Move the same unique_ptr into function in a loop











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Whats the best way to redesign the following error prone code:



void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
methodB(std::move(obj)); // the obj pointer is undefined on second iteration here after the move
}
}

void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
..........
}


The goal is to pass the same unique_ptr to function multiple times.










share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Whats the best way to redesign the following error prone code:



    void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
    for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
    methodB(std::move(obj)); // the obj pointer is undefined on second iteration here after the move
    }
    }

    void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
    ..........
    }


    The goal is to pass the same unique_ptr to function multiple times.










    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Whats the best way to redesign the following error prone code:



      void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
      for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
      methodB(std::move(obj)); // the obj pointer is undefined on second iteration here after the move
      }
      }

      void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
      ..........
      }


      The goal is to pass the same unique_ptr to function multiple times.










      share|improve this question













      Whats the best way to redesign the following error prone code:



      void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
      for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
      methodB(std::move(obj)); // the obj pointer is undefined on second iteration here after the move
      }
      }

      void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
      ..........
      }


      The goal is to pass the same unique_ptr to function multiple times.







      c++ shared-ptr unique-ptr






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 10 at 19:04









      Steve Roy

      44




      44
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          If you don't want to transfer ownership just pass the raw pointer or a reference. If the functions are going to store the pointer a shared_ptr would be more appropriate:



          void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
          for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
          methodB(*obj);
          }
          }

          void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj){
          ..........
          }





          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Pass it by (optionally const) reference to methodB.



            So instead of having



            void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj);


            you can have either of the following



            void ClassA::methodB(const ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);


            or



            void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);





            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              });
              });
              }, "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53242433%2fmove-the-same-unique-ptr-into-function-in-a-loop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              If you don't want to transfer ownership just pass the raw pointer or a reference. If the functions are going to store the pointer a shared_ptr would be more appropriate:



              void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
              for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
              methodB(*obj);
              }
              }

              void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj){
              ..........
              }





              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted










                If you don't want to transfer ownership just pass the raw pointer or a reference. If the functions are going to store the pointer a shared_ptr would be more appropriate:



                void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
                for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                methodB(*obj);
                }
                }

                void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj){
                ..........
                }





                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  If you don't want to transfer ownership just pass the raw pointer or a reference. If the functions are going to store the pointer a shared_ptr would be more appropriate:



                  void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
                  for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                  methodB(*obj);
                  }
                  }

                  void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj){
                  ..........
                  }





                  share|improve this answer












                  If you don't want to transfer ownership just pass the raw pointer or a reference. If the functions are going to store the pointer a shared_ptr would be more appropriate:



                  void ClassA::methodA(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj){
                  for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                  methodB(*obj);
                  }
                  }

                  void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj){
                  ..........
                  }






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 10 at 19:08









                  Alan Birtles

                  7,360733




                  7,360733
























                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Pass it by (optionally const) reference to methodB.



                      So instead of having



                      void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj);


                      you can have either of the following



                      void ClassA::methodB(const ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);


                      or



                      void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);





                      share|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Pass it by (optionally const) reference to methodB.



                        So instead of having



                        void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj);


                        you can have either of the following



                        void ClassA::methodB(const ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);


                        or



                        void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);





                        share|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          Pass it by (optionally const) reference to methodB.



                          So instead of having



                          void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj);


                          you can have either of the following



                          void ClassA::methodB(const ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);


                          or



                          void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);





                          share|improve this answer












                          Pass it by (optionally const) reference to methodB.



                          So instead of having



                          void ClassA::methodB(std::unique_ptr<ClassB::ISomeInterface> obj);


                          you can have either of the following



                          void ClassA::methodB(const ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);


                          or



                          void ClassA::methodB(ClassB::ISomeInterface& obj);






                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 10 at 19:08









                          druckermanly

                          1,252721




                          1,252721






























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53242433%2fmove-the-same-unique-ptr-into-function-in-a-loop%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

                              Glorious Revolution

                              Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python