Does Django's get_queryset() in admin prevent malicious object saving?












0














I am developing a multi-tenant app in Django. In the Django admin, some querysets are filtered based on the user, using get_queryset().



Up till now, when a user updated an object from the Django change form, I would validate the data by creating a ModelAdmin form using a factory function to capture the HttpRequest object, then ensure that the Guest object's user was the current user:



EXAMPLE



models.py



class Guest(models.Model):
guest_name = models.CharField(max_length=64)
user = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)


admin.py



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request)
qs = super().get_queryset(request)
return qs.filter(user=request.user)

def get_form(self, request, obj=None, **kwargs):
self.form = _guest_admin_form_factory(request)
return super().get_form(request, obj, **kwargs)


forms.py



def _guest_admin_form_factory(request):
class GuestAdminForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Guest
exclude =

def clean_user(self):
user = self.cleaned_data.get('user', None)
if not user:
return user
if user != request.user:
raise forms.ValidationError('Invalid request.')
return user
return GuestAdminForm


It occurred to me that Django might use the get_queryset() method to validate this for me, since some simple logging showed that the method is called twice when an object gets updated from the change form.



Is this the case, or do I need to stick to validating through a ModelAdmin form?










share|improve this question
























  • Per Mr. Henry's answer, this is possible... but I would not call it advisable. It's a good idea to treat the Django admin as a low-level interface for top-level technical administration; if you have user-facing object manipulation, it's usually simpler and better to handle this with ModelForm or Form views and templates that can easily be altered/updated without worrying about what might change in the admin package, which is also a lot more complex to skin/alter, should those requirements come up. Particularly for multi-tenancy, I think this is a much more maintainable and debuggable approach.
    – kungphu
    Nov 13 at 5:47
















0














I am developing a multi-tenant app in Django. In the Django admin, some querysets are filtered based on the user, using get_queryset().



Up till now, when a user updated an object from the Django change form, I would validate the data by creating a ModelAdmin form using a factory function to capture the HttpRequest object, then ensure that the Guest object's user was the current user:



EXAMPLE



models.py



class Guest(models.Model):
guest_name = models.CharField(max_length=64)
user = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)


admin.py



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request)
qs = super().get_queryset(request)
return qs.filter(user=request.user)

def get_form(self, request, obj=None, **kwargs):
self.form = _guest_admin_form_factory(request)
return super().get_form(request, obj, **kwargs)


forms.py



def _guest_admin_form_factory(request):
class GuestAdminForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Guest
exclude =

def clean_user(self):
user = self.cleaned_data.get('user', None)
if not user:
return user
if user != request.user:
raise forms.ValidationError('Invalid request.')
return user
return GuestAdminForm


It occurred to me that Django might use the get_queryset() method to validate this for me, since some simple logging showed that the method is called twice when an object gets updated from the change form.



Is this the case, or do I need to stick to validating through a ModelAdmin form?










share|improve this question
























  • Per Mr. Henry's answer, this is possible... but I would not call it advisable. It's a good idea to treat the Django admin as a low-level interface for top-level technical administration; if you have user-facing object manipulation, it's usually simpler and better to handle this with ModelForm or Form views and templates that can easily be altered/updated without worrying about what might change in the admin package, which is also a lot more complex to skin/alter, should those requirements come up. Particularly for multi-tenancy, I think this is a much more maintainable and debuggable approach.
    – kungphu
    Nov 13 at 5:47














0












0








0







I am developing a multi-tenant app in Django. In the Django admin, some querysets are filtered based on the user, using get_queryset().



Up till now, when a user updated an object from the Django change form, I would validate the data by creating a ModelAdmin form using a factory function to capture the HttpRequest object, then ensure that the Guest object's user was the current user:



EXAMPLE



models.py



class Guest(models.Model):
guest_name = models.CharField(max_length=64)
user = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)


admin.py



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request)
qs = super().get_queryset(request)
return qs.filter(user=request.user)

def get_form(self, request, obj=None, **kwargs):
self.form = _guest_admin_form_factory(request)
return super().get_form(request, obj, **kwargs)


forms.py



def _guest_admin_form_factory(request):
class GuestAdminForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Guest
exclude =

def clean_user(self):
user = self.cleaned_data.get('user', None)
if not user:
return user
if user != request.user:
raise forms.ValidationError('Invalid request.')
return user
return GuestAdminForm


It occurred to me that Django might use the get_queryset() method to validate this for me, since some simple logging showed that the method is called twice when an object gets updated from the change form.



Is this the case, or do I need to stick to validating through a ModelAdmin form?










share|improve this question















I am developing a multi-tenant app in Django. In the Django admin, some querysets are filtered based on the user, using get_queryset().



Up till now, when a user updated an object from the Django change form, I would validate the data by creating a ModelAdmin form using a factory function to capture the HttpRequest object, then ensure that the Guest object's user was the current user:



EXAMPLE



models.py



class Guest(models.Model):
guest_name = models.CharField(max_length=64)
user = models.ForeignKey(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE)


admin.py



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request)
qs = super().get_queryset(request)
return qs.filter(user=request.user)

def get_form(self, request, obj=None, **kwargs):
self.form = _guest_admin_form_factory(request)
return super().get_form(request, obj, **kwargs)


forms.py



def _guest_admin_form_factory(request):
class GuestAdminForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Guest
exclude =

def clean_user(self):
user = self.cleaned_data.get('user', None)
if not user:
return user
if user != request.user:
raise forms.ValidationError('Invalid request.')
return user
return GuestAdminForm


It occurred to me that Django might use the get_queryset() method to validate this for me, since some simple logging showed that the method is called twice when an object gets updated from the change form.



Is this the case, or do I need to stick to validating through a ModelAdmin form?







python django django-forms django-admin






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 16 at 13:18

























asked Nov 12 at 19:35









crazy4linux

615




615












  • Per Mr. Henry's answer, this is possible... but I would not call it advisable. It's a good idea to treat the Django admin as a low-level interface for top-level technical administration; if you have user-facing object manipulation, it's usually simpler and better to handle this with ModelForm or Form views and templates that can easily be altered/updated without worrying about what might change in the admin package, which is also a lot more complex to skin/alter, should those requirements come up. Particularly for multi-tenancy, I think this is a much more maintainable and debuggable approach.
    – kungphu
    Nov 13 at 5:47


















  • Per Mr. Henry's answer, this is possible... but I would not call it advisable. It's a good idea to treat the Django admin as a low-level interface for top-level technical administration; if you have user-facing object manipulation, it's usually simpler and better to handle this with ModelForm or Form views and templates that can easily be altered/updated without worrying about what might change in the admin package, which is also a lot more complex to skin/alter, should those requirements come up. Particularly for multi-tenancy, I think this is a much more maintainable and debuggable approach.
    – kungphu
    Nov 13 at 5:47
















Per Mr. Henry's answer, this is possible... but I would not call it advisable. It's a good idea to treat the Django admin as a low-level interface for top-level technical administration; if you have user-facing object manipulation, it's usually simpler and better to handle this with ModelForm or Form views and templates that can easily be altered/updated without worrying about what might change in the admin package, which is also a lot more complex to skin/alter, should those requirements come up. Particularly for multi-tenancy, I think this is a much more maintainable and debuggable approach.
– kungphu
Nov 13 at 5:47




Per Mr. Henry's answer, this is possible... but I would not call it advisable. It's a good idea to treat the Django admin as a low-level interface for top-level technical administration; if you have user-facing object manipulation, it's usually simpler and better to handle this with ModelForm or Form views and templates that can easily be altered/updated without worrying about what might change in the admin package, which is also a lot more complex to skin/alter, should those requirements come up. Particularly for multi-tenancy, I think this is a much more maintainable and debuggable approach.
– kungphu
Nov 13 at 5:47












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














The documented way to do this is to define has_change_permission():



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request):
return super().get_queryset(request).filter(user=request.user)

def has_change_permission(self, request, obj=None):
return (obj is None or obj.user == request.user)


No need to muck about with the form.






share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you. I was unaware of that method. Works like a champ.
    – crazy4linux
    Nov 13 at 12:52













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53268944%2fdoes-djangos-get-queryset-in-admin-prevent-malicious-object-saving%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














The documented way to do this is to define has_change_permission():



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request):
return super().get_queryset(request).filter(user=request.user)

def has_change_permission(self, request, obj=None):
return (obj is None or obj.user == request.user)


No need to muck about with the form.






share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you. I was unaware of that method. Works like a champ.
    – crazy4linux
    Nov 13 at 12:52


















1














The documented way to do this is to define has_change_permission():



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request):
return super().get_queryset(request).filter(user=request.user)

def has_change_permission(self, request, obj=None):
return (obj is None or obj.user == request.user)


No need to muck about with the form.






share|improve this answer





















  • Thank you. I was unaware of that method. Works like a champ.
    – crazy4linux
    Nov 13 at 12:52
















1












1








1






The documented way to do this is to define has_change_permission():



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request):
return super().get_queryset(request).filter(user=request.user)

def has_change_permission(self, request, obj=None):
return (obj is None or obj.user == request.user)


No need to muck about with the form.






share|improve this answer












The documented way to do this is to define has_change_permission():



@admin.register(Guest)
class GuestAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_queryset(self, request):
return super().get_queryset(request).filter(user=request.user)

def has_change_permission(self, request, obj=None):
return (obj is None or obj.user == request.user)


No need to muck about with the form.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 13 at 5:42









Kevin Christopher Henry

22.5k46361




22.5k46361












  • Thank you. I was unaware of that method. Works like a champ.
    – crazy4linux
    Nov 13 at 12:52




















  • Thank you. I was unaware of that method. Works like a champ.
    – crazy4linux
    Nov 13 at 12:52


















Thank you. I was unaware of that method. Works like a champ.
– crazy4linux
Nov 13 at 12:52






Thank you. I was unaware of that method. Works like a champ.
– crazy4linux
Nov 13 at 12:52




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53268944%2fdoes-djangos-get-queryset-in-admin-prevent-malicious-object-saving%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Xamarin.iOS Cant Deploy on Iphone

Glorious Revolution

Dulmage-Mendelsohn matrix decomposition in Python