Solr 7.5.0, error sorting a “pdate” field in ascending 'asc' direction












1














by usign the Solr7.5.0 webUI, I am trying to sort a field of my schema "data_creazione", by setting:



&fl=data_creazione:[2017-11-12T00:00:00Z TO NOW]&sort=data_creazione asc



my complete query URL being:



http://localhost:8983/solr/NUR/select?fq=data_creazione:[2017-11-12T00:00:00Z%20%20TO%20%20NOW]&q=regione%20lazio&sort=data_creazione%20asc


When i inspect the results I am observing a strange and erroneous sorting behavior:




  • results from 0 to 9 (start=0,rows=10) are correctly ordered (from 2018-03-01 to 2018-03-02)

  • results from 10 to 19 (start=10,rows=10) are correctly ordered (from 2018-03-05 to 2018-03-07)

  • results from 20 to 29 (start=20,rows=10) are incorrectly ordered (from 2018-02-23 to 2018-03-1)


Moreover, I am trying to send the same query to Solr 7.5.0 from a .netcore2.1 application by using the Solr.net driver, and I am returned the same identical sort error.



NOTICE: when I try to query the same query but in DESCENDING 'desc' direction all things go fine. All results' pages are correctly ordered.
This error does not appear with Solr 7.2.0: ascending and descending sorting over date fields works fine



In my managed-schema the field "data_creazione" is declared this way:



<fieldType name="pdate" class="solr.DatePointField" docValues="true"/>
...
<field name="data_creazione" type="pdate" multiValued="false" indexed="false" stored="true"/>









share|improve this question






















  • Did you reindex (completely) after changing to the pdate type? Can you create a set of documents that can replicate this issue from scratch with an empty index?
    – MatsLindh
    Nov 12 at 19:02










  • All documents've been indexed after managed-schema updated. Also, I can provide U the set of documents that replicates the problem. Tell me how...
    – ciroBorrelli
    Nov 13 at 12:33












  • ... or get'em here: link
    – ciroBorrelli
    Nov 13 at 12:43
















1














by usign the Solr7.5.0 webUI, I am trying to sort a field of my schema "data_creazione", by setting:



&fl=data_creazione:[2017-11-12T00:00:00Z TO NOW]&sort=data_creazione asc



my complete query URL being:



http://localhost:8983/solr/NUR/select?fq=data_creazione:[2017-11-12T00:00:00Z%20%20TO%20%20NOW]&q=regione%20lazio&sort=data_creazione%20asc


When i inspect the results I am observing a strange and erroneous sorting behavior:




  • results from 0 to 9 (start=0,rows=10) are correctly ordered (from 2018-03-01 to 2018-03-02)

  • results from 10 to 19 (start=10,rows=10) are correctly ordered (from 2018-03-05 to 2018-03-07)

  • results from 20 to 29 (start=20,rows=10) are incorrectly ordered (from 2018-02-23 to 2018-03-1)


Moreover, I am trying to send the same query to Solr 7.5.0 from a .netcore2.1 application by using the Solr.net driver, and I am returned the same identical sort error.



NOTICE: when I try to query the same query but in DESCENDING 'desc' direction all things go fine. All results' pages are correctly ordered.
This error does not appear with Solr 7.2.0: ascending and descending sorting over date fields works fine



In my managed-schema the field "data_creazione" is declared this way:



<fieldType name="pdate" class="solr.DatePointField" docValues="true"/>
...
<field name="data_creazione" type="pdate" multiValued="false" indexed="false" stored="true"/>









share|improve this question






















  • Did you reindex (completely) after changing to the pdate type? Can you create a set of documents that can replicate this issue from scratch with an empty index?
    – MatsLindh
    Nov 12 at 19:02










  • All documents've been indexed after managed-schema updated. Also, I can provide U the set of documents that replicates the problem. Tell me how...
    – ciroBorrelli
    Nov 13 at 12:33












  • ... or get'em here: link
    – ciroBorrelli
    Nov 13 at 12:43














1












1








1







by usign the Solr7.5.0 webUI, I am trying to sort a field of my schema "data_creazione", by setting:



&fl=data_creazione:[2017-11-12T00:00:00Z TO NOW]&sort=data_creazione asc



my complete query URL being:



http://localhost:8983/solr/NUR/select?fq=data_creazione:[2017-11-12T00:00:00Z%20%20TO%20%20NOW]&q=regione%20lazio&sort=data_creazione%20asc


When i inspect the results I am observing a strange and erroneous sorting behavior:




  • results from 0 to 9 (start=0,rows=10) are correctly ordered (from 2018-03-01 to 2018-03-02)

  • results from 10 to 19 (start=10,rows=10) are correctly ordered (from 2018-03-05 to 2018-03-07)

  • results from 20 to 29 (start=20,rows=10) are incorrectly ordered (from 2018-02-23 to 2018-03-1)


Moreover, I am trying to send the same query to Solr 7.5.0 from a .netcore2.1 application by using the Solr.net driver, and I am returned the same identical sort error.



NOTICE: when I try to query the same query but in DESCENDING 'desc' direction all things go fine. All results' pages are correctly ordered.
This error does not appear with Solr 7.2.0: ascending and descending sorting over date fields works fine



In my managed-schema the field "data_creazione" is declared this way:



<fieldType name="pdate" class="solr.DatePointField" docValues="true"/>
...
<field name="data_creazione" type="pdate" multiValued="false" indexed="false" stored="true"/>









share|improve this question













by usign the Solr7.5.0 webUI, I am trying to sort a field of my schema "data_creazione", by setting:



&fl=data_creazione:[2017-11-12T00:00:00Z TO NOW]&sort=data_creazione asc



my complete query URL being:



http://localhost:8983/solr/NUR/select?fq=data_creazione:[2017-11-12T00:00:00Z%20%20TO%20%20NOW]&q=regione%20lazio&sort=data_creazione%20asc


When i inspect the results I am observing a strange and erroneous sorting behavior:




  • results from 0 to 9 (start=0,rows=10) are correctly ordered (from 2018-03-01 to 2018-03-02)

  • results from 10 to 19 (start=10,rows=10) are correctly ordered (from 2018-03-05 to 2018-03-07)

  • results from 20 to 29 (start=20,rows=10) are incorrectly ordered (from 2018-02-23 to 2018-03-1)


Moreover, I am trying to send the same query to Solr 7.5.0 from a .netcore2.1 application by using the Solr.net driver, and I am returned the same identical sort error.



NOTICE: when I try to query the same query but in DESCENDING 'desc' direction all things go fine. All results' pages are correctly ordered.
This error does not appear with Solr 7.2.0: ascending and descending sorting over date fields works fine



In my managed-schema the field "data_creazione" is declared this way:



<fieldType name="pdate" class="solr.DatePointField" docValues="true"/>
...
<field name="data_creazione" type="pdate" multiValued="false" indexed="false" stored="true"/>






sorting date solr






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 12 at 15:38









ciroBorrelli

1313




1313












  • Did you reindex (completely) after changing to the pdate type? Can you create a set of documents that can replicate this issue from scratch with an empty index?
    – MatsLindh
    Nov 12 at 19:02










  • All documents've been indexed after managed-schema updated. Also, I can provide U the set of documents that replicates the problem. Tell me how...
    – ciroBorrelli
    Nov 13 at 12:33












  • ... or get'em here: link
    – ciroBorrelli
    Nov 13 at 12:43


















  • Did you reindex (completely) after changing to the pdate type? Can you create a set of documents that can replicate this issue from scratch with an empty index?
    – MatsLindh
    Nov 12 at 19:02










  • All documents've been indexed after managed-schema updated. Also, I can provide U the set of documents that replicates the problem. Tell me how...
    – ciroBorrelli
    Nov 13 at 12:33












  • ... or get'em here: link
    – ciroBorrelli
    Nov 13 at 12:43
















Did you reindex (completely) after changing to the pdate type? Can you create a set of documents that can replicate this issue from scratch with an empty index?
– MatsLindh
Nov 12 at 19:02




Did you reindex (completely) after changing to the pdate type? Can you create a set of documents that can replicate this issue from scratch with an empty index?
– MatsLindh
Nov 12 at 19:02












All documents've been indexed after managed-schema updated. Also, I can provide U the set of documents that replicates the problem. Tell me how...
– ciroBorrelli
Nov 13 at 12:33






All documents've been indexed after managed-schema updated. Also, I can provide U the set of documents that replicates the problem. Tell me how...
– ciroBorrelli
Nov 13 at 12:33














... or get'em here: link
– ciroBorrelli
Nov 13 at 12:43




... or get'em here: link
– ciroBorrelli
Nov 13 at 12:43

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53265447%2fsolr-7-5-0-error-sorting-a-pdate-field-in-ascending-asc-direction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53265447%2fsolr-7-5-0-error-sorting-a-pdate-field-in-ascending-asc-direction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Vorschmack

Quarantine