Scale Azure nginx ingress controller












1















We have a K8s cluster on Azure (aks). On this cluster, we added a loadbalancer on the setup which installed an nginx-ingress controller.



Looking at the deployments:



addon-http-application-routing-default-http-backend       1
addon-http-application-routing-external-dns 1
addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller 1


I see there is 1 of each running. Now I find very little information if these should be scaled (there is 1 pod each) and if they should, how?



I've tried running



kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3 


Which temporarily scales it to 3 pods, but after a few moments, it is downscaled again.



So again, are these supposed to be scaled? Why? How?



EDIT



For those that missed it like I did: The AKS addon-http-application is not ready for production, it is there to quickly set you up and start experimenting. Which is why I wasn't able to scale it properly.



Read more










share|improve this question

























  • You probably better off installing your own ingress (you can follow this guide) and external-dns.

    – alev
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:32


















1















We have a K8s cluster on Azure (aks). On this cluster, we added a loadbalancer on the setup which installed an nginx-ingress controller.



Looking at the deployments:



addon-http-application-routing-default-http-backend       1
addon-http-application-routing-external-dns 1
addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller 1


I see there is 1 of each running. Now I find very little information if these should be scaled (there is 1 pod each) and if they should, how?



I've tried running



kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3 


Which temporarily scales it to 3 pods, but after a few moments, it is downscaled again.



So again, are these supposed to be scaled? Why? How?



EDIT



For those that missed it like I did: The AKS addon-http-application is not ready for production, it is there to quickly set you up and start experimenting. Which is why I wasn't able to scale it properly.



Read more










share|improve this question

























  • You probably better off installing your own ingress (you can follow this guide) and external-dns.

    – alev
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:32
















1












1








1








We have a K8s cluster on Azure (aks). On this cluster, we added a loadbalancer on the setup which installed an nginx-ingress controller.



Looking at the deployments:



addon-http-application-routing-default-http-backend       1
addon-http-application-routing-external-dns 1
addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller 1


I see there is 1 of each running. Now I find very little information if these should be scaled (there is 1 pod each) and if they should, how?



I've tried running



kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3 


Which temporarily scales it to 3 pods, but after a few moments, it is downscaled again.



So again, are these supposed to be scaled? Why? How?



EDIT



For those that missed it like I did: The AKS addon-http-application is not ready for production, it is there to quickly set you up and start experimenting. Which is why I wasn't able to scale it properly.



Read more










share|improve this question
















We have a K8s cluster on Azure (aks). On this cluster, we added a loadbalancer on the setup which installed an nginx-ingress controller.



Looking at the deployments:



addon-http-application-routing-default-http-backend       1
addon-http-application-routing-external-dns 1
addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller 1


I see there is 1 of each running. Now I find very little information if these should be scaled (there is 1 pod each) and if they should, how?



I've tried running



kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3 


Which temporarily scales it to 3 pods, but after a few moments, it is downscaled again.



So again, are these supposed to be scaled? Why? How?



EDIT



For those that missed it like I did: The AKS addon-http-application is not ready for production, it is there to quickly set you up and start experimenting. Which is why I wasn't able to scale it properly.



Read more







azure kubernetes kubernetes-ingress azure-aks nginx-ingress






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 '18 at 9:11







RVandersteen

















asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:17









RVandersteenRVandersteen

8951129




8951129













  • You probably better off installing your own ingress (you can follow this guide) and external-dns.

    – alev
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:32





















  • You probably better off installing your own ingress (you can follow this guide) and external-dns.

    – alev
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:32



















You probably better off installing your own ingress (you can follow this guide) and external-dns.

– alev
Nov 15 '18 at 9:32







You probably better off installing your own ingress (you can follow this guide) and external-dns.

– alev
Nov 15 '18 at 9:32














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














In AKS, being a managed service, this "system" workloads like kube-dns and the ingress controller, are managed by the service itself and they cannot be modified by the user (because they're labeled with addonmanager.kubernetes.io/mode: Reconcile, which forces the current configuration to reflect what's on disk at /etc/kubernetes/addons on the masters).






share|improve this answer
























  • Does this mean that we do not have to 'care' about it and that aks will handle autoscaling / redundancy etc for it ?

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39











  • I guess I found the answer - see my edit

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12



















2














That's generally the way how you do it:



$ kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3


However, I suspect you have an HPA configured which will scale up/down depending on the load or some metrics and has the minReplicas spec set to 1. You can check with:



$ kubectl get hpa
$ kubectl describe hpa <hpa-name>


If that's the case you can scale up by just patching the HPA:



$ kubectl patch hpa <hpa-name> -p '{"spec": {"minReplicas": 3}}'


or edit it manually:



$ kubectl edit hpa <hpa-name>


More information on HPAs here.



And yes, the ingress controllers are supposed to be scaled up and down depending on the load.






share|improve this answer
























  • This should indeed be the way to go, once i've installed a production ready nginx-ingress-controller

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53303411%2fscale-azure-nginx-ingress-controller%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














In AKS, being a managed service, this "system" workloads like kube-dns and the ingress controller, are managed by the service itself and they cannot be modified by the user (because they're labeled with addonmanager.kubernetes.io/mode: Reconcile, which forces the current configuration to reflect what's on disk at /etc/kubernetes/addons on the masters).






share|improve this answer
























  • Does this mean that we do not have to 'care' about it and that aks will handle autoscaling / redundancy etc for it ?

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39











  • I guess I found the answer - see my edit

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12
















1














In AKS, being a managed service, this "system" workloads like kube-dns and the ingress controller, are managed by the service itself and they cannot be modified by the user (because they're labeled with addonmanager.kubernetes.io/mode: Reconcile, which forces the current configuration to reflect what's on disk at /etc/kubernetes/addons on the masters).






share|improve this answer
























  • Does this mean that we do not have to 'care' about it and that aks will handle autoscaling / redundancy etc for it ?

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39











  • I guess I found the answer - see my edit

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12














1












1








1







In AKS, being a managed service, this "system" workloads like kube-dns and the ingress controller, are managed by the service itself and they cannot be modified by the user (because they're labeled with addonmanager.kubernetes.io/mode: Reconcile, which forces the current configuration to reflect what's on disk at /etc/kubernetes/addons on the masters).






share|improve this answer













In AKS, being a managed service, this "system" workloads like kube-dns and the ingress controller, are managed by the service itself and they cannot be modified by the user (because they're labeled with addonmanager.kubernetes.io/mode: Reconcile, which forces the current configuration to reflect what's on disk at /etc/kubernetes/addons on the masters).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 22:59









alevalev

1709




1709













  • Does this mean that we do not have to 'care' about it and that aks will handle autoscaling / redundancy etc for it ?

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39











  • I guess I found the answer - see my edit

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12



















  • Does this mean that we do not have to 'care' about it and that aks will handle autoscaling / redundancy etc for it ?

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 8:39











  • I guess I found the answer - see my edit

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12

















Does this mean that we do not have to 'care' about it and that aks will handle autoscaling / redundancy etc for it ?

– RVandersteen
Nov 15 '18 at 8:39





Does this mean that we do not have to 'care' about it and that aks will handle autoscaling / redundancy etc for it ?

– RVandersteen
Nov 15 '18 at 8:39













I guess I found the answer - see my edit

– RVandersteen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:12





I guess I found the answer - see my edit

– RVandersteen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:12













2














That's generally the way how you do it:



$ kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3


However, I suspect you have an HPA configured which will scale up/down depending on the load or some metrics and has the minReplicas spec set to 1. You can check with:



$ kubectl get hpa
$ kubectl describe hpa <hpa-name>


If that's the case you can scale up by just patching the HPA:



$ kubectl patch hpa <hpa-name> -p '{"spec": {"minReplicas": 3}}'


or edit it manually:



$ kubectl edit hpa <hpa-name>


More information on HPAs here.



And yes, the ingress controllers are supposed to be scaled up and down depending on the load.






share|improve this answer
























  • This should indeed be the way to go, once i've installed a production ready nginx-ingress-controller

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12
















2














That's generally the way how you do it:



$ kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3


However, I suspect you have an HPA configured which will scale up/down depending on the load or some metrics and has the minReplicas spec set to 1. You can check with:



$ kubectl get hpa
$ kubectl describe hpa <hpa-name>


If that's the case you can scale up by just patching the HPA:



$ kubectl patch hpa <hpa-name> -p '{"spec": {"minReplicas": 3}}'


or edit it manually:



$ kubectl edit hpa <hpa-name>


More information on HPAs here.



And yes, the ingress controllers are supposed to be scaled up and down depending on the load.






share|improve this answer
























  • This should indeed be the way to go, once i've installed a production ready nginx-ingress-controller

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12














2












2








2







That's generally the way how you do it:



$ kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3


However, I suspect you have an HPA configured which will scale up/down depending on the load or some metrics and has the minReplicas spec set to 1. You can check with:



$ kubectl get hpa
$ kubectl describe hpa <hpa-name>


If that's the case you can scale up by just patching the HPA:



$ kubectl patch hpa <hpa-name> -p '{"spec": {"minReplicas": 3}}'


or edit it manually:



$ kubectl edit hpa <hpa-name>


More information on HPAs here.



And yes, the ingress controllers are supposed to be scaled up and down depending on the load.






share|improve this answer













That's generally the way how you do it:



$ kubectl scale deployment addon-http-application-routing-nginx-ingress-controller --replicas=3


However, I suspect you have an HPA configured which will scale up/down depending on the load or some metrics and has the minReplicas spec set to 1. You can check with:



$ kubectl get hpa
$ kubectl describe hpa <hpa-name>


If that's the case you can scale up by just patching the HPA:



$ kubectl patch hpa <hpa-name> -p '{"spec": {"minReplicas": 3}}'


or edit it manually:



$ kubectl edit hpa <hpa-name>


More information on HPAs here.



And yes, the ingress controllers are supposed to be scaled up and down depending on the load.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 19:00









RicoRico

27.9k94966




27.9k94966













  • This should indeed be the way to go, once i've installed a production ready nginx-ingress-controller

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12



















  • This should indeed be the way to go, once i've installed a production ready nginx-ingress-controller

    – RVandersteen
    Nov 15 '18 at 9:12

















This should indeed be the way to go, once i've installed a production ready nginx-ingress-controller

– RVandersteen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:12





This should indeed be the way to go, once i've installed a production ready nginx-ingress-controller

– RVandersteen
Nov 15 '18 at 9:12


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53303411%2fscale-azure-nginx-ingress-controller%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

Glorious Revolution

Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python