How to avoid using same members in a matrix which is made by rand() function?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to make a 5x10 matrix with full of random letters and once the letter is used, it shouldn't be used again. 25 of them have to be small letters, 25 ought to be big letters. Even numbered columns should be small letters too. I don't know how to avoid using same letters. I tried to send the letters used to another array made of one dimension, then check every letter sent by it so that same letter won't be used but my coding skills didn't let me do it.
So, my code is this so far:



#include <iostream> 
#include <iomanip>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <ctime>
#include <locale.h>


using namespace std;

const int row = 5;
const int column = 10;

int main()
{
char matris[row][column];

srand(time(0));

for (int i = 0; i < row; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < column; j++)
if(j % 2 == 0)
matris[i][j] = rand() % 25 + 65;
else
matris[i][j] = rand() % 25 + 97;
for (int i = 0; i < row; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < column; j++)
cout << setw(5) << matris[i][j];
cout << endl;
}
system("pause");

return 0;
}


So, how can I avoid using same letters? Did I approach wrongly? Is there a easier way to do what I'm trying to do? Thanks...










share|improve this question






















  • You'll have to be a bit more precise with your question, because "doesn't work" is not a sufficient description. However, the actual skill that you need it to step through the code with a debugger. You can execute it in single steps and inspect the current state of variables, so after every step you could verify whether the state is as you excpect it to be, which will unveil the error pretty fast.
    – Ulrich Eckhardt
    Nov 11 at 9:56










  • Create a static array of all possible letters. You can split it into small and big if you have some special demands as to where each of them have to be. Then apply a random permutation to the array (or both if you split it) and you have randomly sorted letters you can use to simply fill your matrix with.
    – Qubit
    Nov 11 at 10:00










  • This might be interesting: How to Generate a Sequence of Unique Random Integers
    – Pezo
    Nov 11 at 10:00










  • To clarify, even columns (i.e. 2, 4, 6... should be small) and odd (1, 3, 5...) should be big? Assuming 1-based indexing.
    – Qubit
    Nov 11 at 10:14










  • Yes. That's why I used if declaration.
    – muadgra
    Nov 11 at 10:20















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to make a 5x10 matrix with full of random letters and once the letter is used, it shouldn't be used again. 25 of them have to be small letters, 25 ought to be big letters. Even numbered columns should be small letters too. I don't know how to avoid using same letters. I tried to send the letters used to another array made of one dimension, then check every letter sent by it so that same letter won't be used but my coding skills didn't let me do it.
So, my code is this so far:



#include <iostream> 
#include <iomanip>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <ctime>
#include <locale.h>


using namespace std;

const int row = 5;
const int column = 10;

int main()
{
char matris[row][column];

srand(time(0));

for (int i = 0; i < row; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < column; j++)
if(j % 2 == 0)
matris[i][j] = rand() % 25 + 65;
else
matris[i][j] = rand() % 25 + 97;
for (int i = 0; i < row; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < column; j++)
cout << setw(5) << matris[i][j];
cout << endl;
}
system("pause");

return 0;
}


So, how can I avoid using same letters? Did I approach wrongly? Is there a easier way to do what I'm trying to do? Thanks...










share|improve this question






















  • You'll have to be a bit more precise with your question, because "doesn't work" is not a sufficient description. However, the actual skill that you need it to step through the code with a debugger. You can execute it in single steps and inspect the current state of variables, so after every step you could verify whether the state is as you excpect it to be, which will unveil the error pretty fast.
    – Ulrich Eckhardt
    Nov 11 at 9:56










  • Create a static array of all possible letters. You can split it into small and big if you have some special demands as to where each of them have to be. Then apply a random permutation to the array (or both if you split it) and you have randomly sorted letters you can use to simply fill your matrix with.
    – Qubit
    Nov 11 at 10:00










  • This might be interesting: How to Generate a Sequence of Unique Random Integers
    – Pezo
    Nov 11 at 10:00










  • To clarify, even columns (i.e. 2, 4, 6... should be small) and odd (1, 3, 5...) should be big? Assuming 1-based indexing.
    – Qubit
    Nov 11 at 10:14










  • Yes. That's why I used if declaration.
    – muadgra
    Nov 11 at 10:20













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to make a 5x10 matrix with full of random letters and once the letter is used, it shouldn't be used again. 25 of them have to be small letters, 25 ought to be big letters. Even numbered columns should be small letters too. I don't know how to avoid using same letters. I tried to send the letters used to another array made of one dimension, then check every letter sent by it so that same letter won't be used but my coding skills didn't let me do it.
So, my code is this so far:



#include <iostream> 
#include <iomanip>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <ctime>
#include <locale.h>


using namespace std;

const int row = 5;
const int column = 10;

int main()
{
char matris[row][column];

srand(time(0));

for (int i = 0; i < row; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < column; j++)
if(j % 2 == 0)
matris[i][j] = rand() % 25 + 65;
else
matris[i][j] = rand() % 25 + 97;
for (int i = 0; i < row; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < column; j++)
cout << setw(5) << matris[i][j];
cout << endl;
}
system("pause");

return 0;
}


So, how can I avoid using same letters? Did I approach wrongly? Is there a easier way to do what I'm trying to do? Thanks...










share|improve this question













I'm trying to make a 5x10 matrix with full of random letters and once the letter is used, it shouldn't be used again. 25 of them have to be small letters, 25 ought to be big letters. Even numbered columns should be small letters too. I don't know how to avoid using same letters. I tried to send the letters used to another array made of one dimension, then check every letter sent by it so that same letter won't be used but my coding skills didn't let me do it.
So, my code is this so far:



#include <iostream> 
#include <iomanip>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <ctime>
#include <locale.h>


using namespace std;

const int row = 5;
const int column = 10;

int main()
{
char matris[row][column];

srand(time(0));

for (int i = 0; i < row; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < column; j++)
if(j % 2 == 0)
matris[i][j] = rand() % 25 + 65;
else
matris[i][j] = rand() % 25 + 97;
for (int i = 0; i < row; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < column; j++)
cout << setw(5) << matris[i][j];
cout << endl;
}
system("pause");

return 0;
}


So, how can I avoid using same letters? Did I approach wrongly? Is there a easier way to do what I'm trying to do? Thanks...







c++






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 11 at 9:52









muadgra

7




7












  • You'll have to be a bit more precise with your question, because "doesn't work" is not a sufficient description. However, the actual skill that you need it to step through the code with a debugger. You can execute it in single steps and inspect the current state of variables, so after every step you could verify whether the state is as you excpect it to be, which will unveil the error pretty fast.
    – Ulrich Eckhardt
    Nov 11 at 9:56










  • Create a static array of all possible letters. You can split it into small and big if you have some special demands as to where each of them have to be. Then apply a random permutation to the array (or both if you split it) and you have randomly sorted letters you can use to simply fill your matrix with.
    – Qubit
    Nov 11 at 10:00










  • This might be interesting: How to Generate a Sequence of Unique Random Integers
    – Pezo
    Nov 11 at 10:00










  • To clarify, even columns (i.e. 2, 4, 6... should be small) and odd (1, 3, 5...) should be big? Assuming 1-based indexing.
    – Qubit
    Nov 11 at 10:14










  • Yes. That's why I used if declaration.
    – muadgra
    Nov 11 at 10:20


















  • You'll have to be a bit more precise with your question, because "doesn't work" is not a sufficient description. However, the actual skill that you need it to step through the code with a debugger. You can execute it in single steps and inspect the current state of variables, so after every step you could verify whether the state is as you excpect it to be, which will unveil the error pretty fast.
    – Ulrich Eckhardt
    Nov 11 at 9:56










  • Create a static array of all possible letters. You can split it into small and big if you have some special demands as to where each of them have to be. Then apply a random permutation to the array (or both if you split it) and you have randomly sorted letters you can use to simply fill your matrix with.
    – Qubit
    Nov 11 at 10:00










  • This might be interesting: How to Generate a Sequence of Unique Random Integers
    – Pezo
    Nov 11 at 10:00










  • To clarify, even columns (i.e. 2, 4, 6... should be small) and odd (1, 3, 5...) should be big? Assuming 1-based indexing.
    – Qubit
    Nov 11 at 10:14










  • Yes. That's why I used if declaration.
    – muadgra
    Nov 11 at 10:20
















You'll have to be a bit more precise with your question, because "doesn't work" is not a sufficient description. However, the actual skill that you need it to step through the code with a debugger. You can execute it in single steps and inspect the current state of variables, so after every step you could verify whether the state is as you excpect it to be, which will unveil the error pretty fast.
– Ulrich Eckhardt
Nov 11 at 9:56




You'll have to be a bit more precise with your question, because "doesn't work" is not a sufficient description. However, the actual skill that you need it to step through the code with a debugger. You can execute it in single steps and inspect the current state of variables, so after every step you could verify whether the state is as you excpect it to be, which will unveil the error pretty fast.
– Ulrich Eckhardt
Nov 11 at 9:56












Create a static array of all possible letters. You can split it into small and big if you have some special demands as to where each of them have to be. Then apply a random permutation to the array (or both if you split it) and you have randomly sorted letters you can use to simply fill your matrix with.
– Qubit
Nov 11 at 10:00




Create a static array of all possible letters. You can split it into small and big if you have some special demands as to where each of them have to be. Then apply a random permutation to the array (or both if you split it) and you have randomly sorted letters you can use to simply fill your matrix with.
– Qubit
Nov 11 at 10:00












This might be interesting: How to Generate a Sequence of Unique Random Integers
– Pezo
Nov 11 at 10:00




This might be interesting: How to Generate a Sequence of Unique Random Integers
– Pezo
Nov 11 at 10:00












To clarify, even columns (i.e. 2, 4, 6... should be small) and odd (1, 3, 5...) should be big? Assuming 1-based indexing.
– Qubit
Nov 11 at 10:14




To clarify, even columns (i.e. 2, 4, 6... should be small) and odd (1, 3, 5...) should be big? Assuming 1-based indexing.
– Qubit
Nov 11 at 10:14












Yes. That's why I used if declaration.
– muadgra
Nov 11 at 10:20




Yes. That's why I used if declaration.
– muadgra
Nov 11 at 10:20












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













A possible solution is to create a vector containing all the symbols you want to use, randomized it, then draw from that. Example



#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <random>

using namespace std;

struct CharPool
{
size_t pos;
vector<char> m_unused_char;

CharPool()
: pos(0)
{
// add whatever characters you like to the pool
for (char c = 'a'; c <= 'z'; ++c)
m_unused_char.push_back(c);
for (char c = 'A'; c <= 'Z'; ++c)
m_unused_char.push_back(c);

std::random_device rd;
std::mt19937 g(rd());

// randomize
shuffle(m_unused_char.begin(), m_unused_char.end(), g);
}

char next()
{
// here we should assert that the pool is not depleted
return m_unused_char[pos++];
}
};

int main()
{
CharPool pool;
for (size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
cout << pool.next() << ", ";
cout << "n";
}





share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    You need to keep trace of the chars that already appeared, to do so you can use a std::set , at each random call, you check if the random result is inside the set: if it is you simply random another number and retry; if not, you insert it and put it in your matrix.



    I'd use a set rather than a vector because it's faster when checking if a value already appears in it.



    See this to know how to check if a set contains an element:
    How to check that an element is in a std::set?






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      This is an unnecessary complication in this case. Still, even if one were to go down this road, you only have 52 letters in total, you can create a boolean array and set the values of letters you've already seen to 1. That way no search needs to take place. As for the set vs vector, the set would be faster (asymptotically, it might not be in this special case where the size is so small) because it is sorted.
      – Qubit
      Nov 11 at 10:03










    • you're totally right, there are better ways to "keep trace of the chars that already appeared", I gave a solution that is - imho - simple to implement, but definitely not optimal.
      – L.C.
      Nov 11 at 10:08











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53247547%2fhow-to-avoid-using-same-members-in-a-matrix-which-is-made-by-rand-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    A possible solution is to create a vector containing all the symbols you want to use, randomized it, then draw from that. Example



    #include <iostream>
    #include <algorithm>
    #include <vector>
    #include <random>

    using namespace std;

    struct CharPool
    {
    size_t pos;
    vector<char> m_unused_char;

    CharPool()
    : pos(0)
    {
    // add whatever characters you like to the pool
    for (char c = 'a'; c <= 'z'; ++c)
    m_unused_char.push_back(c);
    for (char c = 'A'; c <= 'Z'; ++c)
    m_unused_char.push_back(c);

    std::random_device rd;
    std::mt19937 g(rd());

    // randomize
    shuffle(m_unused_char.begin(), m_unused_char.end(), g);
    }

    char next()
    {
    // here we should assert that the pool is not depleted
    return m_unused_char[pos++];
    }
    };

    int main()
    {
    CharPool pool;
    for (size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
    cout << pool.next() << ", ";
    cout << "n";
    }





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      A possible solution is to create a vector containing all the symbols you want to use, randomized it, then draw from that. Example



      #include <iostream>
      #include <algorithm>
      #include <vector>
      #include <random>

      using namespace std;

      struct CharPool
      {
      size_t pos;
      vector<char> m_unused_char;

      CharPool()
      : pos(0)
      {
      // add whatever characters you like to the pool
      for (char c = 'a'; c <= 'z'; ++c)
      m_unused_char.push_back(c);
      for (char c = 'A'; c <= 'Z'; ++c)
      m_unused_char.push_back(c);

      std::random_device rd;
      std::mt19937 g(rd());

      // randomize
      shuffle(m_unused_char.begin(), m_unused_char.end(), g);
      }

      char next()
      {
      // here we should assert that the pool is not depleted
      return m_unused_char[pos++];
      }
      };

      int main()
      {
      CharPool pool;
      for (size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
      cout << pool.next() << ", ";
      cout << "n";
      }





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        A possible solution is to create a vector containing all the symbols you want to use, randomized it, then draw from that. Example



        #include <iostream>
        #include <algorithm>
        #include <vector>
        #include <random>

        using namespace std;

        struct CharPool
        {
        size_t pos;
        vector<char> m_unused_char;

        CharPool()
        : pos(0)
        {
        // add whatever characters you like to the pool
        for (char c = 'a'; c <= 'z'; ++c)
        m_unused_char.push_back(c);
        for (char c = 'A'; c <= 'Z'; ++c)
        m_unused_char.push_back(c);

        std::random_device rd;
        std::mt19937 g(rd());

        // randomize
        shuffle(m_unused_char.begin(), m_unused_char.end(), g);
        }

        char next()
        {
        // here we should assert that the pool is not depleted
        return m_unused_char[pos++];
        }
        };

        int main()
        {
        CharPool pool;
        for (size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
        cout << pool.next() << ", ";
        cout << "n";
        }





        share|improve this answer












        A possible solution is to create a vector containing all the symbols you want to use, randomized it, then draw from that. Example



        #include <iostream>
        #include <algorithm>
        #include <vector>
        #include <random>

        using namespace std;

        struct CharPool
        {
        size_t pos;
        vector<char> m_unused_char;

        CharPool()
        : pos(0)
        {
        // add whatever characters you like to the pool
        for (char c = 'a'; c <= 'z'; ++c)
        m_unused_char.push_back(c);
        for (char c = 'A'; c <= 'Z'; ++c)
        m_unused_char.push_back(c);

        std::random_device rd;
        std::mt19937 g(rd());

        // randomize
        shuffle(m_unused_char.begin(), m_unused_char.end(), g);
        }

        char next()
        {
        // here we should assert that the pool is not depleted
        return m_unused_char[pos++];
        }
        };

        int main()
        {
        CharPool pool;
        for (size_t i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
        cout << pool.next() << ", ";
        cout << "n";
        }






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 11 at 10:29









        Fabio

        823318




        823318
























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            You need to keep trace of the chars that already appeared, to do so you can use a std::set , at each random call, you check if the random result is inside the set: if it is you simply random another number and retry; if not, you insert it and put it in your matrix.



            I'd use a set rather than a vector because it's faster when checking if a value already appears in it.



            See this to know how to check if a set contains an element:
            How to check that an element is in a std::set?






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              This is an unnecessary complication in this case. Still, even if one were to go down this road, you only have 52 letters in total, you can create a boolean array and set the values of letters you've already seen to 1. That way no search needs to take place. As for the set vs vector, the set would be faster (asymptotically, it might not be in this special case where the size is so small) because it is sorted.
              – Qubit
              Nov 11 at 10:03










            • you're totally right, there are better ways to "keep trace of the chars that already appeared", I gave a solution that is - imho - simple to implement, but definitely not optimal.
              – L.C.
              Nov 11 at 10:08















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            You need to keep trace of the chars that already appeared, to do so you can use a std::set , at each random call, you check if the random result is inside the set: if it is you simply random another number and retry; if not, you insert it and put it in your matrix.



            I'd use a set rather than a vector because it's faster when checking if a value already appears in it.



            See this to know how to check if a set contains an element:
            How to check that an element is in a std::set?






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              This is an unnecessary complication in this case. Still, even if one were to go down this road, you only have 52 letters in total, you can create a boolean array and set the values of letters you've already seen to 1. That way no search needs to take place. As for the set vs vector, the set would be faster (asymptotically, it might not be in this special case where the size is so small) because it is sorted.
              – Qubit
              Nov 11 at 10:03










            • you're totally right, there are better ways to "keep trace of the chars that already appeared", I gave a solution that is - imho - simple to implement, but definitely not optimal.
              – L.C.
              Nov 11 at 10:08













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            You need to keep trace of the chars that already appeared, to do so you can use a std::set , at each random call, you check if the random result is inside the set: if it is you simply random another number and retry; if not, you insert it and put it in your matrix.



            I'd use a set rather than a vector because it's faster when checking if a value already appears in it.



            See this to know how to check if a set contains an element:
            How to check that an element is in a std::set?






            share|improve this answer












            You need to keep trace of the chars that already appeared, to do so you can use a std::set , at each random call, you check if the random result is inside the set: if it is you simply random another number and retry; if not, you insert it and put it in your matrix.



            I'd use a set rather than a vector because it's faster when checking if a value already appears in it.



            See this to know how to check if a set contains an element:
            How to check that an element is in a std::set?







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 11 at 10:00









            L.C.

            19012




            19012








            • 1




              This is an unnecessary complication in this case. Still, even if one were to go down this road, you only have 52 letters in total, you can create a boolean array and set the values of letters you've already seen to 1. That way no search needs to take place. As for the set vs vector, the set would be faster (asymptotically, it might not be in this special case where the size is so small) because it is sorted.
              – Qubit
              Nov 11 at 10:03










            • you're totally right, there are better ways to "keep trace of the chars that already appeared", I gave a solution that is - imho - simple to implement, but definitely not optimal.
              – L.C.
              Nov 11 at 10:08














            • 1




              This is an unnecessary complication in this case. Still, even if one were to go down this road, you only have 52 letters in total, you can create a boolean array and set the values of letters you've already seen to 1. That way no search needs to take place. As for the set vs vector, the set would be faster (asymptotically, it might not be in this special case where the size is so small) because it is sorted.
              – Qubit
              Nov 11 at 10:03










            • you're totally right, there are better ways to "keep trace of the chars that already appeared", I gave a solution that is - imho - simple to implement, but definitely not optimal.
              – L.C.
              Nov 11 at 10:08








            1




            1




            This is an unnecessary complication in this case. Still, even if one were to go down this road, you only have 52 letters in total, you can create a boolean array and set the values of letters you've already seen to 1. That way no search needs to take place. As for the set vs vector, the set would be faster (asymptotically, it might not be in this special case where the size is so small) because it is sorted.
            – Qubit
            Nov 11 at 10:03




            This is an unnecessary complication in this case. Still, even if one were to go down this road, you only have 52 letters in total, you can create a boolean array and set the values of letters you've already seen to 1. That way no search needs to take place. As for the set vs vector, the set would be faster (asymptotically, it might not be in this special case where the size is so small) because it is sorted.
            – Qubit
            Nov 11 at 10:03












            you're totally right, there are better ways to "keep trace of the chars that already appeared", I gave a solution that is - imho - simple to implement, but definitely not optimal.
            – L.C.
            Nov 11 at 10:08




            you're totally right, there are better ways to "keep trace of the chars that already appeared", I gave a solution that is - imho - simple to implement, but definitely not optimal.
            – L.C.
            Nov 11 at 10:08


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53247547%2fhow-to-avoid-using-same-members-in-a-matrix-which-is-made-by-rand-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            List item for chat from Array inside array React Native

            Thiostrepton

            Caerphilly