Eclispe Milo handle missing Sever Nonce in ActivateSessionRequest
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I use Eclipse Milo (0.2.3) in my prject for OPC UA communication. The OPC UA participants are a client (written using Eclipse Milo) and a server, which is running on a remote machine, and is not implemented using Milo).
I can connect the client to the server normally and if the remote server is shut down, I am able to reconnect the client automatically, as soon as the server is accessible again.
However, after updating the server software, the client can't reconnect any more and it floods the server with the following messages:
- Create Session Request
- The server is able to create a session
- Activate Session Request
- The server sends an Activate Session Response, in which the ServerNonce is missing and the service result is "bad"
This causes the client to send a new Create Session Request. This all happens multiple times within a second, which makes it impossible for the server to execute any other tasks then trying to create this session.
Are there any settings in Milo to specify the reconnection delay? Or is there any setting for sepcifying what should happen when receiving an empty ServerNonce?
The server's responses are as follows:
If the session can be activated:
OpcUa Binary Protocol
Message Type: MSG
Chunk Type: F
Message Size: 96
SecureChannelId: 1599759116
Security Token Id: 1
Security Sequence Number: 53
Security RequestId: 3
OpcUa Service : Encodeable Object
TypeId : ExpandedNodeId
NodeId EncodingMask: Four byte encoded Numeric (0x01)
NodeId Namespace Index: 0
NodeId Identifier Numeric: ActivateSessionResponse (470)
ActivateSessionResponse
ResponseHeader: ResponseHeader
Timestamp: Nov 16, 2018 14:05:47.974000000
RequestHandle: 1
ServiceResult: 0x00000000 [Good]
ServiceDiagnostics: DiagnosticInfo
EncodingMask: 0x00
.... ...0 = has symbolic id: False
.... ..0. = has namespace: False
.... .0.. = has localizedtext: False
.... 0... = has locale: False
...0 .... = has additional info: False
..0. .... = has inner statuscode: False
.0.. .... = has inner diagnostic info: False
StringTable: Array of String
ArraySize: 0
AdditionalHeader: ExtensionObject
TypeId: ExpandedNodeId
EncodingMask: 0x00
ServerNonce: ab...
Results: Array of StatusCode
ArraySize: 0
DiagnosticInfos: Array of DiagnosticInfo
ArraySize: 0
If the session can't be activated (after updating the server's software):
OpcUa Binary Protocol
Message Type: MSG
Chunk Type: F
Message Size: 64
SecureChannelId: 1599759041
Security Token Id: 1
Security Sequence Number: 61
Security RequestId: 11
OpcUa Service : Encodeable Object
TypeId : ExpandedNodeId
ActivateSessionResponse
ResponseHeader: ResponseHeader
Timestamp: Nov 16, 2018 12:49:08.235000000
RequestHandle: 222
ServiceResult: 0x80000000 [Bad]
ServiceDiagnostics: DiagnosticInfo
EncodingMask: 0x00
.... ...0 = has symbolic id: False
.... ..0. = has namespace: False
.... .0.. = has localizedtext: False
.... 0... = has locale: False
...0 .... = has additional info: False
..0. .... = has inner statuscode: False
.0.. .... = has inner diagnostic info: False
StringTable: Array of String
ArraySize: 0
AdditionalHeader: ExtensionObject
TypeId: ExpandedNodeId
EncodingMask: 0x00
ServerNonce: <MISSING>[OpcUa Null ByteString]
Results: Array of StatusCode
ArraySize: 0
DiagnosticInfos: Array of DiagnosticInfo
ArraySize: 0
Thank you in advance for your help.
session opc-ua milo
add a comment |
I use Eclipse Milo (0.2.3) in my prject for OPC UA communication. The OPC UA participants are a client (written using Eclipse Milo) and a server, which is running on a remote machine, and is not implemented using Milo).
I can connect the client to the server normally and if the remote server is shut down, I am able to reconnect the client automatically, as soon as the server is accessible again.
However, after updating the server software, the client can't reconnect any more and it floods the server with the following messages:
- Create Session Request
- The server is able to create a session
- Activate Session Request
- The server sends an Activate Session Response, in which the ServerNonce is missing and the service result is "bad"
This causes the client to send a new Create Session Request. This all happens multiple times within a second, which makes it impossible for the server to execute any other tasks then trying to create this session.
Are there any settings in Milo to specify the reconnection delay? Or is there any setting for sepcifying what should happen when receiving an empty ServerNonce?
The server's responses are as follows:
If the session can be activated:
OpcUa Binary Protocol
Message Type: MSG
Chunk Type: F
Message Size: 96
SecureChannelId: 1599759116
Security Token Id: 1
Security Sequence Number: 53
Security RequestId: 3
OpcUa Service : Encodeable Object
TypeId : ExpandedNodeId
NodeId EncodingMask: Four byte encoded Numeric (0x01)
NodeId Namespace Index: 0
NodeId Identifier Numeric: ActivateSessionResponse (470)
ActivateSessionResponse
ResponseHeader: ResponseHeader
Timestamp: Nov 16, 2018 14:05:47.974000000
RequestHandle: 1
ServiceResult: 0x00000000 [Good]
ServiceDiagnostics: DiagnosticInfo
EncodingMask: 0x00
.... ...0 = has symbolic id: False
.... ..0. = has namespace: False
.... .0.. = has localizedtext: False
.... 0... = has locale: False
...0 .... = has additional info: False
..0. .... = has inner statuscode: False
.0.. .... = has inner diagnostic info: False
StringTable: Array of String
ArraySize: 0
AdditionalHeader: ExtensionObject
TypeId: ExpandedNodeId
EncodingMask: 0x00
ServerNonce: ab...
Results: Array of StatusCode
ArraySize: 0
DiagnosticInfos: Array of DiagnosticInfo
ArraySize: 0
If the session can't be activated (after updating the server's software):
OpcUa Binary Protocol
Message Type: MSG
Chunk Type: F
Message Size: 64
SecureChannelId: 1599759041
Security Token Id: 1
Security Sequence Number: 61
Security RequestId: 11
OpcUa Service : Encodeable Object
TypeId : ExpandedNodeId
ActivateSessionResponse
ResponseHeader: ResponseHeader
Timestamp: Nov 16, 2018 12:49:08.235000000
RequestHandle: 222
ServiceResult: 0x80000000 [Bad]
ServiceDiagnostics: DiagnosticInfo
EncodingMask: 0x00
.... ...0 = has symbolic id: False
.... ..0. = has namespace: False
.... .0.. = has localizedtext: False
.... 0... = has locale: False
...0 .... = has additional info: False
..0. .... = has inner statuscode: False
.0.. .... = has inner diagnostic info: False
StringTable: Array of String
ArraySize: 0
AdditionalHeader: ExtensionObject
TypeId: ExpandedNodeId
EncodingMask: 0x00
ServerNonce: <MISSING>[OpcUa Null ByteString]
Results: Array of StatusCode
ArraySize: 0
DiagnosticInfos: Array of DiagnosticInfo
ArraySize: 0
Thank you in advance for your help.
session opc-ua milo
add a comment |
I use Eclipse Milo (0.2.3) in my prject for OPC UA communication. The OPC UA participants are a client (written using Eclipse Milo) and a server, which is running on a remote machine, and is not implemented using Milo).
I can connect the client to the server normally and if the remote server is shut down, I am able to reconnect the client automatically, as soon as the server is accessible again.
However, after updating the server software, the client can't reconnect any more and it floods the server with the following messages:
- Create Session Request
- The server is able to create a session
- Activate Session Request
- The server sends an Activate Session Response, in which the ServerNonce is missing and the service result is "bad"
This causes the client to send a new Create Session Request. This all happens multiple times within a second, which makes it impossible for the server to execute any other tasks then trying to create this session.
Are there any settings in Milo to specify the reconnection delay? Or is there any setting for sepcifying what should happen when receiving an empty ServerNonce?
The server's responses are as follows:
If the session can be activated:
OpcUa Binary Protocol
Message Type: MSG
Chunk Type: F
Message Size: 96
SecureChannelId: 1599759116
Security Token Id: 1
Security Sequence Number: 53
Security RequestId: 3
OpcUa Service : Encodeable Object
TypeId : ExpandedNodeId
NodeId EncodingMask: Four byte encoded Numeric (0x01)
NodeId Namespace Index: 0
NodeId Identifier Numeric: ActivateSessionResponse (470)
ActivateSessionResponse
ResponseHeader: ResponseHeader
Timestamp: Nov 16, 2018 14:05:47.974000000
RequestHandle: 1
ServiceResult: 0x00000000 [Good]
ServiceDiagnostics: DiagnosticInfo
EncodingMask: 0x00
.... ...0 = has symbolic id: False
.... ..0. = has namespace: False
.... .0.. = has localizedtext: False
.... 0... = has locale: False
...0 .... = has additional info: False
..0. .... = has inner statuscode: False
.0.. .... = has inner diagnostic info: False
StringTable: Array of String
ArraySize: 0
AdditionalHeader: ExtensionObject
TypeId: ExpandedNodeId
EncodingMask: 0x00
ServerNonce: ab...
Results: Array of StatusCode
ArraySize: 0
DiagnosticInfos: Array of DiagnosticInfo
ArraySize: 0
If the session can't be activated (after updating the server's software):
OpcUa Binary Protocol
Message Type: MSG
Chunk Type: F
Message Size: 64
SecureChannelId: 1599759041
Security Token Id: 1
Security Sequence Number: 61
Security RequestId: 11
OpcUa Service : Encodeable Object
TypeId : ExpandedNodeId
ActivateSessionResponse
ResponseHeader: ResponseHeader
Timestamp: Nov 16, 2018 12:49:08.235000000
RequestHandle: 222
ServiceResult: 0x80000000 [Bad]
ServiceDiagnostics: DiagnosticInfo
EncodingMask: 0x00
.... ...0 = has symbolic id: False
.... ..0. = has namespace: False
.... .0.. = has localizedtext: False
.... 0... = has locale: False
...0 .... = has additional info: False
..0. .... = has inner statuscode: False
.0.. .... = has inner diagnostic info: False
StringTable: Array of String
ArraySize: 0
AdditionalHeader: ExtensionObject
TypeId: ExpandedNodeId
EncodingMask: 0x00
ServerNonce: <MISSING>[OpcUa Null ByteString]
Results: Array of StatusCode
ArraySize: 0
DiagnosticInfos: Array of DiagnosticInfo
ArraySize: 0
Thank you in advance for your help.
session opc-ua milo
I use Eclipse Milo (0.2.3) in my prject for OPC UA communication. The OPC UA participants are a client (written using Eclipse Milo) and a server, which is running on a remote machine, and is not implemented using Milo).
I can connect the client to the server normally and if the remote server is shut down, I am able to reconnect the client automatically, as soon as the server is accessible again.
However, after updating the server software, the client can't reconnect any more and it floods the server with the following messages:
- Create Session Request
- The server is able to create a session
- Activate Session Request
- The server sends an Activate Session Response, in which the ServerNonce is missing and the service result is "bad"
This causes the client to send a new Create Session Request. This all happens multiple times within a second, which makes it impossible for the server to execute any other tasks then trying to create this session.
Are there any settings in Milo to specify the reconnection delay? Or is there any setting for sepcifying what should happen when receiving an empty ServerNonce?
The server's responses are as follows:
If the session can be activated:
OpcUa Binary Protocol
Message Type: MSG
Chunk Type: F
Message Size: 96
SecureChannelId: 1599759116
Security Token Id: 1
Security Sequence Number: 53
Security RequestId: 3
OpcUa Service : Encodeable Object
TypeId : ExpandedNodeId
NodeId EncodingMask: Four byte encoded Numeric (0x01)
NodeId Namespace Index: 0
NodeId Identifier Numeric: ActivateSessionResponse (470)
ActivateSessionResponse
ResponseHeader: ResponseHeader
Timestamp: Nov 16, 2018 14:05:47.974000000
RequestHandle: 1
ServiceResult: 0x00000000 [Good]
ServiceDiagnostics: DiagnosticInfo
EncodingMask: 0x00
.... ...0 = has symbolic id: False
.... ..0. = has namespace: False
.... .0.. = has localizedtext: False
.... 0... = has locale: False
...0 .... = has additional info: False
..0. .... = has inner statuscode: False
.0.. .... = has inner diagnostic info: False
StringTable: Array of String
ArraySize: 0
AdditionalHeader: ExtensionObject
TypeId: ExpandedNodeId
EncodingMask: 0x00
ServerNonce: ab...
Results: Array of StatusCode
ArraySize: 0
DiagnosticInfos: Array of DiagnosticInfo
ArraySize: 0
If the session can't be activated (after updating the server's software):
OpcUa Binary Protocol
Message Type: MSG
Chunk Type: F
Message Size: 64
SecureChannelId: 1599759041
Security Token Id: 1
Security Sequence Number: 61
Security RequestId: 11
OpcUa Service : Encodeable Object
TypeId : ExpandedNodeId
ActivateSessionResponse
ResponseHeader: ResponseHeader
Timestamp: Nov 16, 2018 12:49:08.235000000
RequestHandle: 222
ServiceResult: 0x80000000 [Bad]
ServiceDiagnostics: DiagnosticInfo
EncodingMask: 0x00
.... ...0 = has symbolic id: False
.... ..0. = has namespace: False
.... .0.. = has localizedtext: False
.... 0... = has locale: False
...0 .... = has additional info: False
..0. .... = has inner statuscode: False
.0.. .... = has inner diagnostic info: False
StringTable: Array of String
ArraySize: 0
AdditionalHeader: ExtensionObject
TypeId: ExpandedNodeId
EncodingMask: 0x00
ServerNonce: <MISSING>[OpcUa Null ByteString]
Results: Array of StatusCode
ArraySize: 0
DiagnosticInfos: Array of DiagnosticInfo
ArraySize: 0
Thank you in advance for your help.
session opc-ua milo
session opc-ua milo
edited Nov 16 '18 at 18:31
Kevin Herron
2,90821825
2,90821825
asked Nov 16 '18 at 15:11
l_mcqueenl_mcqueen
205
205
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This corner case you described where there's no delay between a failed re-activation and the subsequent re-creation is addressed on the dev/0.3
branch in this commit.
I might be able to back port it to 0.2.x
next week if I have some spare time.
I don't think there are any workarounds you can use.
That would be great, thank you for your help!
– l_mcqueen
Nov 19 '18 at 8:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53340514%2feclispe-milo-handle-missing-sever-nonce-in-activatesessionrequest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This corner case you described where there's no delay between a failed re-activation and the subsequent re-creation is addressed on the dev/0.3
branch in this commit.
I might be able to back port it to 0.2.x
next week if I have some spare time.
I don't think there are any workarounds you can use.
That would be great, thank you for your help!
– l_mcqueen
Nov 19 '18 at 8:23
add a comment |
This corner case you described where there's no delay between a failed re-activation and the subsequent re-creation is addressed on the dev/0.3
branch in this commit.
I might be able to back port it to 0.2.x
next week if I have some spare time.
I don't think there are any workarounds you can use.
That would be great, thank you for your help!
– l_mcqueen
Nov 19 '18 at 8:23
add a comment |
This corner case you described where there's no delay between a failed re-activation and the subsequent re-creation is addressed on the dev/0.3
branch in this commit.
I might be able to back port it to 0.2.x
next week if I have some spare time.
I don't think there are any workarounds you can use.
This corner case you described where there's no delay between a failed re-activation and the subsequent re-creation is addressed on the dev/0.3
branch in this commit.
I might be able to back port it to 0.2.x
next week if I have some spare time.
I don't think there are any workarounds you can use.
answered Nov 16 '18 at 18:30
Kevin HerronKevin Herron
2,90821825
2,90821825
That would be great, thank you for your help!
– l_mcqueen
Nov 19 '18 at 8:23
add a comment |
That would be great, thank you for your help!
– l_mcqueen
Nov 19 '18 at 8:23
That would be great, thank you for your help!
– l_mcqueen
Nov 19 '18 at 8:23
That would be great, thank you for your help!
– l_mcqueen
Nov 19 '18 at 8:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53340514%2feclispe-milo-handle-missing-sever-nonce-in-activatesessionrequest%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown