Are Jordan “Formable” matrices closed under multiplication?
$begingroup$
After learning about Jordan Canonical Form, I began thinking about if you have two matrices $A, B in M_n(mathbb{R}),$ whether or not their product $AB$ will also have a Jordan Canonical Form. Trivially, if we consider polynomials in $ M_n(mathbb{C})$ then our polynomial will always have roots in the field. So, from what I understand, this is equivalent to asking whether or not the characteristic polynomial of $AB$ will have real roots.
I began playing around with the $2 times 2$ case and if we have that $AB$ has a negative determinant then we can't have that the eigenvalues of $AB$ are in $mathbb{C},$ since they must multiply to the determinant, but since the complex eigenvalues always come in a conjugate pair, that would mean that their product is always positive. I am not sure how I can break down the case if the determinant is positive.
Finally, my own intuition says matrices which have Jordan form will be closed under multiplication. This is because if we think about what matrices with strictly, real eigenvalues do, they simply reflect and stretch space. So I don't believe it is possible to find two matrices whose product matrix will be a rotation in the plane.
Also, I couldn't find this question asked elsewhere, but if it has an answer, I'd be happy to read it.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
After learning about Jordan Canonical Form, I began thinking about if you have two matrices $A, B in M_n(mathbb{R}),$ whether or not their product $AB$ will also have a Jordan Canonical Form. Trivially, if we consider polynomials in $ M_n(mathbb{C})$ then our polynomial will always have roots in the field. So, from what I understand, this is equivalent to asking whether or not the characteristic polynomial of $AB$ will have real roots.
I began playing around with the $2 times 2$ case and if we have that $AB$ has a negative determinant then we can't have that the eigenvalues of $AB$ are in $mathbb{C},$ since they must multiply to the determinant, but since the complex eigenvalues always come in a conjugate pair, that would mean that their product is always positive. I am not sure how I can break down the case if the determinant is positive.
Finally, my own intuition says matrices which have Jordan form will be closed under multiplication. This is because if we think about what matrices with strictly, real eigenvalues do, they simply reflect and stretch space. So I don't believe it is possible to find two matrices whose product matrix will be a rotation in the plane.
Also, I couldn't find this question asked elsewhere, but if it has an answer, I'd be happy to read it.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Consider 2 different reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 15 '18 at 22:33
2
$begingroup$
@IlikeSerena That's a particularly nice way to resolve the question---would you consider promoting your comment to an answer?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Nov 16 '18 at 0:13
2
$begingroup$
Thank you @Travis. Done.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 0:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
After learning about Jordan Canonical Form, I began thinking about if you have two matrices $A, B in M_n(mathbb{R}),$ whether or not their product $AB$ will also have a Jordan Canonical Form. Trivially, if we consider polynomials in $ M_n(mathbb{C})$ then our polynomial will always have roots in the field. So, from what I understand, this is equivalent to asking whether or not the characteristic polynomial of $AB$ will have real roots.
I began playing around with the $2 times 2$ case and if we have that $AB$ has a negative determinant then we can't have that the eigenvalues of $AB$ are in $mathbb{C},$ since they must multiply to the determinant, but since the complex eigenvalues always come in a conjugate pair, that would mean that their product is always positive. I am not sure how I can break down the case if the determinant is positive.
Finally, my own intuition says matrices which have Jordan form will be closed under multiplication. This is because if we think about what matrices with strictly, real eigenvalues do, they simply reflect and stretch space. So I don't believe it is possible to find two matrices whose product matrix will be a rotation in the plane.
Also, I couldn't find this question asked elsewhere, but if it has an answer, I'd be happy to read it.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
After learning about Jordan Canonical Form, I began thinking about if you have two matrices $A, B in M_n(mathbb{R}),$ whether or not their product $AB$ will also have a Jordan Canonical Form. Trivially, if we consider polynomials in $ M_n(mathbb{C})$ then our polynomial will always have roots in the field. So, from what I understand, this is equivalent to asking whether or not the characteristic polynomial of $AB$ will have real roots.
I began playing around with the $2 times 2$ case and if we have that $AB$ has a negative determinant then we can't have that the eigenvalues of $AB$ are in $mathbb{C},$ since they must multiply to the determinant, but since the complex eigenvalues always come in a conjugate pair, that would mean that their product is always positive. I am not sure how I can break down the case if the determinant is positive.
Finally, my own intuition says matrices which have Jordan form will be closed under multiplication. This is because if we think about what matrices with strictly, real eigenvalues do, they simply reflect and stretch space. So I don't believe it is possible to find two matrices whose product matrix will be a rotation in the plane.
Also, I couldn't find this question asked elsewhere, but if it has an answer, I'd be happy to read it.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
asked Nov 15 '18 at 21:00
JosabanksJosabanks
1157
1157
3
$begingroup$
Consider 2 different reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 15 '18 at 22:33
2
$begingroup$
@IlikeSerena That's a particularly nice way to resolve the question---would you consider promoting your comment to an answer?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Nov 16 '18 at 0:13
2
$begingroup$
Thank you @Travis. Done.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 0:20
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Consider 2 different reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 15 '18 at 22:33
2
$begingroup$
@IlikeSerena That's a particularly nice way to resolve the question---would you consider promoting your comment to an answer?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Nov 16 '18 at 0:13
2
$begingroup$
Thank you @Travis. Done.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 0:20
3
3
$begingroup$
Consider 2 different reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 15 '18 at 22:33
$begingroup$
Consider 2 different reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 15 '18 at 22:33
2
2
$begingroup$
@IlikeSerena That's a particularly nice way to resolve the question---would you consider promoting your comment to an answer?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Nov 16 '18 at 0:13
$begingroup$
@IlikeSerena That's a particularly nice way to resolve the question---would you consider promoting your comment to an answer?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Nov 16 '18 at 0:13
2
2
$begingroup$
Thank you @Travis. Done.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 0:20
$begingroup$
Thank you @Travis. Done.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 0:20
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is false already in the $2 times 2$ case. Consider the matrices
$$A = left[ begin{array}{cc} -1 & 2 \ -2 & 3 end{array} right], B = left[ begin{array}{cc} 3 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{array} right]$$
$B$ has eigenvalues $3, 1$, and the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $t^2 - 2t + 1 = (t - 1)^2$, so $A$ has eigenvalues $1, 1$. But
$$AB = left[ begin{array}{cc} -3 & 2 \ -6 & 3 end{array} right]$$
has characteristic polynomial $t^2 + 3$, so has eigenvalues $pm i sqrt{3}$.
I found these matrices by first taking $B$ to be diagonal with diagonal entries $s, 1$ and then looked at the effect multiplication by $B$ had on the characteristic polynomial of a generic $A$. It's possible to choose $s$ so that $AB$ has trace zero, so then we just need its determinant to be positive to guarantee that it has complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider 2 reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is generally a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
So the product $AB$ of two real matrices $A$ and $B$ with Jordan Canonical Forms does not necessarily have a Jordan Canonical Form as well.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the generic case, yes - or more precisely, when the lines of reflection aren't coincident or perpendicular. For example, the reflections about the $x$-axis and $y$-axis compose to rotation by $pi$, or $-I$ which is diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
I've clarified that it's 'generally'.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 10:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every square matrix $A$ over any field is similar to its own transpose via a non-singular symmetric matrix $S$ (see Taussky and Zassenhaus, On the similarity transformation between a matrix and its transpose).
If $A=SA^TS^{-1}$ for a symmetric $S$, then $SA^T=AS=(SA^T)^T$, i.e. $SA^T$ is symmetric. Similarly for $A^TS^{-1}$. Consequently, every square matrix can be written as a product of two symmetric matrices (because $A=(SA^T)S^{-1}=S(A^TS^{-1})$) and one of them can be chosen to be non-singular.
It follows immediately that the answer to your question is negative unless $n=1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000326%2fare-jordan-formable-matrices-closed-under-multiplication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is false already in the $2 times 2$ case. Consider the matrices
$$A = left[ begin{array}{cc} -1 & 2 \ -2 & 3 end{array} right], B = left[ begin{array}{cc} 3 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{array} right]$$
$B$ has eigenvalues $3, 1$, and the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $t^2 - 2t + 1 = (t - 1)^2$, so $A$ has eigenvalues $1, 1$. But
$$AB = left[ begin{array}{cc} -3 & 2 \ -6 & 3 end{array} right]$$
has characteristic polynomial $t^2 + 3$, so has eigenvalues $pm i sqrt{3}$.
I found these matrices by first taking $B$ to be diagonal with diagonal entries $s, 1$ and then looked at the effect multiplication by $B$ had on the characteristic polynomial of a generic $A$. It's possible to choose $s$ so that $AB$ has trace zero, so then we just need its determinant to be positive to guarantee that it has complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is false already in the $2 times 2$ case. Consider the matrices
$$A = left[ begin{array}{cc} -1 & 2 \ -2 & 3 end{array} right], B = left[ begin{array}{cc} 3 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{array} right]$$
$B$ has eigenvalues $3, 1$, and the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $t^2 - 2t + 1 = (t - 1)^2$, so $A$ has eigenvalues $1, 1$. But
$$AB = left[ begin{array}{cc} -3 & 2 \ -6 & 3 end{array} right]$$
has characteristic polynomial $t^2 + 3$, so has eigenvalues $pm i sqrt{3}$.
I found these matrices by first taking $B$ to be diagonal with diagonal entries $s, 1$ and then looked at the effect multiplication by $B$ had on the characteristic polynomial of a generic $A$. It's possible to choose $s$ so that $AB$ has trace zero, so then we just need its determinant to be positive to guarantee that it has complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is false already in the $2 times 2$ case. Consider the matrices
$$A = left[ begin{array}{cc} -1 & 2 \ -2 & 3 end{array} right], B = left[ begin{array}{cc} 3 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{array} right]$$
$B$ has eigenvalues $3, 1$, and the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $t^2 - 2t + 1 = (t - 1)^2$, so $A$ has eigenvalues $1, 1$. But
$$AB = left[ begin{array}{cc} -3 & 2 \ -6 & 3 end{array} right]$$
has characteristic polynomial $t^2 + 3$, so has eigenvalues $pm i sqrt{3}$.
I found these matrices by first taking $B$ to be diagonal with diagonal entries $s, 1$ and then looked at the effect multiplication by $B$ had on the characteristic polynomial of a generic $A$. It's possible to choose $s$ so that $AB$ has trace zero, so then we just need its determinant to be positive to guarantee that it has complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
This is false already in the $2 times 2$ case. Consider the matrices
$$A = left[ begin{array}{cc} -1 & 2 \ -2 & 3 end{array} right], B = left[ begin{array}{cc} 3 & 0 \ 0 & 1 end{array} right]$$
$B$ has eigenvalues $3, 1$, and the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $t^2 - 2t + 1 = (t - 1)^2$, so $A$ has eigenvalues $1, 1$. But
$$AB = left[ begin{array}{cc} -3 & 2 \ -6 & 3 end{array} right]$$
has characteristic polynomial $t^2 + 3$, so has eigenvalues $pm i sqrt{3}$.
I found these matrices by first taking $B$ to be diagonal with diagonal entries $s, 1$ and then looked at the effect multiplication by $B$ had on the characteristic polynomial of a generic $A$. It's possible to choose $s$ so that $AB$ has trace zero, so then we just need its determinant to be positive to guarantee that it has complex eigenvalues.
edited Nov 16 '18 at 0:23
Trevor Gunn
14.9k32047
14.9k32047
answered Nov 15 '18 at 22:25
Qiaochu YuanQiaochu Yuan
281k32593938
281k32593938
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider 2 reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is generally a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
So the product $AB$ of two real matrices $A$ and $B$ with Jordan Canonical Forms does not necessarily have a Jordan Canonical Form as well.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the generic case, yes - or more precisely, when the lines of reflection aren't coincident or perpendicular. For example, the reflections about the $x$-axis and $y$-axis compose to rotation by $pi$, or $-I$ which is diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
I've clarified that it's 'generally'.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 10:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider 2 reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is generally a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
So the product $AB$ of two real matrices $A$ and $B$ with Jordan Canonical Forms does not necessarily have a Jordan Canonical Form as well.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the generic case, yes - or more precisely, when the lines of reflection aren't coincident or perpendicular. For example, the reflections about the $x$-axis and $y$-axis compose to rotation by $pi$, or $-I$ which is diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
I've clarified that it's 'generally'.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 10:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider 2 reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is generally a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
So the product $AB$ of two real matrices $A$ and $B$ with Jordan Canonical Forms does not necessarily have a Jordan Canonical Form as well.
$endgroup$
Consider 2 reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is generally a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
So the product $AB$ of two real matrices $A$ and $B$ with Jordan Canonical Forms does not necessarily have a Jordan Canonical Form as well.
edited Nov 16 '18 at 10:27
answered Nov 16 '18 at 0:19
I like SerenaI like Serena
4,3321822
4,3321822
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the generic case, yes - or more precisely, when the lines of reflection aren't coincident or perpendicular. For example, the reflections about the $x$-axis and $y$-axis compose to rotation by $pi$, or $-I$ which is diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
I've clarified that it's 'generally'.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 10:28
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the generic case, yes - or more precisely, when the lines of reflection aren't coincident or perpendicular. For example, the reflections about the $x$-axis and $y$-axis compose to rotation by $pi$, or $-I$ which is diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
I've clarified that it's 'generally'.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 10:28
1
1
$begingroup$
Well, in the generic case, yes - or more precisely, when the lines of reflection aren't coincident or perpendicular. For example, the reflections about the $x$-axis and $y$-axis compose to rotation by $pi$, or $-I$ which is diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
Well, in the generic case, yes - or more precisely, when the lines of reflection aren't coincident or perpendicular. For example, the reflections about the $x$-axis and $y$-axis compose to rotation by $pi$, or $-I$ which is diagonal.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 16 '18 at 1:35
$begingroup$
I've clarified that it's 'generally'.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 10:28
$begingroup$
I've clarified that it's 'generally'.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 10:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every square matrix $A$ over any field is similar to its own transpose via a non-singular symmetric matrix $S$ (see Taussky and Zassenhaus, On the similarity transformation between a matrix and its transpose).
If $A=SA^TS^{-1}$ for a symmetric $S$, then $SA^T=AS=(SA^T)^T$, i.e. $SA^T$ is symmetric. Similarly for $A^TS^{-1}$. Consequently, every square matrix can be written as a product of two symmetric matrices (because $A=(SA^T)S^{-1}=S(A^TS^{-1})$) and one of them can be chosen to be non-singular.
It follows immediately that the answer to your question is negative unless $n=1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every square matrix $A$ over any field is similar to its own transpose via a non-singular symmetric matrix $S$ (see Taussky and Zassenhaus, On the similarity transformation between a matrix and its transpose).
If $A=SA^TS^{-1}$ for a symmetric $S$, then $SA^T=AS=(SA^T)^T$, i.e. $SA^T$ is symmetric. Similarly for $A^TS^{-1}$. Consequently, every square matrix can be written as a product of two symmetric matrices (because $A=(SA^T)S^{-1}=S(A^TS^{-1})$) and one of them can be chosen to be non-singular.
It follows immediately that the answer to your question is negative unless $n=1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every square matrix $A$ over any field is similar to its own transpose via a non-singular symmetric matrix $S$ (see Taussky and Zassenhaus, On the similarity transformation between a matrix and its transpose).
If $A=SA^TS^{-1}$ for a symmetric $S$, then $SA^T=AS=(SA^T)^T$, i.e. $SA^T$ is symmetric. Similarly for $A^TS^{-1}$. Consequently, every square matrix can be written as a product of two symmetric matrices (because $A=(SA^T)S^{-1}=S(A^TS^{-1})$) and one of them can be chosen to be non-singular.
It follows immediately that the answer to your question is negative unless $n=1$.
$endgroup$
Every square matrix $A$ over any field is similar to its own transpose via a non-singular symmetric matrix $S$ (see Taussky and Zassenhaus, On the similarity transformation between a matrix and its transpose).
If $A=SA^TS^{-1}$ for a symmetric $S$, then $SA^T=AS=(SA^T)^T$, i.e. $SA^T$ is symmetric. Similarly for $A^TS^{-1}$. Consequently, every square matrix can be written as a product of two symmetric matrices (because $A=(SA^T)S^{-1}=S(A^TS^{-1})$) and one of them can be chosen to be non-singular.
It follows immediately that the answer to your question is negative unless $n=1$.
edited Nov 28 '18 at 15:12
answered Nov 16 '18 at 10:28
user1551user1551
73.7k566129
73.7k566129
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000326%2fare-jordan-formable-matrices-closed-under-multiplication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Consider 2 different reflections. Each of them has eigenvalues 1 and -1. However, their composition is a rotation with complex eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 15 '18 at 22:33
2
$begingroup$
@IlikeSerena That's a particularly nice way to resolve the question---would you consider promoting your comment to an answer?
$endgroup$
– Travis
Nov 16 '18 at 0:13
2
$begingroup$
Thank you @Travis. Done.
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Nov 16 '18 at 0:20