Error: “Package is declared 'javafx.beans.value' in module 'foo.bar'”











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I've developed a library which module-info.java looks like that:



module foo.bar {
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;
requires javafx.base;
requires java.validation;
exports foo.bar;
}


This library is used in another project where the module-info.java contains the following:



module other.project {
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;
requires javafx.base;
requires javafx.graphics;
requires javafx.fxml;
requires foo.bar;
}


When I try to use import javafx.beans.value.WritableValue; I get the error




Package javafx.beans.value is declared in foo.bar, which does not
export it to module other.project.




UPDATE: I created two example projects which reproduce the problem. Please find them here to download.



I do not understand why that is and yet I could not find a solution.










share|improve this question
























  • Can you post the full exception? Did you manage to get each of the modules running standalone, without having dependencies between them?
    – José Pereda
    Nov 11 at 13:35










  • @JoséPereda I do not get an exception as such, it is just a info provided by IDEA - please see img.picload.org/image/dcoogipr/snippet.png
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:05










  • And did you try your modules as standalone? Do you build/run them normally?
    – José Pereda
    Nov 11 at 14:13










  • module 'foo.bar' works stand-alone, the other one I cannot test since 'foo.bar' is a strict dependency.
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:21






  • 1




    Yes, the HelloFX works fine for me. As soon as I remove the dependency of my other lib I can use the JFX libs. But apparently there is a problem if both my project and the external lib requires the same external module.
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:51















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I've developed a library which module-info.java looks like that:



module foo.bar {
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;
requires javafx.base;
requires java.validation;
exports foo.bar;
}


This library is used in another project where the module-info.java contains the following:



module other.project {
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;
requires javafx.base;
requires javafx.graphics;
requires javafx.fxml;
requires foo.bar;
}


When I try to use import javafx.beans.value.WritableValue; I get the error




Package javafx.beans.value is declared in foo.bar, which does not
export it to module other.project.




UPDATE: I created two example projects which reproduce the problem. Please find them here to download.



I do not understand why that is and yet I could not find a solution.










share|improve this question
























  • Can you post the full exception? Did you manage to get each of the modules running standalone, without having dependencies between them?
    – José Pereda
    Nov 11 at 13:35










  • @JoséPereda I do not get an exception as such, it is just a info provided by IDEA - please see img.picload.org/image/dcoogipr/snippet.png
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:05










  • And did you try your modules as standalone? Do you build/run them normally?
    – José Pereda
    Nov 11 at 14:13










  • module 'foo.bar' works stand-alone, the other one I cannot test since 'foo.bar' is a strict dependency.
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:21






  • 1




    Yes, the HelloFX works fine for me. As soon as I remove the dependency of my other lib I can use the JFX libs. But apparently there is a problem if both my project and the external lib requires the same external module.
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:51













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I've developed a library which module-info.java looks like that:



module foo.bar {
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;
requires javafx.base;
requires java.validation;
exports foo.bar;
}


This library is used in another project where the module-info.java contains the following:



module other.project {
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;
requires javafx.base;
requires javafx.graphics;
requires javafx.fxml;
requires foo.bar;
}


When I try to use import javafx.beans.value.WritableValue; I get the error




Package javafx.beans.value is declared in foo.bar, which does not
export it to module other.project.




UPDATE: I created two example projects which reproduce the problem. Please find them here to download.



I do not understand why that is and yet I could not find a solution.










share|improve this question















I've developed a library which module-info.java looks like that:



module foo.bar {
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;
requires javafx.base;
requires java.validation;
exports foo.bar;
}


This library is used in another project where the module-info.java contains the following:



module other.project {
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;
requires javafx.base;
requires javafx.graphics;
requires javafx.fxml;
requires foo.bar;
}


When I try to use import javafx.beans.value.WritableValue; I get the error




Package javafx.beans.value is declared in foo.bar, which does not
export it to module other.project.




UPDATE: I created two example projects which reproduce the problem. Please find them here to download.



I do not understand why that is and yet I could not find a solution.







java java-module jigsaw java-11 javafx-11






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 at 20:58

























asked Nov 11 at 12:28









Hannes

1,50951728




1,50951728












  • Can you post the full exception? Did you manage to get each of the modules running standalone, without having dependencies between them?
    – José Pereda
    Nov 11 at 13:35










  • @JoséPereda I do not get an exception as such, it is just a info provided by IDEA - please see img.picload.org/image/dcoogipr/snippet.png
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:05










  • And did you try your modules as standalone? Do you build/run them normally?
    – José Pereda
    Nov 11 at 14:13










  • module 'foo.bar' works stand-alone, the other one I cannot test since 'foo.bar' is a strict dependency.
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:21






  • 1




    Yes, the HelloFX works fine for me. As soon as I remove the dependency of my other lib I can use the JFX libs. But apparently there is a problem if both my project and the external lib requires the same external module.
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:51


















  • Can you post the full exception? Did you manage to get each of the modules running standalone, without having dependencies between them?
    – José Pereda
    Nov 11 at 13:35










  • @JoséPereda I do not get an exception as such, it is just a info provided by IDEA - please see img.picload.org/image/dcoogipr/snippet.png
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:05










  • And did you try your modules as standalone? Do you build/run them normally?
    – José Pereda
    Nov 11 at 14:13










  • module 'foo.bar' works stand-alone, the other one I cannot test since 'foo.bar' is a strict dependency.
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:21






  • 1




    Yes, the HelloFX works fine for me. As soon as I remove the dependency of my other lib I can use the JFX libs. But apparently there is a problem if both my project and the external lib requires the same external module.
    – Hannes
    Nov 11 at 14:51
















Can you post the full exception? Did you manage to get each of the modules running standalone, without having dependencies between them?
– José Pereda
Nov 11 at 13:35




Can you post the full exception? Did you manage to get each of the modules running standalone, without having dependencies between them?
– José Pereda
Nov 11 at 13:35












@JoséPereda I do not get an exception as such, it is just a info provided by IDEA - please see img.picload.org/image/dcoogipr/snippet.png
– Hannes
Nov 11 at 14:05




@JoséPereda I do not get an exception as such, it is just a info provided by IDEA - please see img.picload.org/image/dcoogipr/snippet.png
– Hannes
Nov 11 at 14:05












And did you try your modules as standalone? Do you build/run them normally?
– José Pereda
Nov 11 at 14:13




And did you try your modules as standalone? Do you build/run them normally?
– José Pereda
Nov 11 at 14:13












module 'foo.bar' works stand-alone, the other one I cannot test since 'foo.bar' is a strict dependency.
– Hannes
Nov 11 at 14:21




module 'foo.bar' works stand-alone, the other one I cannot test since 'foo.bar' is a strict dependency.
– Hannes
Nov 11 at 14:21




1




1




Yes, the HelloFX works fine for me. As soon as I remove the dependency of my other lib I can use the JFX libs. But apparently there is a problem if both my project and the external lib requires the same external module.
– Hannes
Nov 11 at 14:51




Yes, the HelloFX works fine for me. As soon as I remove the dependency of my other lib I can use the JFX libs. But apparently there is a problem if both my project and the external lib requires the same external module.
– Hannes
Nov 11 at 14:51












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted
+100










Based on the project posted here, the error that you get when you open the project is:




Package 'javafx.beans.property' is declared in module 'com.example.external.lib', which does not export it to module 'example.project'




The reason for this error is that you are adding some packages from javafx.base to your external library, but those are not exported to the project that uses this library. The javafx.beans.property package is internally used by the external module, but it can't be exported.



So these are some proposed changes to make it work.



If you are creating a modular jar (using a module-info class) as a dependency for another project, you don't need to use the shadow plugin, and you don't need to bundle the JavaFX dependencies in your jars.




  1. External-library project


So you can have the same module-info.java file:



module com.example.external.lib {
requires javafx.base;
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;

exports com.example.external.library;
}


with a build.gradle like this:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


Now, when you run gradle build, you will generate libs/external-library.jar, a 2 KB jar, without JavaFX dependencies.



Note that if you still want to do shadow jar with this external project, you can use compileOnly "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform" to keep the JavaFX dependencies out of this jar.




  1. Project-using-external-lib


You can add that jar to the project.



build.gradle:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


But now your module-info file should include again the javafx.base dependency:



module example.project {
requires javafx.base;
requires com.example.external.lib;

exports com.example.project;
}


You can run gradle build to generate a jar, and IntelliJ won't complain anymore.



If you want to have a shadow jar at the end, you can also apply:



buildscript {
repositories {
mavenCentral()
maven {
url "https://plugins.gradle.org/m2/"
}
}
dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'application'
apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

run {
doFirst {
jvmArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

mainClassName = "com.example.project.PublicClass"

jar {
manifest {
attributes 'Main-Class': 'com.example.project.PublicClass'
}
from {
configurations.compile.collect { it.isDirectory() ? it : zipTree(it) }
}
}


so you would be able to run java -jar build/libs/project-using-external-lib.jar. Note that this jar will contain the JavaFX classes.



Doing a shadow jar is not to the recommended way to distribute your project, but since you have automatic modules (commons-lang3) you can't use jlink, unless you convert that into an explicit module (see this answer).






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your answer - that worked out for me on the small example project. But I am not quite sure how to progress with my large codebase depending on a larger number of external libraries which have not been modularized yet. Any thoughts on that? I opened another question regarding this: stackoverflow.com/questions/53314512/…
    – Hannes
    Nov 18 at 22:09










  • I'd say you can do a combination of a fat jar for all non-modular dependencies, with a custom JRE with all the modular dependencies via jlink. Jpackager is around the corner, and that will allow creating an installer for your app, no matter if it has non-modular dependencies. Internally, by the way, is uses jlink, so it works pretty much as I described before.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:40










  • As mentioned at the end of my answer, there are also some "tricky" ways to generate modules out of non modular jars. See this, and this repo. This might help you to modularize jars that won't be ever modularized.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:48












  • Well, I believe I am stuck ... that tricky way is nice if you have one or two dependencies but it is not possible to maintain that for a larger amount of libraries. Is there any roadmap if and when jpacker will be available?
    – Hannes
    Nov 20 at 11:52










  • There is a JEP for it, the initial target is Java 12, but it might not make it on time. Anyway, Gluon is working on a ea release for Java 11.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 20 at 12:06











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53248763%2ferror-package-is-declared-javafx-beans-value-in-module-foo-bar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted
+100










Based on the project posted here, the error that you get when you open the project is:




Package 'javafx.beans.property' is declared in module 'com.example.external.lib', which does not export it to module 'example.project'




The reason for this error is that you are adding some packages from javafx.base to your external library, but those are not exported to the project that uses this library. The javafx.beans.property package is internally used by the external module, but it can't be exported.



So these are some proposed changes to make it work.



If you are creating a modular jar (using a module-info class) as a dependency for another project, you don't need to use the shadow plugin, and you don't need to bundle the JavaFX dependencies in your jars.




  1. External-library project


So you can have the same module-info.java file:



module com.example.external.lib {
requires javafx.base;
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;

exports com.example.external.library;
}


with a build.gradle like this:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


Now, when you run gradle build, you will generate libs/external-library.jar, a 2 KB jar, without JavaFX dependencies.



Note that if you still want to do shadow jar with this external project, you can use compileOnly "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform" to keep the JavaFX dependencies out of this jar.




  1. Project-using-external-lib


You can add that jar to the project.



build.gradle:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


But now your module-info file should include again the javafx.base dependency:



module example.project {
requires javafx.base;
requires com.example.external.lib;

exports com.example.project;
}


You can run gradle build to generate a jar, and IntelliJ won't complain anymore.



If you want to have a shadow jar at the end, you can also apply:



buildscript {
repositories {
mavenCentral()
maven {
url "https://plugins.gradle.org/m2/"
}
}
dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'application'
apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

run {
doFirst {
jvmArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

mainClassName = "com.example.project.PublicClass"

jar {
manifest {
attributes 'Main-Class': 'com.example.project.PublicClass'
}
from {
configurations.compile.collect { it.isDirectory() ? it : zipTree(it) }
}
}


so you would be able to run java -jar build/libs/project-using-external-lib.jar. Note that this jar will contain the JavaFX classes.



Doing a shadow jar is not to the recommended way to distribute your project, but since you have automatic modules (commons-lang3) you can't use jlink, unless you convert that into an explicit module (see this answer).






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your answer - that worked out for me on the small example project. But I am not quite sure how to progress with my large codebase depending on a larger number of external libraries which have not been modularized yet. Any thoughts on that? I opened another question regarding this: stackoverflow.com/questions/53314512/…
    – Hannes
    Nov 18 at 22:09










  • I'd say you can do a combination of a fat jar for all non-modular dependencies, with a custom JRE with all the modular dependencies via jlink. Jpackager is around the corner, and that will allow creating an installer for your app, no matter if it has non-modular dependencies. Internally, by the way, is uses jlink, so it works pretty much as I described before.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:40










  • As mentioned at the end of my answer, there are also some "tricky" ways to generate modules out of non modular jars. See this, and this repo. This might help you to modularize jars that won't be ever modularized.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:48












  • Well, I believe I am stuck ... that tricky way is nice if you have one or two dependencies but it is not possible to maintain that for a larger amount of libraries. Is there any roadmap if and when jpacker will be available?
    – Hannes
    Nov 20 at 11:52










  • There is a JEP for it, the initial target is Java 12, but it might not make it on time. Anyway, Gluon is working on a ea release for Java 11.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 20 at 12:06















up vote
2
down vote



accepted
+100










Based on the project posted here, the error that you get when you open the project is:




Package 'javafx.beans.property' is declared in module 'com.example.external.lib', which does not export it to module 'example.project'




The reason for this error is that you are adding some packages from javafx.base to your external library, but those are not exported to the project that uses this library. The javafx.beans.property package is internally used by the external module, but it can't be exported.



So these are some proposed changes to make it work.



If you are creating a modular jar (using a module-info class) as a dependency for another project, you don't need to use the shadow plugin, and you don't need to bundle the JavaFX dependencies in your jars.




  1. External-library project


So you can have the same module-info.java file:



module com.example.external.lib {
requires javafx.base;
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;

exports com.example.external.library;
}


with a build.gradle like this:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


Now, when you run gradle build, you will generate libs/external-library.jar, a 2 KB jar, without JavaFX dependencies.



Note that if you still want to do shadow jar with this external project, you can use compileOnly "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform" to keep the JavaFX dependencies out of this jar.




  1. Project-using-external-lib


You can add that jar to the project.



build.gradle:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


But now your module-info file should include again the javafx.base dependency:



module example.project {
requires javafx.base;
requires com.example.external.lib;

exports com.example.project;
}


You can run gradle build to generate a jar, and IntelliJ won't complain anymore.



If you want to have a shadow jar at the end, you can also apply:



buildscript {
repositories {
mavenCentral()
maven {
url "https://plugins.gradle.org/m2/"
}
}
dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'application'
apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

run {
doFirst {
jvmArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

mainClassName = "com.example.project.PublicClass"

jar {
manifest {
attributes 'Main-Class': 'com.example.project.PublicClass'
}
from {
configurations.compile.collect { it.isDirectory() ? it : zipTree(it) }
}
}


so you would be able to run java -jar build/libs/project-using-external-lib.jar. Note that this jar will contain the JavaFX classes.



Doing a shadow jar is not to the recommended way to distribute your project, but since you have automatic modules (commons-lang3) you can't use jlink, unless you convert that into an explicit module (see this answer).






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your answer - that worked out for me on the small example project. But I am not quite sure how to progress with my large codebase depending on a larger number of external libraries which have not been modularized yet. Any thoughts on that? I opened another question regarding this: stackoverflow.com/questions/53314512/…
    – Hannes
    Nov 18 at 22:09










  • I'd say you can do a combination of a fat jar for all non-modular dependencies, with a custom JRE with all the modular dependencies via jlink. Jpackager is around the corner, and that will allow creating an installer for your app, no matter if it has non-modular dependencies. Internally, by the way, is uses jlink, so it works pretty much as I described before.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:40










  • As mentioned at the end of my answer, there are also some "tricky" ways to generate modules out of non modular jars. See this, and this repo. This might help you to modularize jars that won't be ever modularized.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:48












  • Well, I believe I am stuck ... that tricky way is nice if you have one or two dependencies but it is not possible to maintain that for a larger amount of libraries. Is there any roadmap if and when jpacker will be available?
    – Hannes
    Nov 20 at 11:52










  • There is a JEP for it, the initial target is Java 12, but it might not make it on time. Anyway, Gluon is working on a ea release for Java 11.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 20 at 12:06













up vote
2
down vote



accepted
+100







up vote
2
down vote



accepted
+100




+100




Based on the project posted here, the error that you get when you open the project is:




Package 'javafx.beans.property' is declared in module 'com.example.external.lib', which does not export it to module 'example.project'




The reason for this error is that you are adding some packages from javafx.base to your external library, but those are not exported to the project that uses this library. The javafx.beans.property package is internally used by the external module, but it can't be exported.



So these are some proposed changes to make it work.



If you are creating a modular jar (using a module-info class) as a dependency for another project, you don't need to use the shadow plugin, and you don't need to bundle the JavaFX dependencies in your jars.




  1. External-library project


So you can have the same module-info.java file:



module com.example.external.lib {
requires javafx.base;
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;

exports com.example.external.library;
}


with a build.gradle like this:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


Now, when you run gradle build, you will generate libs/external-library.jar, a 2 KB jar, without JavaFX dependencies.



Note that if you still want to do shadow jar with this external project, you can use compileOnly "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform" to keep the JavaFX dependencies out of this jar.




  1. Project-using-external-lib


You can add that jar to the project.



build.gradle:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


But now your module-info file should include again the javafx.base dependency:



module example.project {
requires javafx.base;
requires com.example.external.lib;

exports com.example.project;
}


You can run gradle build to generate a jar, and IntelliJ won't complain anymore.



If you want to have a shadow jar at the end, you can also apply:



buildscript {
repositories {
mavenCentral()
maven {
url "https://plugins.gradle.org/m2/"
}
}
dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'application'
apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

run {
doFirst {
jvmArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

mainClassName = "com.example.project.PublicClass"

jar {
manifest {
attributes 'Main-Class': 'com.example.project.PublicClass'
}
from {
configurations.compile.collect { it.isDirectory() ? it : zipTree(it) }
}
}


so you would be able to run java -jar build/libs/project-using-external-lib.jar. Note that this jar will contain the JavaFX classes.



Doing a shadow jar is not to the recommended way to distribute your project, but since you have automatic modules (commons-lang3) you can't use jlink, unless you convert that into an explicit module (see this answer).






share|improve this answer














Based on the project posted here, the error that you get when you open the project is:




Package 'javafx.beans.property' is declared in module 'com.example.external.lib', which does not export it to module 'example.project'




The reason for this error is that you are adding some packages from javafx.base to your external library, but those are not exported to the project that uses this library. The javafx.beans.property package is internally used by the external module, but it can't be exported.



So these are some proposed changes to make it work.



If you are creating a modular jar (using a module-info class) as a dependency for another project, you don't need to use the shadow plugin, and you don't need to bundle the JavaFX dependencies in your jars.




  1. External-library project


So you can have the same module-info.java file:



module com.example.external.lib {
requires javafx.base;
requires org.apache.commons.lang3;

exports com.example.external.library;
}


with a build.gradle like this:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


Now, when you run gradle build, you will generate libs/external-library.jar, a 2 KB jar, without JavaFX dependencies.



Note that if you still want to do shadow jar with this external project, you can use compileOnly "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform" to keep the JavaFX dependencies out of this jar.




  1. Project-using-external-lib


You can add that jar to the project.



build.gradle:



buildscript {
repositories {
jcenter()
}

dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'
apply plugin: 'java'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}


But now your module-info file should include again the javafx.base dependency:



module example.project {
requires javafx.base;
requires com.example.external.lib;

exports com.example.project;
}


You can run gradle build to generate a jar, and IntelliJ won't complain anymore.



If you want to have a shadow jar at the end, you can also apply:



buildscript {
repositories {
mavenCentral()
maven {
url "https://plugins.gradle.org/m2/"
}
}
dependencies {
classpath 'com.google.gradle:osdetector-gradle-plugin:1.6.0'
}
}

apply plugin: 'application'
apply plugin: 'com.google.osdetector'

ext.platform = osdetector.os == 'osx' ? 'mac' : osdetector.os == 'windows' ? 'win' : osdetector.os

sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_11

repositories {
mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
compile files('libs/external-library.jar')
compile 'org.apache.commons:commons-lang3:3.8.1'
compile "org.openjfx:javafx-base:11:$platform"
}

compileJava {
doFirst {
options.compilerArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

run {
doFirst {
jvmArgs = [
'--module-path', classpath.asPath,
'--add-modules', 'javafx.base'
]
}
}

mainClassName = "com.example.project.PublicClass"

jar {
manifest {
attributes 'Main-Class': 'com.example.project.PublicClass'
}
from {
configurations.compile.collect { it.isDirectory() ? it : zipTree(it) }
}
}


so you would be able to run java -jar build/libs/project-using-external-lib.jar. Note that this jar will contain the JavaFX classes.



Doing a shadow jar is not to the recommended way to distribute your project, but since you have automatic modules (commons-lang3) you can't use jlink, unless you convert that into an explicit module (see this answer).







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 14 at 0:32

























answered Nov 14 at 0:18









José Pereda

24.5k33764




24.5k33764












  • Thank you for your answer - that worked out for me on the small example project. But I am not quite sure how to progress with my large codebase depending on a larger number of external libraries which have not been modularized yet. Any thoughts on that? I opened another question regarding this: stackoverflow.com/questions/53314512/…
    – Hannes
    Nov 18 at 22:09










  • I'd say you can do a combination of a fat jar for all non-modular dependencies, with a custom JRE with all the modular dependencies via jlink. Jpackager is around the corner, and that will allow creating an installer for your app, no matter if it has non-modular dependencies. Internally, by the way, is uses jlink, so it works pretty much as I described before.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:40










  • As mentioned at the end of my answer, there are also some "tricky" ways to generate modules out of non modular jars. See this, and this repo. This might help you to modularize jars that won't be ever modularized.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:48












  • Well, I believe I am stuck ... that tricky way is nice if you have one or two dependencies but it is not possible to maintain that for a larger amount of libraries. Is there any roadmap if and when jpacker will be available?
    – Hannes
    Nov 20 at 11:52










  • There is a JEP for it, the initial target is Java 12, but it might not make it on time. Anyway, Gluon is working on a ea release for Java 11.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 20 at 12:06


















  • Thank you for your answer - that worked out for me on the small example project. But I am not quite sure how to progress with my large codebase depending on a larger number of external libraries which have not been modularized yet. Any thoughts on that? I opened another question regarding this: stackoverflow.com/questions/53314512/…
    – Hannes
    Nov 18 at 22:09










  • I'd say you can do a combination of a fat jar for all non-modular dependencies, with a custom JRE with all the modular dependencies via jlink. Jpackager is around the corner, and that will allow creating an installer for your app, no matter if it has non-modular dependencies. Internally, by the way, is uses jlink, so it works pretty much as I described before.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:40










  • As mentioned at the end of my answer, there are also some "tricky" ways to generate modules out of non modular jars. See this, and this repo. This might help you to modularize jars that won't be ever modularized.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 18 at 22:48












  • Well, I believe I am stuck ... that tricky way is nice if you have one or two dependencies but it is not possible to maintain that for a larger amount of libraries. Is there any roadmap if and when jpacker will be available?
    – Hannes
    Nov 20 at 11:52










  • There is a JEP for it, the initial target is Java 12, but it might not make it on time. Anyway, Gluon is working on a ea release for Java 11.
    – José Pereda
    Nov 20 at 12:06
















Thank you for your answer - that worked out for me on the small example project. But I am not quite sure how to progress with my large codebase depending on a larger number of external libraries which have not been modularized yet. Any thoughts on that? I opened another question regarding this: stackoverflow.com/questions/53314512/…
– Hannes
Nov 18 at 22:09




Thank you for your answer - that worked out for me on the small example project. But I am not quite sure how to progress with my large codebase depending on a larger number of external libraries which have not been modularized yet. Any thoughts on that? I opened another question regarding this: stackoverflow.com/questions/53314512/…
– Hannes
Nov 18 at 22:09












I'd say you can do a combination of a fat jar for all non-modular dependencies, with a custom JRE with all the modular dependencies via jlink. Jpackager is around the corner, and that will allow creating an installer for your app, no matter if it has non-modular dependencies. Internally, by the way, is uses jlink, so it works pretty much as I described before.
– José Pereda
Nov 18 at 22:40




I'd say you can do a combination of a fat jar for all non-modular dependencies, with a custom JRE with all the modular dependencies via jlink. Jpackager is around the corner, and that will allow creating an installer for your app, no matter if it has non-modular dependencies. Internally, by the way, is uses jlink, so it works pretty much as I described before.
– José Pereda
Nov 18 at 22:40












As mentioned at the end of my answer, there are also some "tricky" ways to generate modules out of non modular jars. See this, and this repo. This might help you to modularize jars that won't be ever modularized.
– José Pereda
Nov 18 at 22:48






As mentioned at the end of my answer, there are also some "tricky" ways to generate modules out of non modular jars. See this, and this repo. This might help you to modularize jars that won't be ever modularized.
– José Pereda
Nov 18 at 22:48














Well, I believe I am stuck ... that tricky way is nice if you have one or two dependencies but it is not possible to maintain that for a larger amount of libraries. Is there any roadmap if and when jpacker will be available?
– Hannes
Nov 20 at 11:52




Well, I believe I am stuck ... that tricky way is nice if you have one or two dependencies but it is not possible to maintain that for a larger amount of libraries. Is there any roadmap if and when jpacker will be available?
– Hannes
Nov 20 at 11:52












There is a JEP for it, the initial target is Java 12, but it might not make it on time. Anyway, Gluon is working on a ea release for Java 11.
– José Pereda
Nov 20 at 12:06




There is a JEP for it, the initial target is Java 12, but it might not make it on time. Anyway, Gluon is working on a ea release for Java 11.
– José Pereda
Nov 20 at 12:06


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53248763%2ferror-package-is-declared-javafx-beans-value-in-module-foo-bar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

Glorious Revolution

Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python