How does the “this” keyword work?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I have noticed that there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation of what the this
keyword is and how it is correctly (and incorrectly) used in JavaScript on the Stack Overflow site.
I have witnessed some very strange behaviour with it and have failed to understand why it has occurred.
How does this
work and when should it be used?
javascript this
|
show 4 more comments
I have noticed that there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation of what the this
keyword is and how it is correctly (and incorrectly) used in JavaScript on the Stack Overflow site.
I have witnessed some very strange behaviour with it and have failed to understand why it has occurred.
How does this
work and when should it be used?
javascript this
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use ofthis
peter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
An interesting explanation ofthis
keyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript
– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
|
show 4 more comments
I have noticed that there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation of what the this
keyword is and how it is correctly (and incorrectly) used in JavaScript on the Stack Overflow site.
I have witnessed some very strange behaviour with it and have failed to understand why it has occurred.
How does this
work and when should it be used?
javascript this
I have noticed that there doesn't appear to be a clear explanation of what the this
keyword is and how it is correctly (and incorrectly) used in JavaScript on the Stack Overflow site.
I have witnessed some very strange behaviour with it and have failed to understand why it has occurred.
How does this
work and when should it be used?
javascript this
javascript this
edited Feb 8 '15 at 16:10
JJJ
29.3k147693
29.3k147693
asked Jun 27 '10 at 13:12
Maxim GershkovichMaxim Gershkovich
18.2k33116210
18.2k33116210
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use ofthis
peter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
An interesting explanation ofthis
keyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript
– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
|
show 4 more comments
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use ofthis
peter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
An interesting explanation ofthis
keyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript
– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
6
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use of
this
peter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
Peter Michaux advocates against the use of
this
peter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
1
An interesting explanation of
this
keyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
An interesting explanation of
this
keyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20
|
show 4 more comments
23 Answers
23
active
oldest
votes
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this
and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this
, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this
:
§11.1.1 Thethis
keyword
The
this
keyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>
:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window
(§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval()
is. Basically, eval(...)
is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...)
or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...);
is an indirect call to eval()
. See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval()
call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod()
or the equivalent obj["myMethod"]()
, then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj
in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg
which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )
Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype
functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg
.
In the case of the Array.prototype
functions, the given callbackfn
is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg
if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this
. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this
to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this
is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this
, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg
. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg
:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new
operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this
is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this
. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this
.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this
...refer(s) to the values ofthis
in the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
this
at the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()
is executed? Why?
obj
— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun
/obj.myMethod
is not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow
.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod
) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
this
isobj
. However, in the eval code,myFun
is not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindow
for the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);
is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call()
, which acceptsthisArg
as the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeout
example has athis
ofwindow(global)
.
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthis
is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()
),this
iswindow
within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
The this
keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this
keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this
is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()
) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this
in global context, it is bound to global object (window
in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this
inside a function defined in the global context, this
is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1
is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window
object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this
keyword inside an object method, this
is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this
is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this
still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this
inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window
in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this
. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
new
operator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this
above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new
keyword), this
inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this
inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype
. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
this
which will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])
Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passing elements ofargsArray
as its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...
as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Returns the reference to the functionfun
withthis
inside fun bound toobj1
and parameters offun
bound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,...
.- By now the difference between
apply
,call
andbind
must have become apparent.apply
allows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlength
property and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascall
allows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapply
andcall
immediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bind
simply returns the function bound to the specifiedthis
value and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this
inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
this
directly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListener
method or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick
. - Similarly, when you use
this
directly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >
) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
this
indirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow
. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent
. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthis
is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthis
must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1()
, so that meansf1()
is already attached towindow
object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn
, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn
, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this
would be logged as window
. This is because window
is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this
would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict";
to the beginning of the function declaration, this
would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this
would, in this case just log undefined
, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this
.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach
and slice
, you should already know that the this
variable in that case refers to the Object
on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object
, including Array
s and Function
s). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object
contains a property which holds a Function
, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this
variable set to the Object
it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this
is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new
keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new
keyword.
- Calling the function with the
new
keyword would immediately initialze anObject
of typePerson
. - The constructor of this
Object
has its constructor set toPerson
. Also, note thattypeof awal
would returnObject
only. - This new
Object
would be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype
. This means that any method or property in thePerson
prototype would be available to all instances ofPerson
, includingawal
. - The function
Person
itself is now invoked;this
being a reference to the newly constructed objectawal
.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor
functions. They are just normal functions, and new
can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call
and apply
So yeah, since function
s are also Objects
(and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function
, and two of its many methods are call
and apply
, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this
in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call
. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this
in the function foo
as a reference to thisArg
. All other parameters passed to call
are passed to the function foo
as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3]
in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this
in any function.
apply
is almost the same as call
accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg
and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call
call can be translated to apply
like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call
and apply
can override the value of this
set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind
!
bind
is a brother of call
and apply
. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function
constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind
and call
/apply
is that both call
and apply
will actually invoke the function. bind
, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg
and arguments
pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call
and apply
, bind
will also over-ride the value of this
set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call
and apply
would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind
will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this
changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this
changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this
from the original scope. So we 'copied' this
to that
and used the copy instead of this
. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
this
by default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
new
keyword? - How do we manipulate
this
withcall
andapply
? - Using
bind
. - Copying
this
to solve nested-scope issues.
1
Why is there a section about thenew
keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethis
keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
this
is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthis
is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
this
in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this
would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this
will refer to the window object.
add a comment |
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this
topic.
How is the value of this
determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this
is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window
object. Therefore, this
in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window
object.
When use strict
, this
in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined
.
The this
keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this
, 2) we assign a method that uses this
to a variable, 3) a function that uses this
is passed as a callback function, and 4) this
is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)
What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this
binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind()
, it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this
mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
add a comment |
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call
, func.apply
or func.bind
.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthis
in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call
,func.bind
etc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
this
does not reference a function's scope.this
will reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined
), which as you've said can be changed using.call()
or.apply()
. A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,this
and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),this
and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethis
in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthis
never refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
Here is one good source of this
in JavaScript
.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
this
is thewindow
object
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
node
using the repl,this
is the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal
.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
node
executing from a script,this
at the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg
is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this
in a function that is not called with new
references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;
, in which case this
will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new
the this
will be a new context, it will not reference the global this
.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype
property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new
you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype
property. You access those values using this
.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype
. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this
in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new
.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this
is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind
the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this
is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval
to access this
.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with
to add this
to the current scope to read and write to values on this
without referring to this
explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this
refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
add a comment |
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this
execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this
in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">
, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - obj
el.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // obj
el.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - obj
el.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj
<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
add a comment |
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
add a comment |
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this
is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this
is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this
value.
When having troubles identifying this
, do not ask yourself:
Where is
this
taken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
this
where the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this
and will save you from headache.
add a comment |
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
add a comment |
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
add a comment |
this
is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this
refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this
helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this
is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this
can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this
to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a()
was executed in the global context which is the window
.
With Constructor
this
can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person()
is executed, a completely new object is created. Person
is called and its this
is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new
keyword, whatIsThis
referes to the most global context it can find(window
)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this
refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this
refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply()
.call()
and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = this
means in JavaScript
add a comment |
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
add a comment |
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this
keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this
keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this
keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports
is just a reference to module.exports
add a comment |
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
add a comment |
I have a different take on this
from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis
.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call
.
If you just call a function then this
is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this
will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
which means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like +
and -
and *
. There is also the dot operator which is .
The .
operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this
to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is bar
In other words bar.foo()
translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is bar
Again these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b
JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a
for the property b
. If b
is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b
.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class
keyword. For the purposes of this
though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a
for property b
if it finds property b
on the object or in it's prototype chain if b
ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b
references will be called using the call
method and passing a
as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this
before calling another function and then call it with the .
(dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar();
Following the translation to use call
, obj.bar()
becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);
. When we enter the bar
function we call foo
but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this
is that inner object.
This is what both bind
and =>
functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar
above that explicitly sets this
before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this
is set to whatever you pass to bind
.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});
Note that if functionObject.bind
did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the =>
operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind
, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis
but unlike bind
the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this
happens to be when the =>
operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo()
translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj);
which means the arrow operator inside foo
will bind obj
to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b
. b()
will work as it always has as b.call(window)
or b.call(undefined)
calling the new invisible function that foo
created. That invisible function ignores the this
passed into it and passes obj
as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply
is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
add a comment |
Summary this
Javascript:
- The value of
this
is determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
this
is determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (window
in global space) - In event listeners the value of
this
refers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
new
keyword the value ofthis
refers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
this
with the functions:call
,apply
,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object
.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}
<div class="foo">click me</div>
Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.
add a comment |
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike()
function is printing the this.name
which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object)
.
In the above code snippet, when function bike()
gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike()
call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike()
gets called with the execution context as obj1
so this.name
became obj1.name
. Same with obj2.bike()
call where the execution context of function bike()
is obj2
.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike()
is an example of default binding. obj1.bike()
and obj2.bike()
are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1
but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike()
, the context of execution is obj2
so obj2.name
gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call()
method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name
. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike()
and bike.call(obj2)
both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name
means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1
and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1)
; These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
add a comment |
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
you missed a}
in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
23 Answers
23
active
oldest
votes
23 Answers
23
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this
and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this
, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this
:
§11.1.1 Thethis
keyword
The
this
keyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>
:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window
(§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval()
is. Basically, eval(...)
is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...)
or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...);
is an indirect call to eval()
. See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval()
call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod()
or the equivalent obj["myMethod"]()
, then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj
in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg
which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )
Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype
functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg
.
In the case of the Array.prototype
functions, the given callbackfn
is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg
if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this
. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this
to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this
is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this
, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg
. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg
:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new
operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this
is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this
. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this
.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this
...refer(s) to the values ofthis
in the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
this
at the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()
is executed? Why?
obj
— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun
/obj.myMethod
is not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow
.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod
) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
this
isobj
. However, in the eval code,myFun
is not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindow
for the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);
is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call()
, which acceptsthisArg
as the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeout
example has athis
ofwindow(global)
.
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthis
is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()
),this
iswindow
within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this
and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this
, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this
:
§11.1.1 Thethis
keyword
The
this
keyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>
:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window
(§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval()
is. Basically, eval(...)
is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...)
or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...);
is an indirect call to eval()
. See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval()
call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod()
or the equivalent obj["myMethod"]()
, then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj
in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg
which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )
Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype
functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg
.
In the case of the Array.prototype
functions, the given callbackfn
is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg
if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this
. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this
to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this
is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this
, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg
. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg
:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new
operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this
is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this
. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this
.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this
...refer(s) to the values ofthis
in the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
this
at the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()
is executed? Why?
obj
— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun
/obj.myMethod
is not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow
.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod
) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
this
isobj
. However, in the eval code,myFun
is not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindow
for the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);
is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call()
, which acceptsthisArg
as the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeout
example has athis
ofwindow(global)
.
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthis
is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()
),this
iswindow
within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this
and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this
, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this
:
§11.1.1 Thethis
keyword
The
this
keyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>
:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window
(§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval()
is. Basically, eval(...)
is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...)
or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...);
is an indirect call to eval()
. See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval()
call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod()
or the equivalent obj["myMethod"]()
, then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj
in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg
which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )
Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype
functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg
.
In the case of the Array.prototype
functions, the given callbackfn
is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg
if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this
. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this
to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this
is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this
, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg
. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg
:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new
operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this
is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this
. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this
.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this
...refer(s) to the values ofthis
in the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
this
at the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()
is executed? Why?
obj
— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun
/obj.myMethod
is not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow
.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod
) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
this
isobj
. However, in the eval code,myFun
is not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindow
for the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);
is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call()
, which acceptsthisArg
as the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
I recommend reading Mike West's article Scope in JavaScript (mirror) first. It is an excellent, friendly introduction to the concepts of this
and scope chains in JavaScript.
Once you start getting used to this
, the rules are actually pretty simple. The ECMAScript 5.1 Standard defines this
:
§11.1.1 Thethis
keyword
The
this
keyword evaluates to the value of the ThisBinding of the current execution context
ThisBinding is something that the JavaScript interpreter maintains as it evaluates JavaScript code, like a special CPU register which holds a reference to an object. The interpreter updates the ThisBinding whenever establishing an execution context in one of only three different cases:
1. Initial global execution context
This is the case for JavaScript code that is evaluated at the top-level, e.g. when directly inside a <script>
:
<script>
alert("I'm evaluated in the initial global execution context!");
setTimeout(function () {
alert("I'm NOT evaluated in the initial global execution context.");
}, 1);
</script>
When evaluating code in the initial global execution context, ThisBinding is set to the global object, window
(§10.4.1.1).
Entering eval code
…by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is left unchanged; it is the same value as the ThisBinding of the calling execution context (§10.4.2 (2)(a)).…if not by a direct call to
eval()
ThisBinding is set to the global object as if executing in the initial global execution context (§10.4.2 (1)).
§15.1.2.1.1 defines what a direct call to eval()
is. Basically, eval(...)
is a direct call whereas something like (0, eval)(...)
or var indirectEval = eval; indirectEval(...);
is an indirect call to eval()
. See chuckj's answer to (1, eval)('this') vs eval('this') in JavaScript? and Dmitry Soshnikov’s ECMA-262-5 in detail. Chapter 2. Strict Mode. for when you might use an indirect eval()
call.
Entering function code
This occurs when calling a function. If a function is called on an object, such as in obj.myMethod()
or the equivalent obj["myMethod"]()
, then ThisBinding is set to the object (obj
in the example; §13.2.1). In most other cases, ThisBinding is set to the global object (§10.4.3).
The reason for writing "in most other cases" is because there are eight ECMAScript 5 built-in functions that allow ThisBinding to be specified in the arguments list. These special functions take a so-called thisArg
which becomes the ThisBinding when calling the function (§10.4.3).
These special built-in functions are:
Function.prototype.apply( thisArg, argArray )
Function.prototype.call( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Function.prototype.bind( thisArg [ , arg1 [ , arg2, ... ] ] )
Array.prototype.every( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.some( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.forEach( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.map( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
Array.prototype.filter( callbackfn [ , thisArg ] )
In the case of the Function.prototype
functions, they are called on a function object, but rather than setting ThisBinding to the function object, ThisBinding is set to the thisArg
.
In the case of the Array.prototype
functions, the given callbackfn
is called in an execution context where ThisBinding is set to thisArg
if supplied; otherwise, to the global object.
Those are the rules for plain JavaScript. When you begin using JavaScript libraries (e.g. jQuery), you may find that certain library functions manipulate the value of this
. The developers of those JavaScript libraries do this because it tends to support the most common use cases, and users of the library typically find this behavior to be more convenient. When passing callback functions referencing this
to library functions, you should refer to the documentation for any guarantees about what the value of this
is when the function is called.
If you are wondering how a JavaScript library manipulates the value of this
, the library is simply using one of the built-in JavaScript functions accepting a thisArg
. You, too, can write your own function taking a callback function and thisArg
:
function doWork(callbackfn, thisArg) {
//...
if (callbackfn != null) callbackfn.call(thisArg);
}
There’s a special case I didn’t yet mention. When constructing a new object via the new
operator, the JavaScript interpreter creates a new, empty object, sets some internal properties, and then calls the constructor function on the new object. Thus, when a function is called in a constructor context, the value of this
is the new object that the interpreter created:
function MyType() {
this.someData = "a string";
}
var instance = new MyType();
// Kind of like the following, but there are more steps involved:
// var instance = {};
// MyType.call(instance);
Arrow functions
Arrow functions (introduced in ECMA6) alter the scope of this
. See the existing canonical question, Arrow function vs function declaration / expressions: Are they equivalent / exchangeable? for more information. But in short:
Arrow functions don't have their own
this
.... binding.
Instead, those identifiers are resolved in the lexical scope like any
other variable. That means that inside an arrow function,this
...refer(s) to the values ofthis
in the environment
the arrow function is defined in.
Just for fun, test your understanding with some examples
To reveal the answers, mouse over the light yellow boxes.
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
— The marked line is evaluated in the initial global execution context.
if (true) {
// What is `this` here?
}
What is the value of
this
at the marked line whenobj.staticFunction()
is executed? Why?
obj
— When calling a function on an object, ThisBinding is set to the object.
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
In this example, the JavaScript interpreter enters function code, but because
myFun
/obj.myMethod
is not called on an object, ThisBinding is set towindow
.
This is different from Python, in which accessing a method (
obj.myMethod
) creates a bound method object.
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
window
This one was tricky. When evaluating the eval code,
this
isobj
. However, in the eval code,myFun
is not called on an object, so ThisBinding is set towindow
for the call.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
eval("myFun()");
}
};
What is the value of
this
at the marked line? Why?
obj
The line
myFun.call(obj);
is invoking the special built-in functionFunction.prototype.call()
, which acceptsthisArg
as the first argument.
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
function myFun() {
return this // What is `this` here?
}
obj.staticFunction = myFun;
console.log("this is window:", obj.staticFunction() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", obj.staticFunction() == obj);
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
var obj = {
myMethod: function () {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
};
var myFun = obj.myMethod;
console.log("this is window:", myFun() == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun() == obj);
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
function myFun() {
return this; // What is `this` here?
}
var obj = {
someData: "a string"
};
console.log("this is window:", myFun.call(obj) == window);
console.log("this is obj:", myFun.call(obj) == obj);
edited Jan 22 at 14:19
community wiki
20 revs, 5 users 54%
Daniel Trebbien
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeout
example has athis
ofwindow(global)
.
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthis
is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()
),this
iswindow
within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that thesetTimeout
example has athis
ofwindow(global)
.
– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out whatthis
is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g.someObject.someMethod()
),this
iswindow
within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.
– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
what does these signs means? §10.4.1.1
– Ali
Aug 8 '13 at 10:52
6
6
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
@Ali: They are references to sections within edition 5.1 of the ECMAScript Standard, ECMA-262. I provide them so that you can read the Standard for the technical details if you want.
– Daniel Trebbien
Aug 8 '13 at 11:16
1
1
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
I think @supertonsky is right about #2 - if myFun() is called from global scope, and not as a method on the object, "this" will be the global object, so the phrasing of the question matters. btw - I really like the idea of using mouseover to get the answer for something like this.
– user655489
Nov 30 '13 at 0:29
2
2
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that the
setTimeout
example has a this
of window(global)
.– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
But, jsfiddle.net/H4LYm/2 shows that the
setTimeout
example has a this
of window(global)
.– Kevin Meredith
Dec 31 '13 at 22:20
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out what
this
is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g. someObject.someMethod()
), this
is window
within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
Hi @KevinMeredith. True. So to figure out what
this
is within the timeout function, it's not the "initial global execution context" rule that applies, but the "entering function code" rule. Because the timeout function is not called on an object (e.g. someObject.someMethod()
), this
is window
within the timeout function, as the JSFiddle shows.– Daniel Trebbien
Dec 31 '13 at 22:55
|
show 1 more comment
The this
keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this
keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this
is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()
) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this
in global context, it is bound to global object (window
in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this
inside a function defined in the global context, this
is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1
is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window
object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this
keyword inside an object method, this
is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this
is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this
still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this
inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window
in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this
. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
new
operator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this
above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new
keyword), this
inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this
inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype
. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
this
which will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])
Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passing elements ofargsArray
as its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...
as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Returns the reference to the functionfun
withthis
inside fun bound toobj1
and parameters offun
bound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,...
.- By now the difference between
apply
,call
andbind
must have become apparent.apply
allows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlength
property and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascall
allows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapply
andcall
immediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bind
simply returns the function bound to the specifiedthis
value and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this
inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
this
directly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListener
method or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick
. - Similarly, when you use
this
directly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >
) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
this
indirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow
. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent
. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthis
is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthis
must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1()
, so that meansf1()
is already attached towindow
object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn
, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn
, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
The this
keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this
keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this
is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()
) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this
in global context, it is bound to global object (window
in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this
inside a function defined in the global context, this
is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1
is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window
object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this
keyword inside an object method, this
is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this
is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this
still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this
inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window
in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this
. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
new
operator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this
above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new
keyword), this
inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this
inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype
. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
this
which will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])
Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passing elements ofargsArray
as its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...
as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Returns the reference to the functionfun
withthis
inside fun bound toobj1
and parameters offun
bound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,...
.- By now the difference between
apply
,call
andbind
must have become apparent.apply
allows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlength
property and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascall
allows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapply
andcall
immediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bind
simply returns the function bound to the specifiedthis
value and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this
inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
this
directly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListener
method or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick
. - Similarly, when you use
this
directly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >
) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
this
indirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow
. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent
. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthis
is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthis
must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1()
, so that meansf1()
is already attached towindow
object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn
, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn
, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
The this
keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this
keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this
is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()
) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this
in global context, it is bound to global object (window
in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this
inside a function defined in the global context, this
is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1
is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window
object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this
keyword inside an object method, this
is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this
is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this
still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this
inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window
in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this
. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
new
operator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this
above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new
keyword), this
inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this
inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype
. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
this
which will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])
Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passing elements ofargsArray
as its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...
as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Returns the reference to the functionfun
withthis
inside fun bound toobj1
and parameters offun
bound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,...
.- By now the difference between
apply
,call
andbind
must have become apparent.apply
allows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlength
property and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascall
allows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapply
andcall
immediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bind
simply returns the function bound to the specifiedthis
value and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this
inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
this
directly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListener
method or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick
. - Similarly, when you use
this
directly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >
) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
this
indirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow
. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent
. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
The this
keyword behaves differently in JavaScript compared to other language. In Object Oriented languages, the this
keyword refers to the current instance of the class. In JavaScript the value of this
is determined mostly by the invocation context of function (context.function()
) and where it is called.
1. When used in global context
When you use this
in global context, it is bound to global object (window
in browser)
document.write(this); //[object Window]
When you use this
inside a function defined in the global context, this
is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context.
function f1()
{
return this;
}
document.write(f1()); //[object Window]
Above f1
is made a method of global object. Thus we can also call it on window
object as follows:
function f()
{
return this;
}
document.write(window.f()); //[object Window]
2. When used inside object method
When you use this
keyword inside an object method, this
is bound to the "immediate" enclosing object.
var obj = {
name: "obj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj.f()); //[object Object]:obj
Above I have put the word immediate in double quotes. It is to make the point that if you nest the object inside another object, then this
is bound to the immediate parent.
var obj = {
name: "obj1",
nestedobj: {
name:"nestedobj",
f: function () {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
}
}
document.write(obj.nestedobj.f()); //[object Object]:nestedobj
Even if you add function explicitly to the object as a method, it still follows above rules, that is this
still points to the immediate parent object.
var obj1 = {
name: "obj1",
}
function returnName() {
return this + ":" + this.name;
}
obj1.f = returnName; //add method to object
document.write(obj1.f()); //[object Object]:obj1
3. When invoking context-less function
When you use this
inside function that is invoked without any context (i.e. not on any object), it is bound to the global object (window
in browser)(even if the function is defined inside the object) .
var context = "global";
var obj = {
context: "object",
method: function () {
function f() {
var context = "function";
return this + ":" +this.context;
};
return f(); //invoked without context
}
};
document.write(obj.method()); //[object Window]:global
Trying it all with functions
We can try above points with functions too. However there are some differences.
- Above we added members to objects using object literal notation. We can add members to functions by using
this
. to specify them. - Object literal notation creates an instance of object which we can use immediately. With function we may need to first create its instance using
new
operator. - Also in an object literal approach, we can explicitly add members to already defined object using dot operator. This gets added to the specific instance only. However I have added variable to the function prototype so that it gets reflected in all instances of the function.
Below I tried out all the things that we did with Object and this
above, but by first creating function instead of directly writing an object.
/*********************************************************************
1. When you add variable to the function using this keyword, it
gets added to the function prototype, thus allowing all function
instances to have their own copy of the variables added.
*********************************************************************/
function functionDef()
{
this.name = "ObjDefinition";
this.getName = function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
}
obj1 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj1.getName() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:ObjDefinition
/*********************************************************************
2. Members explicitly added to the function protorype also behave
as above: all function instances have their own copy of the
variable added.
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.version = 1;
functionDef.prototype.getVersion = function(){
return "v"+this.version; //see how this.version refers to the
//version variable added through
//prototype
}
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
3. Illustrating that the function variables added by both above
ways have their own copies across function instances
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.incrementVersion = function(){
this.version = this.version + 1;
}
var obj2 = new functionDef();
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
obj2.incrementVersion(); //incrementing version in obj2
//does not affect obj1 version
document.write(obj2.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v2
document.write(obj1.getVersion() + "<br />"); //v1
/*********************************************************************
4. `this` keyword refers to the immediate parent object. If you
nest the object through function prototype, then `this` inside
object refers to the nested object not the function instance
*********************************************************************/
functionDef.prototype.nestedObj = { name: 'nestedObj',
getName1 : function(){
return this+":"+this.name;
}
};
document.write(obj2.nestedObj.getName1() + "<br />"); //[object Object]:nestedObj
/*********************************************************************
5. If the method is on an object's prototype chain, `this` refers
to the object the method was called on, as if the method was on
the object.
*********************************************************************/
var ProtoObj = { fun: function () { return this.a } };
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj); //creating an object setting ProtoObj
//as its prototype
obj3.a = 999; //adding instance member to obj3
document.write(obj3.fun()+"<br />");//999
//calling obj3.fun() makes
//ProtoObj.fun() to access obj3.a as
//if fun() is defined on obj3
4. When used inside constructor function.
When the function is used as a constructor (that is when it is called with new
keyword), this
inside function body points to the new object being constructed.
var myname = "global context";
function SimpleFun()
{
this.myname = "simple function";
}
var obj1 = new SimpleFun(); //adds myname to obj1
//1. `new` causes `this` inside the SimpleFun() to point to the
// object being constructed thus adding any member
// created inside SimipleFun() using this.membername to the
// object being constructed
//2. And by default `new` makes function to return newly
// constructed object if no explicit return value is specified
document.write(obj1.myname); //simple function
5. When used inside function defined on prototype chain
If the method is on an object's prototype chain, this
inside such method refers to the object the method was called on, as if the method is defined on the object.
var ProtoObj = {
fun: function () {
return this.a;
}
};
//Object.create() creates object with ProtoObj as its
//prototype and assigns it to obj3, thus making fun()
//to be the method on its prototype chain
var obj3 = Object.create(ProtoObj);
obj3.a = 999;
document.write(obj3.fun()); //999
//Notice that fun() is defined on obj3's prototype but
//`this.a` inside fun() retrieves obj3.a
6. Inside call(), apply() and bind() functions
- All these methods are defined on
Function.prototype
. - These methods allows to write a function once and invoke it in different context. In other words, they allows to specify the value of
this
which will be used while the function is being executed. They also take any parameters to be passed to the original function when it is invoked.
fun.apply(obj1 [, argsArray])
Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passing elements ofargsArray
as its arguments.
fun.call(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Setsobj1
as the value ofthis
insidefun()
and callsfun()
passingarg1, arg2, arg3, ...
as its arguments.
fun.bind(obj1 [, arg1 [, arg2 [,arg3 [, ...]]]])
- Returns the reference to the functionfun
withthis
inside fun bound toobj1
and parameters offun
bound to the parameters specifiedarg1, arg2, arg3,...
.- By now the difference between
apply
,call
andbind
must have become apparent.apply
allows to specify the arguments to function as array-like object i.e. an object with a numericlength
property and corresponding non-negative integer properties. Whereascall
allows to specify the arguments to the function directly. Bothapply
andcall
immediately invokes the function in the specified context and with the specified arguments. On the other hand,bind
simply returns the function bound to the specifiedthis
value and the arguments. We can capture the reference to this returned function by assigning it to a variable and later we can call it any time.
function add(inc1, inc2)
{
return this.a + inc1 + inc2;
}
var o = { a : 4 };
document.write(add.call(o, 5, 6)+"<br />"); //15
//above add.call(o,5,6) sets `this` inside
//add() to `o` and calls add() resulting:
// this.a + inc1 + inc2 =
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(add.apply(o, [5, 6]) + "<br />"); //15
// `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
var g = add.bind(o, 5, 6); //g: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + 6
document.write(g()+"<br />"); //15
var h = add.bind(o, 5); //h: `o.a` i.e. 4 + 5 + ?
document.write(h(6) + "<br />"); //15
// 4 + 5 + 6 = 15
document.write(h() + "<br />"); //NaN
//no parameter is passed to h()
//thus inc2 inside add() is `undefined`
//4 + 5 + undefined = NaN</code>
7. this
inside event handlers
- When you assign function directly to event handlers of an element, use of
this
directly inside event handling function refers to the corresponding element. Such direct function assignment can be done usingaddeventListener
method or through the traditional event registration methods likeonclick
. - Similarly, when you use
this
directly inside the event property (like<button onclick="...this..." >
) of the element, it refers to the element. - However use of
this
indirectly through the other function called inside the event handling function or event property resolves to the global objectwindow
. - The same above behavior is achieved when we attach the function to the event handler using Microsoft's Event Registration model method
attachEvent
. Instead of assigning the function to the event handler (and the thus making the function method of the element), it calls the function on the event (effectively calling it in global context).
I recommend to better try this in JSFiddle.
<script>
function clickedMe() {
alert(this + " : " + this.tagName + " : " + this.id);
}
document.getElementById("button1").addEventListener("click", clickedMe, false);
document.getElementById("button2").onclick = clickedMe;
document.getElementById("button5").attachEvent('onclick', clickedMe);
</script>
<h3>Using `this` "directly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button id="button1">click() "assigned" using addEventListner() </button><br />
<button id="button2">click() "assigned" using click() </button><br />
<button id="button3" onclick="alert(this+ ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id);">used `this` directly in click event property</button>
<h3>Using `this` "indirectly" inside event handler or event property</h3>
<button onclick="alert((function(){return this + ' : ' + this.tagName + ' : ' + this.id;})());">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> defined & called inside event property</button><br />
<button id="button4" onclick="clickedMe()">`this` used indirectly, inside function <br /> called inside event property</button> <br />
IE only: <button id="button5">click() "attached" using attachEvent() </button>
edited May 7 '15 at 13:42
Jonathan Lin
11.5k45052
11.5k45052
answered Jul 7 '13 at 17:32
Mahesha999Mahesha999
7,3871962118
7,3871962118
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthis
is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthis
must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1()
, so that meansf1()
is already attached towindow
object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn
, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn
, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value ofthis
is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value ofthis
must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make callwindow.f1()
, so that meansf1()
is already attached towindow
object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?
– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of calledwindow.fn
, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it usingwindow.fn
, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)
– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
"When you use this inside a function defined in the global context, this is still bound to global object since the function is actually made a method of global context." is incorrect. this is set by how a function is called or by bind, not by where it is defined. Calling any function without a base reference ("context") will default this to the global object or remain undefined in strict mode.
– RobG
Jun 20 '14 at 1:50
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value of
this
is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value of this
must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make call window.f1()
, so that means f1()
is already attached to window
object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
@RobG hmm may be, but I found this on MDN: In this case, the value of
this
is not set by the call. Since the code is not in strict mode, the value of this
must always be an object so it defaults to the global object. And in fact thats why I thought we can directly make call window.f1()
, so that means f1()
is already attached to window
object, I mean before invocation. Am I getting it wrong?– Mahesha999
Jun 20 '14 at 19:07
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of called
window.fn
, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it using window.fn
, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
I was commenting (perhaps not clearly) on your linking the setting of this with "the function is actually made a method of the global context", as if it's sort of called
window.fn
, which it isn't. this defaults to the global object because no base reference was used in the call, not because of where the function is defined (so this is still set by how the function was called). If you explicitly call it using window.fn
, then you are setting this to window. Same result, different way of going about it. :-)– RobG
Jun 21 '14 at 3:01
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
"above I have put the word immediate..." no you didn't. Can you please revise this so that the error is fixed? It seems semantic to the answer and thus I can't continue reading until the error is fixed for fear of learning something incorrect.
– TylerH
Aug 4 '14 at 14:09
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
@TylerH do Ctrl+F on this page in your browser to find string "immediate" (including double quotes) I think its there if am understanding u wrong
– Mahesha999
Aug 24 '14 at 8:36
|
show 4 more comments
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this
would be logged as window
. This is because window
is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this
would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict";
to the beginning of the function declaration, this
would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this
would, in this case just log undefined
, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this
.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach
and slice
, you should already know that the this
variable in that case refers to the Object
on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object
, including Array
s and Function
s). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object
contains a property which holds a Function
, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this
variable set to the Object
it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this
is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new
keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new
keyword.
- Calling the function with the
new
keyword would immediately initialze anObject
of typePerson
. - The constructor of this
Object
has its constructor set toPerson
. Also, note thattypeof awal
would returnObject
only. - This new
Object
would be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype
. This means that any method or property in thePerson
prototype would be available to all instances ofPerson
, includingawal
. - The function
Person
itself is now invoked;this
being a reference to the newly constructed objectawal
.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor
functions. They are just normal functions, and new
can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call
and apply
So yeah, since function
s are also Objects
(and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function
, and two of its many methods are call
and apply
, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this
in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call
. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this
in the function foo
as a reference to thisArg
. All other parameters passed to call
are passed to the function foo
as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3]
in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this
in any function.
apply
is almost the same as call
accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg
and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call
call can be translated to apply
like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call
and apply
can override the value of this
set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind
!
bind
is a brother of call
and apply
. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function
constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind
and call
/apply
is that both call
and apply
will actually invoke the function. bind
, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg
and arguments
pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call
and apply
, bind
will also over-ride the value of this
set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call
and apply
would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind
will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this
changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this
changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this
from the original scope. So we 'copied' this
to that
and used the copy instead of this
. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
this
by default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
new
keyword? - How do we manipulate
this
withcall
andapply
? - Using
bind
. - Copying
this
to solve nested-scope issues.
1
Why is there a section about thenew
keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this
would be logged as window
. This is because window
is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this
would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict";
to the beginning of the function declaration, this
would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this
would, in this case just log undefined
, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this
.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach
and slice
, you should already know that the this
variable in that case refers to the Object
on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object
, including Array
s and Function
s). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object
contains a property which holds a Function
, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this
variable set to the Object
it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this
is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new
keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new
keyword.
- Calling the function with the
new
keyword would immediately initialze anObject
of typePerson
. - The constructor of this
Object
has its constructor set toPerson
. Also, note thattypeof awal
would returnObject
only. - This new
Object
would be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype
. This means that any method or property in thePerson
prototype would be available to all instances ofPerson
, includingawal
. - The function
Person
itself is now invoked;this
being a reference to the newly constructed objectawal
.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor
functions. They are just normal functions, and new
can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call
and apply
So yeah, since function
s are also Objects
(and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function
, and two of its many methods are call
and apply
, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this
in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call
. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this
in the function foo
as a reference to thisArg
. All other parameters passed to call
are passed to the function foo
as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3]
in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this
in any function.
apply
is almost the same as call
accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg
and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call
call can be translated to apply
like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call
and apply
can override the value of this
set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind
!
bind
is a brother of call
and apply
. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function
constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind
and call
/apply
is that both call
and apply
will actually invoke the function. bind
, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg
and arguments
pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call
and apply
, bind
will also over-ride the value of this
set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call
and apply
would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind
will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this
changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this
changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this
from the original scope. So we 'copied' this
to that
and used the copy instead of this
. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
this
by default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
new
keyword? - How do we manipulate
this
withcall
andapply
? - Using
bind
. - Copying
this
to solve nested-scope issues.
1
Why is there a section about thenew
keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this
would be logged as window
. This is because window
is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this
would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict";
to the beginning of the function declaration, this
would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this
would, in this case just log undefined
, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this
.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach
and slice
, you should already know that the this
variable in that case refers to the Object
on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object
, including Array
s and Function
s). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object
contains a property which holds a Function
, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this
variable set to the Object
it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this
is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new
keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new
keyword.
- Calling the function with the
new
keyword would immediately initialze anObject
of typePerson
. - The constructor of this
Object
has its constructor set toPerson
. Also, note thattypeof awal
would returnObject
only. - This new
Object
would be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype
. This means that any method or property in thePerson
prototype would be available to all instances ofPerson
, includingawal
. - The function
Person
itself is now invoked;this
being a reference to the newly constructed objectawal
.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor
functions. They are just normal functions, and new
can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call
and apply
So yeah, since function
s are also Objects
(and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function
, and two of its many methods are call
and apply
, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this
in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call
. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this
in the function foo
as a reference to thisArg
. All other parameters passed to call
are passed to the function foo
as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3]
in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this
in any function.
apply
is almost the same as call
accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg
and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call
call can be translated to apply
like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call
and apply
can override the value of this
set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind
!
bind
is a brother of call
and apply
. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function
constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind
and call
/apply
is that both call
and apply
will actually invoke the function. bind
, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg
and arguments
pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call
and apply
, bind
will also over-ride the value of this
set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call
and apply
would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind
will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this
changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this
changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this
from the original scope. So we 'copied' this
to that
and used the copy instead of this
. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
this
by default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
new
keyword? - How do we manipulate
this
withcall
andapply
? - Using
bind
. - Copying
this
to solve nested-scope issues.
Javascript's this
Simple function invocation
Consider the following function:
function foo() {
console.log("bar");
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // calling the function
Note that we are running this in the normal mode, i.e. strict mode is not used.
When run in a browser, the value of this
would be logged as window
. This is because window
is the global variable in a web browser's scope.
If you run this same piece of code in an environment like node.js, this
would refer to the global variable in your app.
Now if we run this in strict mode by adding the statement "use strict";
to the beginning of the function declaration, this
would no longer refer to the global variable in either of the envirnoments. This is done to avoid confusions in the strict mode. this
would, in this case just log undefined
, because that is what it is, it is not defined.
In the following cases, we would see how to manipulate the value of this
.
Calling a function on an object
There are different ways to do this. If you have called native methods in Javascript like forEach
and slice
, you should already know that the this
variable in that case refers to the Object
on which you called that function (Note that in javascript, just about everything is an Object
, including Array
s and Function
s). Take the following code for example.
var myObj = {key: "Obj"};
myObj.logThis = function () {
// I am a method
console.log(this);
}
myObj.logThis(); // myObj is logged
If an Object
contains a property which holds a Function
, the property is called a method. This method, when called, will always have it's this
variable set to the Object
it is associated with. This is true for both strict and non-strict modes.
Note that if a method is stored (or rather, copied) in another variable, the reference to this
is no longer preserved in the new variable. For example:
// continuing with the previous code snippet
var myVar = myObj.thisMethod;
myVar();
// logs either of window/global/undefined based on mode of operation
Considering a more commonly practical scenario:
var el = document.getElementById('idOfEl');
el.addEventListener('click', function() { console.log(this) });
// the function called by addEventListener contains this as the reference to the element
// so clicking on our element would log that element itself
The new
keyword
Consider a constructor function in Javascript:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
this.sayHello = function () {
console.log ("Hello", this);
}
}
var awal = new Person("Awal");
awal.sayHello();
// In `awal.sayHello`, `this` contains the reference to the variable `awal`
How does this work? Well, let's see what happens when we use the new
keyword.
- Calling the function with the
new
keyword would immediately initialze anObject
of typePerson
. - The constructor of this
Object
has its constructor set toPerson
. Also, note thattypeof awal
would returnObject
only. - This new
Object
would be assigned the protoype ofPerson.prototype
. This means that any method or property in thePerson
prototype would be available to all instances ofPerson
, includingawal
. - The function
Person
itself is now invoked;this
being a reference to the newly constructed objectawal
.
Pretty straighforward, eh?
Note that the official ECMAScript spec no where states that such types of functions are actual constructor
functions. They are just normal functions, and new
can be used on any function. It's just that we use them as such, and so we call them as such only.
Calling functions on Functions : call
and apply
So yeah, since function
s are also Objects
(and in-fact first class variables in Javascript), even functions have methods which are... well, functions themselved.
All functions inherit from the global Function
, and two of its many methods are call
and apply
, and both can be used to manipulate the value of this
in the function on which they are called.
function foo () { console.log (this, arguments); }
var thisArg = {myObj: "is cool"};
foo.call(thisArg, 1, 2, 3);
This is a typical example of using call
. It basically takes the first parameter and sets this
in the function foo
as a reference to thisArg
. All other parameters passed to call
are passed to the function foo
as arguments.
So the above code will log {myObj: "is cool"}, [1, 2, 3]
in the console. Pretty nice way to change the value of this
in any function.
apply
is almost the same as call
accept that it takes only two parameters: thisArg
and an array which contains the arguments to be passed to the function. So the above call
call can be translated to apply
like this:
foo.apply(thisArg, [1,2,3])
Note that call
and apply
can override the value of this
set by dot method invocation we discussed in the second bullet.
Simple enough :)
Presenting.... bind
!
bind
is a brother of call
and apply
. It is also a method inherited by all functions from the global Function
constructor in Javascript. The difference between bind
and call
/apply
is that both call
and apply
will actually invoke the function. bind
, on the other hand, returns a new function with the thisArg
and arguments
pre-set. Let's take an example to better understand this:
function foo (a, b) {
console.log (this, arguments);
}
var thisArg = {myObj: "even more cool now"};
var bound = foo.bind(thisArg, 1, 2);
console.log (typeof bound); // logs `function`
console.log (bound);
/* logs `function () { native code }` */
bound(); // calling the function returned by `.bind`
// logs `{myObj: "even more cool now"}, [1, 2]`
See the difference between the three? It is subtle, but they are used differently. Like call
and apply
, bind
will also over-ride the value of this
set by dot-method invocation.
Also note that neither of these three functions do any change to the original function. call
and apply
would return the value from freshly constructed functions while bind
will return the freshly constructed function itself, ready to be called.
Extra stuff, copy this
Sometimes, you don't like the fact that this
changes with scope, specially nested scope. Take a look at the following example.
var myObj = {
hello: function () {
return "world"
},
myMethod: function () {
// copy this, variable names are case-sensitive
var that = this;
// callbacks ftw o/
foo.bar("args", function () {
// I want to call `hello` here
this.hello(); // error
// but `this` references to `foo` damn!
// oh wait we have a backup o/
that.hello(); // "world"
});
}
};
In the above code, we see that the value of this
changed with nested scope, but we wanted the value of this
from the original scope. So we 'copied' this
to that
and used the copy instead of this
. Clever, eh?
Index:
- What is held in
this
by default? - What if we call the function as a method with Object-dot notation?
- What if we use the
new
keyword? - How do we manipulate
this
withcall
andapply
? - Using
bind
. - Copying
this
to solve nested-scope issues.
edited Oct 27 '14 at 9:40
Madara Uchiha♦
119k43214263
119k43214263
answered Oct 26 '14 at 15:07
user3459110user3459110
5,82522033
5,82522033
1
Why is there a section about thenew
keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
1
Why is there a section about thenew
keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"
– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
1
1
Why is there a section about the
new
keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
Why is there a section about the
new
keyword? Also this question has been beat to death, but we all have "that time we tried to ride the coat-tails of a question answered 4 years ago"– Jhawins
Oct 27 '14 at 15:30
add a comment |
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethis
keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
this
is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthis
is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethis
keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
this
is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthis
is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
"this" is all about scope. Every function has its own scope, and since everything in JS is an object, even a function can store some values into itself using "this". OOP 101 teaches that "this" is only applicable to instances of an object. Therefore, every-time a function executes, a new "instance" of that function has a new meaning of "this".
Most people get confused when they try to use "this" inside of anonymous closure functions like:
(function(value) {
this.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = this.value; // uh oh!! possibly undefined
});
})(2);
So here, inside each(), "this" doesn't hold the "value" that you expect it to (from
this.value = value;above it). So, to get over this (no pun intended) problem, a developer could:
(function(value) {
var self = this; // small change
self.value = value;
$('.some-elements').each(function(elt){
elt.innerHTML = self.value; // phew!! == 2
});
})(2);
Try it out; you'll begin to like this pattern of programming
edited Oct 29 '14 at 5:00
Daniel Alexiuc
9,81884969
9,81884969
answered Jun 27 '10 at 14:10
arunjitsingharunjitsingh
2,2651715
2,2651715
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethis
keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
this
is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthis
is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
Thethis
keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.
– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
this
is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), butthis
is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.
– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
6
6
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
"everything in JS is an object" is not true, JavaScript also has primitive values, see bclary.com/2004/11/07/#a-4.3.2
– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:47
6
6
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
The primitive values seem to have some methods on themselves, like String#substring(), Number#toString(), etc.. So, maybe not with the same nomenclature as that article, they really behave as if they were objects (they are all prototyped, ie. String#substring() is really: String.prototype.substring = function(){...}). Please correct me if I'm wrong.
– arunjitsingh
Jul 4 '10 at 16:49
11
11
The
this
keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
The
this
keyword has nothing to do with scope. Also, it has a meaning also in functions that are not properties of objects.– Bergi
Dec 8 '12 at 20:59
1
1
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
@arunjitsingh—there are two schools of thought on that. I like the one that says "everything is an object, but some can be represented by primitives for convenience". ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:20
7
7
this
is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), but this
is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
this
is not ALL about scope. It is ALL about execution context, which is not the same thing as scope. JavaScript is lexically scoped (meaning scope is determined by the location of the code), but this
is determined by how the function containing it is invoked - not where that function is.– Scott Marcus
Mar 16 '16 at 5:00
|
show 1 more comment
this
in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this
would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this
will refer to the window object.
add a comment |
this
in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this
would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this
will refer to the window object.
add a comment |
this
in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this
would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this
will refer to the window object.
this
in Javascript always refers to the 'owner' of the function that is being executed.
If no explicit owner is defined, then the top most owner, the window object, is referenced.
So if I did
function someKindOfFunction() {
this.style = 'foo';
}
element.onclick = someKindOfFunction;
this
would refer to the element object. But be careful, a lot of people make this mistake
<element onclick="someKindOfFunction()">
In the latter case, you merely reference the function, not hand it over to the element. Therefor, this
will refer to the window object.
answered Oct 6 '13 at 19:46
SephSeph
8601017
8601017
add a comment |
add a comment |
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this
topic.
How is the value of this
determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this
is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window
object. Therefore, this
in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window
object.
When use strict
, this
in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined
.
The this
keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this
, 2) we assign a method that uses this
to a variable, 3) a function that uses this
is passed as a callback function, and 4) this
is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)
What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this
binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind()
, it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this
mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
add a comment |
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this
topic.
How is the value of this
determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this
is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window
object. Therefore, this
in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window
object.
When use strict
, this
in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined
.
The this
keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this
, 2) we assign a method that uses this
to a variable, 3) a function that uses this
is passed as a callback function, and 4) this
is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)
What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this
binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind()
, it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this
mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
add a comment |
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this
topic.
How is the value of this
determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this
is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window
object. Therefore, this
in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window
object.
When use strict
, this
in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined
.
The this
keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this
, 2) we assign a method that uses this
to a variable, 3) a function that uses this
is passed as a callback function, and 4) this
is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)
What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this
binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind()
, it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this
mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
Since this thread has bumped up, I have compiled few points for readers new to this
topic.
How is the value of this
determined?
We use this similar to the way we use pronouns in natural languages like English: “John is running fast because he is trying to catch the train.” Instead we could have written “… John is trying to catch the train”.
var person = {
firstName: "Penelope",
lastName: "Barrymore",
fullName: function () {
// We use "this" just as in the sentence above:
console.log(this.firstName + " " + this.lastName);
// We could have also written:
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.lastName);
}
}
this
is not assigned a value until an object invokes the function where it is defined. In the global scope, all global variables and functions are defined on the window
object. Therefore, this
in a global function refers to (and has the value of) the global window
object.
When use strict
, this
in global and in anonymous functions that are not bound to any object holds a value of undefined
.
The this
keyword is most misunderstood when: 1) we borrow a method that uses this
, 2) we assign a method that uses this
to a variable, 3) a function that uses this
is passed as a callback function, and 4) this
is used inside a closure — an inner function. (2)
What holds the future
Defined in ECMA Script 6, arrow-functions adopt the this
binding from the
enclosing (function or global) scope.
function foo() {
// return an arrow function
return (a) => {
// `this` here is lexically inherited from `foo()`
console.log(this.a);
};
}
var obj1 = { a: 2 };
var obj2 = { a: 3 };
var bar = foo.call(obj1);
bar.call( obj2 ); // 2, not 3!
While arrow-functions provide an alternative to using bind()
, it’s important to note that they essentially are disabling the traditional this
mechanism in favor of more widely understood lexical scoping. (1)
References:
this & Object Prototypes, by Kyle Simpson. © 2014 Getify Solutions.- javascriptissexy.com - http://goo.gl/pvl0GX
- Angus Croll - http://goo.gl/Z2RacU
answered Oct 30 '14 at 3:58
carlodursocarlodurso
2,72042037
2,72042037
add a comment |
add a comment |
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call
, func.apply
or func.bind
.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthis
in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call
,func.bind
etc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
this
does not reference a function's scope.this
will reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined
), which as you've said can be changed using.call()
or.apply()
. A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,this
and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),this
and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethis
in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthis
never refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call
, func.apply
or func.bind
.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthis
in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call
,func.bind
etc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
this
does not reference a function's scope.this
will reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined
), which as you've said can be changed using.call()
or.apply()
. A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,this
and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),this
and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethis
in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthis
never refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call
, func.apply
or func.bind
.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
Every function execution context in javascript has a scope context this parameter that is set by:
- How the function is called (including as an object method, use of call and apply, use of new)
- Use of bind
- Lexically for arrow functions (they adopt the this of their outer execution context)
Whatever that scope context is, is referenced by "this".
You can change that set the value of this scope context using func.call
, func.apply
or func.bind
.
By default, and what confuses most beginners, when a callback listener is called after an event is raised on a DOM element, the scope context this value of the function is the DOM element.
jQuery makes this trivial to change with jQuery.proxy.
edited Apr 26 '17 at 3:54
RobG
99.5k19111146
99.5k19111146
answered Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
blockheadblockhead
7,65713360
7,65713360
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthis
in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call
,func.bind
etc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
this
does not reference a function's scope.this
will reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined
), which as you've said can be changed using.call()
or.apply()
. A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,this
and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),this
and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethis
in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthis
never refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing aboutthis
in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.
– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions usingfunc.call
,func.bind
etc. – Sushil
– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
this
does not reference a function's scope.this
will reference a specific object (or possiblyundefined
), which as you've said can be changed using.call()
or.apply()
. A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.
– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,this
and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6),this
and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (thethis
in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), butthis
never refers to a scope.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
9
9
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing about
this
in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope. In other words, what's confusing about
this
in Javascript is that it's not an intrinsic property of the function itself, but rather an artifact of the way the function is invoked.– Pointy
Jun 27 '10 at 14:34
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions using
func.call
, func.bind
etc. – Sushil– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
@pointy thanks. what causes the most confusion about this in js is the fact that in all the languages used earlier (c#, c++), - this can't be manipulated n always points to the object instance whereas in js it depends and can be changed when invoking functions using
func.call
, func.bind
etc. – Sushil– Sushil
Jun 25 '13 at 10:04
2
2
this
does not reference a function's scope. this
will reference a specific object (or possibly undefined
), which as you've said can be changed using .call()
or .apply()
. A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
this
does not reference a function's scope. this
will reference a specific object (or possibly undefined
), which as you've said can be changed using .call()
or .apply()
. A function's scope is (essentially, when simplified) which variables it has access to, and this depends entirely on where the function is declared and cannot be changed.– nnnnnn
Jan 3 '15 at 22:48
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
@Pointy: "It's a little more correct to say that every function call has a scope." Even more correct to say that functions (and now blocks) have scope, function calls have context. Scope defines what the identifiers are that can be used by code in that scope. Context defines what those identifiers are bound to.
– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
1
1
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,
this
and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6), this
and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (the this
in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), but this
never refers to a scope.– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
"Whatever that scope is, is referenced by "this"." No,
this
and scope have nothing whatsoever to do with one another in ES5 and before (e.g., when this answer was written). In ES2015 (aka ES6), this
and scope are related one fairly minimal way wrt arrow functions (the this
in an arrow function is inherited from its enclosing scope), but this
never refers to a scope.– T.J. Crowder
Nov 14 '15 at 15:09
|
show 2 more comments
Here is one good source of this
in JavaScript
.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
this
is thewindow
object
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
node
using the repl,this
is the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal
.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
node
executing from a script,this
at the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg
is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this
in a function that is not called with new
references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;
, in which case this
will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new
the this
will be a new context, it will not reference the global this
.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype
property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new
you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype
property. You access those values using this
.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype
. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this
in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new
.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this
is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind
the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this
is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval
to access this
.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with
to add this
to the current scope to read and write to values on this
without referring to this
explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this
refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
add a comment |
Here is one good source of this
in JavaScript
.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
this
is thewindow
object
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
node
using the repl,this
is the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal
.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
node
executing from a script,this
at the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg
is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this
in a function that is not called with new
references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;
, in which case this
will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new
the this
will be a new context, it will not reference the global this
.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype
property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new
you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype
property. You access those values using this
.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype
. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this
in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new
.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this
is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind
the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this
is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval
to access this
.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with
to add this
to the current scope to read and write to values on this
without referring to this
explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this
refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
add a comment |
Here is one good source of this
in JavaScript
.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
this
is thewindow
object
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
node
using the repl,this
is the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal
.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
node
executing from a script,this
at the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg
is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this
in a function that is not called with new
references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;
, in which case this
will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new
the this
will be a new context, it will not reference the global this
.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype
property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new
you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype
property. You access those values using this
.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype
. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this
in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new
.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this
is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind
the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this
is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval
to access this
.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with
to add this
to the current scope to read and write to values on this
without referring to this
explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this
refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
Here is one good source of this
in JavaScript
.
Here is the summary:
global this
In a browser, at the global scope,
this
is thewindow
object
<script type="text/javascript">
console.log(this === window); // true
var foo = "bar";
console.log(this.foo); // "bar"
console.log(window.foo); // "bar"
In
node
using the repl,this
is the top namespace. You can refer to it asglobal
.
>this
{ ArrayBuffer: [Function: ArrayBuffer],
Int8Array: { [Function: Int8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
Uint8Array: { [Function: Uint8Array] BYTES_PER_ELEMENT: 1 },
...
>global === this
true
In
node
executing from a script,this
at the global scope starts as an empty object. It is not the same asglobal
\test.js
console.log(this); \ {}
console.log(this === global); \ fasle
function this
Except in the case of DOM event handlers or when a thisArg
is provided (see further down), both in node and in a browser using this
in a function that is not called with new
references the global scope…
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
If you use use strict;
, in which case this
will be undefined
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
"use strict";
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
testThis(); //Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'foo' of undefined
</script>
If you call a function with new
the this
will be a new context, it will not reference the global this
.
<script type="text/javascript">
foo = "bar";
function testThis() {
this.foo = "foo";
}
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
new testThis();
console.log(this.foo); //logs "bar"
console.log(new testThis().foo); //logs "foo"
</script>
- prototype this
Functions you create become function objects. They automatically get a special prototype
property, which is something you can assign values to. When you create an instance by calling your function with new
you get access to the values you assigned to the prototype
property. You access those values using this
.
function Thing() {
console.log(this.foo);
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
var thing = new Thing(); //logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); //logs "bar"
It is usually a mistake to assign arrays or objects on the prototype
. If you want instances to each have their own arrays, create them in the function, not the prototype.
function Thing() {
this.things = ;
}
var thing1 = new Thing();
var thing2 = new Thing();
thing1.things.push("foo");
console.log(thing1.things); //logs ["foo"]
console.log(thing2.things); //logs
- object this
You can use this
in any function on an object to refer to other properties on that object. This is not the same as an instance created with new
.
var obj = {
foo: "bar",
logFoo: function () {
console.log(this.foo);
}
};
obj.logFoo(); //logs "bar"
- DOM event this
In an HTML DOM event handler, this
is always a reference to the DOM element the event was attached to
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick);
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs "<div id="foo"></div>"
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
Unless you bind
the context
function Listener() {
document.getElementById("foo").addEventListener("click",
this.handleClick.bind(this));
}
Listener.prototype.handleClick = function (event) {
console.log(this); //logs Listener {handleClick: function}
}
var listener = new Listener();
document.getElementById("foo").click();
- HTML this
Inside HTML attributes in which you can put JavaScript, this
is a reference to the element.
<div id="foo" onclick="console.log(this);"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.getElementById("foo").click(); //logs <div id="foo"...
</script>
- eval this
You can use eval
to access this
.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
eval("console.log(this.foo)"); //logs "bar"
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo();
- with this
You can use with
to add this
to the current scope to read and write to values on this
without referring to this
explicitly.
function Thing () {
}
Thing.prototype.foo = "bar";
Thing.prototype.logFoo = function () {
with (this) {
console.log(foo);
foo = "foo";
}
}
var thing = new Thing();
thing.logFoo(); // logs "bar"
console.log(thing.foo); // logs "foo"
- jQuery this
the jQuery will in many places have this
refer to a DOM element.
<div class="foo bar1"></div>
<div class="foo bar2"></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(".foo").each(function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").on("click", function () {
console.log(this); //logs <div class="foo...
});
$(".foo").each(function () {
this.click();
});
</script>
edited Mar 25 '16 at 14:23
gnerkus
7,77743260
7,77743260
answered Nov 29 '15 at 6:01
zangwzangw
24.1k796116
24.1k796116
add a comment |
add a comment |
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this
execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this
in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">
, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - obj
el.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // obj
el.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - obj
el.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj
<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
add a comment |
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this
execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this
in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">
, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - obj
el.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // obj
el.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - obj
el.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj
<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
add a comment |
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this
execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this
in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">
, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - obj
el.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // obj
el.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - obj
el.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj
<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
Daniel, awesome explanation! A couple of words on this and good list of this
execution context pointer in case of event handlers.
In two words, this
in JavaScript points the object from whom (or from whose execution context) the current function was run and it's always read-only, you can't set it anyway (such an attempt will end up with 'Invalid left-hand side in assignment' message.
For event handlers: inline event handlers, such as <element onclick="foo">
, override any other handlers attached earlier and before, so be careful and it's better to stay off of inline event delegation at all.
And thanks to Zara Alaverdyan who inspired me to this list of examples through a dissenting debate :)
el.onclick = foo; // in the foo - obj
el.onclick = function () {this.style.color = '#fff';} // obj
el.onclick = function() {doSomething();} // In the doSomething -
Windowel.addEventListener('click',foo,false) // in the foo - obj
el.attachEvent('onclick, function () { // this }') // window, all the
compliance to IE :)<button onclick="this.style.color = '#fff';"> // obj
<button onclick="foo"> // In the foo - window, but you can <button
onclick="foo(this)">
answered Apr 23 '13 at 12:57
Arman McHitarianArman McHitarian
2,89122631
2,89122631
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
add a comment |
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
add a comment |
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
There is a lot of confusion regarding how "this" keyword is interpreted in JavaScript. Hopefully this article will lay all those to rest once and for all. And a lot more. Please read the entire article carefully. Be forewarned that this article is long.
Irrespective of the context in which it is used, "this" always references the "current object" in Javascript. However, what the "current object" is differs according to context. The context may be exactly 1 of the 6 following:
Global (i.e. Outside all functions)
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has not been bound by calling functionName.bind)
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind)- While Object Creation through "new"
- Inside Inline DOM event handler
The following describes each of this contexts one by one:
Global Context (i.e. Outside all functions):
Outside all functions (i.e. in global context) the "current
object" (and hence the value of "this") is always the
"window" object for browsers.
Inside Direct "Non Bound Function" Call:
Inside a Direct "Non Bound Function" Call, the object that
invoked the function call becomes the "current object" (and hence
the value of "this"). If a function is called without a explicit current object, the current object is either the "window" object (For Non Strict Mode) or undefined (For Strict Mode) . Any function (or variable) defined in
Global Context automatically becomes a property of the "window" object.For e.g Suppose function is defined in Global Context as
function UserDefinedFunction(){
alert(this)
}
it becomes the property of the window object, as if you have defined
it as
window.UserDefinedFunction=function(){
alert(this)
}
In "Non Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking this function directly through "UserDefinedFunction()" will automatically call/invoke
it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()" making "window" as the
"current object" (and hence the value of "this") within "UserDefinedFunction".Invoking this function in "Non Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays [object Window] as it automatically gets invoked as window.UserDefinedFunction()
In "Strict Mode", Calling/Invoking the function directly through
"UserDefinedFunction()" will "NOT" automatically call/invoke it as "window.UserDefinedFunction()".Hence the "current
object" (and the value of "this") within
"UserDefinedFunction" shall be undefined. Invoking this function in "Strict Mode" will result in the following
UserDefinedFunction() // displays undefined
However, invoking it explicitly using window object shall result in
the following
window.UserDefinedFunction() // "always displays [object Window] irrespective of mode."
Let us look at another example. Please look at the following code
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
o1.f() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
In the above example we see that when "UserDefinedFunction" was
invoked through o1, "this" takes value of o1 and the
value of its properties "a" and "b" get displayed. The value
of "c" and "d" were shown as undefined as o1 does
not define these properties
Similarly when "UserDefinedFunction" was invoked through o2,
"this" takes value of o2 and the value of its properties "c" and "d" get displayed.The value of "a" and "b" were shown as undefined as o2 does not define these properties.
Inside Indirect "Non Bound Function" Call through functionName.call and functionName.apply:
When a "Non Bound Function" is called through
functionName.call or functionName.apply, the "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to the value of
"this" parameter (first parameter) passed to call/apply. The following code demonstrates the same.
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction
}
UserDefinedFunction.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
UserDefinedFunction.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
UserDefinedFunction.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.call(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o1.f.apply(o2) // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.f.call(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o2.f.apply(o1) // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
The above code clearly shows that the "this" value for any "NON
Bound Function" can be altered through call/apply. Also,if the
"this" parameter is not explicitly passed to call/apply, "current object" (and hence the value of "this") is set to "window" in Non strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode.
Inside "Bound Function" Call (i.e. a function that has been bound by calling functionName.bind):
A bound function is a function whose "this" value has been
fixed. The following code demonstrated how "this" works in case
of bound function
function UserDefinedFunction()
{
alert(this.a + "," + this.b + "," + this.c + "," + this.d)
}
var o1={
a:1,
b:2,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var o2={
c:3,
d:4,
f:UserDefinedFunction,
bf:null
}
var bound1=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound1" to Object o1
bound1() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
var bound2=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound2" to Object o2
bound2() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound3=o1.f.bind(o2); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound3" to Object o2
bound3() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
var bound4=o2.f.bind(o1); // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "bound4" to Object o1
bound4() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
o1.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o2) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o1.bf" to Object o2
o1.bf() // Shall display undefined,undefined,3,4
o2.bf=UserDefinedFunction.bind(o1) // permanantly fixes "this" value of function "o2.bf" to Object o1
o2.bf() // Shall display 1,2,undefined,undefined
bound1.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
bound1.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.call(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined. "call" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
o2.bf.apply(o2) // Shall still display 1,2,undefined,undefined."apply" cannot alter the value of "this" for bound function
As given in the code above, "this" value for any "Bound Function"
CANNOT be altered through call/apply. Also, if the "this"
parameter is not explicitly passed to bind, "current object"
(and hence the value of "this" ) is set to "window" in Non
strict mode and "undefined" in strict mode. One more thing.
Binding an already bound function does not change the value of "this".
It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
While Object Creation through "new":
Inside a constructor function, the "current object" (and hence the value of
"this") references the object that is currently being created
through "new" irrespective of the bind status of the function. However
if the constructor is a bound function it shall get called with
predefined set of arguments as set for the bound function.
Inside Inline DOM event handler:
Please look at the following HTML Snippet
<button onclick='this.style.color=white'>Hello World</button>
<div style='width:100px;height:100px;' onclick='OnDivClick(event,this)'>Hello World</div>
The "this" in above examples refer to "button" element and the
"div" element respectively.
In the first example, the font color of the button shall be set to
white when it is clicked.
In the second example when the "div" element is clicked it shall
call the OnDivClick function with its second parameter
referencing the clicked div element. However the value of "this"
within OnDivClick SHALL NOT reference the clicked div
element. It shall be set as the "window object" or
"undefined" in Non strict and Strict Modes respectively (if OnDivClick is an unbound function) or set to a predefined
Bound value (if OnDivClick is a bound function)
The following summarizes the entire article
In Global Context "this" always refers to the "window" object
Whenever a function is invoked, it is invoked in context of an
object ("current object"). If the current object is not explicitly provided,
the current object is the "window object" in NON Strict
Mode and "undefined" in Strict Mode by default.The value of "this" within a Non Bound function is the reference to object in context of which the function is invoked ("current object")
The value of "this" within a Non Bound function can be overriden by
call and apply methods of the function.The value of "this" is fixed for a Bound function and cannot be
overriden by call and apply methods of the function.Binding and already bound function does not change the value of "this". It remains set as the value set by first bind function.
The value of "this" within a constructor is the object that is being
created and initializedThe value of "this" within an inline DOM event handler is reference
to the element for which the event handler is given.
edited Mar 3 '17 at 7:34
answered Jan 31 '17 at 8:29
Arup HoreArup Hore
83999
83999
add a comment |
add a comment |
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this
is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this
is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this
value.
When having troubles identifying this
, do not ask yourself:
Where is
this
taken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
this
where the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this
and will save you from headache.
add a comment |
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this
is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this
is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this
value.
When having troubles identifying this
, do not ask yourself:
Where is
this
taken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
this
where the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this
and will save you from headache.
add a comment |
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this
is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this
is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this
value.
When having troubles identifying this
, do not ask yourself:
Where is
this
taken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
this
where the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this
and will save you from headache.
Probably the most detailed and comprehensive article on this
is the following:
Gentle explanation of 'this' keyword in JavaScript
The idea behind this
is to understand that the function invocation types have the significant importance on setting this
value.
When having troubles identifying this
, do not ask yourself:
Where is
this
taken from?
but do ask yourself:
How is the function invoked?
For an arrow function (special case of context transparency) ask yourself:
What value has
this
where the arrow function is defined?
This mindset is correct when dealing with this
and will save you from headache.
edited Aug 22 '18 at 6:19
answered Nov 8 '16 at 12:17
Dmitri PavlutinDmitri Pavlutin
10.7k42731
10.7k42731
add a comment |
add a comment |
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
add a comment |
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
add a comment |
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
This is the best explanation I've seen. Understand JavaScripts this with Clarity
The this reference ALWAYS refers to (and holds the value of) an
object—a singular object—and it is usually used inside a function or a
method, although it can be used outside a function in the global
scope. Note that when we use strict mode, this holds the value of
undefined in global functions and in anonymous functions that are not
bound to any object.
There are Four Conditions where this can be confusing:
- When we pass a method (that uses this) as a parameter to be used as a callback function.
- Another instance when this is misunderstood is when we use an inner method (a closure). It is important to take note that closures cannot access the outer function’s this variable by using the this keyword because the this variable is accessible only by the function itself, not by inner functions.
- Using this when a method is assigned to a variable. The this value is bound to another object, if we assign a method that uses this to a variable
- Using this when using bind, apply, and call methods.
He gives code examples, the explanations, and the code fixes which I thought was very helpful.
answered Jul 12 '16 at 19:03
James DrinkardJames Drinkard
9,7281281121
9,7281281121
add a comment |
add a comment |
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
It is difficult to get a good grasp of JS, or write more than anything trivial in it, if you don't understand it thoroughly. You cannot just afford to take a quick dip :) I think the best way to get started with JS is to first watch these video lectures by Douglas Crockford - http://yuiblog.com/crockford/, which covers this and that, and everything else about JS.
answered Jun 28 '10 at 9:25
tathagatatathagata
417312
417312
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
1
1
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
+1 Crockford should be the first step in anyone's journey into JS. His book chapters (available for free online) got me on my feet very fast indeed. He goes straight for the crucial bits.
– Engineer
Oct 23 '12 at 23:45
2
2
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
Ha, and now Crockford doesn't like this and programs without using it. ;-)
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:21
2
2
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
The link is dead.
– Oriol
Feb 8 '15 at 16:15
add a comment |
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
add a comment |
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
add a comment |
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
In pseudoclassical terms, the way many lectures teach the 'this' keyword is as an object instantiated by a class or object constructor. Each time a new object is constructed from a class, imagine that under the hood a local instance of a 'this' object is created and returned. I remember it taught like this:
function Car(make, model, year) {
var this = {}; // under the hood, so to speak
this.make = make;
this.model = model;
this.year = year;
return this; // under the hood
}
var mycar = new Car('Eagle', 'Talon TSi', 1993);
// ========= under the hood
var this = {};
this.make = 'Eagle';
this.model = 'Talon TSi';
this.year = 1993;
return this;
answered Sep 16 '17 at 22:11
mrmaclean89mrmaclean89
29643
29643
add a comment |
add a comment |
this
is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this
refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this
helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this
is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this
can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this
to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a()
was executed in the global context which is the window
.
With Constructor
this
can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person()
is executed, a completely new object is created. Person
is called and its this
is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new
keyword, whatIsThis
referes to the most global context it can find(window
)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this
refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this
refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply()
.call()
and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = this
means in JavaScript
add a comment |
this
is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this
refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this
helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this
is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this
can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this
to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a()
was executed in the global context which is the window
.
With Constructor
this
can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person()
is executed, a completely new object is created. Person
is called and its this
is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new
keyword, whatIsThis
referes to the most global context it can find(window
)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this
refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this
refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply()
.call()
and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = this
means in JavaScript
add a comment |
this
is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this
refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this
helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this
is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this
can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this
to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a()
was executed in the global context which is the window
.
With Constructor
this
can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person()
is executed, a completely new object is created. Person
is called and its this
is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new
keyword, whatIsThis
referes to the most global context it can find(window
)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this
refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this
refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply()
.call()
and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = this
means in JavaScript
this
is one of the misunderstood concept in JavaScript because it behaves little differently from place to place. Simply, this
refers to the "owner" of the function we are currently executing.
this
helps to get the current object (a.k.a. execution context) we work with. If you understand in which object the current function is getting executed, you can understand easily what current this
is
var val = "window.val"
var obj = {
val: "obj.val",
innerMethod: function () {
var val = "obj.val.inner",
func = function () {
var self = this;
return self.val;
};
return func;
},
outerMethod: function(){
return this.val;
}
};
//This actually gets executed inside window object
console.log(obj.innerMethod()()); //returns window.val
//Breakdown in to 2 lines explains this in detail
var _inn = obj.innerMethod();
console.log(_inn()); //returns window.val
console.log(obj.outerMethod()); //returns obj.val
Above we create 3 variables with same name 'val'. One in global context, one inside obj and the other inside innerMethod of obj. JavaScript resolves identifiers within a particular context by going up the scope chain from local go global.
Few places where this
can be differentiated
Calling a method of a object
var status = 1;
var helper = {
status : 2,
getStatus: function () {
return this.status;
}
};
var theStatus1 = helper.getStatus(); //line1
console.log(theStatus1); //2
var theStatus2 = helper.getStatus;
console.log(theStatus2()); //1
When line1 is executed, JavaScript establishes an execution context (EC) for the function call, setting this
to the object referenced by whatever came before the last ".". so in the last line you can understand that a()
was executed in the global context which is the window
.
With Constructor
this
can be used to refer to the object being created
function Person(name){
this.personName = name;
this.sayHello = function(){
return "Hello " + this.personName;
}
}
var person1 = new Person('Scott');
console.log(person1.sayHello()); //Hello Scott
var person2 = new Person('Hugh');
var sayHelloP2 = person2.sayHello;
console.log(sayHelloP2()); //Hello undefined
When new Person()
is executed, a completely new object is created. Person
is called and its this
is set to reference that new object.
Function call
function testFunc() {
this.name = "Name";
this.myCustomAttribute = "Custom Attribute";
return this;
}
var whatIsThis = testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis); //window
var whatIsThis2 = new testFunc();
console.log(whatIsThis2); //testFunc() / object
console.log(window.myCustomAttribute); //Custom Attribute
If we miss new
keyword, whatIsThis
referes to the most global context it can find(window
)
With event handlers
If the event handler is inline, this
refers to global object
<script type="application/javascript">
function click_handler() {
alert(this); // alerts the window object
}
</script>
<button id='thebutton' onclick='click_handler()'>Click me!</button>
When adding event handler through JavaScript, this
refers to DOM element that generated the event.
- You can also manipulate the context using
.apply()
.call()
and.bind()
- JQuery proxy is another way you can use to make sure this in a function will be the value you desire. (Check Understanding $.proxy(), jQuery.proxy() usage)
- What does
var that = this
means in JavaScript
edited May 23 '17 at 12:02
Community♦
11
11
answered Aug 9 '14 at 9:22
NipunaNipuna
2,60174071
2,60174071
add a comment |
add a comment |
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
add a comment |
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
add a comment |
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
The value of "this" depends on the "context" in which the function is executed. The context can be any object or the global object, i.e., window.
So the Semantic of "this" is different from the traditional OOP languages. And it causes problems:
1. when a function is passed to another variable (most likely, a callback); and 2. when a closure is invoked from a member method of a class.
In both cases, this is set to window.
edited Aug 7 '17 at 7:54
Bhargav Rao♦
31k2092114
31k2092114
answered Jul 3 '17 at 10:07
TrombeTrombe
13918
13918
add a comment |
add a comment |
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
Whould this help? (Most confusion of 'this' in javascript is coming from the fact that it generally is not linked to your object, but to the current executing scope -- that might not be exactly how it works but is always feels like that to me -- see the article for a complete explanation)
answered Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Simon GroenewoltSimon Groenewolt
9,69312958
9,69312958
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
1
1
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
It would be better to say it's linked "to the current execution context". Except ES6 (draft) changes that with arrow functions, where this is resolved on the outer execution context.
– RobG
Jan 6 '15 at 23:29
add a comment |
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this
keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this
keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this
keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports
is just a reference to module.exports
add a comment |
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this
keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this
keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this
keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports
is just a reference to module.exports
add a comment |
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this
keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this
keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this
keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports
is just a reference to module.exports
A little bit info about this keyword
Let's log this
keyword to the console in global scope without any more code but
console.log(this)
In Client/Browser this
keyword is a global object which is window
console.log(this === window) // true
and
In Server/Node/Javascript runtime this
keyword is also a global object which is module.exports
console.log(this === module.exports) // true
console.log(this === exports) // true
Keep in mind exports
is just a reference to module.exports
answered Jul 25 '18 at 7:04
unclexounclexo
1,307512
1,307512
add a comment |
add a comment |
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
add a comment |
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
add a comment |
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
this use for Scope just like this
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
$('#tbleName tbody tr').each(function{
var txt='';
txt += $(this).find("td").eq(0).text();
\same as above but synatx different
var txt1='';
txt1+=$('#tbleName tbody tr').eq(0).text();
alert(txt1)
});
</script>
value of txt1 and txt is same
in Above example
$(this)=$('#tbleName tbody tr') is Same
answered Apr 6 '16 at 7:15
community wiki
PRADEEP SINGH Chundawat
add a comment |
add a comment |
I have a different take on this
from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis
.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call
.
If you just call a function then this
is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this
will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
which means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like +
and -
and *
. There is also the dot operator which is .
The .
operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this
to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is bar
In other words bar.foo()
translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is bar
Again these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b
JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a
for the property b
. If b
is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b
.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class
keyword. For the purposes of this
though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a
for property b
if it finds property b
on the object or in it's prototype chain if b
ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b
references will be called using the call
method and passing a
as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this
before calling another function and then call it with the .
(dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar();
Following the translation to use call
, obj.bar()
becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);
. When we enter the bar
function we call foo
but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this
is that inner object.
This is what both bind
and =>
functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar
above that explicitly sets this
before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this
is set to whatever you pass to bind
.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});
Note that if functionObject.bind
did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the =>
operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind
, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis
but unlike bind
the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this
happens to be when the =>
operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo()
translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj);
which means the arrow operator inside foo
will bind obj
to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b
. b()
will work as it always has as b.call(window)
or b.call(undefined)
calling the new invisible function that foo
created. That invisible function ignores the this
passed into it and passes obj
as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply
is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
add a comment |
I have a different take on this
from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis
.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call
.
If you just call a function then this
is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this
will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
which means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like +
and -
and *
. There is also the dot operator which is .
The .
operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this
to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is bar
In other words bar.foo()
translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is bar
Again these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b
JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a
for the property b
. If b
is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b
.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class
keyword. For the purposes of this
though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a
for property b
if it finds property b
on the object or in it's prototype chain if b
ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b
references will be called using the call
method and passing a
as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this
before calling another function and then call it with the .
(dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar();
Following the translation to use call
, obj.bar()
becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);
. When we enter the bar
function we call foo
but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this
is that inner object.
This is what both bind
and =>
functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar
above that explicitly sets this
before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this
is set to whatever you pass to bind
.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});
Note that if functionObject.bind
did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the =>
operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind
, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis
but unlike bind
the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this
happens to be when the =>
operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo()
translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj);
which means the arrow operator inside foo
will bind obj
to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b
. b()
will work as it always has as b.call(window)
or b.call(undefined)
calling the new invisible function that foo
created. That invisible function ignores the this
passed into it and passes obj
as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply
is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
add a comment |
I have a different take on this
from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis
.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call
.
If you just call a function then this
is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this
will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
which means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like +
and -
and *
. There is also the dot operator which is .
The .
operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this
to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is bar
In other words bar.foo()
translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is bar
Again these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b
JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a
for the property b
. If b
is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b
.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class
keyword. For the purposes of this
though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a
for property b
if it finds property b
on the object or in it's prototype chain if b
ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b
references will be called using the call
method and passing a
as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this
before calling another function and then call it with the .
(dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar();
Following the translation to use call
, obj.bar()
becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);
. When we enter the bar
function we call foo
but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this
is that inner object.
This is what both bind
and =>
functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar
above that explicitly sets this
before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this
is set to whatever you pass to bind
.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});
Note that if functionObject.bind
did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the =>
operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind
, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis
but unlike bind
the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this
happens to be when the =>
operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo()
translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj);
which means the arrow operator inside foo
will bind obj
to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b
. b()
will work as it always has as b.call(window)
or b.call(undefined)
calling the new invisible function that foo
created. That invisible function ignores the this
passed into it and passes obj
as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply
is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
I have a different take on this
from the other answers that I hope is helpful.
One way to look at JavaScript is to see that there are only 1 way to call a function1. It is
functionObject.call(objectForThis, arg0, arg1, arg2, ...);
There is always some value supplied for objectForThis
.
Everything else is syntactic sugar for functionObject.call
So, everything else can be described by how it translates into functionObject.call
.
If you just call a function then this
is the "global object" which in the browser is the window
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(window);
Note that if you use strict mode then this
will be undefined
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
which means
In other words,
foo();
was effectively translated into
foo.call(undefined);
In JavaScript there are operators like +
and -
and *
. There is also the dot operator which is .
The .
operator when used with a function on the right and an object on the left effectively means "pass object as this
to function.
Example
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is bar
In other words bar.foo()
translates into const temp = bar.foo; temp.call(bar);
Note that it doesn't matter how the function was created (mostly...). All of these will produce the same results
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is bar
Again these all are just syntactic sugar for
{ const temp = bar.fn1; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn2; temp.call(bar); }
{ const temp = bar.fn3; temp.call(bar); }
One other wrinkle is the prototype chain. When you use a.b
JavaScript first looks on the object referenced directly by a
for the property b
. If b
is not found on the object then JavaScript will look in the object's prototype to find b
.
There are various ways to define an object's prototype, the most common in 2019 is the class
keyword. For the purposes of this
though it doesn't matter. What matters is that as it looks in object a
for property b
if it finds property b
on the object or in it's prototype chain if b
ends up being a function then the same rules as above apply. The function b
references will be called using the call
method and passing a
as objectForThis as shown a the top of this answer.
Now. Let's imagine we make a function that explicitly sets this
before calling another function and then call it with the .
(dot) operator
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar();
Following the translation to use call
, obj.bar()
becomes const temp = obj.bar; temp.call(obj);
. When we enter the bar
function we call foo
but we explicitly passed in another object for objectForThis so when we arrive at foo this
is that inner object.
This is what both bind
and =>
functions effectively do. They are more syntactic sugar. They effectively build a new invisible function exactly like bar
above that explicitly sets this
before it calls whatever function is specified. In the case of bind this
is set to whatever you pass to bind
.
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});
Note that if functionObject.bind
did not exist we could make our own like this
function bind(fn, objectForThis) {
return function(...args) {
return fn.call(objectForthis, ...args);
};
}
and then we could call it like this
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = bind(foo, {name:'abc'});
Arrow functions, the =>
operator are syntactic sugar for bind
const a = () => {console.log(this)};
is the same as
const tempFn = function() {console.log(this)};
const a = tempFn.bind(this);
Just like bind
, a new invisible function is created that calls the given function with a bound value for objectForThis
but unlike bind
the object to be bound is implicit. It's whatever this
happens to be when the =>
operator is used.
So, just like the rules above
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is the global object
'use strict';
const a = () => { console.log(this); } // this is undefined
function foo() {
return () => { console.log(this); }
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b();
obj.foo()
translates to const temp = obj.foo; temp.call(obj);
which means the arrow operator inside foo
will bind obj
to a new invisible function and return that new invisible function which is assigned to b
. b()
will work as it always has as b.call(window)
or b.call(undefined)
calling the new invisible function that foo
created. That invisible function ignores the this
passed into it and passes obj
as objectForThis` to the arrow function.
The code above translates to
function foo() {
function tempFn() {
console.log(this);
}
return tempFn.bind(this);
}
const obj = {
foo,
};
const b = obj.foo();
b.call(window or undefined if strict mode);
1apply
is another function similar to call
functionName.apply(objectForThis, arrayOfArgs);
But as of ES6 conceptually you can even translate that into
functionName.call(objectForThis, ...arrayOfArgs);
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
'use strict';
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
foo(); // this is the window object
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is bar
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
foo() {
console.log(this);
},
};
bar.foo(); // this is bar
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is bar
const bar = {
name: 'bar',
fn1() { console.log(this); },
fn2: function() { console.log(this); },
fn3: otherFunction,
};
function otherFunction() { console.log(this) };
bar.fn1(); // this is bar
bar.fn2(); // this is bar
bar.fn3(); // this is bar
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar();
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
function bar() {
const objectForThis = {name: 'moo'}
foo.call(objectForThis); // explicitly passing objectForThis
}
const obj = {
bar,
};
obj.bar();
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});
function foo() {
console.log(this);
}
const bar = foo.bind({name: 'moo'});
// bind created a new invisible function that calls foo with the bound object.
bar();
// the objectForThis we are passing to bar here is ignored because
// the invisible function that bind created will call foo with with
// the object we bound above
bar.call({name: 'other'});
answered Jan 28 at 18:37
gmangman
49.2k17114207
49.2k17114207
add a comment |
add a comment |
Summary this
Javascript:
- The value of
this
is determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
this
is determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (window
in global space) - In event listeners the value of
this
refers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
new
keyword the value ofthis
refers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
this
with the functions:call
,apply
,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object
.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}
<div class="foo">click me</div>
Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.
add a comment |
Summary this
Javascript:
- The value of
this
is determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
this
is determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (window
in global space) - In event listeners the value of
this
refers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
new
keyword the value ofthis
refers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
this
with the functions:call
,apply
,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object
.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}
<div class="foo">click me</div>
Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.
add a comment |
Summary this
Javascript:
- The value of
this
is determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
this
is determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (window
in global space) - In event listeners the value of
this
refers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
new
keyword the value ofthis
refers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
this
with the functions:call
,apply
,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object
.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}
<div class="foo">click me</div>
Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.
Summary this
Javascript:
- The value of
this
is determined by how the function is invoked not, where it was created!
- Usually the value of
this
is determined by the Object which is left of the dot. (window
in global space) - In event listeners the value of
this
refers to the DOM element on which the event was called. - When in function is called with the
new
keyword the value ofthis
refers to the newly created object - You can manipulate the value of
this
with the functions:call
,apply
,bind
Example:
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
Example event listeners:
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object
.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}
<div class="foo">click me</div>
Example constructor:
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
let object = {
prop1: function () {console.log(this);}
}
object.prop1(); // object is left of the dot, thus this is object
const myFunction = object.prop1 // We store the function in the variable myFunction
myFunction(); // Here we are in the global space
// myFunction is a property on the global object
// Therefore it logs the window object
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object
.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}
<div class="foo">click me</div>
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', function () {
console.log(this); // This refers to the DOM element the eventListener was invoked from
})
document.querySelector('.foo').addEventListener('click', () => {
console.log(this); // Tip, es6 arrow function don't have their own binding to the this v
}) // Therefore this will log the global object
.foo:hover {
color: red;
cursor: pointer;
}
<div class="foo">click me</div>
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.
function Person (name) {
this.name = name;
}
const me = new Person('Willem');
// When using the new keyword the this in the constructor function will refer to the newly created object
console.log(me.name);
// Therefore, the name property was placed on the object created with new keyword.
answered Aug 21 '18 at 17:12
Willem van der VeenWillem van der Veen
5,41533037
5,41533037
add a comment |
add a comment |
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike()
function is printing the this.name
which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object)
.
In the above code snippet, when function bike()
gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike()
call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike()
gets called with the execution context as obj1
so this.name
became obj1.name
. Same with obj2.bike()
call where the execution context of function bike()
is obj2
.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike()
is an example of default binding. obj1.bike()
and obj2.bike()
are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1
but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike()
, the context of execution is obj2
so obj2.name
gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call()
method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name
. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike()
and bike.call(obj2)
both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name
means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1
and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1)
; These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
add a comment |
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike()
function is printing the this.name
which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object)
.
In the above code snippet, when function bike()
gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike()
call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike()
gets called with the execution context as obj1
so this.name
became obj1.name
. Same with obj2.bike()
call where the execution context of function bike()
is obj2
.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike()
is an example of default binding. obj1.bike()
and obj2.bike()
are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1
but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike()
, the context of execution is obj2
so obj2.name
gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call()
method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name
. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike()
and bike.call(obj2)
both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name
means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1
and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1)
; These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
add a comment |
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike()
function is printing the this.name
which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object)
.
In the above code snippet, when function bike()
gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike()
call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike()
gets called with the execution context as obj1
so this.name
became obj1.name
. Same with obj2.bike()
call where the execution context of function bike()
is obj2
.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike()
is an example of default binding. obj1.bike()
and obj2.bike()
are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1
but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike()
, the context of execution is obj2
so obj2.name
gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call()
method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name
. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike()
and bike.call(obj2)
both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name
means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1
and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1)
; These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
What is “this” keyword in JavaScript
This keyword refers to an object, that object which is executing the current bit of javascript code.
In other words, every javascript function while executing has a reference to its current execution context, called this. Execution context means here is how the function is called.
To understand this keyword, only we need to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter how and where a function is declared or defined.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar", bike: bike };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: bike };
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, the job of bike()
function is printing the this.name
which means it’s trying to print the value of name property of the current execution context(i.e.this object)
.
In the above code snippet, when function bike()
gets called it prints “Ninja” because the context of execution is not specified so by default its global context and there is a variable name is present at global context whose value is “Ninja”.
In the case of obj1().bike()
call, “Pulsar” gets printed and the reason behind this is function bike()
gets called with the execution context as obj1
so this.name
became obj1.name
. Same with obj2.bike()
call where the execution context of function bike()
is obj2
.
Default and Implicit binding of “this”
If we are in strict mode then the default value of this keyword is undefined otherwise this keyword act as a global object, it’s called default binding of this keyword. (default is window object in case of browser).
when there is an object property which we are calling as a method then that object becomes this object or execution context object for that method, it is implicit binding of this keyword.
var obj1 = {
name: "Pulsar",
bike: function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
}
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer", bike: obj1.bike };
var name = "Ninja";
var bike = obj1.bike;
bike(); // "Ninja"
obj1.bike(); // "Pulsar"
obj2.bike(); // "Gixxer"
In the above code snippet, function call bike()
is an example of default binding. obj1.bike()
and obj2.bike()
are examples of implicit binding. Here bike function is declared as part of obj1
but regardless of that when we executeobj2.bike()
, the context of execution is obj2
so obj2.name
gets printed.
It’s important to know how, when and from where the function is called, does not matter where a function is declared.
Explicit and Fixed Binding of “this” keyword
If we use call and apply method with calling function, both of those methods take as their first parameter as execution context. that is this binding.
function bike() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj = { name: "Pulsar" }
bike(); // "Ninja"
bike.call(obj); // "Pulsar"
In this above snippet, if we call the function bike with call()
method passing execution context object obj as first argument, then obj gets assigned to this object and it prints “Pulsar” which is nothing but obj.name
. It’s called explicit binding of this keyword.
In Fixed binding or Hard binding
we can force the this object to be the same always no matter from where and how it gets called.
var bike = function() {
console.log(this.name);
}
var name = "Ninja";
var obj1 = { name: "Pulsar" };
var obj2 = { name: "Gixxer" };
var originalBikeFun = bike;
bike = function() {
originalBikeFun.call(obj1);
};
bike(); // "Pulsar"
bike.call(obj2); // "Pulsar"
As per above code snippet, bike()
and bike.call(obj2)
both call prints "Pulsar" which is nothing but obj1.name
means the execution context of the function bike is always obj1
and its because of originalBikeFun.call(obj1)
; These kind of this binding is just another flavor of explicit binding called fixed binding.
answered Mar 16 at 4:58
ashishashish
323110
323110
add a comment |
add a comment |
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
you missed a}
in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
you missed a}
in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
Simple answer:
"this" keyword is always dependant on the context of invocation. They are mentioned below.
FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH NEW KEYWORD
If the function is called with NEW keyword then THIS will be bound to the newly created object.
function Car(){
this.name="BMW";
}
const myCar=new Car();
myCar.name; // output "BMW"
In the above this will be bound to 'myCar' object
FUNCTION IS CALLED EXPLICITLY USING CALL AND APPLY METHODS.
In this case, THIS will be bound to the object which is explicitly passed to the function.
var obj1={"name":"bond"};
function printMessage(msg){
return msg+" "+this.name;
}
const message=printMessage.call(obj1,"my name is ");
console.log(message); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1 WHICH WE PASSED EXPLICITLY. SAME FOR APPLY METHOD ALSO.
IF FUNCTION IS CALLED WITH OBJECT IMPLICITLY THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT OBJECT
var obj1={
"name":"bond",
getName: function () {
return this.name;
}
};
const newname=obj1.getName();
console.log(newname); //HERE THIS WILL BE BOUND TO obj1(WHITCHEVER OBJECT IS MENTIONED BEFORE THE DOT THIS WILL BE BOUND TO THAT)
WHEN FUNCTION IS CALLED WITHOUT ANY CONTEXT THEN THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
const util = {
name: 'Utility',
getName: function () {
return this.name;
};
const getName=util.getName;
const newName=getName();
console.log(newName); // IF THIS EXECUTED IN BROWSER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO WINDOW OBJECT. IF THIS EXECUTED IN SERVER THIS WILL BE BOUND TO GLOBAL OBJECT
IN STRICT MODE THIS WILL BE UNDEFINED
function setName(name){
"use strict"
return this.name;
}
setName(); //WILL BE ERROR SAYING name IS UNDEFINED.
edited Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
Suraj Rao
24k85973
24k85973
answered Nov 30 '18 at 6:00
PALLAMOLLA SAIPALLAMOLLA SAI
2906
2906
you missed a}
in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
you missed a}
in point 4
– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
you missed a
}
in point 4– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
you missed a
}
in point 4– Suraj Rao
Nov 30 '18 at 8:03
add a comment |
6
I found this when I googled "this" quirksmode.org/js/this.html
– Wai Wong
Jun 27 '10 at 13:15
Some useful related questions * jQuery/JavaScript “this” pointer confusion * In Javascript, why is the “this” operator inconsistent? and a nice writeup here * scope/context in javascript
– Paul Dixon
Jun 27 '10 at 13:20
2
Peter Michaux advocates against the use of
this
peter.michaux.ca/articles/javascript-widgets-without-this– Marcel Korpel
Jun 27 '10 at 14:53
1
The MDN overview isn't half-bad... developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/…
– dat
Feb 1 '13 at 16:46
1
An interesting explanation of
this
keyword: rainsoft.io/gentle-explanation-of-this-in-javascript– Dmitri Pavlutin
May 24 '16 at 7:20