DB2 Client in Docker












1















We have the need to create a docker container that also has the db2 client installed. This container will also have some shell scripts that make use of the db2 client.



We take a base Cent OS image and then add db2 via a RUN command:



COPY  db2rtcl_nr.rsp /db2install/
RUN cd /db2install && curl -o ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz http://public_file_server.com/downloads/appTools/installs/db2/ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
tar -xvf ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
rm -f ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
rtcl/db2setup -u db2rtcl_nr.rsp -f sysreq &&

chown -R 1000:1000 /opt/ibm/db2/V11.1

ENV PATH="$PATH:/opt/ibm/db2/V11.1/bin"


The image builds ok with no errors.



However, when I try running and connecting to the container via interactive shell command:



docker run -it --entrypoint=/bin/bash db2Container


and try to invoke the db2 CLI with



db2


I get the error:




DB21018E A system error occurred. The command line processor could not
continue processing.




Whats confusing is that if I immediately run a bash shell and then invoke the db2 CLI, it works:



bash
db2
(c) Copyright IBM Corporation 1993,2007
Command Line Processor for DB2 Client 11.1.0

You can issue database manager commands and SQL statements from the command
prompt. For example:
db2 => connect to sample
db2 => bind sample.bnd

For general help, type: ?.
For command help, type: ? command, where command can be
the first few keywords of a database manager command. For example:
? CATALOG DATABASE for help on the CATALOG DATABASE command
? CATALOG for help on all of the CATALOG commands.

To exit db2 interactive mode, type QUIT at the command prompt. Outside
interactive mode, all commands must be prefixed with 'db2'.
To list the current command option settings, type LIST COMMAND OPTIONS.

For more detailed help, refer to the Online Reference Manual.

db2 =>


Things I have tried to diagnose the issue:




  1. When I 1st drop into the interactive shell session, I type
    env > /tmp/env1.txt
    I then type bash and run
    env > /tmp/env2.txt
    When I diff the files, they are virtually identical EXCEPT for the variable:
    SHLVL=2
    which I know is just indicating that the 2nd shell is a nested shell


  2. When I 1st drop into the interactive shell session, I type
    set > /tmp/set1.txt
    I then type bash and run
    set > /tmp/set2.txt
    When I diff the files, they are virtually identical EXCEPT for the SHLVL variable again



Why is the db2 CLI accessible after I bash in the container but not in the initial session when i have used docker run -it?



We are attempting to use this container as an executable container that has the db2 client in it to connect to external DB2 databases. We are NOT trying to run a db2 DB in a container.



What I am starting to find is that I might have an issue with how the entrypoint is defined in our Dockerfile.
Using:



ENTRYPOINT cat /dev/null && /usr/bin/bash


the DB2 client is available when I run docker run -it ContainerName without having to immediately type bash



BUT it does not work when I try to run the container as an executable docker run ContainerName



The closest I have come to the solution is this modification to the Dockerfile:



ENTRYPOINT 

CMD ["/bin/bash"]


When I run the container as an executable docker run ContainerName db2 list command options it works however NOW if I docker run -it ContainerName I dont immediately have db2 commands available without typing bash once. This is still problematic since this container will have shell script in it that need to be able to run db2 commands










share|improve this question

























  • Does it make a difference if you explicitly dot in the db2profile before you run the CLP? If it does, either the wrong startup profile is running, or that startup profile has'nt been properly updated, or is not running correctly.

    – mao
    Nov 13 '18 at 19:32











  • Possible duplicate of DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E

    – bhamby
    Nov 14 '18 at 23:00











  • @mao when you say "dot in the db2profile" do you mean source it?

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:09











  • If the login shell for the userid is either bash or ksh/ksh93 then dot in means the equivalent of source in csh. A default installation of the current V11.1.3.3b runtime client on linux with bash as the configured shell will automatically update the .bashrc with the relevant dot in command for the db2profile.

    – mao
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:24











  • @bhamby I dont think this is exactly the same as DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E as they seem to be spinning up a db in their container and need to keep it running as a service. Whereas Im trying to use this container to execute some db2 client commands against an external DB.

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:24
















1















We have the need to create a docker container that also has the db2 client installed. This container will also have some shell scripts that make use of the db2 client.



We take a base Cent OS image and then add db2 via a RUN command:



COPY  db2rtcl_nr.rsp /db2install/
RUN cd /db2install && curl -o ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz http://public_file_server.com/downloads/appTools/installs/db2/ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
tar -xvf ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
rm -f ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
rtcl/db2setup -u db2rtcl_nr.rsp -f sysreq &&

chown -R 1000:1000 /opt/ibm/db2/V11.1

ENV PATH="$PATH:/opt/ibm/db2/V11.1/bin"


The image builds ok with no errors.



However, when I try running and connecting to the container via interactive shell command:



docker run -it --entrypoint=/bin/bash db2Container


and try to invoke the db2 CLI with



db2


I get the error:




DB21018E A system error occurred. The command line processor could not
continue processing.




Whats confusing is that if I immediately run a bash shell and then invoke the db2 CLI, it works:



bash
db2
(c) Copyright IBM Corporation 1993,2007
Command Line Processor for DB2 Client 11.1.0

You can issue database manager commands and SQL statements from the command
prompt. For example:
db2 => connect to sample
db2 => bind sample.bnd

For general help, type: ?.
For command help, type: ? command, where command can be
the first few keywords of a database manager command. For example:
? CATALOG DATABASE for help on the CATALOG DATABASE command
? CATALOG for help on all of the CATALOG commands.

To exit db2 interactive mode, type QUIT at the command prompt. Outside
interactive mode, all commands must be prefixed with 'db2'.
To list the current command option settings, type LIST COMMAND OPTIONS.

For more detailed help, refer to the Online Reference Manual.

db2 =>


Things I have tried to diagnose the issue:




  1. When I 1st drop into the interactive shell session, I type
    env > /tmp/env1.txt
    I then type bash and run
    env > /tmp/env2.txt
    When I diff the files, they are virtually identical EXCEPT for the variable:
    SHLVL=2
    which I know is just indicating that the 2nd shell is a nested shell


  2. When I 1st drop into the interactive shell session, I type
    set > /tmp/set1.txt
    I then type bash and run
    set > /tmp/set2.txt
    When I diff the files, they are virtually identical EXCEPT for the SHLVL variable again



Why is the db2 CLI accessible after I bash in the container but not in the initial session when i have used docker run -it?



We are attempting to use this container as an executable container that has the db2 client in it to connect to external DB2 databases. We are NOT trying to run a db2 DB in a container.



What I am starting to find is that I might have an issue with how the entrypoint is defined in our Dockerfile.
Using:



ENTRYPOINT cat /dev/null && /usr/bin/bash


the DB2 client is available when I run docker run -it ContainerName without having to immediately type bash



BUT it does not work when I try to run the container as an executable docker run ContainerName



The closest I have come to the solution is this modification to the Dockerfile:



ENTRYPOINT 

CMD ["/bin/bash"]


When I run the container as an executable docker run ContainerName db2 list command options it works however NOW if I docker run -it ContainerName I dont immediately have db2 commands available without typing bash once. This is still problematic since this container will have shell script in it that need to be able to run db2 commands










share|improve this question

























  • Does it make a difference if you explicitly dot in the db2profile before you run the CLP? If it does, either the wrong startup profile is running, or that startup profile has'nt been properly updated, or is not running correctly.

    – mao
    Nov 13 '18 at 19:32











  • Possible duplicate of DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E

    – bhamby
    Nov 14 '18 at 23:00











  • @mao when you say "dot in the db2profile" do you mean source it?

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:09











  • If the login shell for the userid is either bash or ksh/ksh93 then dot in means the equivalent of source in csh. A default installation of the current V11.1.3.3b runtime client on linux with bash as the configured shell will automatically update the .bashrc with the relevant dot in command for the db2profile.

    – mao
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:24











  • @bhamby I dont think this is exactly the same as DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E as they seem to be spinning up a db in their container and need to keep it running as a service. Whereas Im trying to use this container to execute some db2 client commands against an external DB.

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:24














1












1








1


1






We have the need to create a docker container that also has the db2 client installed. This container will also have some shell scripts that make use of the db2 client.



We take a base Cent OS image and then add db2 via a RUN command:



COPY  db2rtcl_nr.rsp /db2install/
RUN cd /db2install && curl -o ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz http://public_file_server.com/downloads/appTools/installs/db2/ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
tar -xvf ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
rm -f ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
rtcl/db2setup -u db2rtcl_nr.rsp -f sysreq &&

chown -R 1000:1000 /opt/ibm/db2/V11.1

ENV PATH="$PATH:/opt/ibm/db2/V11.1/bin"


The image builds ok with no errors.



However, when I try running and connecting to the container via interactive shell command:



docker run -it --entrypoint=/bin/bash db2Container


and try to invoke the db2 CLI with



db2


I get the error:




DB21018E A system error occurred. The command line processor could not
continue processing.




Whats confusing is that if I immediately run a bash shell and then invoke the db2 CLI, it works:



bash
db2
(c) Copyright IBM Corporation 1993,2007
Command Line Processor for DB2 Client 11.1.0

You can issue database manager commands and SQL statements from the command
prompt. For example:
db2 => connect to sample
db2 => bind sample.bnd

For general help, type: ?.
For command help, type: ? command, where command can be
the first few keywords of a database manager command. For example:
? CATALOG DATABASE for help on the CATALOG DATABASE command
? CATALOG for help on all of the CATALOG commands.

To exit db2 interactive mode, type QUIT at the command prompt. Outside
interactive mode, all commands must be prefixed with 'db2'.
To list the current command option settings, type LIST COMMAND OPTIONS.

For more detailed help, refer to the Online Reference Manual.

db2 =>


Things I have tried to diagnose the issue:




  1. When I 1st drop into the interactive shell session, I type
    env > /tmp/env1.txt
    I then type bash and run
    env > /tmp/env2.txt
    When I diff the files, they are virtually identical EXCEPT for the variable:
    SHLVL=2
    which I know is just indicating that the 2nd shell is a nested shell


  2. When I 1st drop into the interactive shell session, I type
    set > /tmp/set1.txt
    I then type bash and run
    set > /tmp/set2.txt
    When I diff the files, they are virtually identical EXCEPT for the SHLVL variable again



Why is the db2 CLI accessible after I bash in the container but not in the initial session when i have used docker run -it?



We are attempting to use this container as an executable container that has the db2 client in it to connect to external DB2 databases. We are NOT trying to run a db2 DB in a container.



What I am starting to find is that I might have an issue with how the entrypoint is defined in our Dockerfile.
Using:



ENTRYPOINT cat /dev/null && /usr/bin/bash


the DB2 client is available when I run docker run -it ContainerName without having to immediately type bash



BUT it does not work when I try to run the container as an executable docker run ContainerName



The closest I have come to the solution is this modification to the Dockerfile:



ENTRYPOINT 

CMD ["/bin/bash"]


When I run the container as an executable docker run ContainerName db2 list command options it works however NOW if I docker run -it ContainerName I dont immediately have db2 commands available without typing bash once. This is still problematic since this container will have shell script in it that need to be able to run db2 commands










share|improve this question
















We have the need to create a docker container that also has the db2 client installed. This container will also have some shell scripts that make use of the db2 client.



We take a base Cent OS image and then add db2 via a RUN command:



COPY  db2rtcl_nr.rsp /db2install/
RUN cd /db2install && curl -o ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz http://public_file_server.com/downloads/appTools/installs/db2/ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
tar -xvf ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
rm -f ibm_data_server_runtime_client_linuxx64_v11.1.tar.gz &&
rtcl/db2setup -u db2rtcl_nr.rsp -f sysreq &&

chown -R 1000:1000 /opt/ibm/db2/V11.1

ENV PATH="$PATH:/opt/ibm/db2/V11.1/bin"


The image builds ok with no errors.



However, when I try running and connecting to the container via interactive shell command:



docker run -it --entrypoint=/bin/bash db2Container


and try to invoke the db2 CLI with



db2


I get the error:




DB21018E A system error occurred. The command line processor could not
continue processing.




Whats confusing is that if I immediately run a bash shell and then invoke the db2 CLI, it works:



bash
db2
(c) Copyright IBM Corporation 1993,2007
Command Line Processor for DB2 Client 11.1.0

You can issue database manager commands and SQL statements from the command
prompt. For example:
db2 => connect to sample
db2 => bind sample.bnd

For general help, type: ?.
For command help, type: ? command, where command can be
the first few keywords of a database manager command. For example:
? CATALOG DATABASE for help on the CATALOG DATABASE command
? CATALOG for help on all of the CATALOG commands.

To exit db2 interactive mode, type QUIT at the command prompt. Outside
interactive mode, all commands must be prefixed with 'db2'.
To list the current command option settings, type LIST COMMAND OPTIONS.

For more detailed help, refer to the Online Reference Manual.

db2 =>


Things I have tried to diagnose the issue:




  1. When I 1st drop into the interactive shell session, I type
    env > /tmp/env1.txt
    I then type bash and run
    env > /tmp/env2.txt
    When I diff the files, they are virtually identical EXCEPT for the variable:
    SHLVL=2
    which I know is just indicating that the 2nd shell is a nested shell


  2. When I 1st drop into the interactive shell session, I type
    set > /tmp/set1.txt
    I then type bash and run
    set > /tmp/set2.txt
    When I diff the files, they are virtually identical EXCEPT for the SHLVL variable again



Why is the db2 CLI accessible after I bash in the container but not in the initial session when i have used docker run -it?



We are attempting to use this container as an executable container that has the db2 client in it to connect to external DB2 databases. We are NOT trying to run a db2 DB in a container.



What I am starting to find is that I might have an issue with how the entrypoint is defined in our Dockerfile.
Using:



ENTRYPOINT cat /dev/null && /usr/bin/bash


the DB2 client is available when I run docker run -it ContainerName without having to immediately type bash



BUT it does not work when I try to run the container as an executable docker run ContainerName



The closest I have come to the solution is this modification to the Dockerfile:



ENTRYPOINT 

CMD ["/bin/bash"]


When I run the container as an executable docker run ContainerName db2 list command options it works however NOW if I docker run -it ContainerName I dont immediately have db2 commands available without typing bash once. This is still problematic since this container will have shell script in it that need to be able to run db2 commands







docker db2






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 '18 at 14:56







JuanD

















asked Nov 13 '18 at 15:11









JuanDJuanD

39128




39128













  • Does it make a difference if you explicitly dot in the db2profile before you run the CLP? If it does, either the wrong startup profile is running, or that startup profile has'nt been properly updated, or is not running correctly.

    – mao
    Nov 13 '18 at 19:32











  • Possible duplicate of DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E

    – bhamby
    Nov 14 '18 at 23:00











  • @mao when you say "dot in the db2profile" do you mean source it?

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:09











  • If the login shell for the userid is either bash or ksh/ksh93 then dot in means the equivalent of source in csh. A default installation of the current V11.1.3.3b runtime client on linux with bash as the configured shell will automatically update the .bashrc with the relevant dot in command for the db2profile.

    – mao
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:24











  • @bhamby I dont think this is exactly the same as DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E as they seem to be spinning up a db in their container and need to keep it running as a service. Whereas Im trying to use this container to execute some db2 client commands against an external DB.

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:24



















  • Does it make a difference if you explicitly dot in the db2profile before you run the CLP? If it does, either the wrong startup profile is running, or that startup profile has'nt been properly updated, or is not running correctly.

    – mao
    Nov 13 '18 at 19:32











  • Possible duplicate of DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E

    – bhamby
    Nov 14 '18 at 23:00











  • @mao when you say "dot in the db2profile" do you mean source it?

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:09











  • If the login shell for the userid is either bash or ksh/ksh93 then dot in means the equivalent of source in csh. A default installation of the current V11.1.3.3b runtime client on linux with bash as the configured shell will automatically update the .bashrc with the relevant dot in command for the db2profile.

    – mao
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:24











  • @bhamby I dont think this is exactly the same as DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E as they seem to be spinning up a db in their container and need to keep it running as a service. Whereas Im trying to use this container to execute some db2 client commands against an external DB.

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 13:24

















Does it make a difference if you explicitly dot in the db2profile before you run the CLP? If it does, either the wrong startup profile is running, or that startup profile has'nt been properly updated, or is not running correctly.

– mao
Nov 13 '18 at 19:32





Does it make a difference if you explicitly dot in the db2profile before you run the CLP? If it does, either the wrong startup profile is running, or that startup profile has'nt been properly updated, or is not running correctly.

– mao
Nov 13 '18 at 19:32













Possible duplicate of DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E

– bhamby
Nov 14 '18 at 23:00





Possible duplicate of DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E

– bhamby
Nov 14 '18 at 23:00













@mao when you say "dot in the db2profile" do you mean source it?

– JuanD
Nov 15 '18 at 13:09





@mao when you say "dot in the db2profile" do you mean source it?

– JuanD
Nov 15 '18 at 13:09













If the login shell for the userid is either bash or ksh/ksh93 then dot in means the equivalent of source in csh. A default installation of the current V11.1.3.3b runtime client on linux with bash as the configured shell will automatically update the .bashrc with the relevant dot in command for the db2profile.

– mao
Nov 15 '18 at 13:24





If the login shell for the userid is either bash or ksh/ksh93 then dot in means the equivalent of source in csh. A default installation of the current V11.1.3.3b runtime client on linux with bash as the configured shell will automatically update the .bashrc with the relevant dot in command for the db2profile.

– mao
Nov 15 '18 at 13:24













@bhamby I dont think this is exactly the same as DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E as they seem to be spinning up a db in their container and need to keep it running as a service. Whereas Im trying to use this container to execute some db2 client commands against an external DB.

– JuanD
Nov 15 '18 at 13:24





@bhamby I dont think this is exactly the same as DB2 in Docker results in DB21018E as they seem to be spinning up a db in their container and need to keep it running as a service. Whereas Im trying to use this container to execute some db2 client commands against an external DB.

– JuanD
Nov 15 '18 at 13:24












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














After some more googling, I found this article: https://engineeringblog.yelp.com/2016/01/dumb-init-an-init-for-docker.html



Using their Github page example, I updated our Dockerfile with:



RUN wget -O /usr/local/bin/dumb-init https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init/releases/download/v1.2.2/dumb-init_1.2.2_amd64
RUN chmod +x /usr/local/bin/dumb-init


and also updated our Dockerfile's entrypoint with:



ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/local/bin/dumb-init", "--"]
CMD ["/bin/bash"]


The result has been that my dummy shell script (that has a db2 command in it) that lives inside of the container works when the docker container is called as an executable:



docker run myContainer /scripts/dummyDB2connect.sh


AND I can also interactively spin up and connect to the container to run db2 commands without having to type the extra bash command.






share|improve this answer
























  • Additional implementation of using an init tool to run as your initial entrypoint: github.com/krallin/tini

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:28













  • OR this all could have been solved had I started the container with --init But for the sake of not having to remember to always type that we're gonna leave the dumb init in the ENTRYPOINT

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:54













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53284001%2fdb2-client-in-docker%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














After some more googling, I found this article: https://engineeringblog.yelp.com/2016/01/dumb-init-an-init-for-docker.html



Using their Github page example, I updated our Dockerfile with:



RUN wget -O /usr/local/bin/dumb-init https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init/releases/download/v1.2.2/dumb-init_1.2.2_amd64
RUN chmod +x /usr/local/bin/dumb-init


and also updated our Dockerfile's entrypoint with:



ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/local/bin/dumb-init", "--"]
CMD ["/bin/bash"]


The result has been that my dummy shell script (that has a db2 command in it) that lives inside of the container works when the docker container is called as an executable:



docker run myContainer /scripts/dummyDB2connect.sh


AND I can also interactively spin up and connect to the container to run db2 commands without having to type the extra bash command.






share|improve this answer
























  • Additional implementation of using an init tool to run as your initial entrypoint: github.com/krallin/tini

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:28













  • OR this all could have been solved had I started the container with --init But for the sake of not having to remember to always type that we're gonna leave the dumb init in the ENTRYPOINT

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:54


















0














After some more googling, I found this article: https://engineeringblog.yelp.com/2016/01/dumb-init-an-init-for-docker.html



Using their Github page example, I updated our Dockerfile with:



RUN wget -O /usr/local/bin/dumb-init https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init/releases/download/v1.2.2/dumb-init_1.2.2_amd64
RUN chmod +x /usr/local/bin/dumb-init


and also updated our Dockerfile's entrypoint with:



ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/local/bin/dumb-init", "--"]
CMD ["/bin/bash"]


The result has been that my dummy shell script (that has a db2 command in it) that lives inside of the container works when the docker container is called as an executable:



docker run myContainer /scripts/dummyDB2connect.sh


AND I can also interactively spin up and connect to the container to run db2 commands without having to type the extra bash command.






share|improve this answer
























  • Additional implementation of using an init tool to run as your initial entrypoint: github.com/krallin/tini

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:28













  • OR this all could have been solved had I started the container with --init But for the sake of not having to remember to always type that we're gonna leave the dumb init in the ENTRYPOINT

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:54
















0












0








0







After some more googling, I found this article: https://engineeringblog.yelp.com/2016/01/dumb-init-an-init-for-docker.html



Using their Github page example, I updated our Dockerfile with:



RUN wget -O /usr/local/bin/dumb-init https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init/releases/download/v1.2.2/dumb-init_1.2.2_amd64
RUN chmod +x /usr/local/bin/dumb-init


and also updated our Dockerfile's entrypoint with:



ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/local/bin/dumb-init", "--"]
CMD ["/bin/bash"]


The result has been that my dummy shell script (that has a db2 command in it) that lives inside of the container works when the docker container is called as an executable:



docker run myContainer /scripts/dummyDB2connect.sh


AND I can also interactively spin up and connect to the container to run db2 commands without having to type the extra bash command.






share|improve this answer













After some more googling, I found this article: https://engineeringblog.yelp.com/2016/01/dumb-init-an-init-for-docker.html



Using their Github page example, I updated our Dockerfile with:



RUN wget -O /usr/local/bin/dumb-init https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init/releases/download/v1.2.2/dumb-init_1.2.2_amd64
RUN chmod +x /usr/local/bin/dumb-init


and also updated our Dockerfile's entrypoint with:



ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/local/bin/dumb-init", "--"]
CMD ["/bin/bash"]


The result has been that my dummy shell script (that has a db2 command in it) that lives inside of the container works when the docker container is called as an executable:



docker run myContainer /scripts/dummyDB2connect.sh


AND I can also interactively spin up and connect to the container to run db2 commands without having to type the extra bash command.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 15 '18 at 14:55









JuanDJuanD

39128




39128













  • Additional implementation of using an init tool to run as your initial entrypoint: github.com/krallin/tini

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:28













  • OR this all could have been solved had I started the container with --init But for the sake of not having to remember to always type that we're gonna leave the dumb init in the ENTRYPOINT

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:54





















  • Additional implementation of using an init tool to run as your initial entrypoint: github.com/krallin/tini

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:28













  • OR this all could have been solved had I started the container with --init But for the sake of not having to remember to always type that we're gonna leave the dumb init in the ENTRYPOINT

    – JuanD
    Nov 15 '18 at 16:54



















Additional implementation of using an init tool to run as your initial entrypoint: github.com/krallin/tini

– JuanD
Nov 15 '18 at 16:28







Additional implementation of using an init tool to run as your initial entrypoint: github.com/krallin/tini

– JuanD
Nov 15 '18 at 16:28















OR this all could have been solved had I started the container with --init But for the sake of not having to remember to always type that we're gonna leave the dumb init in the ENTRYPOINT

– JuanD
Nov 15 '18 at 16:54







OR this all could have been solved had I started the container with --init But for the sake of not having to remember to always type that we're gonna leave the dumb init in the ENTRYPOINT

– JuanD
Nov 15 '18 at 16:54




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53284001%2fdb2-client-in-docker%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bressuire

Vorschmack

Quarantine