How to figure out the functor for cats.Parallel?












1














Because IntelliJ does not play all that nicely with Cats, I am sometimes explicit about type parameters in my code to avoid ugly red lines. For example, if we assume this gives a red line under IO.pure(x.toString),



List(1, 2, 3).traverse(x => IO.pure(x.toString))


then I can easily add the types and IntelliJ is happy:



List(1, 2, 3).traverse[IO, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))


Now, with parTraverse it seems a bit more difficult because of the functor parameter:



List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, ???, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString)) //what is ???


Is there any way to figure out the type of the F[_] parameter here so I can please IntelliJ or is this some partial unification thing and so I'm doomed to ugliness? Thanks










share|improve this question





























    1














    Because IntelliJ does not play all that nicely with Cats, I am sometimes explicit about type parameters in my code to avoid ugly red lines. For example, if we assume this gives a red line under IO.pure(x.toString),



    List(1, 2, 3).traverse(x => IO.pure(x.toString))


    then I can easily add the types and IntelliJ is happy:



    List(1, 2, 3).traverse[IO, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))


    Now, with parTraverse it seems a bit more difficult because of the functor parameter:



    List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, ???, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString)) //what is ???


    Is there any way to figure out the type of the F[_] parameter here so I can please IntelliJ or is this some partial unification thing and so I'm doomed to ugliness? Thanks










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1







      Because IntelliJ does not play all that nicely with Cats, I am sometimes explicit about type parameters in my code to avoid ugly red lines. For example, if we assume this gives a red line under IO.pure(x.toString),



      List(1, 2, 3).traverse(x => IO.pure(x.toString))


      then I can easily add the types and IntelliJ is happy:



      List(1, 2, 3).traverse[IO, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))


      Now, with parTraverse it seems a bit more difficult because of the functor parameter:



      List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, ???, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString)) //what is ???


      Is there any way to figure out the type of the F[_] parameter here so I can please IntelliJ or is this some partial unification thing and so I'm doomed to ugliness? Thanks










      share|improve this question















      Because IntelliJ does not play all that nicely with Cats, I am sometimes explicit about type parameters in my code to avoid ugly red lines. For example, if we assume this gives a red line under IO.pure(x.toString),



      List(1, 2, 3).traverse(x => IO.pure(x.toString))


      then I can easily add the types and IntelliJ is happy:



      List(1, 2, 3).traverse[IO, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))


      Now, with parTraverse it seems a bit more difficult because of the functor parameter:



      List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, ???, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString)) //what is ???


      Is there any way to figure out the type of the F[_] parameter here so I can please IntelliJ or is this some partial unification thing and so I'm doomed to ugliness? Thanks







      scala intellij-idea implicit scala-cats






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 13 '18 at 13:12









      Andrey Tyukin

      26.8k42348




      26.8k42348










      asked Nov 12 '18 at 23:41









      Lasf

      1,242822




      1,242822
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:



          List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))





          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You're the best, man, seriously thanks
            – Lasf
            Nov 13 '18 at 3:38











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53271700%2fhow-to-figure-out-the-functor-for-cats-parallel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:



          List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))





          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You're the best, man, seriously thanks
            – Lasf
            Nov 13 '18 at 3:38
















          2














          If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:



          List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))





          share|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You're the best, man, seriously thanks
            – Lasf
            Nov 13 '18 at 3:38














          2












          2








          2






          If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:



          List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))





          share|improve this answer












          If you go to the scaladoc api of cats-effects, and search for Parallel instances, it lists you just a single implicit method that produces Parallel[IO, ???], namely Parallel[IO, Par] provided by cats.effect.IO.ioParallel. So, it seems that cats.effect.IO.Par should do the trick:



          List(1, 2, 3).parTraverse[IO, Par, String](x => IO.pure(x.toString))






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 13 '18 at 2:41









          Andrey Tyukin

          26.8k42348




          26.8k42348








          • 1




            You're the best, man, seriously thanks
            – Lasf
            Nov 13 '18 at 3:38














          • 1




            You're the best, man, seriously thanks
            – Lasf
            Nov 13 '18 at 3:38








          1




          1




          You're the best, man, seriously thanks
          – Lasf
          Nov 13 '18 at 3:38




          You're the best, man, seriously thanks
          – Lasf
          Nov 13 '18 at 3:38


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53271700%2fhow-to-figure-out-the-functor-for-cats-parallel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          List item for chat from Array inside array React Native

          Thiostrepton

          Caerphilly