced-search/
answered Oct 12 '15 at 20:09
mrcheshiremrcheshire
45028
man, that's too bad. I did a few searches myself, but I figured it was because I was bad, not that there was no solution. :(
– 1mike12
Oct 12 '15 at 20:36
Since at least 2016, there has been a way to do this, as given in stackoverflow.com/a/51321004/323177
– Woodz
Nov 7 '18 at 4:27
add a comment |
I am not aware of a way to do this. While this is not definitive, my initial search of the help on github suggests that it's not currently possible. Based on this link: https://help.github.com/articles/searching-code/
Only the default branch is considered. In most cases, this will be the master branch.
Also, there's nothing about branches on the advanced search page, sad to say: https://help.github.com/articles/advanced-search/
answered Oct 12 '15 at 20:09
mrcheshiremrcheshire
45028
man, that's too bad. I did a few searches myself, but I figured it was because I was bad, not that there was no solution. :(
– 1mike12
Oct 12 '15 at 20:36
Since at least 2016, there has been a way to do this, as given in stackoverflow.com/a/51321004/323177
– Woodz
Nov 7 '18 at 4:27
add a comment |
I am not aware of a way to do this. While this is not definitive, my initial search of the help on github suggests that it's not currently possible. Based on this link: https://help.github.com/articles/searching-code/
Only the default branch is considered. In most cases, this will be the master branch.
Also, there's nothing about branches on the advanced search page, sad to say: https://help.github.com/articles/advanced-search/
answered Oct 12 '15 at 20:09
mrcheshiremrcheshire
45028
I am not aware of a way to do this. While this is not definitive, my initial search of the help on github suggests that it's not currently possible. Based on this link: https://help.github.com/articles/searching-code/
Only the default branch is considered. In most cases, this will be the master branch.
Also, there's nothing about branches on the advanced search page, sad to say: https://help.github.com/articles/advanced-search/
answered Oct 12 '15 at 20:09
mrcheshiremrcheshire
45028
answered Oct 12 '15 at 20:09
mrcheshiremrcheshire
45028
answered Oct 12 '15 at 20:09
mrcheshiremrcheshire
45028
answered Oct 12 '15 at 20:09
mrcheshiremrcheshire
45028
45028
man, that's too bad. I did a few searches myself, but I figured it was because I was bad, not that there was no solution. :(
– 1mike12
Oct 12 '15 at 20:36
Since at least 2016, there has been a way to do this, as given in stackoverflow.com/a/51321004/323177
– Woodz
Nov 7 '18 at 4:27
add a comment |
man, that's too bad. I did a few searches myself, but I figured it was because I was bad, not that there was no solution. :(
– 1mike12
Oct 12 '15 at 20:36
Since at least 2016, there has been a way to do this, as given in stackoverflow.com/a/51321004/323177
– Woodz
Nov 7 '18 at 4:27
man, that's too bad. I did a few searches myself, but I figured it was because I was bad, not that there was no solution. :(
– 1mike12
Oct 12 '15 at 20:36
man, that's too bad. I did a few searches myself, but I figured it was because I was bad, not that there was no solution. :(
– 1mike12
Oct 12 '15 at 20:36
Since at least 2016, there has been a way to do this, as given in stackoverflow.com/a/51321004/323177
– Woodz
Nov 7 '18 at 4:27
Since at least 2016, there has been a way to do this, as given in stackoverflow.com/a/51321004/323177
– Woodz
Nov 7 '18 at 4:27
add a comment |
have you tried to use
github.com/yourrepository/branches/yours
It works in my projects but I do not know if somebody have done that
answered Jul 13 '18 at 8:35
vmrvictorvmrvictor
253117
add a comment |
have you tried to use
github.com/yourrepository/branches/yours
It works in my projects but I do not know if somebody have done that
answered Jul 13 '18 at 8:35
vmrvictorvmrvictor
253117
add a comment |
have you tried to use
github.com/yourrepository/branches/yours
It works in my projects but I do not know if somebody have done that
answered Jul 13 '18 at 8:35
vmrvictorvmrvictor
253117
have you tried to use
github.com/yourrepository/branches/yours
It works in my projects but I do not know if somebody have done that
answered Jul 13 '18 at 8:35
vmrvictorvmrvictor
253117
answered Jul 13 '18 at 8:35
vmrvictorvmrvictor
253117
answered Jul 13 '18 at 8:35
vmrvictorvmrvictor
253117
answered Jul 13 '18 at 8:35
vmrvictorvmrvictor
253117
253117
add a comment |
add a comment |
I would also like to point out that there is a graphical way to accomplish what is answered already here.
From https://help.github.com/articles/viewing-branches-in-your-repository/ :
On GitHub, navigate to the main page of the repository.
Above the list of files, click NUMBER branches.
Use the navigation at the top of the page to view specific lists of branches:
- Your branches: In repositories that you have push access to, the Yours view shows all branches that you’ve pushed to, with the most recent branches first.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:02
dadexix86dadexix86
13718
add a comment |
I would also like to point out that there is a graphical way to accomplish what is answered already here.
From https://help.github.com/articles/viewing-branches-in-your-repository/ :
On GitHub, navigate to the main page of the repository.
Above the list of files, click NUMBER branches.
Use the navigation at the top of the page to view specific lists of branches:
- Your branches: In repositories that you have push access to, the Yours view shows all branches that you’ve pushed to, with the most recent branches first.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:02
dadexix86dadexix86
13718
add a comment |
I would also like to point out that there is a graphical way to accomplish what is answered already here.
From https://help.github.com/articles/viewing-branches-in-your-repository/ :
On GitHub, navigate to the main page of the repository.
Above the list of files, click NUMBER branches.
Use the navigation at the top of the page to view specific lists of branches:
- Your branches: In repositories that you have push access to, the Yours view shows all branches that you’ve pushed to, with the most recent branches first.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:02
dadexix86dadexix86
13718
I would also like to point out that there is a graphical way to accomplish what is answered already here.
From https://help.github.com/articles/viewing-branches-in-your-repository/ :
On GitHub, navigate to the main page of the repository.
Above the list of files, click NUMBER branches.
Use the navigation at the top of the page to view specific lists of branches:
- Your branches: In repositories that you have push access to, the Yours view shows all branches that you’ve pushed to, with the most recent branches first.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:02
dadexix86dadexix86
13718
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:02
dadexix86dadexix86
13718
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:02
dadexix86dadexix86
13718
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:02
dadexix86dadexix86
13718
13718
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f33087252%2fa-way-to-show-all-my-branches-on-github%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
