Is it possible to add annotations to static factorymetods with lombok
If I create a class like
@Value
@AllArgsConstructor(staticName = "of", onConstructor = @__(@JsonCreator))
public class Test {
String value;
}
The onConstructor properties is added to the constructor (which makes sense). However I need to add an annotations to the factory metod. Is this possible?
My root problem is trying to make
{
"test": 2018
}
deserialize to:
SomeJavaClass:
private final Test test
This doesn't work because of the ConstructorProperties.
java jackson lombok
asked Nov 12 at 11:47
Astrogat
1,070615
add a comment |
If I create a class like
@Value
@AllArgsConstructor(staticName = "of", onConstructor = @__(@JsonCreator))
public class Test {
String value;
}
The onConstructor properties is added to the constructor (which makes sense). However I need to add an annotations to the factory metod. Is this possible?
My root problem is trying to make
{
"test": 2018
}
deserialize to:
SomeJavaClass:
private final Test test
This doesn't work because of the ConstructorProperties.
java jackson lombok
asked Nov 12 at 11:47
Astrogat
1,070615
add a comment |
If I create a class like
@Value
@AllArgsConstructor(staticName = "of", onConstructor = @__(@JsonCreator))
public class Test {
String value;
}
The onConstructor properties is added to the constructor (which makes sense). However I need to add an annotations to the factory metod. Is this possible?
My root problem is trying to make
{
"test": 2018
}
deserialize to:
SomeJavaClass:
private final Test test
This doesn't work because of the ConstructorProperties.
java jackson lombok
asked Nov 12 at 11:47
Astrogat
1,070615
If I create a class like
@Value
@AllArgsConstructor(staticName = "of", onConstructor = @__(@JsonCreator))
public class Test {
String value;
}
The onConstructor properties is added to the constructor (which makes sense). However I need to add an annotations to the factory metod. Is this possible?
My root problem is trying to make
{
"test": 2018
}
deserialize to:
SomeJavaClass:
private final Test test
This doesn't work because of the ConstructorProperties.
java jackson lombok
java jackson lombok
asked Nov 12 at 11:47
Astrogat
1,070615
asked Nov 12 at 11:47
Astrogat
1,070615
asked Nov 12 at 11:47
Astrogat
1,070615
asked Nov 12 at 11:47
Astrogat
1,070615
asked Nov 12 at 11:47
Astrogat
1,070615
1,070615
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Putting the annotation on the static factory method would be the most reasonable thing to do when both staticName and onConstructor are set. In that case, the regular constructor becomes private and, thus, cannot be used from elsewhere (except for ugly reflection tricks). Therefore, annotations only make sense on the static factory method in most cases.
However, this is not Lombok's current behavior, and there is no way to configure Lombok differently. I suggest you create a feature request at GitHub.
However, be aware that the onX feature is an experimental feature, so this feature request may be declined or deferred.
answered Nov 12 at 23:49
Jan Rieke
9001213
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261524%2fis-it-possible-to-add-annotations-to-static-factorymetods-with-lombok%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Putting the annotation on the static factory method would be the most reasonable thing to do when both staticName and onConstructor are set. In that case, the regular constructor becomes private and, thus, cannot be used from elsewhere (except for ugly reflection tricks). Therefore, annotations only make sense on the static factory method in most cases.
However, this is not Lombok's current behavior, and there is no way to configure Lombok differently. I suggest you create a feature request at GitHub.
However, be aware that the onX feature is an experimental feature, so this feature request may be declined or deferred.
answered Nov 12 at 23:49
Jan Rieke
9001213
add a comment |
Putting the annotation on the static factory method would be the most reasonable thing to do when both staticName and onConstructor are set. In that case, the regular constructor becomes private and, thus, cannot be used from elsewhere (except for ugly reflection tricks). Therefore, annotations only make sense on the static factory method in most cases.
However, this is not Lombok's current behavior, and there is no way to configure Lombok differently. I suggest you create a feature request at GitHub.
However, be aware that the onX feature is an experimental feature, so this feature request may be declined or deferred.
answered Nov 12 at 23:49
Jan Rieke
9001213
add a comment |
Putting the annotation on the static factory method would be the most reasonable thing to do when both staticName and onConstructor are set. In that case, the regular constructor becomes private and, thus, cannot be used from elsewhere (except for ugly reflection tricks). Therefore, annotations only make sense on the static factory method in most cases.
However, this is not Lombok's current behavior, and there is no way to configure Lombok differently. I suggest you create a feature request at GitHub.
However, be aware that the onX feature is an experimental feature, so this feature request may be declined or deferred.
answered Nov 12 at 23:49
Jan Rieke
9001213
Putting the annotation on the static factory method would be the most reasonable thing to do when both staticName and onConstructor are set. In that case, the regular constructor becomes private and, thus, cannot be used from elsewhere (except for ugly reflection tricks). Therefore, annotations only make sense on the static factory method in most cases.
However, this is not Lombok's current behavior, and there is no way to configure Lombok differently. I suggest you create a feature request at GitHub.
However, be aware that the onX feature is an experimental feature, so this feature request may be declined or deferred.
answered Nov 12 at 23:49
Jan Rieke
9001213
edited Nov 14 at 22:53
answered Nov 12 at 23:49
Jan Rieke
9001213
answered Nov 12 at 23:49
Jan Rieke
9001213
answered Nov 12 at 23:49
Jan Rieke
9001213
9001213
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53261524%2fis-it-possible-to-add-annotations-to-static-factorymetods-with-lombok%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
