C# won't read updated version of SQL variable












0















Resolved - was querying the wrong DB by mistake



sorry for wasting your time! :(





I'm trying to read the results of a series of actions on a SQL variable, this is the query i'm trying to get the value out of:



DECLARE @Count INT = 0 
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table1' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table1)
END
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table2' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table2)
END
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table3' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table3)
END
SELECT @Count


Basically it checks if a bunch of tables (which might not exist) have rows in them.





C# Code



List<string> queries = new List<string>();
foreach (var table in tables)
{
queries.Add(string.Format(@"IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'{0}' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {0})
END", table.Name.Trim()));
}

var queryString = string.Format(@"DECLARE @Count INT = 0 {0} SELECT @Count
GO", string.Join(" ", queries));

using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
connection.Open();
//I also tried these methods using Dapper:
// int count = connection.Query<int>(queryString);
// int count = (int)connection.ExecuteScalar(queryString);

SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(queryString, connection);
using (SqlDataReader dr = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
dt.Load(dr);

//dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it
}
connection.Close();
}




The Problem



The problem is, no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned (in this case 0, but if i change it in the query the change gets reflected in the result).



I'd like for the returned value to be the sum of all these queries:



(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM X) 




What I tried




  1. Searching online i thought it was a scope problem, so i tried running the query with and without SqlCommand parameters, which didn't change the outcome, maybe i'm not searching the right words

  2. Adding 'GO' both after the SET commands and at the end

  3. Trying different ways to parse the data in the ASP.NET application, including using an external library, called Dapper


Putting the query in a stored procedure is not possible unfortunately, anyone has an idea about what to try next? I've been stuck on this for a while...




SQL Server version is SQLServer 2014











share|improve this question




















  • 1





    We need code, please post what you've tried.

    – Barr J
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:57











  • In c# you have two commands 1) Insert 2) Update. When using ExecuteNonQuery() you have to check the return value which is the number of rows affected. If you get a return value of zero it means no rows changed. If you are doing an INSERT it means the key already exists in the table and then you have to use UPDATE to change the existing key value. If you are doing UPDATE it means the key doesn't exist in table and then you have to do a INSERT to put a new key into the table.

    – jdweng
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:02











  • no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned where is this C# you talk of?

    – Liam
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:04











  • I've updated my answer based on the edits...

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:11






  • 1





    Also, make sure you're executing the query on the same database that C# is; wouldn't be the first time I've had someone say "oh, i was testing the query on my prod DB with 4252 rows but I forgot my local debug DB that c# was using is actually empty..."

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:21
















0















Resolved - was querying the wrong DB by mistake



sorry for wasting your time! :(





I'm trying to read the results of a series of actions on a SQL variable, this is the query i'm trying to get the value out of:



DECLARE @Count INT = 0 
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table1' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table1)
END
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table2' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table2)
END
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table3' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table3)
END
SELECT @Count


Basically it checks if a bunch of tables (which might not exist) have rows in them.





C# Code



List<string> queries = new List<string>();
foreach (var table in tables)
{
queries.Add(string.Format(@"IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'{0}' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {0})
END", table.Name.Trim()));
}

var queryString = string.Format(@"DECLARE @Count INT = 0 {0} SELECT @Count
GO", string.Join(" ", queries));

using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
connection.Open();
//I also tried these methods using Dapper:
// int count = connection.Query<int>(queryString);
// int count = (int)connection.ExecuteScalar(queryString);

SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(queryString, connection);
using (SqlDataReader dr = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
dt.Load(dr);

//dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it
}
connection.Close();
}




The Problem



The problem is, no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned (in this case 0, but if i change it in the query the change gets reflected in the result).



I'd like for the returned value to be the sum of all these queries:



(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM X) 




What I tried




  1. Searching online i thought it was a scope problem, so i tried running the query with and without SqlCommand parameters, which didn't change the outcome, maybe i'm not searching the right words

  2. Adding 'GO' both after the SET commands and at the end

  3. Trying different ways to parse the data in the ASP.NET application, including using an external library, called Dapper


Putting the query in a stored procedure is not possible unfortunately, anyone has an idea about what to try next? I've been stuck on this for a while...




SQL Server version is SQLServer 2014











share|improve this question




















  • 1





    We need code, please post what you've tried.

    – Barr J
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:57











  • In c# you have two commands 1) Insert 2) Update. When using ExecuteNonQuery() you have to check the return value which is the number of rows affected. If you get a return value of zero it means no rows changed. If you are doing an INSERT it means the key already exists in the table and then you have to use UPDATE to change the existing key value. If you are doing UPDATE it means the key doesn't exist in table and then you have to do a INSERT to put a new key into the table.

    – jdweng
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:02











  • no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned where is this C# you talk of?

    – Liam
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:04











  • I've updated my answer based on the edits...

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:11






  • 1





    Also, make sure you're executing the query on the same database that C# is; wouldn't be the first time I've had someone say "oh, i was testing the query on my prod DB with 4252 rows but I forgot my local debug DB that c# was using is actually empty..."

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:21














0












0








0








Resolved - was querying the wrong DB by mistake



sorry for wasting your time! :(





I'm trying to read the results of a series of actions on a SQL variable, this is the query i'm trying to get the value out of:



DECLARE @Count INT = 0 
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table1' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table1)
END
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table2' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table2)
END
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table3' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table3)
END
SELECT @Count


Basically it checks if a bunch of tables (which might not exist) have rows in them.





C# Code



List<string> queries = new List<string>();
foreach (var table in tables)
{
queries.Add(string.Format(@"IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'{0}' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {0})
END", table.Name.Trim()));
}

var queryString = string.Format(@"DECLARE @Count INT = 0 {0} SELECT @Count
GO", string.Join(" ", queries));

using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
connection.Open();
//I also tried these methods using Dapper:
// int count = connection.Query<int>(queryString);
// int count = (int)connection.ExecuteScalar(queryString);

SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(queryString, connection);
using (SqlDataReader dr = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
dt.Load(dr);

//dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it
}
connection.Close();
}




The Problem



The problem is, no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned (in this case 0, but if i change it in the query the change gets reflected in the result).



I'd like for the returned value to be the sum of all these queries:



(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM X) 




What I tried




  1. Searching online i thought it was a scope problem, so i tried running the query with and without SqlCommand parameters, which didn't change the outcome, maybe i'm not searching the right words

  2. Adding 'GO' both after the SET commands and at the end

  3. Trying different ways to parse the data in the ASP.NET application, including using an external library, called Dapper


Putting the query in a stored procedure is not possible unfortunately, anyone has an idea about what to try next? I've been stuck on this for a while...




SQL Server version is SQLServer 2014











share|improve this question
















Resolved - was querying the wrong DB by mistake



sorry for wasting your time! :(





I'm trying to read the results of a series of actions on a SQL variable, this is the query i'm trying to get the value out of:



DECLARE @Count INT = 0 
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table1' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table1)
END
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table2' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table2)
END
IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'Table3' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Table3)
END
SELECT @Count


Basically it checks if a bunch of tables (which might not exist) have rows in them.





C# Code



List<string> queries = new List<string>();
foreach (var table in tables)
{
queries.Add(string.Format(@"IF EXISTS(SELECT name FROM sys.sysobjects WHERE Name = N'{0}' AND xtype = N'U')
BEGIN
SET @Count = @Count + (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM {0})
END", table.Name.Trim()));
}

var queryString = string.Format(@"DECLARE @Count INT = 0 {0} SELECT @Count
GO", string.Join(" ", queries));

using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
connection.Open();
//I also tried these methods using Dapper:
// int count = connection.Query<int>(queryString);
// int count = (int)connection.ExecuteScalar(queryString);

SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(queryString, connection);
using (SqlDataReader dr = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
dt.Load(dr);

//dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it
}
connection.Close();
}




The Problem



The problem is, no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned (in this case 0, but if i change it in the query the change gets reflected in the result).



I'd like for the returned value to be the sum of all these queries:



(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM X) 




What I tried




  1. Searching online i thought it was a scope problem, so i tried running the query with and without SqlCommand parameters, which didn't change the outcome, maybe i'm not searching the right words

  2. Adding 'GO' both after the SET commands and at the end

  3. Trying different ways to parse the data in the ASP.NET application, including using an external library, called Dapper


Putting the query in a stored procedure is not possible unfortunately, anyone has an idea about what to try next? I've been stuck on this for a while...




SQL Server version is SQLServer 2014








c# sql sql-server






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '18 at 11:29







HiSpy

















asked Nov 14 '18 at 10:55









HiSpyHiSpy

74




74








  • 1





    We need code, please post what you've tried.

    – Barr J
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:57











  • In c# you have two commands 1) Insert 2) Update. When using ExecuteNonQuery() you have to check the return value which is the number of rows affected. If you get a return value of zero it means no rows changed. If you are doing an INSERT it means the key already exists in the table and then you have to use UPDATE to change the existing key value. If you are doing UPDATE it means the key doesn't exist in table and then you have to do a INSERT to put a new key into the table.

    – jdweng
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:02











  • no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned where is this C# you talk of?

    – Liam
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:04











  • I've updated my answer based on the edits...

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:11






  • 1





    Also, make sure you're executing the query on the same database that C# is; wouldn't be the first time I've had someone say "oh, i was testing the query on my prod DB with 4252 rows but I forgot my local debug DB that c# was using is actually empty..."

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:21














  • 1





    We need code, please post what you've tried.

    – Barr J
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:57











  • In c# you have two commands 1) Insert 2) Update. When using ExecuteNonQuery() you have to check the return value which is the number of rows affected. If you get a return value of zero it means no rows changed. If you are doing an INSERT it means the key already exists in the table and then you have to use UPDATE to change the existing key value. If you are doing UPDATE it means the key doesn't exist in table and then you have to do a INSERT to put a new key into the table.

    – jdweng
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:02











  • no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned where is this C# you talk of?

    – Liam
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:04











  • I've updated my answer based on the edits...

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:11






  • 1





    Also, make sure you're executing the query on the same database that C# is; wouldn't be the first time I've had someone say "oh, i was testing the query on my prod DB with 4252 rows but I forgot my local debug DB that c# was using is actually empty..."

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:21








1




1





We need code, please post what you've tried.

– Barr J
Nov 14 '18 at 10:57





We need code, please post what you've tried.

– Barr J
Nov 14 '18 at 10:57













In c# you have two commands 1) Insert 2) Update. When using ExecuteNonQuery() you have to check the return value which is the number of rows affected. If you get a return value of zero it means no rows changed. If you are doing an INSERT it means the key already exists in the table and then you have to use UPDATE to change the existing key value. If you are doing UPDATE it means the key doesn't exist in table and then you have to do a INSERT to put a new key into the table.

– jdweng
Nov 14 '18 at 11:02





In c# you have two commands 1) Insert 2) Update. When using ExecuteNonQuery() you have to check the return value which is the number of rows affected. If you get a return value of zero it means no rows changed. If you are doing an INSERT it means the key already exists in the table and then you have to use UPDATE to change the existing key value. If you are doing UPDATE it means the key doesn't exist in table and then you have to do a INSERT to put a new key into the table.

– jdweng
Nov 14 '18 at 11:02













no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned where is this C# you talk of?

– Liam
Nov 14 '18 at 11:04





no matter how I try to load the result in C# the original value always gets returned where is this C# you talk of?

– Liam
Nov 14 '18 at 11:04













I've updated my answer based on the edits...

– Marc Gravell
Nov 14 '18 at 11:11





I've updated my answer based on the edits...

– Marc Gravell
Nov 14 '18 at 11:11




1




1





Also, make sure you're executing the query on the same database that C# is; wouldn't be the first time I've had someone say "oh, i was testing the query on my prod DB with 4252 rows but I forgot my local debug DB that c# was using is actually empty..."

– Caius Jard
Nov 14 '18 at 11:21





Also, make sure you're executing the query on the same database that C# is; wouldn't be the first time I've had someone say "oh, i was testing the query on my prod DB with 4252 rows but I forgot my local debug DB that c# was using is actually empty..."

– Caius Jard
Nov 14 '18 at 11:21












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0














Edit to reflect the question edits:



With the change shown, and:



//dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it


then: the answer is zero. You're querying it in an OK way (the DataTable is massively overkill, but... meh), but: the answer is zero.



I'm pretty sure that if you run the same TSQL in SSMS (in the same database, as the same user): you'll get zero there, too.





Ultimately, the key factor here is: how are you returning the value? In this case, you are doing:



SELECT @Count


which means that it is going to be coming back as a results grid - i.e. it is a query; so: as long as you use a query API, you should be fine. This includes ExecuteScalar in ADO.NET, and QuerySingle<int> in dapper (which you mention).



What you can't do is use the return value of ExecuteNonQuery (Execute in dapper), as this is an unrelated value (and is usually wrong and/or empty and/or useless - don't use it pretty much ever).






share|improve this answer


























  • Oh, i dunno.. ExecuteNonQuery on a CRUD is pretty vital for getting optimistic concurrency to work out properly

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:05













  • @CaiusJard nothing wrong with ExecuteNonQuery, but the return value is not guaranteed to be set at all; if you want to know a rowcount, for example, then I would strongly recomment select @@rowcount - or if you really want to use ExecuteNonQuery, set @someOutArg = @@rowcount, or return @@rowcount, which is accessed virtually identically to the @someOutArg API, and is not the return value of ExecuteNonQuery

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:07













  • OK.. Though have you ever run an plain old INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE query and NOT had ExecuteNonQuery return the number of rows affected?

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:12











  • thanks for the reply, unfortunately (int)cmd.ExecuteScalar() still returns 0

    – HiSpy
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:13











  • @CaiusJard yes, very often; a: a lot of places make it standard practice to SET NOCOUNT ON to slightly reduce TDS traffic; b: if tables have triggers, those triggers can cause very confusing results from this

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:14



















0














Try this C# (might have minor syntax errors - didn't write/run it in VS). If you still get 0 out of it, you're querying an empty db:



int count = 0;
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
try{
connection.Open();
foreach (var table in tables)
{

try{
var cmd = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM " + table;
using(var sc as new SqlCommand(cmd, connection)){
count += (int)sc.ExecuteScalar();
}
}
catch {}
}
}finally{
connection.Close();
}
}





share|improve this answer































    -1














    The best way here is to attach your sql to a command, then do



    int retVal = cmd.ExecuteScalar();


    should get the value back fine - it's one of several ways of doing it though.



    ExecuteScalar is for instances where you want to return a single row with a single column, as you have done here.






    share|improve this answer
























    • tried ExecuteScalar, the result is still 0

      – HiSpy
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:19











    • have you confirmed zero is not the value in the variable? Try doing SET @COUNT=1; the line before you SELECT it, as a check.

      – Cato
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:38











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53298550%2fc-sharp-wont-read-updated-version-of-sql-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Edit to reflect the question edits:



    With the change shown, and:



    //dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it


    then: the answer is zero. You're querying it in an OK way (the DataTable is massively overkill, but... meh), but: the answer is zero.



    I'm pretty sure that if you run the same TSQL in SSMS (in the same database, as the same user): you'll get zero there, too.





    Ultimately, the key factor here is: how are you returning the value? In this case, you are doing:



    SELECT @Count


    which means that it is going to be coming back as a results grid - i.e. it is a query; so: as long as you use a query API, you should be fine. This includes ExecuteScalar in ADO.NET, and QuerySingle<int> in dapper (which you mention).



    What you can't do is use the return value of ExecuteNonQuery (Execute in dapper), as this is an unrelated value (and is usually wrong and/or empty and/or useless - don't use it pretty much ever).






    share|improve this answer


























    • Oh, i dunno.. ExecuteNonQuery on a CRUD is pretty vital for getting optimistic concurrency to work out properly

      – Caius Jard
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:05













    • @CaiusJard nothing wrong with ExecuteNonQuery, but the return value is not guaranteed to be set at all; if you want to know a rowcount, for example, then I would strongly recomment select @@rowcount - or if you really want to use ExecuteNonQuery, set @someOutArg = @@rowcount, or return @@rowcount, which is accessed virtually identically to the @someOutArg API, and is not the return value of ExecuteNonQuery

      – Marc Gravell
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:07













    • OK.. Though have you ever run an plain old INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE query and NOT had ExecuteNonQuery return the number of rows affected?

      – Caius Jard
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:12











    • thanks for the reply, unfortunately (int)cmd.ExecuteScalar() still returns 0

      – HiSpy
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:13











    • @CaiusJard yes, very often; a: a lot of places make it standard practice to SET NOCOUNT ON to slightly reduce TDS traffic; b: if tables have triggers, those triggers can cause very confusing results from this

      – Marc Gravell
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:14
















    0














    Edit to reflect the question edits:



    With the change shown, and:



    //dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it


    then: the answer is zero. You're querying it in an OK way (the DataTable is massively overkill, but... meh), but: the answer is zero.



    I'm pretty sure that if you run the same TSQL in SSMS (in the same database, as the same user): you'll get zero there, too.





    Ultimately, the key factor here is: how are you returning the value? In this case, you are doing:



    SELECT @Count


    which means that it is going to be coming back as a results grid - i.e. it is a query; so: as long as you use a query API, you should be fine. This includes ExecuteScalar in ADO.NET, and QuerySingle<int> in dapper (which you mention).



    What you can't do is use the return value of ExecuteNonQuery (Execute in dapper), as this is an unrelated value (and is usually wrong and/or empty and/or useless - don't use it pretty much ever).






    share|improve this answer


























    • Oh, i dunno.. ExecuteNonQuery on a CRUD is pretty vital for getting optimistic concurrency to work out properly

      – Caius Jard
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:05













    • @CaiusJard nothing wrong with ExecuteNonQuery, but the return value is not guaranteed to be set at all; if you want to know a rowcount, for example, then I would strongly recomment select @@rowcount - or if you really want to use ExecuteNonQuery, set @someOutArg = @@rowcount, or return @@rowcount, which is accessed virtually identically to the @someOutArg API, and is not the return value of ExecuteNonQuery

      – Marc Gravell
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:07













    • OK.. Though have you ever run an plain old INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE query and NOT had ExecuteNonQuery return the number of rows affected?

      – Caius Jard
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:12











    • thanks for the reply, unfortunately (int)cmd.ExecuteScalar() still returns 0

      – HiSpy
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:13











    • @CaiusJard yes, very often; a: a lot of places make it standard practice to SET NOCOUNT ON to slightly reduce TDS traffic; b: if tables have triggers, those triggers can cause very confusing results from this

      – Marc Gravell
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:14














    0












    0








    0







    Edit to reflect the question edits:



    With the change shown, and:



    //dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it


    then: the answer is zero. You're querying it in an OK way (the DataTable is massively overkill, but... meh), but: the answer is zero.



    I'm pretty sure that if you run the same TSQL in SSMS (in the same database, as the same user): you'll get zero there, too.





    Ultimately, the key factor here is: how are you returning the value? In this case, you are doing:



    SELECT @Count


    which means that it is going to be coming back as a results grid - i.e. it is a query; so: as long as you use a query API, you should be fine. This includes ExecuteScalar in ADO.NET, and QuerySingle<int> in dapper (which you mention).



    What you can't do is use the return value of ExecuteNonQuery (Execute in dapper), as this is an unrelated value (and is usually wrong and/or empty and/or useless - don't use it pretty much ever).






    share|improve this answer















    Edit to reflect the question edits:



    With the change shown, and:



    //dt has one row where the data is 0, not the sum as i want it


    then: the answer is zero. You're querying it in an OK way (the DataTable is massively overkill, but... meh), but: the answer is zero.



    I'm pretty sure that if you run the same TSQL in SSMS (in the same database, as the same user): you'll get zero there, too.





    Ultimately, the key factor here is: how are you returning the value? In this case, you are doing:



    SELECT @Count


    which means that it is going to be coming back as a results grid - i.e. it is a query; so: as long as you use a query API, you should be fine. This includes ExecuteScalar in ADO.NET, and QuerySingle<int> in dapper (which you mention).



    What you can't do is use the return value of ExecuteNonQuery (Execute in dapper), as this is an unrelated value (and is usually wrong and/or empty and/or useless - don't use it pretty much ever).







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 14 '18 at 11:12

























    answered Nov 14 '18 at 11:02









    Marc GravellMarc Gravell

    783k19521402547




    783k19521402547













    • Oh, i dunno.. ExecuteNonQuery on a CRUD is pretty vital for getting optimistic concurrency to work out properly

      – Caius Jard
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:05













    • @CaiusJard nothing wrong with ExecuteNonQuery, but the return value is not guaranteed to be set at all; if you want to know a rowcount, for example, then I would strongly recomment select @@rowcount - or if you really want to use ExecuteNonQuery, set @someOutArg = @@rowcount, or return @@rowcount, which is accessed virtually identically to the @someOutArg API, and is not the return value of ExecuteNonQuery

      – Marc Gravell
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:07













    • OK.. Though have you ever run an plain old INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE query and NOT had ExecuteNonQuery return the number of rows affected?

      – Caius Jard
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:12











    • thanks for the reply, unfortunately (int)cmd.ExecuteScalar() still returns 0

      – HiSpy
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:13











    • @CaiusJard yes, very often; a: a lot of places make it standard practice to SET NOCOUNT ON to slightly reduce TDS traffic; b: if tables have triggers, those triggers can cause very confusing results from this

      – Marc Gravell
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:14



















    • Oh, i dunno.. ExecuteNonQuery on a CRUD is pretty vital for getting optimistic concurrency to work out properly

      – Caius Jard
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:05













    • @CaiusJard nothing wrong with ExecuteNonQuery, but the return value is not guaranteed to be set at all; if you want to know a rowcount, for example, then I would strongly recomment select @@rowcount - or if you really want to use ExecuteNonQuery, set @someOutArg = @@rowcount, or return @@rowcount, which is accessed virtually identically to the @someOutArg API, and is not the return value of ExecuteNonQuery

      – Marc Gravell
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:07













    • OK.. Though have you ever run an plain old INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE query and NOT had ExecuteNonQuery return the number of rows affected?

      – Caius Jard
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:12











    • thanks for the reply, unfortunately (int)cmd.ExecuteScalar() still returns 0

      – HiSpy
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:13











    • @CaiusJard yes, very often; a: a lot of places make it standard practice to SET NOCOUNT ON to slightly reduce TDS traffic; b: if tables have triggers, those triggers can cause very confusing results from this

      – Marc Gravell
      Nov 14 '18 at 11:14

















    Oh, i dunno.. ExecuteNonQuery on a CRUD is pretty vital for getting optimistic concurrency to work out properly

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:05







    Oh, i dunno.. ExecuteNonQuery on a CRUD is pretty vital for getting optimistic concurrency to work out properly

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:05















    @CaiusJard nothing wrong with ExecuteNonQuery, but the return value is not guaranteed to be set at all; if you want to know a rowcount, for example, then I would strongly recomment select @@rowcount - or if you really want to use ExecuteNonQuery, set @someOutArg = @@rowcount, or return @@rowcount, which is accessed virtually identically to the @someOutArg API, and is not the return value of ExecuteNonQuery

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:07







    @CaiusJard nothing wrong with ExecuteNonQuery, but the return value is not guaranteed to be set at all; if you want to know a rowcount, for example, then I would strongly recomment select @@rowcount - or if you really want to use ExecuteNonQuery, set @someOutArg = @@rowcount, or return @@rowcount, which is accessed virtually identically to the @someOutArg API, and is not the return value of ExecuteNonQuery

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:07















    OK.. Though have you ever run an plain old INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE query and NOT had ExecuteNonQuery return the number of rows affected?

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:12





    OK.. Though have you ever run an plain old INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE query and NOT had ExecuteNonQuery return the number of rows affected?

    – Caius Jard
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:12













    thanks for the reply, unfortunately (int)cmd.ExecuteScalar() still returns 0

    – HiSpy
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:13





    thanks for the reply, unfortunately (int)cmd.ExecuteScalar() still returns 0

    – HiSpy
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:13













    @CaiusJard yes, very often; a: a lot of places make it standard practice to SET NOCOUNT ON to slightly reduce TDS traffic; b: if tables have triggers, those triggers can cause very confusing results from this

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:14





    @CaiusJard yes, very often; a: a lot of places make it standard practice to SET NOCOUNT ON to slightly reduce TDS traffic; b: if tables have triggers, those triggers can cause very confusing results from this

    – Marc Gravell
    Nov 14 '18 at 11:14













    0














    Try this C# (might have minor syntax errors - didn't write/run it in VS). If you still get 0 out of it, you're querying an empty db:



    int count = 0;
    using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
    {
    try{
    connection.Open();
    foreach (var table in tables)
    {

    try{
    var cmd = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM " + table;
    using(var sc as new SqlCommand(cmd, connection)){
    count += (int)sc.ExecuteScalar();
    }
    }
    catch {}
    }
    }finally{
    connection.Close();
    }
    }





    share|improve this answer




























      0














      Try this C# (might have minor syntax errors - didn't write/run it in VS). If you still get 0 out of it, you're querying an empty db:



      int count = 0;
      using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
      {
      try{
      connection.Open();
      foreach (var table in tables)
      {

      try{
      var cmd = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM " + table;
      using(var sc as new SqlCommand(cmd, connection)){
      count += (int)sc.ExecuteScalar();
      }
      }
      catch {}
      }
      }finally{
      connection.Close();
      }
      }





      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        Try this C# (might have minor syntax errors - didn't write/run it in VS). If you still get 0 out of it, you're querying an empty db:



        int count = 0;
        using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
        {
        try{
        connection.Open();
        foreach (var table in tables)
        {

        try{
        var cmd = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM " + table;
        using(var sc as new SqlCommand(cmd, connection)){
        count += (int)sc.ExecuteScalar();
        }
        }
        catch {}
        }
        }finally{
        connection.Close();
        }
        }





        share|improve this answer













        Try this C# (might have minor syntax errors - didn't write/run it in VS). If you still get 0 out of it, you're querying an empty db:



        int count = 0;
        using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
        {
        try{
        connection.Open();
        foreach (var table in tables)
        {

        try{
        var cmd = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM " + table;
        using(var sc as new SqlCommand(cmd, connection)){
        count += (int)sc.ExecuteScalar();
        }
        }
        catch {}
        }
        }finally{
        connection.Close();
        }
        }






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 14 '18 at 11:34









        Caius JardCaius Jard

        11.6k21239




        11.6k21239























            -1














            The best way here is to attach your sql to a command, then do



            int retVal = cmd.ExecuteScalar();


            should get the value back fine - it's one of several ways of doing it though.



            ExecuteScalar is for instances where you want to return a single row with a single column, as you have done here.






            share|improve this answer
























            • tried ExecuteScalar, the result is still 0

              – HiSpy
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:19











            • have you confirmed zero is not the value in the variable? Try doing SET @COUNT=1; the line before you SELECT it, as a check.

              – Cato
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:38
















            -1














            The best way here is to attach your sql to a command, then do



            int retVal = cmd.ExecuteScalar();


            should get the value back fine - it's one of several ways of doing it though.



            ExecuteScalar is for instances where you want to return a single row with a single column, as you have done here.






            share|improve this answer
























            • tried ExecuteScalar, the result is still 0

              – HiSpy
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:19











            • have you confirmed zero is not the value in the variable? Try doing SET @COUNT=1; the line before you SELECT it, as a check.

              – Cato
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:38














            -1












            -1








            -1







            The best way here is to attach your sql to a command, then do



            int retVal = cmd.ExecuteScalar();


            should get the value back fine - it's one of several ways of doing it though.



            ExecuteScalar is for instances where you want to return a single row with a single column, as you have done here.






            share|improve this answer













            The best way here is to attach your sql to a command, then do



            int retVal = cmd.ExecuteScalar();


            should get the value back fine - it's one of several ways of doing it though.



            ExecuteScalar is for instances where you want to return a single row with a single column, as you have done here.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 14 '18 at 11:03









            CatoCato

            2,912210




            2,912210













            • tried ExecuteScalar, the result is still 0

              – HiSpy
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:19











            • have you confirmed zero is not the value in the variable? Try doing SET @COUNT=1; the line before you SELECT it, as a check.

              – Cato
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:38



















            • tried ExecuteScalar, the result is still 0

              – HiSpy
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:19











            • have you confirmed zero is not the value in the variable? Try doing SET @COUNT=1; the line before you SELECT it, as a check.

              – Cato
              Nov 14 '18 at 11:38

















            tried ExecuteScalar, the result is still 0

            – HiSpy
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:19





            tried ExecuteScalar, the result is still 0

            – HiSpy
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:19













            have you confirmed zero is not the value in the variable? Try doing SET @COUNT=1; the line before you SELECT it, as a check.

            – Cato
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:38





            have you confirmed zero is not the value in the variable? Try doing SET @COUNT=1; the line before you SELECT it, as a check.

            – Cato
            Nov 14 '18 at 11:38


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53298550%2fc-sharp-wont-read-updated-version-of-sql-variable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

            Glorious Revolution

            Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python