git interactive rebase: stop without commit












1















(TLDR)
Is there a way in git rebase -i to stop for editing, without a commit id?
(/TLDR)



Longer version:



Background



With git rebase -i, I get a text editor where I can define a list of commands, starting with pick COMMIT_ID on each line.



One of the options is to replace "pick COMMIT_ID" with "edit COMMIT_ID", which means it will stop after the commit for me to do amend the commit, or to do some manual operations. Then I can proceed with git rebase --continue.



From the list of options:



#  e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending


Question



I wonder if there is an option to stop for editing, without picking any commit.



Motivation / Use case



E.g. if I want to squash a range of commits, and stop afterwards for some manual operations, I would have to put edit + squash in front of the same commit id - which is not allowed.



Instead, I would do something like this:



pick COMMIT_0 Change some colors
pick COMMIT_1 Make it faster
squash COMMIT_2 Fix a typo in previous commit
squash COMMIT_3 Fix another typo in previous commit
edit
pick COMMIT_4 Refactor some things
pick COMMIT_5 Introduce new options


Such an option would also allow to stop before the first commit in the sequence.



(I was going to say it would allow to edit before the initial commit of the entire history, but this is not true - the initial commit is never part of the rebase sequence)



If I do it like this, git says this:




Warning: the SHA-1 is missing or isn't a commit in the following line:




Interestingly, the effect is more or less what I want, it stops and I can do things. But I am sure this is not the intended way to do it.










share|improve this question



























    1















    (TLDR)
    Is there a way in git rebase -i to stop for editing, without a commit id?
    (/TLDR)



    Longer version:



    Background



    With git rebase -i, I get a text editor where I can define a list of commands, starting with pick COMMIT_ID on each line.



    One of the options is to replace "pick COMMIT_ID" with "edit COMMIT_ID", which means it will stop after the commit for me to do amend the commit, or to do some manual operations. Then I can proceed with git rebase --continue.



    From the list of options:



    #  e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending


    Question



    I wonder if there is an option to stop for editing, without picking any commit.



    Motivation / Use case



    E.g. if I want to squash a range of commits, and stop afterwards for some manual operations, I would have to put edit + squash in front of the same commit id - which is not allowed.



    Instead, I would do something like this:



    pick COMMIT_0 Change some colors
    pick COMMIT_1 Make it faster
    squash COMMIT_2 Fix a typo in previous commit
    squash COMMIT_3 Fix another typo in previous commit
    edit
    pick COMMIT_4 Refactor some things
    pick COMMIT_5 Introduce new options


    Such an option would also allow to stop before the first commit in the sequence.



    (I was going to say it would allow to edit before the initial commit of the entire history, but this is not true - the initial commit is never part of the rebase sequence)



    If I do it like this, git says this:




    Warning: the SHA-1 is missing or isn't a commit in the following line:




    Interestingly, the effect is more or less what I want, it stops and I can do things. But I am sure this is not the intended way to do it.










    share|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1








      (TLDR)
      Is there a way in git rebase -i to stop for editing, without a commit id?
      (/TLDR)



      Longer version:



      Background



      With git rebase -i, I get a text editor where I can define a list of commands, starting with pick COMMIT_ID on each line.



      One of the options is to replace "pick COMMIT_ID" with "edit COMMIT_ID", which means it will stop after the commit for me to do amend the commit, or to do some manual operations. Then I can proceed with git rebase --continue.



      From the list of options:



      #  e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending


      Question



      I wonder if there is an option to stop for editing, without picking any commit.



      Motivation / Use case



      E.g. if I want to squash a range of commits, and stop afterwards for some manual operations, I would have to put edit + squash in front of the same commit id - which is not allowed.



      Instead, I would do something like this:



      pick COMMIT_0 Change some colors
      pick COMMIT_1 Make it faster
      squash COMMIT_2 Fix a typo in previous commit
      squash COMMIT_3 Fix another typo in previous commit
      edit
      pick COMMIT_4 Refactor some things
      pick COMMIT_5 Introduce new options


      Such an option would also allow to stop before the first commit in the sequence.



      (I was going to say it would allow to edit before the initial commit of the entire history, but this is not true - the initial commit is never part of the rebase sequence)



      If I do it like this, git says this:




      Warning: the SHA-1 is missing or isn't a commit in the following line:




      Interestingly, the effect is more or less what I want, it stops and I can do things. But I am sure this is not the intended way to do it.










      share|improve this question














      (TLDR)
      Is there a way in git rebase -i to stop for editing, without a commit id?
      (/TLDR)



      Longer version:



      Background



      With git rebase -i, I get a text editor where I can define a list of commands, starting with pick COMMIT_ID on each line.



      One of the options is to replace "pick COMMIT_ID" with "edit COMMIT_ID", which means it will stop after the commit for me to do amend the commit, or to do some manual operations. Then I can proceed with git rebase --continue.



      From the list of options:



      #  e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending


      Question



      I wonder if there is an option to stop for editing, without picking any commit.



      Motivation / Use case



      E.g. if I want to squash a range of commits, and stop afterwards for some manual operations, I would have to put edit + squash in front of the same commit id - which is not allowed.



      Instead, I would do something like this:



      pick COMMIT_0 Change some colors
      pick COMMIT_1 Make it faster
      squash COMMIT_2 Fix a typo in previous commit
      squash COMMIT_3 Fix another typo in previous commit
      edit
      pick COMMIT_4 Refactor some things
      pick COMMIT_5 Introduce new options


      Such an option would also allow to stop before the first commit in the sequence.



      (I was going to say it would allow to edit before the initial commit of the entire history, but this is not true - the initial commit is never part of the rebase sequence)



      If I do it like this, git says this:




      Warning: the SHA-1 is missing or isn't a commit in the following line:




      Interestingly, the effect is more or less what I want, it stops and I can do things. But I am sure this is not the intended way to do it.







      git rebase git-interactive-rebase






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 14 '18 at 11:48









      donquixotedonquixote

      1,87811934




      1,87811934
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          You have one, two, or three options, depending on some circumstances.



          First option



          Insert



          exec false


          or its short form



          x false


          at the point where you want to stop. As you may know, exec runs the shell command at the point where the command occurs; but if the command exits with failure, git rebase stops, and the command false always exits with failure.



          Second option



          If you are using Git 2.20 or later, you can insert



          break


          or its short form



          b


          at the point where you want to stop. This command was introduced for the very purpose that you are asking for.



          Third option



          Mark the commit before the point where you want to stop with edit instead of pick. Obviously, this does not work if you want to stop before the first commit or after a squash or fixup commit.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Also, change the last squash to an edit, and do the squash yourself with git reset --soft @^; git commit --amend

            – jthill
            Nov 14 '18 at 13:10



















          1














          I don't know if that is possible. After squash you must do second interactive rebase and then modified commit.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Ok, going to wait if someone proposes a better workaround.

            – donquixote
            Nov 14 '18 at 12:25











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53299542%2fgit-interactive-rebase-stop-without-commit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          You have one, two, or three options, depending on some circumstances.



          First option



          Insert



          exec false


          or its short form



          x false


          at the point where you want to stop. As you may know, exec runs the shell command at the point where the command occurs; but if the command exits with failure, git rebase stops, and the command false always exits with failure.



          Second option



          If you are using Git 2.20 or later, you can insert



          break


          or its short form



          b


          at the point where you want to stop. This command was introduced for the very purpose that you are asking for.



          Third option



          Mark the commit before the point where you want to stop with edit instead of pick. Obviously, this does not work if you want to stop before the first commit or after a squash or fixup commit.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Also, change the last squash to an edit, and do the squash yourself with git reset --soft @^; git commit --amend

            – jthill
            Nov 14 '18 at 13:10
















          4














          You have one, two, or three options, depending on some circumstances.



          First option



          Insert



          exec false


          or its short form



          x false


          at the point where you want to stop. As you may know, exec runs the shell command at the point where the command occurs; but if the command exits with failure, git rebase stops, and the command false always exits with failure.



          Second option



          If you are using Git 2.20 or later, you can insert



          break


          or its short form



          b


          at the point where you want to stop. This command was introduced for the very purpose that you are asking for.



          Third option



          Mark the commit before the point where you want to stop with edit instead of pick. Obviously, this does not work if you want to stop before the first commit or after a squash or fixup commit.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            Also, change the last squash to an edit, and do the squash yourself with git reset --soft @^; git commit --amend

            – jthill
            Nov 14 '18 at 13:10














          4












          4








          4







          You have one, two, or three options, depending on some circumstances.



          First option



          Insert



          exec false


          or its short form



          x false


          at the point where you want to stop. As you may know, exec runs the shell command at the point where the command occurs; but if the command exits with failure, git rebase stops, and the command false always exits with failure.



          Second option



          If you are using Git 2.20 or later, you can insert



          break


          or its short form



          b


          at the point where you want to stop. This command was introduced for the very purpose that you are asking for.



          Third option



          Mark the commit before the point where you want to stop with edit instead of pick. Obviously, this does not work if you want to stop before the first commit or after a squash or fixup commit.






          share|improve this answer















          You have one, two, or three options, depending on some circumstances.



          First option



          Insert



          exec false


          or its short form



          x false


          at the point where you want to stop. As you may know, exec runs the shell command at the point where the command occurs; but if the command exits with failure, git rebase stops, and the command false always exits with failure.



          Second option



          If you are using Git 2.20 or later, you can insert



          break


          or its short form



          b


          at the point where you want to stop. This command was introduced for the very purpose that you are asking for.



          Third option



          Mark the commit before the point where you want to stop with edit instead of pick. Obviously, this does not work if you want to stop before the first commit or after a squash or fixup commit.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 14 '18 at 9:58

























          answered Nov 14 '18 at 13:05









          j6tj6t

          1,266139




          1,266139








          • 2





            Also, change the last squash to an edit, and do the squash yourself with git reset --soft @^; git commit --amend

            – jthill
            Nov 14 '18 at 13:10














          • 2





            Also, change the last squash to an edit, and do the squash yourself with git reset --soft @^; git commit --amend

            – jthill
            Nov 14 '18 at 13:10








          2




          2





          Also, change the last squash to an edit, and do the squash yourself with git reset --soft @^; git commit --amend

          – jthill
          Nov 14 '18 at 13:10





          Also, change the last squash to an edit, and do the squash yourself with git reset --soft @^; git commit --amend

          – jthill
          Nov 14 '18 at 13:10













          1














          I don't know if that is possible. After squash you must do second interactive rebase and then modified commit.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Ok, going to wait if someone proposes a better workaround.

            – donquixote
            Nov 14 '18 at 12:25
















          1














          I don't know if that is possible. After squash you must do second interactive rebase and then modified commit.






          share|improve this answer
























          • Ok, going to wait if someone proposes a better workaround.

            – donquixote
            Nov 14 '18 at 12:25














          1












          1








          1







          I don't know if that is possible. After squash you must do second interactive rebase and then modified commit.






          share|improve this answer













          I don't know if that is possible. After squash you must do second interactive rebase and then modified commit.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 14 '18 at 12:16









          TomaszTomasz

          215




          215













          • Ok, going to wait if someone proposes a better workaround.

            – donquixote
            Nov 14 '18 at 12:25



















          • Ok, going to wait if someone proposes a better workaround.

            – donquixote
            Nov 14 '18 at 12:25

















          Ok, going to wait if someone proposes a better workaround.

          – donquixote
          Nov 14 '18 at 12:25





          Ok, going to wait if someone proposes a better workaround.

          – donquixote
          Nov 14 '18 at 12:25


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53299542%2fgit-interactive-rebase-stop-without-commit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

          Glorious Revolution

          Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python