Infinispan distributed cache and executing tasks on primary key owner












0















Is it possible to get Infinispan (9.4+) to execute a task on a primary key owner? Like if I give it a cache, a key in that cache, and a Runnable/Callable, can it just execute that task on the owner of that key?



This would be similar to Hazelcast IExecutorService's submitToKeyOwner or executeOnKeyOwner.



Thanks.










share|improve this question



























    0















    Is it possible to get Infinispan (9.4+) to execute a task on a primary key owner? Like if I give it a cache, a key in that cache, and a Runnable/Callable, can it just execute that task on the owner of that key?



    This would be similar to Hazelcast IExecutorService's submitToKeyOwner or executeOnKeyOwner.



    Thanks.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      Is it possible to get Infinispan (9.4+) to execute a task on a primary key owner? Like if I give it a cache, a key in that cache, and a Runnable/Callable, can it just execute that task on the owner of that key?



      This would be similar to Hazelcast IExecutorService's submitToKeyOwner or executeOnKeyOwner.



      Thanks.










      share|improve this question














      Is it possible to get Infinispan (9.4+) to execute a task on a primary key owner? Like if I give it a cache, a key in that cache, and a Runnable/Callable, can it just execute that task on the owner of that key?



      This would be similar to Hazelcast IExecutorService's submitToKeyOwner or executeOnKeyOwner.



      Thanks.







      infinispan






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:38









      Scott Van WartScott Van Wart

      84




      84
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          There are a few ways.



          The simplest if the key exists is just to use DistributedStreams



          cache.entrySet().stream().filterKeys(Collections.singleton(key)).forEach((cache, k) -> <do stuff>);



          If the key doesn't exist you can use the ClusterExecutor



          cacheManager.executor().singleNodeSubmission().filterTargets(Collections.singleton(address)
          .submit(<runnable>);



          You can find the target address by invoking



          Address address = cache.getAdvancedCache().getDistributionManager()
          .getCacheTopology().getDistributionInfo(key).primary();



          I also suggest you check out this section http://infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/user_guide.html#execute_code_grid






          share|improve this answer
























          • Also to note you can use DistributedExecutor, however this is deprecated and will eventually be removed.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 19 '18 at 14:51











          • I think I had your second suggestion figured out but I really like the first one using streams. I hadn't considered that. Thanks very much.

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:03











          • Also to note that the forEach method on distributed streams runs in an at least once delivery mode. Not sure if that is problematic or not. You can make it run in at most once mode by disabling rehash awareness. infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/…

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











          • It's definitely something I need to be aware of. I'm assuming that's only an issue on an unstable cluster (e.g. member just left/degraded or member joining).

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:04











          • Correct, if the cluster is stable it will guarantee exactly once semantics.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 23 '18 at 1:08











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53326810%2finfinispan-distributed-cache-and-executing-tasks-on-primary-key-owner%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          There are a few ways.



          The simplest if the key exists is just to use DistributedStreams



          cache.entrySet().stream().filterKeys(Collections.singleton(key)).forEach((cache, k) -> <do stuff>);



          If the key doesn't exist you can use the ClusterExecutor



          cacheManager.executor().singleNodeSubmission().filterTargets(Collections.singleton(address)
          .submit(<runnable>);



          You can find the target address by invoking



          Address address = cache.getAdvancedCache().getDistributionManager()
          .getCacheTopology().getDistributionInfo(key).primary();



          I also suggest you check out this section http://infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/user_guide.html#execute_code_grid






          share|improve this answer
























          • Also to note you can use DistributedExecutor, however this is deprecated and will eventually be removed.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 19 '18 at 14:51











          • I think I had your second suggestion figured out but I really like the first one using streams. I hadn't considered that. Thanks very much.

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:03











          • Also to note that the forEach method on distributed streams runs in an at least once delivery mode. Not sure if that is problematic or not. You can make it run in at most once mode by disabling rehash awareness. infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/…

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











          • It's definitely something I need to be aware of. I'm assuming that's only an issue on an unstable cluster (e.g. member just left/degraded or member joining).

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:04











          • Correct, if the cluster is stable it will guarantee exactly once semantics.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 23 '18 at 1:08
















          1














          There are a few ways.



          The simplest if the key exists is just to use DistributedStreams



          cache.entrySet().stream().filterKeys(Collections.singleton(key)).forEach((cache, k) -> <do stuff>);



          If the key doesn't exist you can use the ClusterExecutor



          cacheManager.executor().singleNodeSubmission().filterTargets(Collections.singleton(address)
          .submit(<runnable>);



          You can find the target address by invoking



          Address address = cache.getAdvancedCache().getDistributionManager()
          .getCacheTopology().getDistributionInfo(key).primary();



          I also suggest you check out this section http://infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/user_guide.html#execute_code_grid






          share|improve this answer
























          • Also to note you can use DistributedExecutor, however this is deprecated and will eventually be removed.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 19 '18 at 14:51











          • I think I had your second suggestion figured out but I really like the first one using streams. I hadn't considered that. Thanks very much.

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:03











          • Also to note that the forEach method on distributed streams runs in an at least once delivery mode. Not sure if that is problematic or not. You can make it run in at most once mode by disabling rehash awareness. infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/…

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











          • It's definitely something I need to be aware of. I'm assuming that's only an issue on an unstable cluster (e.g. member just left/degraded or member joining).

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:04











          • Correct, if the cluster is stable it will guarantee exactly once semantics.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 23 '18 at 1:08














          1












          1








          1







          There are a few ways.



          The simplest if the key exists is just to use DistributedStreams



          cache.entrySet().stream().filterKeys(Collections.singleton(key)).forEach((cache, k) -> <do stuff>);



          If the key doesn't exist you can use the ClusterExecutor



          cacheManager.executor().singleNodeSubmission().filterTargets(Collections.singleton(address)
          .submit(<runnable>);



          You can find the target address by invoking



          Address address = cache.getAdvancedCache().getDistributionManager()
          .getCacheTopology().getDistributionInfo(key).primary();



          I also suggest you check out this section http://infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/user_guide.html#execute_code_grid






          share|improve this answer













          There are a few ways.



          The simplest if the key exists is just to use DistributedStreams



          cache.entrySet().stream().filterKeys(Collections.singleton(key)).forEach((cache, k) -> <do stuff>);



          If the key doesn't exist you can use the ClusterExecutor



          cacheManager.executor().singleNodeSubmission().filterTargets(Collections.singleton(address)
          .submit(<runnable>);



          You can find the target address by invoking



          Address address = cache.getAdvancedCache().getDistributionManager()
          .getCacheTopology().getDistributionInfo(key).primary();



          I also suggest you check out this section http://infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/user_guide.html#execute_code_grid







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 19 '18 at 14:51









          MudokonmanMudokonman

          70636




          70636













          • Also to note you can use DistributedExecutor, however this is deprecated and will eventually be removed.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 19 '18 at 14:51











          • I think I had your second suggestion figured out but I really like the first one using streams. I hadn't considered that. Thanks very much.

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:03











          • Also to note that the forEach method on distributed streams runs in an at least once delivery mode. Not sure if that is problematic or not. You can make it run in at most once mode by disabling rehash awareness. infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/…

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











          • It's definitely something I need to be aware of. I'm assuming that's only an issue on an unstable cluster (e.g. member just left/degraded or member joining).

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:04











          • Correct, if the cluster is stable it will guarantee exactly once semantics.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 23 '18 at 1:08



















          • Also to note you can use DistributedExecutor, however this is deprecated and will eventually be removed.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 19 '18 at 14:51











          • I think I had your second suggestion figured out but I really like the first one using streams. I hadn't considered that. Thanks very much.

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:03











          • Also to note that the forEach method on distributed streams runs in an at least once delivery mode. Not sure if that is problematic or not. You can make it run in at most once mode by disabling rehash awareness. infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/…

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 20 '18 at 15:57











          • It's definitely something I need to be aware of. I'm assuming that's only an issue on an unstable cluster (e.g. member just left/degraded or member joining).

            – Scott Van Wart
            Nov 21 '18 at 16:04











          • Correct, if the cluster is stable it will guarantee exactly once semantics.

            – Mudokonman
            Nov 23 '18 at 1:08

















          Also to note you can use DistributedExecutor, however this is deprecated and will eventually be removed.

          – Mudokonman
          Nov 19 '18 at 14:51





          Also to note you can use DistributedExecutor, however this is deprecated and will eventually be removed.

          – Mudokonman
          Nov 19 '18 at 14:51













          I think I had your second suggestion figured out but I really like the first one using streams. I hadn't considered that. Thanks very much.

          – Scott Van Wart
          Nov 20 '18 at 15:03





          I think I had your second suggestion figured out but I really like the first one using streams. I hadn't considered that. Thanks very much.

          – Scott Van Wart
          Nov 20 '18 at 15:03













          Also to note that the forEach method on distributed streams runs in an at least once delivery mode. Not sure if that is problematic or not. You can make it run in at most once mode by disabling rehash awareness. infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/…

          – Mudokonman
          Nov 20 '18 at 15:57





          Also to note that the forEach method on distributed streams runs in an at least once delivery mode. Not sure if that is problematic or not. You can make it run in at most once mode by disabling rehash awareness. infinispan.org/docs/stable/user_guide/…

          – Mudokonman
          Nov 20 '18 at 15:57













          It's definitely something I need to be aware of. I'm assuming that's only an issue on an unstable cluster (e.g. member just left/degraded or member joining).

          – Scott Van Wart
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:04





          It's definitely something I need to be aware of. I'm assuming that's only an issue on an unstable cluster (e.g. member just left/degraded or member joining).

          – Scott Van Wart
          Nov 21 '18 at 16:04













          Correct, if the cluster is stable it will guarantee exactly once semantics.

          – Mudokonman
          Nov 23 '18 at 1:08





          Correct, if the cluster is stable it will guarantee exactly once semantics.

          – Mudokonman
          Nov 23 '18 at 1:08




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53326810%2finfinispan-distributed-cache-and-executing-tasks-on-primary-key-owner%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

          Glorious Revolution

          Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python