How to figure out the functor for cats.Parallel?
Because IntelliJ does not play all that nicely with Cats, I am sometimes explicit about type parameters in my code to avoid ugly red lines. For example, if we assume this gives a red line under IO.pure(x.toString),
List(1, 2, 3).traverse(x => IO.pure(x.toString))
then I can easily add the types and IntelliJ is happy:
List(1, 2, 3).traverse[IO, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
Now, with parTraverse it seems a bit more difficult because of the functor parameter:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, ???, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString)) //what is ???
Is there any way to figure out the type of the F[_] parameter here so I can please IntelliJ or is this some partial unification thing and so I'm doomed to ugliness? Thanks
scala intellij-idea implicit scala-cats
add a comment |
Because IntelliJ does not play all that nicely with Cats, I am sometimes explicit about type parameters in my code to avoid ugly red lines. For example, if we assume this gives a red line under IO.pure(x.toString),
List(1, 2, 3).traverse(x => IO.pure(x.toString))
then I can easily add the types and IntelliJ is happy:
List(1, 2, 3).traverse[IO, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
Now, with parTraverse it seems a bit more difficult because of the functor parameter:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, ???, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString)) //what is ???
Is there any way to figure out the type of the F[_] parameter here so I can please IntelliJ or is this some partial unification thing and so I'm doomed to ugliness? Thanks
scala intellij-idea implicit scala-cats
add a comment |
Because IntelliJ does not play all that nicely with Cats, I am sometimes explicit about type parameters in my code to avoid ugly red lines. For example, if we assume this gives a red line under IO.pure(x.toString),
List(1, 2, 3).traverse(x => IO.pure(x.toString))
then I can easily add the types and IntelliJ is happy:
List(1, 2, 3).traverse[IO, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
Now, with parTraverse it seems a bit more difficult because of the functor parameter:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, ???, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString)) //what is ???
Is there any way to figure out the type of the F[_] parameter here so I can please IntelliJ or is this some partial unification thing and so I'm doomed to ugliness? Thanks
scala intellij-idea implicit scala-cats
Because IntelliJ does not play all that nicely with Cats, I am sometimes explicit about type parameters in my code to avoid ugly red lines. For example, if we assume this gives a red line under IO.pure(x.toString),
List(1, 2, 3).traverse(x => IO.pure(x.toString))
then I can easily add the types and IntelliJ is happy:
List(1, 2, 3).traverse[IO, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
Now, with parTraverse it seems a bit more difficult because of the functor parameter:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, ???, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString)) //what is ???
Is there any way to figure out the type of the F[_] parameter here so I can please IntelliJ or is this some partial unification thing and so I'm doomed to ugliness? Thanks
scala intellij-idea implicit scala-cats
scala intellij-idea implicit scala-cats
edited Nov 13 '18 at 13:12
Andrey Tyukin
26.8k42348
26.8k42348
asked Nov 12 '18 at 23:41
Lasf
1,242822
1,242822
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
1
You're the best, man, seriously thanks
– Lasf
Nov 13 '18 at 3:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53271700%2fhow-to-figure-out-the-functor-for-cats-parallel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
1
You're the best, man, seriously thanks
– Lasf
Nov 13 '18 at 3:38
add a comment |
If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
1
You're the best, man, seriously thanks
– Lasf
Nov 13 '18 at 3:38
add a comment |
If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:
List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))
answered Nov 13 '18 at 2:41
Andrey Tyukin
26.8k42348
26.8k42348
1
You're the best, man, seriously thanks
– Lasf
Nov 13 '18 at 3:38
add a comment |
1
You're the best, man, seriously thanks
– Lasf
Nov 13 '18 at 3:38
1
1
You're the best, man, seriously thanks
– Lasf
Nov 13 '18 at 3:38
You're the best, man, seriously thanks
– Lasf
Nov 13 '18 at 3:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53271700%2fhow-to-figure-out-the-functor-for-cats-parallel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown