Vfrdtyky

Part of a series on:
Wargaming
Types Scales Grand strategy wargame Strategic wargame Operational wargame Tactical wargame Skirmish Genres Air wargaming Board wargames Computer wargame Fantasy wargame Miniature wargaming Naval wargaming
People Founders Julius von Verdy du Vernois (1832–1910) C. A. L. Totten (1851–1908) Fred T. Jane (1865–1916) H. G. Wells (1866–1946) Fletcher Pratt (1897–1956) 20th century Pioneers Jack Scruby (1916–1988) Don Featherstone (1918–2013) Tony Bath (1926–2000) Charles S. Roberts (1930–2010) Allan B. Calhamer (1931–2013) Phil Barker (born 1932) Gary Gygax (1938–2008) Redmond Simonsen (1942–2005) Jim Dunnigan (born 1943) Richard Berg (born 1943) John Hill (1945–2015) Tom Dalgliesh (born 1945) S. Craig Taylor (1946–2012) Paddy Griffith (1947–2010) Larry Harris, Jr. (born 1948) Groups Castle & Crusade Society Game Manufacturers Association International Federation of Wargaming International Wargames Federation Johnny Reb Gaming Society Naval Wargames Society Society of Fantasy and Science Fiction Wargamers Society of Twentieth Century Wargamers Events Charles S. Roberts Award Gen Con Origins Game Fair World Boardgaming Championships
Lists List of board wargames List of miniature wargames List of wargame publishers
v t e

A wargame is a type of strategy game that simulates warfare to some degree of realism, as opposed to abstract strategy games such as chess or backgammon. A wargame does not involve the activities of actual military forces, which is better called a field training exercise.^[1] Likewise, the term "wargame" should not be applied to sports such as paintball.

Overview

A professional wargame is one that is employed by a military for the purposes of training or research. A recreational wargame is played for pleasure, generally by civilians.

While a wargame does not involve the activities of actual military forces (that is what the military prefers to call a field training exercise), military command and associated staff may operate in a physical command and control center and execute their decision-making as if the simulation were real. A wargame must at least involve one human player, otherwise it's a mere simulation.^[1][2]

Although wargames are adversarial, a wargame need not have clear victory conditions, nor does it have to give each player a fair chance of winning. This is common in military wargames, which are primarily for research and training, not competition. Real-world conflicts, after all, are rarely fair and do not always have clear winners and losers. By contrast, recreational wargames are typically designed for competitive play and are structured around fairness and clear victory conditions.

Setting and scenario

A wargame must have a setting that is based on some historical era of warfare so as to establish what armaments the combatants may wield and the environment they fight in.^[3] A historical setting accurately depicts a real historical era of warfare. Among recreational wargamers, the most popular historical era is World War 2. Professional military wargamers prefer the modern era. A fantasy setting depicts a fictional world in which the combatants wield fictional or anachronistic armaments, but it should be similar enough to some historical era of warfare such that the combatants fight in a familiar and credible way. For instance, Warhammer Age of Sigmar has wizards and dragons, but the combat is mostly based on medieval warfare (spearmen, archers, knights, etc.).

A wargame's scenario describes the circumstances of the specific conflict being simulated, from the layout of the terrain to the exact composition of the fighting forces to the mission objectives of the players. Historical wargamers often re-enact historical battles. Alternatively, players may construct a fictional scenario. It is easier to design a balanced scenario where either player has a fair chance of winning if it is fictionalized. Board wargames usually have a fixed scenario.

Level of war

A wargame's level of war determines to the scope of the scenario, the basic unit of command, and the degree to which lower level processes are abstracted.

At the tactical level, the scenario is a single battle. The basic unit of command is an individual soldier or small group of soldiers.^[4] The time span of the scenario is in the order of minutes. At this level, the specific capabilities of the soldiers and their armaments are described in detail. An example of a tactical-level games is Flames of War, in which players use miniature figurines to represent individual soldiers, and move them around on a scale model of the battlefield.

At the operational level, the scenario is a military campaign, and the basic unit of command is a large group of soldiers. At this level, the outcomes of battles are usually determined by a simple computation.

At the strategic level, the scenario is an entire war. The player addresses higher-level concerns such as economics, research, and diplomacy. The time span of the game is in the order of months or years.^[5][6]

Examples

• 
  Flames of War is a tactical-level historical miniature wargame that simulates land battles during World War 2.


• 
  TACSPIEL is an operational-level military wargame developed in the 1960s by the US Army for research into guerilla warfare.^[7]
  


• 
  Hearts of Iron IV is a strategic-level computer wargame set in the mid-20th century.


• 
  Wings of War is tactical-level historical wargame that simulates World War 1 aerial dogfights.


• 
  Star Wars: X-Wing is a fantasy wargame whose rules are based on Wings of War.

The following strategy games are typically NOT considered wargames (it depends on how far one stretches the definition):

• 
  Battleship depicts a naval battle, but is too abstract.


• 
  Dungeons and Dragons is a role-playing game that adapts wargaming rules to simulate combat, but combat is not the focus of the game.


• 
  Stellaris depicts strategic-level warfare between interstellar empires, but its setting is too divorced from reality.

Design issues

Realism

No wargame can be perfectly realistic. A wargame's design must make trade-offs between realism, simplicity, and fun; and function with the constraints of its medium. Military wargames need to be highly realistic, because their purpose is to prepare officers for real warfare. Recreational wargames only need to be realistic to the degree that the players can suspend their disbelief—they need to be credible, if not perfectly realistic.

Fantasy wargames arguably stretch the definition of wargaming by representing fictional or anachronistic armaments, but they may still be called wargames if they, for the most part, function like historical wargames.^[8] For example, Warhammer Age of Sigmar has wizards and dragons, but the bulk of the armaments are taken from medieval warfare (spearmen, knights, archers, etc.).

Complexity

Whereas the rules of chess are relatively simple, wargames tend to have very sophisticated rules. Generally speaking, the more realistic a wargame seeks to be, the more complicated its rules must be.^[9] This makes wargames difficult to learn. Even experienced wargamers usually play with their rulebook on hand, because the rules for most wargames are too complex to fully memorize. For many people, the complexity also makes wargames difficult to enjoy, but some players enjoy high realism, so finding a balance between realism and simplicity is tricky when it comes to recreational wargames.

One way to solve the problem of complexity is to use an umpire who has the discretion to arbitrate events, using whatever tools and knowledge he deems fit. This solution is popular with military instructors because it allows them to apply their own expertise when they use wargames to instruct students. The drawback of this approach is that the umpire must be very knowledgeable in warfare and impartial, else he may issue unrealistic or unfair rulings.^[10]

Another way to address complexity is to use a computer to automate some or all of the routine procedures. Video games can be both sophisticated and easy to learn, which is why computer wargames are more popular than tabletop wargames.

Scale

Every wargame must have a sense of scale, so that it may realistically simulate how topography, distance, and time affect warfare. Military wargames typically aim to model time and space as realistically as is feasible. Recreational wargame designers, by contrast, tend to use abstract scaling techniques to make their wargames easier to learn and play.

Tabletop miniature wargames, for instance, cannot realistically model the range of modern firearms, because miniature wargaming models are typically built to a scale ratio between 1:64 and 1:120.^[a] At those scales, riflemen should be able to shoot each other from several meters away,^[b] which is longer than most game tables. If model soldiers could shoot each other from opposite ends of the table, without the need to maneuver, the game would not be much fun. The miniature wargame Bolt Action solves this problem by reducing a rifle's range to 24 inches, a sub-machine gun's range to 12 inches, and a pistol's range to 6 inches. Even if these ranges are not realistic, the proportions make intuitive sense and thus keep the game somewhat credible, all the while compressing the battle to fit the confines of the table. Also, the ranges are multiples of 6, which makes them easier to remember.^[11]

Fog of war

In real warfare, commanders have incomplete information about their enemy and the battlespace. A wargame that conceals some information from the player is called a closed game. An open wargame has no secret information.^[12] Most recreational wargames are open wargames. A closed wargame can simulate the espionage and reconnaissance aspects of war.

Military wargames often use umpires to manage secret information. The players may be forced to sit in separate rooms, and communicate their orders with the umpire in the game room, who in turn reports back only the information he judges the players should know. Some recreational wargames use an umpire too, often referring to them as "the GameMaster" (e.g. Warhammer 40,000: Rogue Trader).

The fog of war is easy to simulate in a computer wargame, as a virtual environment is free of the constraints of a physical tabletop game.

Medium

Miniature

A miniature wargame, set in Ancient Greece.

Miniature wargaming is a form of wargaming where units on the battlefield are represented by miniature models, as opposed to abstract pieces such as wooden blocks or plastic counters. Likewise, the battlefield itself is represented by a scale model, as opposed to a flat board or map.

Miniature wargaming tends to be more expensive and time-consuming than other forms of wargaming.^[13] The models tend to be expensive, particularly when they have a distinctive copyrighted design, such as models made by Games Workshop. Furthermore, most manufacturers do not sell ready-to-play models, they sell boxes of model parts, which the players are expected to assemble and paint themselves. This is requires skill, time, and more money, but many players actually prefer it this way because it gives them a way to show off their artistic skill. Miniature wargaming is as much about artistry as it is about play.

Board

A board wargame is played on a board that has a more-or-less fixed layout and is supplied by the game's manufacturer. This is in contrast to customizable playing fields made with modular components, such as in miniature wargaming.

Block

A game of Julius Caesar from Columbia Games shows how a player may only know the strength and unit type of their own forces, creating a fog of war element that does not exist in most wargames.

In block wargaming, the Fog of War is built into the game by representing units with upright wooden blocks that are marked on only one face, which is oriented towards the player who owns the block. The opponent cannot see the markings from his position. The first such block wargame was Quebec 1759 by Columbia Games (previously named Gamma Two Games), depicting the campaign surrounding the Battle of the Plains of Abraham.

Card

Because of their nature, cards are well suited for abstract games, as opposed to the simulation aspects of wargames. Traditional card games are not considered wargames even when nominally about the same subject (such as the game War).

An early card wargame was Nuclear War, a 'tongue-in-cheek game of the end of the world', first published in 1966 and still published today by Flying Buffalo. It does not simulate how any actual nuclear exchange would happen, but it is still structured unlike most card games because of the way it deals with its subject.

In the late 1970s Battleline Publications (a board wargame company) produced two card games, Naval War and Armor Supremacy. The first was fairly popular in wargaming circles, and is a light system of naval combat, though again not depicting any 'real' situation (players may operate ships from opposing navies side-by-side). Armor Supremacy was not as successful, but is a look at the constant design and development of new types of tanks during World War II.

The most successful card wargame (as a card game and as a wargame) would almost certainly be Up Front, a card game about tactical combat in World War II published by Avalon Hill in 1983. The abstractness is harnessed in the game by having the deck produce random terrain, and chances to fire, and the like, simulating uncertainty as to the local conditions (nature of the terrain, etc.).

Dan Verssen Games is a specialist designer and publisher of card games for several genres, including air combat and World War II and Modern land combat.

Also, card driven games (CDGs), first introduced in 1993, use a deck of (custom) cards to drive most elements of the game, such as unit movement (activation) and random events. These are, however, distinctly board games, the deck is merely one of the most important elements of the game.

Computer

The term "wargame" is rarely used in the video gaming hobby. Most strategy video games depict realistic (or semi-realistic) scenarios of war anyway, so computer wargames are usually just called "strategy games". If a strategy video game is especially realistic, they are often called "simulations".

Computer wargames have many advantages over traditional wargames. In a computer game, all the routine procedures and calculations are automated. The player needs only to make strategic and tactical decisions. The learning curve for the player is smaller, as he doesn't have to master all the mechanics of the game. The gameplay is faster, as a computer can process calculations much faster than a human. Computer wargames often have more sophisticated mechanics than traditional wargames thanks to automation. Computer games tend to be cheaper than traditional wargames because, being software, they can be copied and distributed very efficiently. It's easier for a player to find opponents with a computer game: a computer game can use artificial intelligence to provide a virtual opponent, or connect him to another human player over the Internet. For these reasons, computers are now the dominant medium for wargaming.

Computer-assisted

In the recent years, programs have been developed for computer-assisted gaming as regards to wargaming. Two different categories can be distinguished: local computer assisted wargames and remote computer assisted wargames.

Local computer assisted wargames are mostly not designed toward recreating the battlefield inside computer memory, but employing the computer to play the role of game master by storing game rules and unit characteristics, tracking unit status and positions or distances, animating the game with sounds and voice and resolving combat. Flow of play is simple: each turn, the units come up in a random order. Therefore, the more units an opponent has, the more chance he will be selected for the next turn. When a unit comes up, the commander specifies an order and if offensive action is being taken, a target, along with details about distance. The results of the order, base move distance and effect to target, are reported, and the unit is moved on the tabletop. All distance relationships are tracked on the tabletop. All record-keeping is tracked by the computer.

Remote computer assisted wargames can be considered as extensions to the concept of play-by-email gaming, however the presentation and actual capabilities are completely different. They have been designed to replicate the look and feel of existing board or miniatures wargames on the computer. The map and counters are presented to the user who can then manipulate these, more-or-less as if he were playing the physical game, and send a saved file off to his opponent, who can review what has been done without having to duplicate everything on his physical set-up of the game, and respond. Some allow for both players to get on-line and see each other's moves in real-time.

These systems are generally set up so that while one can play the game, the program has no knowledge of the rules, and cannot enforce them. The human players must have a knowledge of the rules themselves. The idea is to promote the playing of the games (by making play against a remote opponent easier), while supporting the industry (and reducing copyright issues) by ensuring that the players have access to the actual physical game.

The four main programs that can be used to play a number of games each are Aide de Camp, Cyberboard, Vassal and ZunTzu. Aide de Camp is available for purchase, while the other three are offered free. Vassal is in turn an outgrowth of the VASL (Virtual ASL) project, and uses Java, making it accessible to any computer that can run a modern JVM, while the other three are Microsoft Windows programs.

Play-by-Mail (PBM)

Wargames were played remotely through the mail, with players sending lists of moves, or orders, to each other through the mail.

In some early PBM systems, six sided dice rolling was simulated by designating a specific stock and a future date and once that date passed, the players would determine an actions outcome using the sales in hundreds value for specific stocks on a specific date and then dividing the NYSE published sales in hundreds by six, using the remainder as the dice result.

Nuclear Destruction, by the Flying Buffalo, was an early PBM game in 1970. Origins Award Hall-of-Fame member Middle-Earth Play-By-Mail is still active today.

Reality Simulations, Inc. still runs a number of PBM games, such as Duel2 (formerly known as Duelmasters), Hyborian War, and Forgotten Realms: War of the Avatars.

E-mail and traditional

Since e-mail is faster than the standard postal service, the rise of the Internet saw a shift of people playing board wargames from play-by-mail (PBM) to play-by-email (PBEM) or play-by-web (PBW). The mechanics were the same, merely the medium was faster.

At this time, turn-based strategy computer games still had a decent amount of popularity, and many started explicitly supporting the sending of saved-game files through email (instead of needing to find the file to send to the opponent by hand). As with all types of video games, the rise in home networking solutions and Internet access has also meant that networked games are now common and easy to set up.

History

Early German wargames (1780-1806)

The playing field and pieces from Hellwig's wargame.

The first wargame was invented in Prussia by Johann Christian Ludwig Hellwig in 1780, who sought to develop a chess-like game that more accurately reflected real warfare. Hellwig called his game kriegsspiel, which from German translates to "war-game" — this is where the term comes from.^[14] Hellwig's kriegsspiel was meant both to teach strategic thinking as well as entertain. Hellwig published his first rulebook in 1780, and a second edition in 1803.

As in chess, Hellwig's game was played on a grid of squares, but it was a much larger grid, and the squares were color-coded to represent different types of terrain: mountains, swamp, water, trenches, etc. The layout of the terrain was not fixed, which allowed players to create their own custom battlefields. The pieces in the game represented real military units: cavalry, infantry, artillery, and various support units. As in chess, only a single piece could occupy a square, and the pieces moved square by square, either laterally or diagonally. Over normal terrain, infantry could move a maximum distance of eight squares, dragoons could move twelve squares, and light cavalry could move sixteen squares — intuitively mirroring the speed at which these units move in the real world. But terrain could impede movement: mountains were impassable, swamps slowed units down, rivers could only be crossed with the help of a special pontoon unit, etc. A player could only move one piece per turn, or one group of pieces if they were arranged in a rectangle. A piece could capture an enemy piece by moving into its square, just like in chess, but infantry and artillery pieces could also shoot enemy pieces, at a maximum ranges of two to three squares. Unlike chess, the pieces had orientation: for instance, an infantry piece could only shoot an enemy piece if they were facing it and flanking it.^[15][16]

In 1796, another Prussian named Johann Georg Julius Venturini invented his own wargame, inspired by Hellwig's game. Venturini's game was played on an even larger grid.^[17] Venturini's game also added rules governing logistics, such as supply convoys and mobile bakeries, and the effects of weather and seasons, making this perhaps the first operational-level wargame.^[18][19]

In 1806, an Austrian named Johann Ferdinand Opiz developed a wargame aimed at both civilian and military markets. Like Hellwig's game, it used a modular grid-based board. But unlike Hellwig's game, Opiz's game used dice rolls to simulate the unpredictability of real warfare. This innovation was controversial at the time.^[20] Hellwig, who designed his wargame for both leisure as well as instruction, felt that introducing chance would spoil the fun.^[21]

Prussian military wargaming (kriegsspiel)

Reiswitz Sr's 1812 wargaming apparatus.

A criticism of the wargames of Hellwig, Venturini, and Opiz was that the pieces moved across a grid in chess-like fashion: only a single piece could occupy a square, and the pieces had to move square by square. This, of course, did not reflect how real troops in the field actually moved. A Prussian nobleman named George Leopold von Reiswitz began developing a more realistic wargame wherein the units could move about the battlefield in a free-form manner.^[22] The king of Prussia heard of Reiswitz's project and invited him to demonstrate it at the palace. In early 1812,^[23] Reiswitz presented to the king an elaborate apparatus that came in the form of a wooden table-cabinet, and shortly afterwards Reiswitz published a book describing his game.^[24]

The game's materials were stored in the cabinet's drawers. The battlefield was made of porcelain tiles laid out on the cabinet's top. The tiles displayed painted bas-relief images of various terrain types (rivers, roads, marshes, hills, etc.). They were modular, and so they could be arranged to create a custom battlefield. The game pieces were little porcelain blocks, each representing a troop formation. ^[25][26] The pieces could move about the battlefield in free-form manner. The players used wooden dividers to measure the distances pieces could move.^[27]

The royal family loved Reiswitz's game and played it frequently. However, it was not adopted by army instructors nor sold commercially. Reiswitz never perfected his wargame, largely because he was distracted by the upheavals caused by the Napoleonic Wars. By 1816, Reiswitz seemed to have lost interest in wargaming altogether. The development of the wargame was continued by his son, Georg Heinrich Rudolf Johann von Reiswitz, who was a junior officer in the Prussian army.^[28] Reiswitz Jr. presented his own wargame to his superiors in 1824.

A reconstruction of the wargame developed in 1824 by Reiswitz Jr.

The major innovation by Reiswitz Jr. was the introduction of an umpire. The players were made to sit in adjacent rooms where they could not see the pieces on the game map in the umpire's room.^[20][29][30] The umpire would send the players written reports on the state of the battlefield, similar to what an actual field commander would receive. The umpire withheld information that the players could not realistically know—for instance, he would not tell a player the position of the enemy's units on the game map if they were not in visual range of the player's own units. The player then issued orders to his units by passing written instructions to the umpire. The umpire would then move the player's units across the game map per these instructions, compute the outcomes of attacks, and report them back to the player.^[31] This is how the game simulated the fog of war, and how commanders in the field commanded their troops.

Another innovation by Reiswitz Jr. was that his wargame could be played on paper maps. In the 1820s, the Prussian army had begun using highly accurate topographical maps, which were the product of new advances in cartography and printing.^[32] This allowed Reiswitz Jr.'s wargames to be set in the real-world. One could re-enact a historical battle or simulate a future hypothetical one simply by using a map of the region of Europe in question. This made Reiswitz Jr.'s game much more useful as a research and training tool.

The Prussian royal family and the General Staff officially endorsed Reiswitz Jr.'s wargame, and Reiswitz Jr. established a workshop by which he could mass-produce and distribute it.^[33] It was widely played by the officer corps, and a number of wargaming clubs formed. This was thus the first wargame to be widely adopted by a military as a serious tool for training and research.

Reiswitzian wargaming was played at the tactical level. In 1875, Klemens Wilhelm Jacob Meckel developed the first wargaming system that could be played at the operation and strategic levels: a "detachment" game played on 1:6,250 maps, a "grand war game" played on 1:12,500 maps, and a "strategic" game played on 1:100,000 maps.^[34]

A criticism of Reiswitzian kriegsspiel was that it had very complicated rules, which were difficult to memorize, and the complex computations greatly slowed down the gameplay. This put off many officers from adopting kriegsspiel. A senior Prussian officer named Julius von Verdy du Vernois proposed dispensing with the rules and instead allowing the umpire to arbitrate events as he saw fit. The umpire, of course, had to be very knowledgeable and impartial so that his rulings would be realistic and fair. This innovation was well-received by army instructors, who could now apply their own expertise to their wargaming sessions. This style of wargaming came to be known as free kriegsspiel.^[35][36]

Wargaming spreads around the world

A French translation of Reiswitz Jr.'s wargaming manual appeared in 1829, and a Dutch translation appeared in 1836. But overall, kriegsspiel attracted little attention outside Prussia until 1870, when Prussia defeated France in the Franco-Prussian War. Many credited Prussia's victory to its wargaming tradition, and this led to great worldwide interest in kriegsspiel.^[37] Civilians and military forces around the world now took a keen interest in the German military wargames, which foreigners referred to by its German name, kriegsspiel.^[38] The first kriegsspiel manual in English, based on the system of Wilhelm von Tschischwitz, was published in 1872 for the British army and received a royal endorsement.^[34] The world's first recreational wargaming club was the University Kriegspiel [sic] Club, founded in 1873 at Oxford University in England. In the United States, Charles Adiel Lewis Totten published Strategos, the American War Game in 1880, and William R. Livermore published The American Kriegsspiel in 1882, both heavily inspired by Prussian wargames. In 1894, the US Naval War College made wargaming a regular tool of instruction.^[39]

Miniature wargaming

In 1881, the English writer Robert Louis Stevenson became the first documented person to use toy soldiers in a wargame, and thus he might be the inventor of miniature wargaming. However, in his game, each toy soldier was used to represent an entire unit rather than an individual, and his playing field was just a chalk map drawn on the floor. Stevenson never published his rules, but according to an account by his stepson, they were very sophisticated and realistic, on par with German military wargames.^[40]

In 1898, the British writer Fred T. Jane published the first rulebook for a naval wargame: Rules for the Jane Naval War Game. Jane's wargame was also the first published wargame to use miniature models. It used scale models of warships made out of cork and wires; the wires were used for guns and masts. Jane's rulebook described in great detail the capabilities of the warships, such as the range and armor-penetrating power of the guns. It also simulated localized damage, such as what would happen to a warship if its boiler was damaged, or its gun battery.

H. G. Wells and his friends playing Little Wars.

The English writer H. G. Wells developed his own codified rules for playing with toy soldiers, which he published in a book titled Little Wars (1913). This is widely remembered as the first rulebook for miniature wargaming (for terrestrial armies, at least). Little Wars had very simple rules to make it fun and accessible to anyone. Little Wars did not use dice or computation to resolve fights. For artillery attacks, players used spring-loaded toy cannons which fired little wooden cylinders to physically knock over enemy models. As for infantry and cavalry, they could only engage in hand-to-hand combat (even if the figurines exhibited firearms). When two infantry units fought in close quarters, the units would suffer non-random losses determined by their relative sizes. Little Wars was designed for a large field of play, such as a lawn or the floor of a large room. An infantryman could move up to one foot per turn, and a cavalryman could move up to two feet per turn. To measure these distances, players used a two-foot long piece of string. Wells was also the first wargamer to use scale models of buildings, trees, and other terrain features to create a three-dimensional battlefield.^[41]

Wells' rulebook was for a long time regarded as the standard system by which other miniature wargames were judged. However, it failed to invigorate the miniature wargaming community. A possible reason was the two World Wars, which de-glamorized war and caused shortages of tin and lead that made model soldiers expensive.^[42][43] Another reason may have been the lack of magazines or clubs dedicated to miniature wargames. Miniature wargaming was seen as a niche within the larger hobby of making and collecting model soldiers.

In 1955, a California man named Jack Scruby began making inexpensive miniature models for miniature wargames out of type metal. Scruby's major contribution to the miniature wargaming hobby was to network players across America and the UK. At the time, the miniature wargaming community was miniscule, and players struggled to find each other. In 1956, Scruby organized the first miniature wargaming convention in America, which was attended by just fourteen people. From 1957 to 1962, he self-published the world's first wargaming magazine, titled The War Game Digest, through which wargamers could publish their rules and share game reports. It had less than two hundred subscribers, but it did establish a community that kept growing.^[44]

Around the same time in the United Kingdom, Donald Featherstone began writing an influential series of books on wargaming, which represented the first mainstream published contribution to wargaming since Little Wars. Titles included : War Games (1962), Advanced Wargames, Solo Wargaming, Wargame Campaigns, Battles with Model Tanks, Skirmish Wargaming. Such was the popularity of such titles that other authors were able to have published wargaming titles. This output of published wargaming titles from British authors coupled with the emergence at the same time of several manufacturers providing suitable wargame miniatures (e.g. Miniature Figurines, Hinchliffe, Peter Laing, Garrisson, Skytrex, Davco, Heroic & Ros) was responsible for the huge upsurge of popularity of the hobby in the late 1960s and into the 1970s.^[45]

In 1956, Tony Bath published what was the first ruleset for a miniature wargame set in the medieval period. These rules were a major inspiration for Gary Gygax's Chainmail (1971).

Board wargaming (1954- )

Tactics (1954) was the first successful board wargame.

The first successful commercial board wargame was Tactics (1954) by an American named Charles S. Roberts. What distinguished this wargame from previous ones is that it was mass-produced and all the necessary materials for play were bundled together in a box. Previous wargames were often just a rulebook and required players to obtain the other materials themselves.^[46] The game was played on a pre-fabricated board with a fixed layout, which is why it was called a board game.

Roberts later founded the Avalon Hill Game Company, the first firm that specialized in commercial wargames. In 1958, Avalon Hill released Gettysburg, which was a retooling of the rules of Tactics, and was based on the historical Battle of Gettysburg. Gettysburg became the most widely-played wargame yet.^[47]

Board wargames were more popular than miniature wargames. One reason was that assembling a playset for miniature wargaming was expensive, time-consuming, and require artisanal skill. Another reason was that board wargames could be played by correspondence. Board wargames were usually grid-based, or else designed in some way that moves could be explained in writing in simple terms. This was not possible with the free-form nature of miniature wargames.^[48]

Post-WW2 simulators

The US military was the first to use electronic computers to assist in wargaming. Computers in this era were very expensive, the purview of governments and large corporations.

Beginning in the 1950s, the RAND Corporation developed a number of wargames for the US military.

The advent of nuclear weapons and the Cold War created a need for wargames to simulate the political and economic dimensions of war.

Fantasy wargames

In 1971, Gary Gygax developed a wargame system for medieval warfare called Chainmail. Gygax later produced a supplement for Chainmail that added magic and fantasy creatures, making this the first fantasy wargame. The supplement was inspired by the success of the Lord of the Rings novels by J. R. R. Tolkien in the mid-1960s.

Gygax later went on to invent the first role-playing game, Dungeons and Dragons. Dungeons and Dragons was a story-driven game, but adapted wargaming rules to model the fights players could get in.

In 1983, Games Workshop released Warhammer Fantasy Battle, a fantasy wargame. Games Workshop at the time made miniature models for use in Dungeons and Dragons, and Warhammer was meant to encourage players to buy more models. The success of Warhammer led Games Workshop to create Warhammer 40,000, a science-fiction counterpart. These two games went on to become the most popular miniature wargames in the world.

A smaller but continuing presence

The wargaming hobby declined in the 1980s. One factor was competition from role-playing games such as Dungeons and Dragons: the sort of person who would have gone into wargaming instead went into RPGs. A second factor was the rise of affordable and powerful personal computers and gaming consoles. Computer wargames were easier to learn and faster to play because the routine procedures and arithmetic were automated.

Notable people

Wargaming as a Hobby

• 
  Georg Leopold von Reisswitz and his son Georg Heinrich Rudolf von Reisswitz – inventors of Kriegsspiel.


• 
  H.G. Wells – Pioneer in miniature wargaming, author of Little Wars. His usual companion in wargames was Jerome K. Jerome (of Three Men in a Boat fame).


• 
  Jack Scruby – After H.G. Wells, he did the most to make miniature wargaming a respectable hobby. He also popularized miniatures wargaming with a cheaper production process for miniature figures, publishing the first miniature wargaming magazine, the War Game Digest, and community building.


• 
  Don Featherstone – Known in the UK as the "co-father" of modern miniature wargaming.


• Phil Dunn – founder of the Naval Wargames Society, the only international organisation of naval wargaming to date, and author of Sea Battle Games.


• 
  Charles S. Roberts – Known as the "Father of modern board wargaming", designed the first modern wargame, as well as the company most identified with modern wargames (Avalon Hill).


• 
  Phil Barker – Co-founder of (Wargames Research Group),^[49] co writer of WRG Ancients in 1969 and of DBA the innovative 1990 ruleset.

Designers/Developers

• 
  Richard Berg – Designer of Terrible Swift Sword, and worked at SPI.


• 
  Larry Bond – Designer of Harpoon, and best selling author


• 
  Frank Chadwick – A co-founder of Game Designers Workshop (along with Loren Wiseman, Marc Miller, and Rich Banner), one of the first major competitors to Avalon Hill, and himself a prolific wargame designer and innovator.


• 
  Jim Dunnigan – considered "The Dean of Modern Wargaming", founder of SPI and the most prolific print wargame designer in history. His designs included many firsts in wargaming, including the first tactical wargames.


• 
  Charles Grant – Author of The Wargame.


• Laurence Groves – Founded Martial Enterprises and designed La Bataille de la Moscowa (1974), recognized as the first "monster game." Died in the late 1970s in a motorcycle accident.


• 
  E. Gary Gygax – Designer of several miniatures and board wargames who went on to co-create (with Dave Arneson) and publish Dungeons & Dragons.


• 
  Larry Harris – Designer of Axis and Allies, Conquest of the Empire, and other games in the Axis and Allies Series.


• 
  Bruce Quarrie – wrote rule sets for Napoleonic and World War II wargames and also on military history.


• Mark Herman – Member of the "Hall of Fame" and designer of We The People, the first Card Driven Wargame; worked originally at SPI and was the CEO of VG. Most recent designs are For The People and Empire of the Sun, each of which won the Charles S. Roberts Award for best game in their category.


• 
  John Hill – Designer of Squad Leader, Johnny Reb, and other well-received designs.


• 
  David Manley – author of "Iron and Fire", "Fox Two" and other air and naval rules systems, editor of the Naval Wargames Society journal "Battlefleet"


• 
  Redmond Simonsen – Co-founder of SPI and introduced many advanced graphics design elements to wargame designs.


• Richard Thomas Bailey - Designer and founder of www.Tinywargames.com and designer of boardgames such as Bullet.

Notable players

• 
  Peter Cushing – Actor^[50]
  

Notable examples

Board

While a comprehensive list will show the variety of titles, the following games are notable for the reasons indicated:

• 
  Diplomacy – (1954) a classic multi-player game from the "golden age" of wargames in which strategy is exercised off the game board as well as on it.


• 
  Tactics II (Avalon Hill, 1958) – the wargame that launched Avalon Hill.


• 
  Risk (Parker Brothers, 1959) – Widely accepted as the first mainstream wargame.


• 
  Gettysburg (Avalon Hill, 1958) – the first modern era wargame intended to model an actual historical event.


• 
  Tactical Game 3 (Strategy & Tactics Magazine game, 1969); re-released as PanzerBlitz by Avalon Hill in 1970. The very first tactical wargame. The game pioneered the use of "geomorphic mapboards" and PanzerBlitz was a game system rather than just a game in that forces could be used to depict any number of actual tactical situations rather than one specific scenario. Pioneered several ground-breaking features, such as use of various types of weapons fire to reflect battlefield conditions. Also created new level of realism in reflecting tactical armored vehicles.


• 
  Sniper! (SPI, 1973) – along with Patrol, the first Man to Man wargames where game pieces depicted a single soldier. An adaptation of Sniper! also became one of the first multi-player computer wargames.


• 
  Wooden Ships and Iron Men (Battleline Publications, 1974 Avalon Hill, 1976) – the definitive game of Age of Sail warfare for many years.


• 
  Rise and Decline of the Third Reich (Avalon Hill, 1974) – The first serious attempt to model World War II in Europe in its entirety, including (in a limited way) the economic and industrial production of the nations involved. It has seen numerous versions and editions, and is currently available as John Prados' Third Reich from Avalanche Press, and as a far more complex descendant game, A World At War, published by GMT Games.


• 
  La Bataille de la Moskowa (Martial Enterprises, 1974) Later republished by Games Designers Workshop and Clash of Arms. With 4 maps and 1000+ counters, it is credited with being the first "monster" wargame (by famed designer Richard Berg.)


• 
  SPQR (GMT Games, 1992)


• 
  Squad Leader (Avalon Hill, 1977) and Advanced Squad Leader (1985) have become the most prolific series of wargames, including 3 add-on modules for the former, and 12 for the latter, with additional Historical modules and Deluxe modules also having been released. ASL also sets the record for sheer volume of playing components, with thousands of official counters and 60+ "geomorphic mapboards" not counting Deluxe and Historical maps.


• 
  Star Fleet Battles – (Task Force Games, 1978) one of the older still actively played and published wargames today; based on Star Trek, it is arguably the most successful tactical space combat system that does not rely on miniatures (published by Amarillo Design Bureau).


• 
  Storm Over Arnhem (Avalon Hill, 1981) – pioneered the use of "point to point" or "area movement" in tactical wargames.


• 
  Axis and Allies – (Nova Games, 1981) the most successful of Milton Bradley's (1984) 'GameMaster' line in an attempt to bring wargaming into the mainstream by appealing to non-wargamers through simplicity and attractive components.


• 
  Ambush! – (Victory Games, 1983) the first solitaire board wargame depicting man to man combat, in which each game piece represented a single person.


• 
  Blue Max – (GDW, 1983) is a multi-player game of World War I aerial combat over the Western Front during 1917 and 1918 with an extremely easy to play mechanism but allow the development of complex strategies.


• 
  We the People – (Avalon Hill, 1994) this game started the Card-Driven wargame movement, which is very influential in current wargame design.

Miniature

• 
  Rules for the Jane Naval War Game (S. Low, Marston, 1898) – The first published miniature wargame. A 26-page rule set limited to naval miniature battles. It came in a crate measuring 4 ft. X 4 ft. X 2 ft. Written by Fred Jane. As only a handful of these games survive, they are highly collectible.^[51]
  


• 
  Little Wars (H.G. Wells, 1913) – The first popular published wargame rules. Includes the common miniature wargaming mechanics of dice rolling, range, line of sight, and moving in alternate turns. This game earned Wells the title "The Father of Miniature Wargaming".^[52]
  


• 
  Miniature Wargames du temps de Napoleon (John C. Candler, 1964) – First period-specific historical miniature wargame.^{[citation needed]} Also the first in a long line of Napoleonic miniature wargames.


• 
  Chainmail (Guidon Games, 1971) – An extension and distillation of rules previously published in various periodicals. While mostly about historical medieval combat, it had an addendum that covered fantasy elements. Major elements of this game were adopted by the role-playing game Dungeons & Dragons. Unlike Dungeons & Dragons, Chainmail used two six-sided dice to resolve combat. Previous fantasy miniature wargames had been written, but this was the first one published. Drawing on the popularity of The Lord of the Rings, this game featured the novelties of combat magic and fantastic creatures as combatants.


• 
  Warhammer Fantasy Battle (Games Workshop, 1983) – An internationally successful fantasy miniature wargame. The First Edition rules introduced innovative open unit design rules, however later editions eliminated the option to build custom units and make use of standard army lists mandatory. Warhammer was one of the first newly developed miniature wargames to enjoy popularity after role-playing games came to market in 1974. In fact, it is because of Roleplaying games becoming so popular, and people having too many models that were rarely used, that this was first published^{[citation needed]}.


• 
  Warhammer 40,000 (Games Workshop, 1987) – A futuristic wargame featuring rival armies with different fighting styles. This wargame has very conceptual artwork suggesting a post-apocalyptic neo-gothic universe with heavy dystopic themes. Un-arguably the most profitable miniature wargame ever, it has popularized competitive tournament gameplay in large, international events sanctioned by Games Workshop.


• 
  De Bellis Antiquitatis (Wargames Research Group, 1990) – Radically minimalist rules differentiate this game from other notable miniature wargames. A number of systems have been strongly influenced by DBA.


• 
  Mage Knight (WizKids Inc., 2001) – Innovative game popularizing the combat dial, pre-painted plastic miniatures, and the collectible miniatures games. Mage Knight has inspired numerous collectible, skirmish miniature wargames.


• 
  Warmachine (Privateer Press, 2003) – A steampunk-inspired miniatures game featuring steam-powered robots fighting under the direction of powerful wizards. Also has a sister game, Hordes, which features large monstrous creatures in the place of robots.


• 
  Heroscape (Milton Bradley Company, 2004) – An inexpensive, simple wargame that has been successfully mass marketed to both younger wargamers and adults. As miniature wargaming is often an expensive hobby, Heroscape and the collectible miniatures games have opened the miniature wargaming hobby to a new demographic.


• 
  Infinity (Corvus Belli, 2005) is a tabletop wargame in which sci-fi themed with 28mm scale metal miniatures are used to simulate futuristic skirmishes. Infinity is a groundbreaking, dynamic system that allows you to make meaningful, fun choices throughout the entire game sequence, and gives you the tools to implement any number of strategies with realism and flexibility.


• 
  BrikWars is a wargame that uses Lego bricks as miniatures and scenery and is steadily growing in popularity mostly due to the looseness of the rules.


• 
  Flames of War (Battlefront Miniatures, 2002) – Popular World War II wargame at 15mm (1:100) scale, currently focusing on the European and Mediterean theatres. Splits into three time periods (Early War 1939-41, Mid War 1942-43 and Late War 1944-45) to bring some balance and historical matchups.


• Malifaux

See also List of miniature wargames.

Computer

• 
  Panzer General – (Strategic Simulations, Inc., 1994) – probably the most widely popular computer game that is recognizably a traditional wargame. It spawned several sequels, some of which explored different subject matter.


• 
  Steel Panthers – (Strategic Simulations, Inc., 1995) – an early tactical wargame on the same scale as Squad Leader, which led to two sequels, and a complete revision of the title for free release.


• 
  Close Combat – (Microsoft, 1996) – not the first wargame to break out from hexes, and still presented in a 2-dimensional format, Close Combat nonetheless uniquely addressed factors such as individual morale and reluctance to carry out orders. The original title led to 5 very successful sequels for the general public, as well as being developed into a training tool for military use only. Close Combat stemmed from an early attempt to translate the Squad Leader boardgame to the computer.


• 
  Combat Mission – (Big Time Software, 2000) – not the first 3D tactical wargame (titles such as Muzzle Velocity preceded it), but a groundbreaking game series featuring simultaneous order resolution, complete orders of battle for numerous nationalities, with three titles based on the original game engine. As of 2006, a campaign layer is in testing as well as a revised game engine to be released before 2007. CM's genesis was also as a failed attempt by Avalon Hill to translate Squad Leader to the computer.


• 
  TacOps – (Major I.L. Holdridge, 2003 for v4) – commercial version of “TacOpsCav 4”, an officially issued standard training device of the US Army. It is a simulation of contemporary and near-future tactical, ground, combat between the modern armed forces of the world.


• 
  Wargame: Red Dragon – (Eugen Systems, 2014) – a 3D regiment or brigade scale simulation set as a "Cold War Gone Hot" themed game in both multiplayer and singleplayer environments. Players construct customized armies through use of a deck system comprising land vehicles, infantry, and helicopters from several NATO and Warsaw Pact nations and manage logistics such as fuel and ammunition while on the battlefield. There is no cohesive campaign, the game instead taking place in several hypothetical conflicts.


• 
  Total war – a wargame set in different time periods, with a turn based map, and a real time battle component, featured on the television series Time Commanders
  


• 
  Hearts of Iron IV – (Paradox Interactive, 2016) a grand strategy wargame focused on World War 2. Player may act as any reasonably sized nation at the time, influencing international politics, economic and military development, and can control battlefields on both strategic and operational levels using combined arms. Frequently used to entertain and simulate alternative history scenarios as well as recreate historical events.

Unique game systems

• 
  Ace of Aces – (Nova Games, 1980) – this flip-book system has long been considered^{[by whom?]} one of the best simulations of aerial dogfighting.


• 
  BattleTech – (FASA, 1984) – initially conceived as a board game, it has created a brand that now includes various different boardgames (tactical as well as strategic), miniature game rules, a role-playing game, computer games, flip-book games (by Nova Games) as well as novels and a TV series.


• 
  Car Wars – (Steve Jackson Games, 1982) – initially printed as a board game, it quickly evolved to incorporate elements of miniatures games.


• 
  Up Front – (Avalon Hill, 1983) – the most popular^{[citation needed]} of the very small class of card wargames.

See also

• Air wargaming


• Naval wargaming


• Miniature wargaming


• Tactical wargame


• Business war games


• International Wargames Federation


• List of wargame publishers

Footnotes

Bibliogrpahy

• 
  Phillip von Hilgers (2000). "Eine Anleitung zur Anleitung. Das Takstische Kriegsspiel 1812-1824" (PDF). Board Games Studies: International Journal For the Study of Board Games (in German) (3): 59–78.
  


• 
  Georg Heinrich Rudolf Johann von Reiswitz (1824). Anleitung zur Darstellung militairische Manover mit dem Apparat des Kriegsspiel [Instructions for the Representation of Military Maneuvres with the Kriegsspiel Apparatus] (in German). (translation by Bill Leeson, 1989)


• 
  George Leopold von Reiswitz (1812). Taktisches Kriegs-Spiel oder Anleitung zu einer mechanischen Vorrichtung um taktische Manoeuvres sinnlich darzustellen [Tactical War Game - or, instruction to a mechanical device to simulate tactical maneuvers]. Gädicke.
  


• 
  Peter P. Perla (2012) [1st pub. 1990]. John Curry, ed. Peter Perla's The Art of Wargaming: A Guide for Professionals and Hobbyists. The History of Wargaming Project. ISBN 978-1-4716-2242-7.
  


• 
  H. G. Wells (1913). Little Wars.
  


• 
  Paul Schuurman (2017). "Models of war 1770–1830: the birth of wargames and the trade-off between realism and simplicity". History of European Ideas. 43 (5): 442–455. doi:10.1080/01916599.2017.1366928. Retrieved 2018-10-27.
  


• 
  Michael J. Tresca (2011). The Evolution of Fantasy Role-Playing Games. McFarland. ISBN 9780786460090.
  


• 
  Pat Harrigan; Matthew G. Kirschenbaum, eds. (2016). Zones of Control: Perspectives on Wargaming. MIT Press. ISBN 9780262033992.
  


• 
  Johann Christian Ludwig Hellwig (1803). Das Kriegsspiel [The Wargame].
  


• 
  Tristan Donovan (2017). It's All a Game: The History of Board Games from Monopoly to Settlers of Catan. Macmillan. ISBN 9781250082732.
  


• 
  Martin van Creveld (2013). Wargames: From Gladiators to Gigabytes. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781107036956.
  


• 
  Rolf F. Nohr; Stefan Böhme (2009). Die Auftritte des Krieges sinnlich machen. Appelhans-Verlag Braunschweig. ISBN 978-3-941737-02-0.
  


• 
  Rick Priestley; John Lambshead (2016). Tabletop Wargames: A Designers' and Writers' Handbook. Pen & Sword Books Limited. ISBN 9781783831487.
  


• 
  Peter P. Perla; Raymond T. Barrett (1985). An Introduction to Wargaming and its Uses (PDF).
  


• 
  Shawn Burns, ed. (2013). War Gamers' Handbook: A Guide for Professional War Gamers (PDF). US Naval War College.
  


• 
  Jon Peterson (2012). Playing at the World: A History of Simulating Wars, People and Fantastic Adventures, from Chess to Role-playing Games. Unreason Press. ISBN 9780615642048.
  

The tactical gears
www.pts-steelshop.com

Further reading

Books

• Stuart Asquith Wargaming World War Two , Special Interest Model Books; New edition (31 December 1998)
  ISBN 978-1-85486-000-2
  


• Stuart Asquith Military Modelling Guide to War Gaming , Special Interest Model Books 1987


• Stuart Asquith Military Modelling Guide to Siege War Gaming , Special Interest Model Books 1990


• Stuart Asquith Military Modelling Guide to Solo War Gaming , Special Interest Model Books 1989


• Phil Barker Know The Game: War Gaming, EP Publishing 1978.


• Phil Barker Airfix magazine Guides : Ancient Wargaming, P.Stephens Ltd 1975.


• 
  Jim Dunnigan, The Complete Wargames Handbook: How to Play, Design, and Find Them, Quill 1992.
  ISBN 0-688-10368-5 This is available online at hyw.com (verified December 2011).


• 
  Jon Freeman, The Complete Book of Wargames, Simon and Schuster 1980.
  ISBN 0-671-25374-3
  


• 
  Nicholas Palmer, The Comprehensive Guide to Board Wargaming, Arthur Baker Limited London 1977.
  ISBN 0-213-16646-1
  


• Nicholas Palmer, The Best of Board Wargaming, Hippocrene Books, Inc. New York, NY 1980.
  ISBN 0-88254-525-6
  


• 
  Donald Featherstone Featherstone's Complete Wargaming, David & Charles UK 1989.
  ISBN 0-7153-9262-X
  


• Donald Featherstone War Games, Lulu 2008,
  ISBN 978-1-4092-1676-6
  


• Donald Featherstone Advanced War Games, Sportshelf & Soccer Assoc 1969.
  ISBN 0-392-00441-0
  


• Donald Featherstone Tank Battles in Miniature: Wargamers' Guide to the Western Desert Campaign, 1940-42, P.Stephens Ltd 1973


• Donald Featherstone War Game Campaigns, S. Paul 1970


• Donald Featherstone War Games Through the Ages Vol. 2 1420–1783 , S. Paul 1974


• Donald Featherstone War Games Through the Ages Vol. 3 1792–1859, S. Paul 1975


• Dorca Bis Alejo, "El Hobby de los soldados en miniatura, el wargame, el rol, el modelismo y el coleccionismo." primera edición: 23 de agosto de 2008,
  ISBN 99920-1-701-5, 212 p.


• Dorca Alejo, "My Toy Soldiers & Me" Second edition.


• 
  Charles Grant Battle! Practical Wargaming, Model and Allied Publishing (MAP) 1970.
  ISBN 0-85344-034-4
  


• Paddy Griffith Napoleonic Wargaming For Fun, Ward Lock Ltd, London, 1980, reprinted 2008 by the History of Wargaming Project link
  


• Paddy Griffith Sprawling Wargames multiplayer Wargaming, Ward Lock Ltd, London, 1980, reprinted 2009 by the History of Wargaming Project link
  


• Peter Perla The Art of Wargaming, Naval Institute Press 1990.
  ISBN 0-87021-050-5
  


• 
  Mark Herman, Mark Frost, Robert Kurz Wargaming for Leaders, McGraw-Hill 2009.
  ISBN 978-0-07-159688-6
  


• Bruce Quarrie Airfix magazine Guides : Napoleonic Wargaming, P.Stephens Ltd 1974.


• Bruce Quarrie Airfix magazine Guides : World War 2 Wargaming, P.Stephens Ltd 1976


• Philip Sabin: Simulating War. Studying Conflict Simulation through Games, London 2012.


• C.F. Wesencraft Practical wargaming, Hippocrene Books, 1974
  ISBN 978-0-88254-271-3 reprinted by the History of Wargaming Project link
  


• C.F. Wesencraft With Pike and Musket, reprinted by the History of Wargaming Project link
  


• Andrew Wilson War Gaming, Penguin 1970.


• Terence Wise Airfix magazine Guides : American Civil War Wargaming, P.Stephens Ltd 1977.


• Terence Wise Introduction to Battle Gaming, Model and Allied Publishing (MAP) 1972.
  ISBN 0-85344-014-X
  


• Terence Wise Terry Wise's Introduction to Battlegaming including his unpublished wargaming rules Printed by the History of Wargaming Project link
  

Articles

• 
  Sport: Little Wars, Time Magazine, December 14, 1942.


• 
  War games, by Dr. Brett Holman, PhD in History, 5 August 2007.


• 
  Dice against the Nazis: Propaganda aimed to reduce fear, By Clive Gilbert and Kevin Allen, BBC News Magazine, 24 August 2007.


• "Return of the hex-crazed wargamers; Is the Net breathing new life into an endangered hobby--or just postponing the inevitable?," by Andrew Leonard, Salon Magazine, May 29, 1998.


• 
  Gray, Bill (21 September 2016). "Impedimenta: Cardboard Logistics". Wargamer.
  


• 
  LaFleur, Col. Thomas. "Wargaming: Training, Educational Tool for the Future" (PDF).
  

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Wargames.