How to understand this example in Do Carmo?












5














I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
enter image description here



enter image description here



enter image description here



I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?










share|cite|improve this question





























    5














    I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
    enter image description here



    enter image description here



    enter image description here



    I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
    No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?










    share|cite|improve this question



























      5












      5








      5







      I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
      No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
      No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?







      general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 12 at 11:38









      José Carlos Santos

      148k22117218




      148k22117218










      asked Nov 12 at 11:16









      user450201

      718




      718






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:




          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.


          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            Nov 12 at 11:27










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 12 at 11:34











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995192%2fhow-to-understand-this-example-in-do-carmo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8














          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:




          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.


          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            Nov 12 at 11:27










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 12 at 11:34
















          8














          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:




          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.


          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            Nov 12 at 11:27










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 12 at 11:34














          8












          8








          8






          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:




          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.


          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:




          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.


          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 12 at 13:59

























          answered Nov 12 at 11:23









          José Carlos Santos

          148k22117218




          148k22117218








          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            Nov 12 at 11:27










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 12 at 11:34














          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            Nov 12 at 11:27










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            Nov 12 at 11:34








          1




          1




          Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
          – user450201
          Nov 12 at 11:27




          Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
          – user450201
          Nov 12 at 11:27












          That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
          – José Carlos Santos
          Nov 12 at 11:34




          That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
          – José Carlos Santos
          Nov 12 at 11:34


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995192%2fhow-to-understand-this-example-in-do-carmo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

          Glorious Revolution

          Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python