How to confirm a win 64 dll and its dependencies are also win 64?
My C++ un-managed component (dll) is compiled in Win 64 platform and used by a web API written in ASP.NET and hosted in IIS.
My web API works only when the C++ dll is placed under c:windowssyswow64inetsrv rather than c:windowssystem32intetsrv.
I verified using sigcheck64.exe (ref: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/sigcheck) to confirm that the dll I have compiled is in win 64 bit platform. When I used depends64.exe (dependency walker) tool to verify the dependency, I am unable to conclude if my dll and its dependencies are in Win 64 bit platform.
What is the best way / tool to check if my dll and its dependencies are in win 64bit platform?
dll win64
asked Nov 16 '18 at 9:29
user2922040user2922040
3614
add a comment |
My C++ un-managed component (dll) is compiled in Win 64 platform and used by a web API written in ASP.NET and hosted in IIS.
My web API works only when the C++ dll is placed under c:windowssyswow64inetsrv rather than c:windowssystem32intetsrv.
I verified using sigcheck64.exe (ref: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/sigcheck) to confirm that the dll I have compiled is in win 64 bit platform. When I used depends64.exe (dependency walker) tool to verify the dependency, I am unable to conclude if my dll and its dependencies are in Win 64 bit platform.
What is the best way / tool to check if my dll and its dependencies are in win 64bit platform?
dll win64
asked Nov 16 '18 at 9:29
user2922040user2922040
3614
Dumpbin.exe /headers is another way, the "machine" field (first listed value) identifies the target architecture. That is the one that truly matters. But quite doubtful that this explains anything.
– Hans Passant
Nov 16 '18 at 9:37
Thanks. I used sigcheck64.exe and sigcheck.exe to confirm individual components.
– user2922040
Nov 19 '18 at 11:09
add a comment |
My C++ un-managed component (dll) is compiled in Win 64 platform and used by a web API written in ASP.NET and hosted in IIS.
My web API works only when the C++ dll is placed under c:windowssyswow64inetsrv rather than c:windowssystem32intetsrv.
I verified using sigcheck64.exe (ref: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/sigcheck) to confirm that the dll I have compiled is in win 64 bit platform. When I used depends64.exe (dependency walker) tool to verify the dependency, I am unable to conclude if my dll and its dependencies are in Win 64 bit platform.
What is the best way / tool to check if my dll and its dependencies are in win 64bit platform?
dll win64
asked Nov 16 '18 at 9:29
user2922040user2922040
3614
My C++ un-managed component (dll) is compiled in Win 64 platform and used by a web API written in ASP.NET and hosted in IIS.
My web API works only when the C++ dll is placed under c:windowssyswow64inetsrv rather than c:windowssystem32intetsrv.
I verified using sigcheck64.exe (ref: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/downloads/sigcheck) to confirm that the dll I have compiled is in win 64 bit platform. When I used depends64.exe (dependency walker) tool to verify the dependency, I am unable to conclude if my dll and its dependencies are in Win 64 bit platform.
What is the best way / tool to check if my dll and its dependencies are in win 64bit platform?
dll win64
dll win64
asked Nov 16 '18 at 9:29
user2922040user2922040
3614
asked Nov 16 '18 at 9:29
user2922040user2922040
3614
asked Nov 16 '18 at 9:29
user2922040user2922040
3614
asked Nov 16 '18 at 9:29
user2922040user2922040
3614
asked Nov 16 '18 at 9:29
user2922040user2922040
3614
3614
Dumpbin.exe /headers is another way, the "machine" field (first listed value) identifies the target architecture. That is the one that truly matters. But quite doubtful that this explains anything.
– Hans Passant
Nov 16 '18 at 9:37
Thanks. I used sigcheck64.exe and sigcheck.exe to confirm individual components.
– user2922040
Nov 19 '18 at 11:09
add a comment |
Dumpbin.exe /headers is another way, the "machine" field (first listed value) identifies the target architecture. That is the one that truly matters. But quite doubtful that this explains anything.
– Hans Passant
Nov 16 '18 at 9:37
Thanks. I used sigcheck64.exe and sigcheck.exe to confirm individual components.
– user2922040
Nov 19 '18 at 11:09
Dumpbin.exe /headers is another way, the "machine" field (first listed value) identifies the target architecture. That is the one that truly matters. But quite doubtful that this explains anything.
– Hans Passant
Nov 16 '18 at 9:37
Dumpbin.exe /headers is another way, the "machine" field (first listed value) identifies the target architecture. That is the one that truly matters. But quite doubtful that this explains anything.
– Hans Passant
Nov 16 '18 at 9:37
Thanks. I used sigcheck64.exe and sigcheck.exe to confirm individual components.
– user2922040
Nov 19 '18 at 11:09
Thanks. I used sigcheck64.exe and sigcheck.exe to confirm individual components.
– user2922040
Nov 19 '18 at 11:09
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53334931%2fhow-to-confirm-a-win-64-dll-and-its-dependencies-are-also-win-64%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53334931%2fhow-to-confirm-a-win-64-dll-and-its-dependencies-are-also-win-64%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Dumpbin.exe /headers is another way, the "machine" field (first listed value) identifies the target architecture. That is the one that truly matters. But quite doubtful that this explains anything.
– Hans Passant
Nov 16 '18 at 9:37
Thanks. I used sigcheck64.exe and sigcheck.exe to confirm individual components.
– user2922040
Nov 19 '18 at 11:09