Why DateTime.Now.TimeOfDay does not work as manual time setting?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to send the time of day to the API but TimeOfDay does not result right response (API returns null). If I set the time manually (commented in code) its working fine. Debug watch shows similar format as manual writting.
What is the issue here?
Any workaround?
asp.net timeofday
asked Nov 11 at 8:27
PCG
85111
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to send the time of day to the API but TimeOfDay does not result right response (API returns null). If I set the time manually (commented in code) its working fine. Debug watch shows similar format as manual writting.
What is the issue here?
Any workaround?
asp.net timeofday
asked Nov 11 at 8:27
PCG
85111
Avoid posting pictures of code
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:48
1
Unrelated tips: you may want to read Can we stop using AddWithValue. The command is IDisposable so should be in ausingblock. Actually, that first tip might be the answer.
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:49
Another unrelated tip: for parameter 7 you take an enum value, convert it to a string, parse it back into a typed enum value of the same type. Why not just pass the enum value as the parameter?
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:17
Is the query that it calls under your control? If so, why not use Parameter5 instead of 3 and 4. (And consider giving the parameters meaningful names while you're at it.)
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:19
"Debug watch shows similar format as manual writing." Consider that the debugger has to turn everything into a string to show it to you in the watch window; but that doesn't mean you can use a string instead of it. There is another column in the debug windows which shows the type of the thing it is showing you... that is what you should be paying attention to, if you are trying to supply that value yourself.
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I need to send the time of day to the API but TimeOfDay does not result right response (API returns null). If I set the time manually (commented in code) its working fine. Debug watch shows similar format as manual writting.
What is the issue here?
Any workaround?
asp.net timeofday
asked Nov 11 at 8:27
PCG
85111
I need to send the time of day to the API but TimeOfDay does not result right response (API returns null). If I set the time manually (commented in code) its working fine. Debug watch shows similar format as manual writting.
What is the issue here?
Any workaround?
asp.net timeofday
asp.net timeofday
asked Nov 11 at 8:27
PCG
85111
asked Nov 11 at 8:27
PCG
85111
asked Nov 11 at 8:27
PCG
85111
asked Nov 11 at 8:27
PCG
85111
asked Nov 11 at 8:27
PCG
85111
85111
Avoid posting pictures of code
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:48
1
Unrelated tips: you may want to read Can we stop using AddWithValue. The command is IDisposable so should be in ausingblock. Actually, that first tip might be the answer.
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:49
Another unrelated tip: for parameter 7 you take an enum value, convert it to a string, parse it back into a typed enum value of the same type. Why not just pass the enum value as the parameter?
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:17
Is the query that it calls under your control? If so, why not use Parameter5 instead of 3 and 4. (And consider giving the parameters meaningful names while you're at it.)
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:19
"Debug watch shows similar format as manual writing." Consider that the debugger has to turn everything into a string to show it to you in the watch window; but that doesn't mean you can use a string instead of it. There is another column in the debug windows which shows the type of the thing it is showing you... that is what you should be paying attention to, if you are trying to supply that value yourself.
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:26
add a comment |
Avoid posting pictures of code
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:48
1
Unrelated tips: you may want to read Can we stop using AddWithValue. The command is IDisposable so should be in ausingblock. Actually, that first tip might be the answer.
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:49
Another unrelated tip: for parameter 7 you take an enum value, convert it to a string, parse it back into a typed enum value of the same type. Why not just pass the enum value as the parameter?
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:17
Is the query that it calls under your control? If so, why not use Parameter5 instead of 3 and 4. (And consider giving the parameters meaningful names while you're at it.)
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:19
"Debug watch shows similar format as manual writing." Consider that the debugger has to turn everything into a string to show it to you in the watch window; but that doesn't mean you can use a string instead of it. There is another column in the debug windows which shows the type of the thing it is showing you... that is what you should be paying attention to, if you are trying to supply that value yourself.
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:26
Avoid posting pictures of code
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:48
Avoid posting pictures of code
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:48
1
1
Unrelated tips: you may want to read Can we stop using AddWithValue. The command is IDisposable so should be in a
using block. Actually, that first tip might be the answer.– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:49
Unrelated tips: you may want to read Can we stop using AddWithValue. The command is IDisposable so should be in a
using block. Actually, that first tip might be the answer.– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:49
Another unrelated tip: for parameter 7 you take an enum value, convert it to a string, parse it back into a typed enum value of the same type. Why not just pass the enum value as the parameter?
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:17
Another unrelated tip: for parameter 7 you take an enum value, convert it to a string, parse it back into a typed enum value of the same type. Why not just pass the enum value as the parameter?
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:17
Is the query that it calls under your control? If so, why not use Parameter5 instead of 3 and 4. (And consider giving the parameters meaningful names while you're at it.)
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:19
Is the query that it calls under your control? If so, why not use Parameter5 instead of 3 and 4. (And consider giving the parameters meaningful names while you're at it.)
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:19
"Debug watch shows similar format as manual writing." Consider that the debugger has to turn everything into a string to show it to you in the watch window; but that doesn't mean you can use a string instead of it. There is another column in the debug windows which shows the type of the thing it is showing you... that is what you should be paying attention to, if you are trying to supply that value yourself.
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:26
"Debug watch shows similar format as manual writing." Consider that the debugger has to turn everything into a string to show it to you in the watch window; but that doesn't mean you can use a string instead of it. There is another column in the debug windows which shows the type of the thing it is showing you... that is what you should be paying attention to, if you are trying to supply that value yourself.
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:26
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53247024%2fwhy-datetime-now-timeofday-does-not-work-as-manual-time-setting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Avoid posting pictures of code
– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:48
1
Unrelated tips: you may want to read Can we stop using AddWithValue. The command is IDisposable so should be in a
usingblock. Actually, that first tip might be the answer.– Richardissimo
Nov 11 at 8:49
Another unrelated tip: for parameter 7 you take an enum value, convert it to a string, parse it back into a typed enum value of the same type. Why not just pass the enum value as the parameter?
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:17
Is the query that it calls under your control? If so, why not use Parameter5 instead of 3 and 4. (And consider giving the parameters meaningful names while you're at it.)
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:19
"Debug watch shows similar format as manual writing." Consider that the debugger has to turn everything into a string to show it to you in the watch window; but that doesn't mean you can use a string instead of it. There is another column in the debug windows which shows the type of the thing it is showing you... that is what you should be paying attention to, if you are trying to supply that value yourself.
– Richardissimo
Nov 12 at 6:26