Jenkins Declarative Pipeline How to block parallel stage until all sub-stages have completed












0














I'm running Jenkins Declarative Pipeline controlles by a central Jenkins master and running on 2 slaves on 2 different sites, siteA and siteB.



I have one stage that needs to be run on both sites (ideally in parallel to save time) that waits until some resources are loaded. So this stage basically runs a script that checks if the resources are loaded and if not, waits X seconds and tries again until all resources are loaded.



What happens is that at one site, resource loading is faster than on the other site so when one site finishes the whole stage is done although the other site is not yet complete.



The pipeline for this stage looks like this:



stage('myStage') {
parallel {
stage('myStage-siteA') {
agent {
node {
label 'siteA'
}
}
steps {
waitForResourcesLoaded(siteA)
}
}
stage('myStage-siteB') {
agent {
node {
label 'siteB'
}
}
steps {
waitForResourcesLoaded(siteB)
}
}
}
}


Is there any way to "synchronize" each parallel stage so that the overall stage "myStage" will only be marked complete once each sub-stage has completed?










share|improve this question






















  • What exactly is your "waitForResourcesLoaded" step doing?
    – Fitzi
    Nov 12 at 11:56










  • Let's say its calling a URL and parsing the response for a certain keyword. If the keyword is not present it waits 10 seconds and polls again until the keyword is present.
    – phivo
    Nov 12 at 13:51










  • How do you achieve this? Can you assure that these steps (especially the 10 second wait) are beeing executed in a blocking fashion?
    – Fitzi
    Nov 12 at 15:17










  • That is the issue. Both parallel stages run completely independent on 2 different slave nodes and as soon as one slave finishes the whole stage is finished even if the stage on the second slave is not complete.
    – phivo
    Nov 13 at 6:42










  • Or let's make an even easier example: Create a parallel stage with 2 sub-stages running on 2 different slave nodes. Have one sub-stage wait for 30 seconds and the other wait for 60 seconds. The whole stage will finish after 30 seconds, i.e. when the first slave finishes, and not wait for 60 seconds until the other slave has finished as well.
    – phivo
    Nov 13 at 6:44
















0














I'm running Jenkins Declarative Pipeline controlles by a central Jenkins master and running on 2 slaves on 2 different sites, siteA and siteB.



I have one stage that needs to be run on both sites (ideally in parallel to save time) that waits until some resources are loaded. So this stage basically runs a script that checks if the resources are loaded and if not, waits X seconds and tries again until all resources are loaded.



What happens is that at one site, resource loading is faster than on the other site so when one site finishes the whole stage is done although the other site is not yet complete.



The pipeline for this stage looks like this:



stage('myStage') {
parallel {
stage('myStage-siteA') {
agent {
node {
label 'siteA'
}
}
steps {
waitForResourcesLoaded(siteA)
}
}
stage('myStage-siteB') {
agent {
node {
label 'siteB'
}
}
steps {
waitForResourcesLoaded(siteB)
}
}
}
}


Is there any way to "synchronize" each parallel stage so that the overall stage "myStage" will only be marked complete once each sub-stage has completed?










share|improve this question






















  • What exactly is your "waitForResourcesLoaded" step doing?
    – Fitzi
    Nov 12 at 11:56










  • Let's say its calling a URL and parsing the response for a certain keyword. If the keyword is not present it waits 10 seconds and polls again until the keyword is present.
    – phivo
    Nov 12 at 13:51










  • How do you achieve this? Can you assure that these steps (especially the 10 second wait) are beeing executed in a blocking fashion?
    – Fitzi
    Nov 12 at 15:17










  • That is the issue. Both parallel stages run completely independent on 2 different slave nodes and as soon as one slave finishes the whole stage is finished even if the stage on the second slave is not complete.
    – phivo
    Nov 13 at 6:42










  • Or let's make an even easier example: Create a parallel stage with 2 sub-stages running on 2 different slave nodes. Have one sub-stage wait for 30 seconds and the other wait for 60 seconds. The whole stage will finish after 30 seconds, i.e. when the first slave finishes, and not wait for 60 seconds until the other slave has finished as well.
    – phivo
    Nov 13 at 6:44














0












0








0







I'm running Jenkins Declarative Pipeline controlles by a central Jenkins master and running on 2 slaves on 2 different sites, siteA and siteB.



I have one stage that needs to be run on both sites (ideally in parallel to save time) that waits until some resources are loaded. So this stage basically runs a script that checks if the resources are loaded and if not, waits X seconds and tries again until all resources are loaded.



What happens is that at one site, resource loading is faster than on the other site so when one site finishes the whole stage is done although the other site is not yet complete.



The pipeline for this stage looks like this:



stage('myStage') {
parallel {
stage('myStage-siteA') {
agent {
node {
label 'siteA'
}
}
steps {
waitForResourcesLoaded(siteA)
}
}
stage('myStage-siteB') {
agent {
node {
label 'siteB'
}
}
steps {
waitForResourcesLoaded(siteB)
}
}
}
}


Is there any way to "synchronize" each parallel stage so that the overall stage "myStage" will only be marked complete once each sub-stage has completed?










share|improve this question













I'm running Jenkins Declarative Pipeline controlles by a central Jenkins master and running on 2 slaves on 2 different sites, siteA and siteB.



I have one stage that needs to be run on both sites (ideally in parallel to save time) that waits until some resources are loaded. So this stage basically runs a script that checks if the resources are loaded and if not, waits X seconds and tries again until all resources are loaded.



What happens is that at one site, resource loading is faster than on the other site so when one site finishes the whole stage is done although the other site is not yet complete.



The pipeline for this stage looks like this:



stage('myStage') {
parallel {
stage('myStage-siteA') {
agent {
node {
label 'siteA'
}
}
steps {
waitForResourcesLoaded(siteA)
}
}
stage('myStage-siteB') {
agent {
node {
label 'siteB'
}
}
steps {
waitForResourcesLoaded(siteB)
}
}
}
}


Is there any way to "synchronize" each parallel stage so that the overall stage "myStage" will only be marked complete once each sub-stage has completed?







jenkins jenkins-pipeline jenkins-declarative-pipeline






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 12 at 11:47









phivo

76113




76113












  • What exactly is your "waitForResourcesLoaded" step doing?
    – Fitzi
    Nov 12 at 11:56










  • Let's say its calling a URL and parsing the response for a certain keyword. If the keyword is not present it waits 10 seconds and polls again until the keyword is present.
    – phivo
    Nov 12 at 13:51










  • How do you achieve this? Can you assure that these steps (especially the 10 second wait) are beeing executed in a blocking fashion?
    – Fitzi
    Nov 12 at 15:17










  • That is the issue. Both parallel stages run completely independent on 2 different slave nodes and as soon as one slave finishes the whole stage is finished even if the stage on the second slave is not complete.
    – phivo
    Nov 13 at 6:42










  • Or let's make an even easier example: Create a parallel stage with 2 sub-stages running on 2 different slave nodes. Have one sub-stage wait for 30 seconds and the other wait for 60 seconds. The whole stage will finish after 30 seconds, i.e. when the first slave finishes, and not wait for 60 seconds until the other slave has finished as well.
    – phivo
    Nov 13 at 6:44


















  • What exactly is your "waitForResourcesLoaded" step doing?
    – Fitzi
    Nov 12 at 11:56










  • Let's say its calling a URL and parsing the response for a certain keyword. If the keyword is not present it waits 10 seconds and polls again until the keyword is present.
    – phivo
    Nov 12 at 13:51










  • How do you achieve this? Can you assure that these steps (especially the 10 second wait) are beeing executed in a blocking fashion?
    – Fitzi
    Nov 12 at 15:17










  • That is the issue. Both parallel stages run completely independent on 2 different slave nodes and as soon as one slave finishes the whole stage is finished even if the stage on the second slave is not complete.
    – phivo
    Nov 13 at 6:42










  • Or let's make an even easier example: Create a parallel stage with 2 sub-stages running on 2 different slave nodes. Have one sub-stage wait for 30 seconds and the other wait for 60 seconds. The whole stage will finish after 30 seconds, i.e. when the first slave finishes, and not wait for 60 seconds until the other slave has finished as well.
    – phivo
    Nov 13 at 6:44
















What exactly is your "waitForResourcesLoaded" step doing?
– Fitzi
Nov 12 at 11:56




What exactly is your "waitForResourcesLoaded" step doing?
– Fitzi
Nov 12 at 11:56












Let's say its calling a URL and parsing the response for a certain keyword. If the keyword is not present it waits 10 seconds and polls again until the keyword is present.
– phivo
Nov 12 at 13:51




Let's say its calling a URL and parsing the response for a certain keyword. If the keyword is not present it waits 10 seconds and polls again until the keyword is present.
– phivo
Nov 12 at 13:51












How do you achieve this? Can you assure that these steps (especially the 10 second wait) are beeing executed in a blocking fashion?
– Fitzi
Nov 12 at 15:17




How do you achieve this? Can you assure that these steps (especially the 10 second wait) are beeing executed in a blocking fashion?
– Fitzi
Nov 12 at 15:17












That is the issue. Both parallel stages run completely independent on 2 different slave nodes and as soon as one slave finishes the whole stage is finished even if the stage on the second slave is not complete.
– phivo
Nov 13 at 6:42




That is the issue. Both parallel stages run completely independent on 2 different slave nodes and as soon as one slave finishes the whole stage is finished even if the stage on the second slave is not complete.
– phivo
Nov 13 at 6:42












Or let's make an even easier example: Create a parallel stage with 2 sub-stages running on 2 different slave nodes. Have one sub-stage wait for 30 seconds and the other wait for 60 seconds. The whole stage will finish after 30 seconds, i.e. when the first slave finishes, and not wait for 60 seconds until the other slave has finished as well.
– phivo
Nov 13 at 6:44




Or let's make an even easier example: Create a parallel stage with 2 sub-stages running on 2 different slave nodes. Have one sub-stage wait for 30 seconds and the other wait for 60 seconds. The whole stage will finish after 30 seconds, i.e. when the first slave finishes, and not wait for 60 seconds until the other slave has finished as well.
– phivo
Nov 13 at 6:44

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261523%2fjenkins-declarative-pipeline-how-to-block-parallel-stage-until-all-sub-stages-ha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261523%2fjenkins-declarative-pipeline-how-to-block-parallel-stage-until-all-sub-stages-ha%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Vorschmack

Quarantine