C# Need advice on reading large Excel workbook












-1















My program is required to read a large Excel workbook which has 4-5 sheets with roughly 35000 cells. The biggest problem that almost every cell is linked to cell in other large workbooks in a computer network.



It's is also required that user chooses a sheet to read data from first.



I tried Excel Interop, but the program just freezes while trying to open a workbook.










share|improve this question























  • Try "Syncfusion". .

    – Waleed Naveed
    Oct 24 '18 at 10:45











  • I got good results with NPOI and it is Open Source.

    – Marc Forment
    Oct 24 '18 at 10:47











  • I would consider re-engineering the entire solution. This should like a perfect case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." It's impossible to suggest a solution without knowing more about your process and content, but I think your best bet in most case would be to stage the data from the spreadsheet somewhere else (like a DBMS) and mine it from there.

    – Hambone
    Oct 24 '18 at 18:13











  • How are you reading the book? If you are looping over all cells and calling Value each time, the performance will be horrendous. Try reading the range into an array by calling Value on the range, then readin the values from the array.

    – D Stanley
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:59


















-1















My program is required to read a large Excel workbook which has 4-5 sheets with roughly 35000 cells. The biggest problem that almost every cell is linked to cell in other large workbooks in a computer network.



It's is also required that user chooses a sheet to read data from first.



I tried Excel Interop, but the program just freezes while trying to open a workbook.










share|improve this question























  • Try "Syncfusion". .

    – Waleed Naveed
    Oct 24 '18 at 10:45











  • I got good results with NPOI and it is Open Source.

    – Marc Forment
    Oct 24 '18 at 10:47











  • I would consider re-engineering the entire solution. This should like a perfect case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." It's impossible to suggest a solution without knowing more about your process and content, but I think your best bet in most case would be to stage the data from the spreadsheet somewhere else (like a DBMS) and mine it from there.

    – Hambone
    Oct 24 '18 at 18:13











  • How are you reading the book? If you are looping over all cells and calling Value each time, the performance will be horrendous. Try reading the range into an array by calling Value on the range, then readin the values from the array.

    – D Stanley
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:59
















-1












-1








-1








My program is required to read a large Excel workbook which has 4-5 sheets with roughly 35000 cells. The biggest problem that almost every cell is linked to cell in other large workbooks in a computer network.



It's is also required that user chooses a sheet to read data from first.



I tried Excel Interop, but the program just freezes while trying to open a workbook.










share|improve this question














My program is required to read a large Excel workbook which has 4-5 sheets with roughly 35000 cells. The biggest problem that almost every cell is linked to cell in other large workbooks in a computer network.



It's is also required that user chooses a sheet to read data from first.



I tried Excel Interop, but the program just freezes while trying to open a workbook.







c# excel interop






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Oct 24 '18 at 10:42









TechnicalTechnical

376




376













  • Try "Syncfusion". .

    – Waleed Naveed
    Oct 24 '18 at 10:45











  • I got good results with NPOI and it is Open Source.

    – Marc Forment
    Oct 24 '18 at 10:47











  • I would consider re-engineering the entire solution. This should like a perfect case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." It's impossible to suggest a solution without knowing more about your process and content, but I think your best bet in most case would be to stage the data from the spreadsheet somewhere else (like a DBMS) and mine it from there.

    – Hambone
    Oct 24 '18 at 18:13











  • How are you reading the book? If you are looping over all cells and calling Value each time, the performance will be horrendous. Try reading the range into an array by calling Value on the range, then readin the values from the array.

    – D Stanley
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:59





















  • Try "Syncfusion". .

    – Waleed Naveed
    Oct 24 '18 at 10:45











  • I got good results with NPOI and it is Open Source.

    – Marc Forment
    Oct 24 '18 at 10:47











  • I would consider re-engineering the entire solution. This should like a perfect case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." It's impossible to suggest a solution without knowing more about your process and content, but I think your best bet in most case would be to stage the data from the spreadsheet somewhere else (like a DBMS) and mine it from there.

    – Hambone
    Oct 24 '18 at 18:13











  • How are you reading the book? If you are looping over all cells and calling Value each time, the performance will be horrendous. Try reading the range into an array by calling Value on the range, then readin the values from the array.

    – D Stanley
    Nov 14 '18 at 16:59



















Try "Syncfusion". .

– Waleed Naveed
Oct 24 '18 at 10:45





Try "Syncfusion". .

– Waleed Naveed
Oct 24 '18 at 10:45













I got good results with NPOI and it is Open Source.

– Marc Forment
Oct 24 '18 at 10:47





I got good results with NPOI and it is Open Source.

– Marc Forment
Oct 24 '18 at 10:47













I would consider re-engineering the entire solution. This should like a perfect case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." It's impossible to suggest a solution without knowing more about your process and content, but I think your best bet in most case would be to stage the data from the spreadsheet somewhere else (like a DBMS) and mine it from there.

– Hambone
Oct 24 '18 at 18:13





I would consider re-engineering the entire solution. This should like a perfect case of "just because you can, doesn't mean you should." It's impossible to suggest a solution without knowing more about your process and content, but I think your best bet in most case would be to stage the data from the spreadsheet somewhere else (like a DBMS) and mine it from there.

– Hambone
Oct 24 '18 at 18:13













How are you reading the book? If you are looping over all cells and calling Value each time, the performance will be horrendous. Try reading the range into an array by calling Value on the range, then readin the values from the array.

– D Stanley
Nov 14 '18 at 16:59







How are you reading the book? If you are looping over all cells and calling Value each time, the performance will be horrendous. Try reading the range into an array by calling Value on the range, then readin the values from the array.

– D Stanley
Nov 14 '18 at 16:59














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Try ClosedXML: https://github.com/closedxml/closedxml This doesn't solve the size problem but I don't know of anything that will except using a database.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52966943%2fc-sharp-need-advice-on-reading-large-excel-workbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Try ClosedXML: https://github.com/closedxml/closedxml This doesn't solve the size problem but I don't know of anything that will except using a database.






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      Try ClosedXML: https://github.com/closedxml/closedxml This doesn't solve the size problem but I don't know of anything that will except using a database.






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        Try ClosedXML: https://github.com/closedxml/closedxml This doesn't solve the size problem but I don't know of anything that will except using a database.






        share|improve this answer













        Try ClosedXML: https://github.com/closedxml/closedxml This doesn't solve the size problem but I don't know of anything that will except using a database.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 14 '18 at 16:49









        Clayton HarbichClayton Harbich

        272413




        272413
































            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f52966943%2fc-sharp-need-advice-on-reading-large-excel-workbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bressuire

            Vorschmack

            Quarantine