How to understand this example in Do Carmo?
I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?
general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves
add a comment |
I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?
general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves
add a comment |
I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?
general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves
I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?
general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves
general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves
edited Nov 12 at 11:38
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
148k22117218
asked Nov 12 at 11:16
user450201
718
718
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:
- the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.
- the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.
Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.
1
Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
– user450201
Nov 12 at 11:27
That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 12 at 11:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995192%2fhow-to-understand-this-example-in-do-carmo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:
- the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.
- the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.
Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.
1
Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
– user450201
Nov 12 at 11:27
That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 12 at 11:34
add a comment |
The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:
- the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.
- the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.
Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.
1
Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
– user450201
Nov 12 at 11:27
That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 12 at 11:34
add a comment |
The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:
- the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.
- the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.
Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.
The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:
- the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbb{R}^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbb{R}^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.
- the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.
Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.
edited Nov 12 at 13:59
answered Nov 12 at 11:23
José Carlos Santos
148k22117218
148k22117218
1
Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
– user450201
Nov 12 at 11:27
That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 12 at 11:34
add a comment |
1
Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
– user450201
Nov 12 at 11:27
That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 12 at 11:34
1
1
Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
– user450201
Nov 12 at 11:27
Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
– user450201
Nov 12 at 11:27
That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 12 at 11:34
That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 12 at 11:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995192%2fhow-to-understand-this-example-in-do-carmo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown