Problems when implementing Keras model in Tensorflow












1















I'm just starting off with Tensorflow.



I tried implementing a model to classify digits in the MNSIT dataset.



I am familiar with Keras, so I first used it to create the model.



Keras code:



from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
from keras.datasets import mnist
from os import path

import numpy as np

network = Sequential()
network.add(Dense(700, input_dim=784, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(10, activation='softmax'))

network.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam')

(x_train, y_temp), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
y_train = vectorize(y_temp) # I defined this function to create vectors of the labels. It works without issues.

x_train = x_train.reshape(x_train.shape[0], x_train.shape[1]*x_train.shape[2])

network.fit(x_train, y_train, batch_size=100, epochs=3)

x_test = x_test.reshape(x_test.shape[0], x_test.shape[1]*x_test.shape[2])


scores = network.predict(x_test)

correct_pred = 0
for i in range(len(scores)):
if np.argmax(scores[i]) == y_test[i]:
correct_pred += 1

print((correct_pred/len(scores))*100)


The above code gives me an accuracy of around 92%.



I tried implementing the same model in Tensorflow:



import sys

import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data

data = input_data.read_data_sets('.', one_hot=True)

sess = tf.InteractiveSession()

x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 784])
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 10])

w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))

h1 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(x, w))
h2 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h1, w2))
h3 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h2, w3))
h4 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h3, w4))
h = tf.matmul(h4, w5)

loss = tf.math.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=h, labels=y))
gradient_descent = tf.train.AdamOptimizer().minimize(loss)

correct_mask = tf.equal(tf.argmax(h, 1), tf.argmax(y, 1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_mask, tf.float32))

sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())

for i in range(3):
batch_x, batch_y = data.train.next_batch(100)
loss_print = tf.print(loss, output_stream=sys.stdout)
sess.run([gradient_descent, loss_print], feed_dict={x: batch_x, y: batch_y})

ans = sess.run(accuracy, feed_dict={x: data.test.images, y: data.test.labels})

print(ans)


However, this code only gave me an accuracy of around 11%.
I tried increasing the number of epochs to 1000, but the result didn't change. Furthermore, the loss in every epoch was the same (2.30).



Am I missing something in the Tensorflow code?










share|improve this question

























  • One issue is that you have not considered the bias variables of Dense layers in your TF model.

    – today
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:12











  • The bias values are all zero. Does it still make a difference if I don't include them?

    – Susmit Agrawal
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:15











  • They are initially zero, but during training they change like the kernel weights. That's why they are called variables not constants.

    – today
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:16


















1















I'm just starting off with Tensorflow.



I tried implementing a model to classify digits in the MNSIT dataset.



I am familiar with Keras, so I first used it to create the model.



Keras code:



from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
from keras.datasets import mnist
from os import path

import numpy as np

network = Sequential()
network.add(Dense(700, input_dim=784, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(10, activation='softmax'))

network.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam')

(x_train, y_temp), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
y_train = vectorize(y_temp) # I defined this function to create vectors of the labels. It works without issues.

x_train = x_train.reshape(x_train.shape[0], x_train.shape[1]*x_train.shape[2])

network.fit(x_train, y_train, batch_size=100, epochs=3)

x_test = x_test.reshape(x_test.shape[0], x_test.shape[1]*x_test.shape[2])


scores = network.predict(x_test)

correct_pred = 0
for i in range(len(scores)):
if np.argmax(scores[i]) == y_test[i]:
correct_pred += 1

print((correct_pred/len(scores))*100)


The above code gives me an accuracy of around 92%.



I tried implementing the same model in Tensorflow:



import sys

import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data

data = input_data.read_data_sets('.', one_hot=True)

sess = tf.InteractiveSession()

x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 784])
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 10])

w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))

h1 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(x, w))
h2 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h1, w2))
h3 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h2, w3))
h4 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h3, w4))
h = tf.matmul(h4, w5)

loss = tf.math.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=h, labels=y))
gradient_descent = tf.train.AdamOptimizer().minimize(loss)

correct_mask = tf.equal(tf.argmax(h, 1), tf.argmax(y, 1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_mask, tf.float32))

sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())

for i in range(3):
batch_x, batch_y = data.train.next_batch(100)
loss_print = tf.print(loss, output_stream=sys.stdout)
sess.run([gradient_descent, loss_print], feed_dict={x: batch_x, y: batch_y})

ans = sess.run(accuracy, feed_dict={x: data.test.images, y: data.test.labels})

print(ans)


However, this code only gave me an accuracy of around 11%.
I tried increasing the number of epochs to 1000, but the result didn't change. Furthermore, the loss in every epoch was the same (2.30).



Am I missing something in the Tensorflow code?










share|improve this question

























  • One issue is that you have not considered the bias variables of Dense layers in your TF model.

    – today
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:12











  • The bias values are all zero. Does it still make a difference if I don't include them?

    – Susmit Agrawal
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:15











  • They are initially zero, but during training they change like the kernel weights. That's why they are called variables not constants.

    – today
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:16
















1












1








1








I'm just starting off with Tensorflow.



I tried implementing a model to classify digits in the MNSIT dataset.



I am familiar with Keras, so I first used it to create the model.



Keras code:



from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
from keras.datasets import mnist
from os import path

import numpy as np

network = Sequential()
network.add(Dense(700, input_dim=784, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(10, activation='softmax'))

network.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam')

(x_train, y_temp), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
y_train = vectorize(y_temp) # I defined this function to create vectors of the labels. It works without issues.

x_train = x_train.reshape(x_train.shape[0], x_train.shape[1]*x_train.shape[2])

network.fit(x_train, y_train, batch_size=100, epochs=3)

x_test = x_test.reshape(x_test.shape[0], x_test.shape[1]*x_test.shape[2])


scores = network.predict(x_test)

correct_pred = 0
for i in range(len(scores)):
if np.argmax(scores[i]) == y_test[i]:
correct_pred += 1

print((correct_pred/len(scores))*100)


The above code gives me an accuracy of around 92%.



I tried implementing the same model in Tensorflow:



import sys

import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data

data = input_data.read_data_sets('.', one_hot=True)

sess = tf.InteractiveSession()

x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 784])
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 10])

w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))

h1 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(x, w))
h2 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h1, w2))
h3 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h2, w3))
h4 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h3, w4))
h = tf.matmul(h4, w5)

loss = tf.math.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=h, labels=y))
gradient_descent = tf.train.AdamOptimizer().minimize(loss)

correct_mask = tf.equal(tf.argmax(h, 1), tf.argmax(y, 1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_mask, tf.float32))

sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())

for i in range(3):
batch_x, batch_y = data.train.next_batch(100)
loss_print = tf.print(loss, output_stream=sys.stdout)
sess.run([gradient_descent, loss_print], feed_dict={x: batch_x, y: batch_y})

ans = sess.run(accuracy, feed_dict={x: data.test.images, y: data.test.labels})

print(ans)


However, this code only gave me an accuracy of around 11%.
I tried increasing the number of epochs to 1000, but the result didn't change. Furthermore, the loss in every epoch was the same (2.30).



Am I missing something in the Tensorflow code?










share|improve this question
















I'm just starting off with Tensorflow.



I tried implementing a model to classify digits in the MNSIT dataset.



I am familiar with Keras, so I first used it to create the model.



Keras code:



from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense
from keras.datasets import mnist
from os import path

import numpy as np

network = Sequential()
network.add(Dense(700, input_dim=784, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(500, activation='tanh'))
network.add(Dense(10, activation='softmax'))

network.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam')

(x_train, y_temp), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
y_train = vectorize(y_temp) # I defined this function to create vectors of the labels. It works without issues.

x_train = x_train.reshape(x_train.shape[0], x_train.shape[1]*x_train.shape[2])

network.fit(x_train, y_train, batch_size=100, epochs=3)

x_test = x_test.reshape(x_test.shape[0], x_test.shape[1]*x_test.shape[2])


scores = network.predict(x_test)

correct_pred = 0
for i in range(len(scores)):
if np.argmax(scores[i]) == y_test[i]:
correct_pred += 1

print((correct_pred/len(scores))*100)


The above code gives me an accuracy of around 92%.



I tried implementing the same model in Tensorflow:



import sys

import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data

data = input_data.read_data_sets('.', one_hot=True)

sess = tf.InteractiveSession()

x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 784])
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, 10])

w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))

h1 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(x, w))
h2 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h1, w2))
h3 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h2, w3))
h4 = tf.nn.tanh(tf.matmul(h3, w4))
h = tf.matmul(h4, w5)

loss = tf.math.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits=h, labels=y))
gradient_descent = tf.train.AdamOptimizer().minimize(loss)

correct_mask = tf.equal(tf.argmax(h, 1), tf.argmax(y, 1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_mask, tf.float32))

sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())

for i in range(3):
batch_x, batch_y = data.train.next_batch(100)
loss_print = tf.print(loss, output_stream=sys.stdout)
sess.run([gradient_descent, loss_print], feed_dict={x: batch_x, y: batch_y})

ans = sess.run(accuracy, feed_dict={x: data.test.images, y: data.test.labels})

print(ans)


However, this code only gave me an accuracy of around 11%.
I tried increasing the number of epochs to 1000, but the result didn't change. Furthermore, the loss in every epoch was the same (2.30).



Am I missing something in the Tensorflow code?







python python-3.x tensorflow keras neural-network






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 '18 at 17:21







Susmit Agrawal

















asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:06









Susmit AgrawalSusmit Agrawal

1,002513




1,002513













  • One issue is that you have not considered the bias variables of Dense layers in your TF model.

    – today
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:12











  • The bias values are all zero. Does it still make a difference if I don't include them?

    – Susmit Agrawal
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:15











  • They are initially zero, but during training they change like the kernel weights. That's why they are called variables not constants.

    – today
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:16





















  • One issue is that you have not considered the bias variables of Dense layers in your TF model.

    – today
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:12











  • The bias values are all zero. Does it still make a difference if I don't include them?

    – Susmit Agrawal
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:15











  • They are initially zero, but during training they change like the kernel weights. That's why they are called variables not constants.

    – today
    Nov 15 '18 at 17:16



















One issue is that you have not considered the bias variables of Dense layers in your TF model.

– today
Nov 15 '18 at 17:12





One issue is that you have not considered the bias variables of Dense layers in your TF model.

– today
Nov 15 '18 at 17:12













The bias values are all zero. Does it still make a difference if I don't include them?

– Susmit Agrawal
Nov 15 '18 at 17:15





The bias values are all zero. Does it still make a difference if I don't include them?

– Susmit Agrawal
Nov 15 '18 at 17:15













They are initially zero, but during training they change like the kernel weights. That's why they are called variables not constants.

– today
Nov 15 '18 at 17:16







They are initially zero, but during training they change like the kernel weights. That's why they are called variables not constants.

– today
Nov 15 '18 at 17:16














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Turns out, the problem was that I initialized the weights as zeros!



Simply changing



w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))


to



w = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([784, 700], seed=42))
w2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([700, 500], seed=42))
w3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
w4 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
w5 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 10], seed=42))


gave significant improvements.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324596%2fproblems-when-implementing-keras-model-in-tensorflow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Turns out, the problem was that I initialized the weights as zeros!



    Simply changing



    w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
    w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
    w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
    w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
    w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))


    to



    w = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([784, 700], seed=42))
    w2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([700, 500], seed=42))
    w3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
    w4 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
    w5 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 10], seed=42))


    gave significant improvements.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      Turns out, the problem was that I initialized the weights as zeros!



      Simply changing



      w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
      w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
      w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
      w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
      w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))


      to



      w = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([784, 700], seed=42))
      w2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([700, 500], seed=42))
      w3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
      w4 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
      w5 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 10], seed=42))


      gave significant improvements.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        Turns out, the problem was that I initialized the weights as zeros!



        Simply changing



        w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
        w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
        w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
        w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
        w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))


        to



        w = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([784, 700], seed=42))
        w2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([700, 500], seed=42))
        w3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
        w4 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
        w5 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 10], seed=42))


        gave significant improvements.






        share|improve this answer













        Turns out, the problem was that I initialized the weights as zeros!



        Simply changing



        w = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([784, 700]))
        w2 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([700, 500]))
        w3 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
        w4 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 500]))
        w5 = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([500, 10]))


        to



        w = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([784, 700], seed=42))
        w2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([700, 500], seed=42))
        w3 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
        w4 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 500], seed=42))
        w5 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([500, 10], seed=42))


        gave significant improvements.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 15 '18 at 18:06









        Susmit AgrawalSusmit Agrawal

        1,002513




        1,002513
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324596%2fproblems-when-implementing-keras-model-in-tensorflow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Vorschmack

            Quarantine